[Nagios-users] Mapping options.
Good Day to all, I finally got my NAGIOS setup pretty much the way that I like it. I am monitoring over 1000 devices, and I have 2 questions. 1. When displaying the host group summary is there a way to group /sub group the display. For example at the moment I have 6 different type of Microsoft 2003 Servers. I have a group for exchange, a group for AD, Ishare, etc. A group of Linux boxes, HPUX, SUN and AIX. What I would like to do is to have a summary that would only give me the servers by type, then a summary of the functions. Has anyone done this or some thing similar. 2. The Status Map, for the number of devices that I am monitoring when I click on the status map, I get a BLOB, icons on top of icons, etc. Any way to clean this up? Thanks for all your responses in advance. Luis - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
Actually,
I was thinking of hostgroups that have hostgroups.
Luis
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 09:17 -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Fernando Lacayo
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:47 AM
To: Nagios Users
Subject: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
Good Day to all,
I finally got my NAGIOS setup pretty much the way that I like it. I
am
monitoring over 1000 devices, and I have 2 questions.
1. When displaying the host group summary is there a way to group /sub
group the display. For example at the moment I have 6 different type
of
Microsoft 2003 Servers. I have a group for exchange, a group for AD,
Ishare, etc. A group of Linux boxes, HPUX, SUN and AIX. What I would
like to do is to have a summary that would only give me the servers by
type, then a summary of the functions. Has anyone done this or some
thing similar.
Sounds like hostgroups{} to group by type of box and servicegroups{} to
group by services provided. There is no 'nesting' capability. Am I
mis-interpreting?
2. The Status Map, for the number of devices that I am monitoring when
I
click on the status map, I get a BLOB, icons on top of icons, etc.
Any way to clean this up?
Change the layout type or use a custom cords per object (hostextinfo{}).
With that many hosts though, you'll be challenged. Setting proper
parent's relationships will help. We have about 3000 devices and there
just isn't enough useful information in those maps to make that process
worthwhile for us so I don't have a whole lot of experience with it.
--
Marc
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
--
Luis Fernando Lacayo
Chicago Public Schools
Senior Unix Administrator
ITS/ UNIX Infrastructure
Office: 773-553-3835
Cell: 773-203-4493
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
On 18 Jan 2008, at 16:38, Luis Fernando Lacayo wrote: Actually, I was thinking of hostgroups that have hostgroups. Luis, It is currently not possible to set up a hierarchy in this way purely within Nagios. If you need this sort of functionality you have to use 3rd party software such as Opsview (http';//www.opsview.org/) Duncs -- Duncan Ferguson Senior Developer, Altinity Limited http://www.altinity.com Tel: +44 (0)870 787 9243 US: +1 866 879 9184 Fax: +44 (0)845 280 1725 Skype: duncan_j_ferguson MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individuals to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender and delete this e-mail immediately. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Altinity Limited | 404 Seven Sisters Road | London | N4 2LX | United Kingdom Registered in England and Wales under company number 4743767 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Fernando Lacayo Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:39 AM To: Marc Powell Cc: Nagios Users Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Mapping options. Actually, I was thinking of hostgroups that have hostgroups. Yes, I know. That's why I said there was no nesting capability and offered alternatives that I know of. -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Fernando Lacayo
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:47 AM
To: Nagios Users
Subject: [Nagios-users] Mapping options.
Good Day to all,
I finally got my NAGIOS setup pretty much the way that I like it. I
am
monitoring over 1000 devices, and I have 2 questions.
1. When displaying the host group summary is there a way to group /sub
group the display. For example at the moment I have 6 different type
of
Microsoft 2003 Servers. I have a group for exchange, a group for AD,
Ishare, etc. A group of Linux boxes, HPUX, SUN and AIX. What I would
like to do is to have a summary that would only give me the servers by
type, then a summary of the functions. Has anyone done this or some
thing similar.
Sounds like hostgroups{} to group by type of box and servicegroups{} to
group by services provided. There is no 'nesting' capability. Am I
mis-interpreting?
2. The Status Map, for the number of devices that I am monitoring when
I
click on the status map, I get a BLOB, icons on top of icons, etc.
Any way to clean this up?
Change the layout type or use a custom cords per object (hostextinfo{}).
With that many hosts though, you'll be challenged. Setting proper
parent's relationships will help. We have about 3000 devices and there
just isn't enough useful information in those maps to make that process
worthwhile for us so I don't have a whole lot of experience with it.
--
Marc
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
