Re: MPLS ICMP Extensions

2003-08-17 Thread Marc Binderberger


As far as I remember we have seen labels from other providers, until 
they turned on the traceroute hide. And there was no LDP coupling 
between them and us so ... . That was with Cisco in both networks.

The question is if these information cause any problem for you - 
despite curious customers asking ;-)

The labels seem to be allocated from a start value - usually 20, 1024, 
4096 or such, depending on your system, OS version - in an incremental 
order, so guessing labels isn't that difficult. If your network accepts 
labels although it shouldn't then the extra information in ICMP doesn't 
really make things worse anymore.

Marc





On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 08:39  PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

In a message written on Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:21:28PM -0500, Mike 
Bernico wrote:
Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that the extended MPLS info only showed
up when the trace was started on a PE or P router. Is that right?
I did the traceroute from a router with _NO_ mpls commands turned on,
and it's on a network that uses _NO_ mpls today.
Basically from reading the draft if the router that generates the ICMP
unreachable received the packet with an MPLS label, it adds the MPLS
info to the returned data.  As long as your traceroute can parse/show
it (so far I've only confirmed Juniper can do it), it will be displayed
to the world.
--
   Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
mime-attachment
--
Marc Binderberger[EMAIL PROTECTED]Powered by *BSD ;-)


Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread Chris Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am a little rusty on this one, but I seem to remember that AC travels 
only on the outside skin of the wire but DC uses all the wire. 
Skin effect is only significant at high frequencies (lots of megahertz 
and up).  At 60hz it can be ignored.




RE: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread McBurnett, Jim



--Huh ? Where in the physics of ohms law is Hz a factor ? Having lived off
--the grid, where systems are often at max 48v, yes the wires have to be
--several 0's of gage to carry the lagre amperages. Much the same in A/B DC legs in
--a colo. Up the volts and the amps go down to produce the same power (watts
--or work).

HMM, it's been a LONG time but I remember high amp, low voltage
The formula makes it a swap out. Raise the voltage drop the current, or lower the
voltage and raise the current if the resistance stays constant.


--I am a little rusty on this one, but I seem to remember that AC travels
--only on the outside skin of the wire but DC uses all the wire.

This is called the skin effect, and from my RF days we did not consider it
to be an issue until you get to close the KHz range. In high voltage
transmission lines it may get a little higher than 60 Hz, but I don't think by much.
I have many UPS that track HZ and I have seen it coming in from 59.8 to 60.2.
The skin effect was a really big deal in the L band systems where I used to work.
1.2 GHz to 1.6 GHz. And in the S Band we had to use pressurized dehumidified 
transmission Waveguide due to freq and power levels (2 Megawatts).

We did AC/DC conversion and worked with 400 Hz power for those systems, and we were
not concerned with skin effect at all. But we were concerned with RF induction into
the power systems supply lines that could dirty up the power input and 
create problems for the ac/dc conversion for the discrete electronics.

anyway-it's been awhile...

J


Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread Randy Neals (ORION)

 I wasn't aware that there are high voltage DC long-haul lines that then
 are converted to AC for local distribution.

Another use for HVDC is to isolate transmission networks.
Hydro Quebec uses Back-to-Back High Voltage DC conversion equipment at its
interconnection points with other transmission networks such as the New
York, Vermont and Mass. transmision networks.

The HVDC interconnection removes frequency synchronization as a concern at
the interconnect and allows much simpler protection and control
implementations as there are less electrical properties to
consider/monitor/manage at the HVDC interconnect point.

Perhaps the H-Q interconnect design is one of the reasons that H-Q was
unaffected by the blackout.

Conversely, the Lake Erie Loop is an example of a richly meshed ring with
multiple paths. when synchronized, flow on the mesh/ring is a function of
voltage. To import power into a grid you lower the voltage slightly, to
export power you raise the voltage slightly.

AC Syncronization across the interconnect can limit power transfer
capability. Out of sync condition causes the interconnect to be reactive
with current peaks leading or lagging voltage peaks. Phase Angle Regulators
(PARs) are transformers with phase shifting capabilities. They are often
used at AC interconnect points to manipulate the synchronization to optimize
power transfer.

-Randy




Availability of Natural Gas during Blackout

2003-08-17 Thread Randy Neals (ORION)

Some weeks back there was a dicussion on the merits of naural gas versus
diesel generators.

It is my observation that Natural Gas continued to be available throught
this recent blackout.
In speaking to a friend who works for the gas company he informed me that
the compressor stations on the main pipelines are driven by gas turbines,
thus they don't require electrical power to operate.
All telemetering/control equipment on the distribution network is either
passive, or equipped with natural gas generators to ensure it operates.

Did others notice if there was a gas interuption in your area during the
blackout ?
(A lot of people here were cooking on their Nat. gas bbque here)

This was an exceptionally long blackout, did people have trouble getting
diesel fuel replenished?
Fuel trucks where no doubt having difficulty with traffic congestion due to
traffic lights not working.

Regards,
Randy




Re: Availability of Natural Gas during Blackout

2003-08-17 Thread Vincent J. Bono

There are a couple of problems with Natural Gas generators:

1. It takes an aweful lot of pressure to get a NG engine up past enough HP
to generate more than say 150KW.  At least thats what we have seen with
current models.  It seems to be an issue of pressure, and whether being fed
from a pipeline or coming from a tank separte (electric) compressors are
almost always needed.

2. In times of weather emergencies, snow and excessive cold, the gas
companies routinely shut down gas flow to non-residential areas (like where
you would put datacenters) to assure heat for people's homes.  This bit me
personally in a a very minor way a few years back in a region as far south
as McLean, VA.  We had a small kitchen with a gas stove in the office and
when we got snowed in one night it was shut off.  If the gas supply had been
powering the backup generator for our datacenter it would have been ugly as
the electrical power went out a few hours later.

On the other hand, LNG in tanks is a bit more reliable in the snow if you
have a large enough tank to provide pressure during cold whether and to get
you by during a prolonged snow emergency.  In our transmission shelters
which are spaced aout 50 miles apart along the fiber right of way, we always
try and use LNG generators because they don't have cold start problems the
way diesels do, they just fire up.  And the power needs for the repeater
stations in  65kw so we dont need to worry about the limit in size on LNG
engines.

-vb




- Original Message - 
From: Randy Neals (ORION) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 10:51 AM
Subject: Availability of Natural Gas during Blackout



 Some weeks back there was a dicussion on the merits of naural gas versus
 diesel generators.

 It is my observation that Natural Gas continued to be available throught
 this recent blackout.
 In speaking to a friend who works for the gas company he informed me that
 the compressor stations on the main pipelines are driven by gas turbines,
 thus they don't require electrical power to operate.
 All telemetering/control equipment on the distribution network is either
 passive, or equipped with natural gas generators to ensure it operates.

 Did others notice if there was a gas interuption in your area during the
 blackout ?
 (A lot of people here were cooking on their Nat. gas bbque here)

 This was an exceptionally long blackout, did people have trouble getting
 diesel fuel replenished?
 Fuel trucks where no doubt having difficulty with traffic congestion due
to
 traffic lights not working.

 Regards,
 Randy





Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread hackerwacker

On Saturday 16 August 2003 04:54 pm, Having folded space, the Third Stage 
Guild Navigator said:
 Thus spake Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]

subsidize) local power generation via renewable energy sources 
(e.g.
solar, wind, hydro) it would go a long way towards solving this

 problem.

   Rubbish.
  
   If in order to make it viable such energy needs to be subsidized 
then
   it

 is

   not affordable.
 
  And solar nor wind are good for base energy production so we´re stuck
  with other methods unless you want to move IP packets only when it´s
  windy.

 Or you store excess power generated on windy/sunny days for later
 distribution on calm/rainy days:
 http://www.tva.gov/sites/raccoonmt.htm

 That still ignores tidal, hydro, and geothermal power, which are 
available
 24x7.  And let's not forget ethanol, which is easy to make from excess 
food
 crops and has already replaced gasoline entirely in a few countries.


Use hydrogen. One solar panel (which will last forever unless you drop 
something on it) can split H2O into H and O. Store the H for windless days 
or at night. Feed this to a turbine for electricity and recover heat for hot 
water, store it in a heat sink, ect. Or feed the H into a fuel cell  
strip off the electron volts. Now a home user can produce  wattage to 
supply power for his neighbors. The amount of power to be had via these 
hydrogen processes is huge. Now, try to take out this decentralized power 
system. You can't, at least not on the scale we saw last week.

The by-products of this are water and Oxygen. Hydrogen is our new battery.
Please don't go on about it's storage dangers ! LPG (bottle gas) has been 
used for quite some time and the safety is . We all drive mobile hydrogen 
bombs, and show no concern.

The only problem is that the Oil men are in charge. They want to pipe NG 
to houses and have us crack NG into hydrogen. Cut the cord !

To stay on topic, consider the long term savings in generating DC 
directly, via a clean source, instead of converting AC to DC at colos.
We pay dearly for the amps on those A and B legs. Replace the multiple 
utility service feeds, gennys, batt rooms, and DC chargers with a 
hydrogen feed turbine for each leg. Recover the heat for cooling.

 end of rant by long haired *nix based hippie 
 



Re: Availability of Natural Gas during Blackout

2003-08-17 Thread Vincent J. Bono

  2. In times of weather emergencies, snow and excessive cold, the gas
  companies routinely shut down gas flow to non-residential areas

 This is a contract issue; Commercial customers often get better rates
 for being 'cutable'... but you need to assure the generator is not one.

This is true as long as no emergency is declared.  If a state of emergency
*is* declared (yes, Nortern Virginia declares a state of emergency for snow
flurries) contract or not, commercial customers get cut if the gas is needed
for residences.

  On the other hand, LNG in tanks is a bit more reliable in the snow if
you
  have a large enough tank to provide pressure during cold whether and to
getc

 LNG tanks for any big installation will be BIG. You'll have to
 pay to keep all the LNG in stock. Propane has another issue --
 it can get too cold for it to vaporize, leaving you really SOL.

Yes, thats why only small (again sub 65KW) installations make sense.  And
from experience, we have had -22F in Lancaster, PA and our propane genset
started right up.  That the coldest we have on record at any of our sites
though during a utility outage.





 -- 
 A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
 Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
 is busy, hung or dead20915-1433




Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread Petri Helenius

 
 Use hydrogen. One solar panel (which will last forever unless you drop 
 something on it) can split H2O into H and O. Store the H for windless days 
 or at night. Feed this to a turbine for electricity and recover heat for hot 
 water, store it in a heat sink, ect. Or feed the H into a fuel cell  

What kind of land area of solar panels do you plan to produce enough H for
producing a gigawatt 24/7? Then multiply that by 60. You probably have to 
produce H equivivalent of 180GW to accommodate for nights and cloudier
days, even if you would be somewhere where it usually shines.

If you want to add windmills to the equation, do the land area calculation
taking into account turbulence effects which mandate your mill spacing.

Pete



Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread hackerwacker

On Sunday 17 August 2003 11:55 am, Having folded space, the Third Stage 
Guild Navigator said:
  Use hydrogen. One solar panel (which will last forever unless you drop
  something on it) can split H2O into H and O. Store the H for windless
  days or at night. Feed this to a turbine for electricity and recover 
heat
  for hot water, store it in a heat sink, ect. Or feed the H into a fuel
  cell 

 What kind of land area of solar panels do you plan to produce enough H 
for
 producing a gigawatt 24/7? Then multiply that by 60. You probably have 
to
 produce H equivivalent of 180GW to accommodate for nights and cloudier
 days, even if you would be somewhere where it usually shines.

 If you want to add windmills to the equation, do the land area 
calculation
 taking into account turbulence effects which mandate your mill spacing.

 Pete

The calculations I have seen of hydrogen produced vs watts in indicate
solar could supply enough hydrogen to more than satisfy
the requirements of a residential user.

To calculate the theoretical (maximum) volume of the hydrogen produced, 
also in cubic meters, from the other data for the current and the time, 
using Faraday's First Law:

Vtheoretical = (R I T t) / (F p z),

where R=8.314 Joule/(mol Kelvin), I = current in amps, T is the 
temperature in Kelvins (273 + Celsius temperature), t = time in seconds, F 
= Faraday's constant = 96485 Coulombs per mol, p = ambient pressure = 
about 1 x 105 pascals (one pascal = 1 Joule/meter3), z = number of 
excess electrons = 2 (for hydrogen, H2), 4 (if you're measuring oxygen 
production instead). 

6 hours sunlight, ave (it's 7.1 here in new mexico) 4 120 watt panels, so:

8.914* 28*303*21600=1.633529e+09

96485*105*2= 20261850

80.620965 cubic meters of hydrogen a day

Kyocera KC-120's are 1242mm by 652 mm

So, put them on your roof. Lots of unused space. No need to have huge 
expanses
for centralized generation. I've read of Solar Cells as building 
materials, using the Cells as the shell of the house.

Sorry, I do not have a formula to factor in the Exxon Valdez damage, 
other damage to our enrironment, billions lost last week, ect !




Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread alex

  
   And solar nor wind are good for base energy production so we´re stuck
   with other methods unless you want to move IP packets only when it´s
   windy.
 
  Or you store excess power generated on windy/sunny days for later
  distribution on calm/rainy days:
  http://www.tva.gov/sites/raccoonmt.htm
 
  That still ignores tidal, hydro, and geothermal power, which are 
 available
  24x7.  And let's not forget ethanol, which is easy to make from excess 
 food
  crops and has already replaced gasoline entirely in a few countries.
 
 
 Use hydrogen. One solar panel (which will last forever unless you drop 
 something on it) can split H2O into H and O. 

Sure, burn energy to store it.

 Store the H for windless days 
 or at night.

Burn energy here as well.

 Feed this to a turbine for electricity and recover heat for hot 
 water, store it in a heat sink, ect. 

Burn energy.

 Or feed the H into a fuel cell  
 strip off the electron volts. 

Burn energy.

 Now a home user can produce  wattage to 
 supply power for his neighbors. 

Release energy.

 The amount of power to be had via these 
 hydrogen processes is huge.

Release energy.

 The by-products of this are water and Oxygen.

Release energy.

 The only problem is that the Oil men are in charge. They want to pipe NG 
 to houses and have us crack NG into hydrogen. Cut the cord !

So let us use N J to let us release M J, where N is significantly greater
than M. What a brilliant concept. When someone starts actively doing it,
please remind me the name of the company so I can short it all the way to
zero. Thanks god that the oil people are in charge.


Alex

P.S. The problem with ethanol is the same - the total amount of energy
needed to crate useful fuel is greater than the amount of energy it
generates.





Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On zondag, aug 17, 2003, at 20:57 Europe/Amsterdam, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The calculations I have seen of hydrogen produced vs watts in indicate
solar could supply enough hydrogen to more than satisfy
the requirements of a residential user.
Sure, a regular house has enough surface area to generate this 
electricity, but not appartment buildings or businesses. But why have 
the hydrogen in the middle? Batteries aren't as explosive. Also, it 
seems that the large amount of hydrogen that will leak out (remember, 
tinyiest molecules ever, but this is well established for other gasses 
as well) don't do the environment much good.

I don't think wholesale replacement of our current power systems is an 
attainable goal in our lifetime. (And it will happen automatically 
anyway as oil starts running out and gets so expensive that people who 
just want to burn it can't afford it anymore.) However, it is still a 
very good idea to add more solar energy to the mix, both on the large 
and the small ends of the scale.

Small: a few solar panels (with batteries) will give you at least 
_some_ power when the utility power is out. Being able to recharge your 
cell phone, run a light, a laptop and an ADSL or cable modem is much, 
much better than nothing.

Large: demand for power peaks when it's hot, but generating capacity is 
often much lower under these circumstances because river water gets 
much warmer so power plants that need this water for cooling can't run 
at full capacity. (We could be facing rolling blackouts because of this 
soon in Europe.) Guess what: solar panels don't need cooling and their 
output is highest when the weather is hot = lots of sunshine.

So, put them on your roof. Lots of unused space. No need to have huge
expanses for centralized generation. I've read of Solar Cells as 
building
materials, using the Cells as the shell of the house.
There has recently been a breakthrough that makes it possible to 
convert more of the sun's spectrum into electricity. This could 
potentially double the efficiency of solar cells in the future, then 
maybe they'll be more cost efficient.



Windows update down again?

2003-08-17 Thread variable

Hi all,

I was just updating a couple of Windows machines and had been using 
Windows Update without any problems until about 5 mins ago (22:10 GMT) 
when I've started getting this:

Thank you for your interest in Windows Update

Windows Update is the online extension of Windows that helps you get the 
most out of your computer.

The latest version of Windows Update is available on computers that are 
running Microsoft Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows 
Millennium Edition, Windows 2000 (except Windows 2000 Datacenter Server), 
Windows XP, and the Windows Server 2003 family.

URL is http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/default.asp which redirects 
to http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/thanks.asp.  Also happens for 
http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/.

This is from multiple machines running Windows 2000 (Pro and Server) and 
Windows 2003 server.  Anyone else seeing this yet?

Does anyone know of an alternative URL for Windows Update in the meantime?

Rich



Re: Windows update down again?

2003-08-17 Thread variable

It's just come back now.  Must have been a temporary holding page while 
they did some maintenance.

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hi all,
 
 I was just updating a couple of Windows machines and had been using 
 Windows Update without any problems until about 5 mins ago (22:10 GMT) 
 when I've started getting this:
 
 Thank you for your interest in Windows Update
 
 Windows Update is the online extension of Windows that helps you get the 
 most out of your computer.
 
 The latest version of Windows Update is available on computers that are 
 running Microsoft Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows 
 Millennium Edition, Windows 2000 (except Windows 2000 Datacenter Server), 
 Windows XP, and the Windows Server 2003 family.
 
 URL is http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/default.asp which redirects 
 to http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/thanks.asp.  Also happens for 
 http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/.
 
 This is from multiple machines running Windows 2000 (Pro and Server) and 
 Windows 2003 server.  Anyone else seeing this yet?
 
 Does anyone know of an alternative URL for Windows Update in the meantime?
 
 Rich
 
 -- 
 Virus scanned by edNET.
 



Re: East Coast outage?

2003-08-17 Thread hackerwacker

On Sunday 17 August 2003 03:11 pm, Having folded space, the Third Stage 
Guild Navigator said:
 On zondag, aug 17, 2003, at 20:57 Europe/Amsterdam,

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sure, a regular house has enough surface area to generate this
 electricity, but not appartment buildings or businesses. But why have
 the hydrogen in the middle? Batteries aren't as explosive. Also, it
 seems that the large amount of hydrogen that will leak out (remember,
 tinyiest molecules ever, but this is well established for other gasses
 as well) don't do the environment much good.

Yep. Batt rooms do go boom if not vented. However you loose quite a bit 
in the charge/recharge cycles. i have not worked with the gel or sealed
batts that don't leak anything. When I was off the grid, I factored in the 
costs to transport them vs the cheap marine deep cycle batts 30 miles
away at Wal Mart and the cheap ones won.


 I don't think wholesale replacement of our current power systems is an
 attainable goal in our lifetime. (And it will happen automatically
 anyway as oil starts running out and gets so expensive that people who
 just want to burn it can't afford it anymore.) However, it is still a
 very good idea to add more solar energy to the mix, both on the large
 and the small ends of the scale.

 Small: a few solar panels (with batteries) will give you at least
 _some_ power when the utility power is out. Being able to recharge your
 cell phone, run a light, a laptop and an ADSL or cable modem is much,
 much better than nothing.

 Large: demand for power peaks when it's hot, but generating capacity is
 often much lower under these circumstances because river water gets
 much warmer so power plants that need this water for cooling can't run
 at full capacity. (We could be facing rolling blackouts because of this
 soon in Europe.) Guess what: solar panels don't need cooling and their
 output is highest when the weather is hot = lots of sunshine.

Totally agree. Some here seem to be taking this as an all or nothing.
So much high fat thinking going on. It's gotta be big and it has to feed 
the 
status quo greed where the few make the money.

I learned, while off the grid, that if I made better choices (with my 
energy 
appliances) I did not have to suffer. You do pay more for devices that do 
the 
same work with less power. Cheap things wear out sooner. last time I 
checked
my NG fridge is still keeping the ice cream rock hard and the person I 
sold it to is very happy. All it takes is a candle sized flame. 

Presently now in the grid, however my landlord placed all windows 
on the south side. In northern New Mexico I require no heat during the day 
time, in winter, and can make it most of the time with a little heat from 
the air tight. I simlpe walk in the woods yields all the wood I need; the 
cat powered bed warmers do the rest.



  So, put them on your roof. Lots of unused space. No need to have huge
  expanses for centralized generation. I've read of Solar Cells as
  building
  materials, using the Cells as the shell of the house.

 There has recently been a breakthrough that makes it possible to
 convert more of the sun's spectrum into electricity. This could
 potentially double the efficiency of solar cells in the future, then
 maybe they'll be more cost efficient.




Re: MPLS ICMP Extensions

2003-08-17 Thread Jesper Skriver

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:40:01PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
 
 I wanted to get some other opinions on some new features that have
 appeared in recent code from the popular vendors.  It appears there
 is a new draft, a copy of which can be found at
 http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-01.txt that
 allows MPLS enabled boxes to return some additonal information in
 a traceroute packet.
 
 That's all well and good, and I can see how that might be amazingly
 useful to someone running an MPLS network, however, it seems to
 expose data much further than the local network.  Here's a random
 example from a traceroute I recently performed (on a Juniper):
 
 traceroute wcg.net
 [snip]
 11  hrndva1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.95.117)  91.935 ms  102.652 ms 92.960 ms
  MPLS Label=13198 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 12  hrndva1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.95.77)  92.593 ms  92.785 ms 93.119 ms
  MPLS Label=12676 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 13  nycmny2wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.45)  93.273 ms  93.121 ms 93.067 ms
  MPLS Label=12632 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 14  nycmny2wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.87.78)  104.755 ms  91.949 ms 92.169 ms
  MPLS Label=12672 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 15  chcgil1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.37)  92.021 ms  91.737 ms 91.684 ms
  MPLS Label=12592 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 16  chcgil1wcx3-pos5-0.wcg.net (64.200.210.114)  175.907 ms  278.144 ms 203.763 ms
  MPLS Label=12695 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 17  chcgil1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.103.73)  93.286 ms  93.230 ms 93.593 ms
  MPLS Label=13506 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 18  stlsmo3wcf1-atm.wcg.net (64.200.210.158)  92.780 ms  92.344 ms 92.596 ms

If anyone is interested I have a patch for LBL traceroute to display
this information too.

Download ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/traceroute.tar.gz, patch in
http://e.wheel.dk/~jesper/traceroute.diff, and you will have

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jesper traceroute wcg.net
traceroute to wcg.net (64.200.241.26), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  217.79.98.25.adsl.griffin.net.uk (217.79.98.25)  0.895 ms  0.836 ms  0.751 ms
 2  217.79.96.209 (217.79.96.209)  21.557 ms  18.431 ms  19.075 ms
 3  f0-0.core1.tchx.lon.uk.griffin.com (217.79.96.1)  19.768 ms  19.094 ms  19.285 ms
 4  lndnuk1icx1.wcg.net (195.66.224.105)  18.824 ms  20.206 ms  19.800 ms
 5  nycmny2wcx2-pos15-3.wcg.net (64.200.87.61)  126.360 ms  127.665 ms  127.702 ms
 MPLS Label=12632 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 6  nycmny2wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.87.74)  125.205 ms  126.923 ms  125.993 ms
 MPLS Label=12672 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 7  chcgil1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.37)  126.425 ms  126.212 ms  126.220 ms
 MPLS Label=12592 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 8  brvwil1wcxa-pos9-0.wcg.net (64.200.103.193)  126.920 ms  127.660 ms  127.462 ms
 MPLS Label=12604 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
 9  64.200.236.14 (64.200.236.14)  129.886 ms  125.499 ms  126.715 ms
 MPLS Label=13506 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
10  stlsmo3wcf1-atm.wcg.net (64.200.210.158)  126.080 ms  124.598 ms  125.235 ms
11  stl-clust01.wcg.net (64.200.241.26)  126.723 ms  124.544 ms  124.736 ms

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456

One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.


Did Sean Gorman's maps show the cascading vulnerability in Ohio?

2003-08-17 Thread Sean Donelan


So, the US Government wants to classify Sean Gorman's student project.
The question is did Mr. Gorman's maps divulge the vulnerability in the
East Coast power grid that resulted in the blackouts this week?

Would it be better to know about these vulnerabilities, and do something
about them; or is it better to keep them secret until they fail in a
catastrophic way?





RE: Did Sean Gorman's maps show the cascading vulnerability in Ohio?

2003-08-17 Thread McBurnett, Jim


-So, the US Government wants to classify Sean Gorman's student project.
-The question is did Mr. Gorman's maps divulge the vulnerability in the
-East Coast power grid that resulted in the blackouts this week?

-Would it be better to know about these vulnerabilities, and do something
-about them; or is it better to keep them secret until they fail in a
-catastrophic way?


This is a question whose answer I am willing to bet will 
remain classified should his research be classified.

J


NYC 9-1-1 problems due to generator/Cable modems affect police

2003-08-17 Thread Sean Donelan

City to Investigate 911 Outages During Blackout
By LUKAS I. ALPERT
Associated Press Writer
August 17, 2003, 3:37 PM EDT

Problems with the system's telephone service provider caused disruptions
of up to 14 minutes. We've got to make sure that doesn't happen again,
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Sunday.
[...]
The disruptions were caused by the failure of a backup diesel generator at
the Verizon Communications office that supplies power to the city's 911
headquarters in downtown Brooklyn, company spokesman John Bonomo said.
[...]
On Sunday, nine police precincts were still experiencing problems
connecting to the department's main computer system, stemming from
disruptions with their cable modem connections.



Re: Did Sean Gorman's maps show the cascading vulnerability in Ohio?

2003-08-17 Thread hackerwacker

On Sunday 17 August 2003 06:28 pm, Having folded space, the Third Stage 
Guild Navigator said:
 So, the US Government wants to classify Sean Gorman's student project.
 The question is did Mr. Gorman's maps divulge the vulnerability in the
 East Coast power grid that resulted in the blackouts this week?

 Would it be better to know about these vulnerabilities, and do something
 about them; or is it better to keep them secret until they fail in a
 catastrophic way?

Please correct me if I misunderstand this, but I have a different take on 
all of this. Power Cos. have for some time traded power in a futures 
market system. Org A buys x gigawatts at an attractive price to be 
delivered at a specific time in the future from Org B, via the grid. Org C is facing a 
brown/blackout today so they are highly motivated to pay any price; Org 
A's  contract terms with Org B fit Org C's needs so Org A makes a killing.
Given that the players were producers, buyers and sellers of the same 
product this creates no incentaive to build out additional capasity. Quite 
different from say, Hog futures, were the supply side and demand side are 
not the same person. According the the NPR report I heard on this, the money to be 
made 
here is huge  provided there was just enough power or not quite enough. So 
there were not market checks and ballances. having additional capasity on 
hand, in this system, drives down price in a futures market.

So back on Sean's question, maps did not divulge this; at least not the 
primary cause. I see the primary cause as economic. It seems to me 
we are seeking a mechanical cause instead of looking at the fauly business
model that allowed this to happen.