[Nagios-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2010-10-05 Thread Saulo Silva via LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Saulo Silva requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--

Lei,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- Saulo

Accept invitation from Saulo Silva
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-gex8d18x-z/7aCDeLHzGLmxXEqs56OlWLXvehObD1msS6AcGvXdAD2fsFLVlfh/blk/I885998228_3/pmpxnSRJrSdvj4R5fnhv9ClRsDgZp6lQs6lzoQ5AomZIpn8_cRYUcz8UejARe3x9bSBiplxRslFmbPwTdj8QejwTdz4LrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/

View invitation from Saulo Silva
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-gex8d18x-z/7aCDeLHzGLmxXEqs56OlWLXvehObD1msS6AcGvXdAD2fsFLVlfh/blk/I885998228_3/0PnPwOczwVejkUe4ALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/
 
--

DID YOU KNOW LinkedIn can help you find the right service providers using 
recommendations from your trusted network? Using LinkedIn Services, you can 
take the risky guesswork out of selecting service providers by reading the 
recommendations of credible, trustworthy members of your network. 
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-gex8d18x-z/svp/inv-25/

 
-- 
(c) 2010, LinkedIn Corporation--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2010-09-16 Thread Saulo Silva via LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Saulo Silva requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--

Lei,

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- Saulo

Accept invitation from Saulo Silva
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-ge69vw4o-e/7aCDeLHzGLmxXEqs56OlWLXvehObD1msS6AcGvXdAD2fsFLVlfh/blk/I856383336_3/pmpxnSRJrSdvj4R5fnhv9ClRsDgZp6lQs6lzoQ5AomZIpn8_cRYScPcPe3cSdjx9bSBiplxRslFmbPwTdj8QejwTdz4LrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/

View invitation from Saulo Silva
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-ge69vw4o-e/7aCDeLHzGLmxXEqs56OlWLXvehObD1msS6AcGvXdAD2fsFLVlfh/blk/I856383336_3/0PnPoPcPcUcPoRe4ALqnpPbOYWrSlI/svi/
 
--

DID YOU KNOW LinkedIn can help you find the right service providers using 
recommendations from your trusted network? Using LinkedIn Services, you can 
take the risky guesswork out of selecting service providers by reading the 
recommendations of credible, trustworthy members of your network. 
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-bdl42y-ge69vw4o-e/svp/inv-25/

 
-- 
(c) 2010, LinkedIn Corporation--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] HOST - check is not working

2008-05-20 Thread Saulo Silva
Here some host example

define host{
   host_namehostname
   contact_groups   1
   alias  hostname.fulname
   address  x.xx.xxx.xxx
   parents route1
   use  generic-host-active
}

define host{
   host_nameroute1
   contact_groups   1
   address  x.xx.xxx.xxx
   use  generic-host-active
}

define  host{
   name generic-host-active
   register  0
   notification_options d,u,r
   check_commandcheck-host-alive
   event_handler_enabled1
   flap_detection_enabled   1
   notification_interval120
   notification_period  full_week
   notifications_enabled1
   max_check_attempts   4
}

define command{
   command_name check-host-alive
   command_line /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ping
-H $HOSTADDRESS$ -w 3000.0,80% -c 5000.0,100% -p 1
}

So that is it . That is a few services associated to the server if necessary
I can include that here .

Thanks for help

Saulo Silva


2008/5/20 Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Saulo Silva wrote:
>
> | I have a strange situation where my nagios is not recovering after some
> | server goes to UNREACHABLE state  unless I force a recheck .
>
> What service have you assigned to this host? How did you define this host?
>
> Did you read the section about host checks?
>
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG <http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG>? Use:
> http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>A: Yes.
>>Q: Are you sure?
>>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIMt6TBvzDRVjxmYERAs8iAJkBAlgbOh7Nt5XFxAOip+H6NihoIACfc5QG
> zaC5IUC32ARg/h/ximdwjBY=
> =RBP6
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
> ___
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] HOST - check is not working

2008-05-20 Thread Saulo Silva
Hi All ,

I have a strange situation where my nagios is not recovering after some
server goes to UNREACHABLE state  unless I force a recheck .

That is the state before the Re-schedule the next check of this host

Host Status:  UNREACHABLE
Status Information:CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seconds Performance
Data:
Current Attempt:1/4 State Type:HARD Last Check Type:ACTIVE Last Check
Time:05-20-2008
10:05:32 Status Data Age: 0d 0h 1m 20s Next Scheduled Active Check:  N/A
Latency:0.000 seconds Check Duration:10.034 seconds Last State
Change:05-17-2008
01:03:56 Current State Duration: 3d 9h 2m 56s
So after the Re-check :

Host Status:  UP
Status Information:PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 58.26 ms Performance
Data:
Current Attempt:0/4 State Type:HARD Last Check Type:ACTIVE Last Check
Time:05-20-2008
10:08:24 Status Data Age: 0d 0h 0m 13s Next Scheduled Active Check:  N/A
Latency:5.545 seconds Check Duration:0.077 seconds Last State Change:05-20-2008
10:08:24 Current State Duration: 0d 0h 0m 13s

Any clue ?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring : Monitoring server sending alert .

2007-01-25 Thread Saulo Silva

Hi Folks ,

I have a distribute nagios configuration running well . Except that the
monitoring server start to send notification either the configuration is set
to no in this monitoring . ( enable_notifications=0 )

I using Nagios 1.2 with SUSE 9 .
Another questions. Is it any way to do host passive monitoring in nagios 1.x?
I would not like to use active monitoring in my central server .

best regards,

Saulo Silva
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] How to use the "use" statement

2007-01-09 Thread Saulo Silva

Hi all ,

I am installed I Nagios in a Suse 10 box And have a question.

How I can use the "use" statement when I am writing a service definition
based in templates .

first idea - Create all services templates  separated and put all in the
service definition that should be monitoring :

the s_default_template.cfg

define service{
   namedefault_service
   process_perf_data   1
   retain_status_information   1
   retain_nonstatus_information1
   register0
   is_volatile 0
   max_check_attempts  3
   normal_check_interval   45
   retry_check_interval8
   notification_interval   120
   notification_period 24x7
   notification_optionsw,u,c,r
   }

define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Active
   active_checks_enabled   1
   passive_checks_enabled  0
   obsess_over_service 1
   check_freshness 0
   notifications_enabled   0
   flap_detection_enabled  1
   check_period24x7
   register0
   }

define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Passive
   active_checks_enabled   0
   passive_checks_enabled  1
   obsess_over_service 0
   check_freshness 1
   notifications_enabled   1
   flap_detection_enabled  0
   check_periodnone
   register0
   }

the s_cpu_template.cfg ( part of )

define service{
   nameService_CPU_Prod_Local
   register0
   max_check_attempts  5
   normal_check_interval   5
   retry_check_interval1
   check_command   $USER6$/rcheck_cpu
}

the service itself

define service{
   host_name   ztux-appserv.pok.ibm.com
   service_description CPU_check
   use Service_Defaults_Passive
   use Service_CPU_Prod_Local
   use default_service
   contact_groups  cyoung
  }

And the second one : Use templates cascaded to final service

define service{
   namedefault_service
   process_perf_data   1
   retain_status_information   1
   retain_nonstatus_information1
   register0
   is_volatile 0
   max_check_attempts  3
   normal_check_interval   45
   retry_check_interval8
   notification_interval   120
   notification_period 24x7
   notification_optionsw,u,c,r
   }


define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Passive
   active_checks_enabled   0
   passive_checks_enabled  1
   obsess_over_service 0
   check_freshness 1
   notifications_enabled   1
   flap_detection_enabled  0
   check_periodnone
   register0
   use default_service
   }

define service{
   nameService_CPU_Prod_Local
   register0
   max_check_attempts  5
   normal_check_interval   5
   retry_check_interval1
   check_command   $USER6$/rcheck_cpu
   use   Service_Defaults_Passive
}

define service{
   host_name   ztux-appserv.pok.ibm.com
   service_description CPU_check
   use Service_CPU_Prod_Local
   contact_groups  cyoung
  }




So that is the simple question . One of this kind of construction works ? I
test with nagios -v  in version 1.2 ( SUSE 9 ) no error , in nagios 1.3 (
Suse 10 ) I had error . Or should I create just one template for each
different kind of check and copy all other information ?

Best regards,

Saulo Augusto Silva
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS wh

[Nagios-users] How to use the "use" statament

2007-01-09 Thread Saulo Silva

Hi all ,

I am installed I Nagios in a Suse 10 box And have a question.

How I can use the "use" statement when I am writing a service definition
based in templates .

first idea - Create all services templates  separated and put all in the
service definition that should be monitoring :

the s_default_template.cfg

define service{
   namedefault_service
   process_perf_data   1
   retain_status_information   1
   retain_nonstatus_information1
   register0
   is_volatile 0
   max_check_attempts  3
   normal_check_interval   45
   retry_check_interval8
   notification_interval   120
   notification_period 24x7
   notification_optionsw,u,c,r
   }

define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Active
   active_checks_enabled   1
   passive_checks_enabled  0
   obsess_over_service 1
   check_freshness 0
   notifications_enabled   0
   flap_detection_enabled  1
   check_period24x7
   register0
   }

define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Passive
   active_checks_enabled   0
   passive_checks_enabled  1
   obsess_over_service 0
   check_freshness 1
   notifications_enabled   1
   flap_detection_enabled  0
   check_periodnone
   register0
   }

the s_cpu_template.cfg ( part of )

define service{
   nameService_CPU_Prod_Local
   register0
   max_check_attempts  5
   normal_check_interval   5
   retry_check_interval1
   check_command   $USER6$/rcheck_cpu
}

the service itself

define service{
   host_name   ztux-appserv.pok.ibm.com
   service_description CPU_check
   use Service_Defaults_Passive
   use Service_CPU_Prod_Local
   use default_service
   contact_groups  cyoung
  }

And the second one : Use templates cascaded to final service

define service{
   namedefault_service
   process_perf_data   1
   retain_status_information   1
   retain_nonstatus_information1
   register0
   is_volatile 0
   max_check_attempts  3
   normal_check_interval   45
   retry_check_interval8
   notification_interval   120
   notification_period 24x7
   notification_optionsw,u,c,r
   }


define service{
   nameService_Defaults_Passive
   active_checks_enabled   0
   passive_checks_enabled  1
   obsess_over_service 0
   check_freshness 1
   notifications_enabled   1
   flap_detection_enabled  0
   check_periodnone
   register0
   use default_service
   }

define service{
   nameService_CPU_Prod_Local
   register0
   max_check_attempts  5
   normal_check_interval   5
   retry_check_interval1
   check_command   $USER6$/rcheck_cpu
   use   Service_Defaults_Passive
}

define service{
   host_name   ztux-appserv.pok.ibm.com
   service_description CPU_check
   use Service_CPU_Prod_Local
   contact_groups  cyoung
  }




So that is the simple question . One of this kind of construction works ? I
test with nagios -v  in version 1.2 ( SUSE 9 ) no error , in nagios 1.3 (
Suse 10 ) I had error . Or should I create just one template for each
different kind of check and copy all other information ?

Best regards,

Saulo Augusto Silva
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS wh

[Nagios-users] Use statement

2006-12-19 Thread Saulo Silva

Hi all ,

Just to confirm . Can I use two use statement when I am defining a service .

Like  a example  :

service http{
host_name  some name
use service definition 1
use service definition 2



Best Regards ,


Saulo Augusto Silva
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null