Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[William Allen Simpson]

Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Nate, customers are not OSP savvy. The ones that could be  would be like
you, me, and vin.
Those are few and between.
 

Yeah, we are an odd bunch.  I've found that my friends and others
think of it as magic.  And find it wierd that I'm always looking up
into the air, especially at intersections or while riding along as a
passenger, commenting on things.  Why doesn't everybody _look_ around?
Though, it does rub off and do some good.  This past political season
one of the telecomm managers was still marvelling about a fundraiser
we attended a couple of year ago: "Amazing, she knew what a CLEC was!"
--
William Allen Simpson
   Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Hannigan, Martin]

Nate, customers are not OSP savvy. The ones that could be  would be like
you, me, and vin.

Those are few and between.

If I were DHS/FBI/SS? Employee or ex employee involvement. Circa 98
possibly. It is familiar for Boston area transmission.

-M


---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: Nathan Allen Stratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hannigan, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; nanog@merit.edu 
Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:58:04 2005
Subject: Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

> I know how to cut those cables from experience. A customer isn't showing
up
> with a battery powered Makita to do it. And they don't know where to cut
to
> do max damage. If they were cutting SLC splice boxes, sure. Not this.
IMHO.
> These cuts indicate knowledge. I may be wrong. @shrug@

You have not talked to enough ISPs who have been killed by the ILECs. They
know what to do... I am not defending them in any way, it is wrong, but
they have a lot of customers who have clue to get back at them if they are
ticked off.

-Nathan

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Nathan Allen Stratton]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:

> I know how to cut those cables from experience. A customer isn't showing up
> with a battery powered Makita to do it. And they don't know where to cut to
> do max damage. If they were cutting SLC splice boxes, sure. Not this. IMHO.
> These cuts indicate knowledge. I may be wrong. @shrug@

You have not talked to enough ISPs who have been killed by the ILECs. They
know what to do... I am not defending them in any way, it is wrong, but
they have a lot of customers who have clue to get back at them if they are
ticked off.

-Nathan

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Hannigan, Martin]

I know how to cut those cables from experience. A customer isn't showing up
with a battery powered Makita to do it. And they don't know where to cut to
do max damage. If they were cutting SLC splice boxes, sure. Not this. IMHO.
These cuts indicate knowledge. I may be wrong. @shrug@
 

-M

---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: Joshua Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hannigan, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; nanog@merit.edu

Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:31:30 2005
Subject: Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

Your not giving customers enough credit, your a customer yourself
arn't you? Do you know how to cut those cables? Would anyone else on
the list who isn't a disgruntled verizon employee?


On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:26:04 -0500, Hannigan, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Disgruntled customers don't know how to cut X hundred pair cables.
> 
> ---
> Martin Hannigan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verisign, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: nanog@merit.edu 
> Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:10:35 2005
> Subject: Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter
> 
> Sean Donelan wrote:
> 
> >Verizon is offering a $50,000 reward for information about several
> >acts of cut cables in the last couple of months.  At least three lines
> >were cut in the last week.
> >
>
>http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/13/verizon_
> seeking_information_about_cable_cutter/
> >
> >
> >
> With a power saw?  Goodness, that sounds noisy in the middle of the
> night.  I'd have thought a low tech ax would do the job. :-)
> 
> Probably a disgruntled customer, with cable bundles that repair says
> were supposed to be replaced 12 years ago, but engineering says isn't
> in the budget (like my SBC/Ameritech neighborhood in Ann Arbor).
> 
> Sigh, not enough criminal instinct here.
> 
> --
> William Allen Simpson
> Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
> 


-- 
Joshua Brady

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Joshua Brady]

Your not giving customers enough credit, your a customer yourself
arn't you? Do you know how to cut those cables? Would anyone else on
the list who isn't a disgruntled verizon employee?


On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:26:04 -0500, Hannigan, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Disgruntled customers don't know how to cut X hundred pair cables.
> 
> ---
> Martin Hannigan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verisign, Inc.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: nanog@merit.edu 
> Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:10:35 2005
> Subject: Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter
> 
> Sean Donelan wrote:
> 
> >Verizon is offering a $50,000 reward for information about several
> >acts of cut cables in the last couple of months.  At least three lines
> >were cut in the last week.
> >
> >http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/13/verizon_
> seeking_information_about_cable_cutter/
> >
> >
> >
> With a power saw?  Goodness, that sounds noisy in the middle of the
> night.  I'd have thought a low tech ax would do the job. :-)
> 
> Probably a disgruntled customer, with cable bundles that repair says
> were supposed to be replaced 12 years ago, but engineering says isn't
> in the budget (like my SBC/Ameritech neighborhood in Ann Arbor).
> 
> Sigh, not enough criminal instinct here.
> 
> --
> William Allen Simpson
> Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
> 


-- 
Joshua Brady

Re: Internap power outage?

[Nathan Allen Stratton]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:

> From hitting LiveJournal's home page there is/was a major Internap power
> outage?  Any details?  Related to Y! Financials outage?

Did not see any blips on my Internap connections.


><>
Nathan Stratton   BroadVoice, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net Talk IS Cheap
http://www.robotics.net   http://www.broadvoice.com

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Hannigan, Martin]

Disgruntled customers don't know how to cut X hundred pair cables.


---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu 
Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:10:35 2005
Subject: Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter


Sean Donelan wrote:

>Verizon is offering a $50,000 reward for information about several
>acts of cut cables in the last couple of months.  At least three lines
>were cut in the last week.
>
>http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/13/verizon_
seeking_information_about_cable_cutter/
>
>  
>
With a power saw?  Goodness, that sounds noisy in the middle of the
night.  I'd have thought a low tech ax would do the job. :-)

Probably a disgruntled customer, with cable bundles that repair says
were supposed to be replaced 12 years ago, but engineering says isn't
in the budget (like my SBC/Ameritech neighborhood in Ann Arbor).

Sigh, not enough criminal instinct here.

-- 
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Re: Internap power outage?

[Hannigan, Martin]

Which facility? A,B side or both? 


---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu 
Sent: Fri Jan 14 19:05:14 2005
Subject: Internap power outage?


>From hitting LiveJournal's home page there is/was a major Internap power 
outage?  Any details?  Related to Y! Financials outage?

--
Undocumented Features quote of the moment...
"It's not the one bullet with your name on it that you
have to worry about; it's the twenty thousand-odd rounds
labeled `occupant.'"
   --Murphy's Laws of Combat

Re: Internap power outage?

[chuck goolsbee]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
 From hitting LiveJournal's home page there is/was a major Internap power
 outage?  Any details?  Related to Y! Financials outage?
Did not see any blips on my Internap connections.
Nathan Stratton   BroadVoice, Inc.

Apparently the outage was isolated to their Seattle/Fisher Plaza 
Colocation facility.

--
--chuck goolsbee
geek wrangler, digital.forest inc, seattle, wa 

Re: $50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[William Allen Simpson]

Sean Donelan wrote:
Verizon is offering a $50,000 reward for information about several
acts of cut cables in the last couple of months.  At least three lines
were cut in the last week.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/13/verizon_seeking_information_about_cable_cutter/
 

With a power saw?  Goodness, that sounds noisy in the middle of the
night.  I'd have thought a low tech ax would do the job. :-)
Probably a disgruntled customer, with cable bundles that repair says
were supposed to be replaced 12 years ago, but engineering says isn't
in the budget (like my SBC/Ameritech neighborhood in Ann Arbor).
Sigh, not enough criminal instinct here.
--
William Allen Simpson
   Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Re: Internap power outage?

[Micah McNelly]

It only affected fisher plaza in seattle.

/m

- Original Message -
From: "Michael Loftis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 7:05 PM
Subject: Internap power outage?


>
> >From hitting LiveJournal's home page there is/was a major Internap power
> outage?  Any details?  Related to Y! Financials outage?
>
> --
> Undocumented Features quote of the moment...
> "It's not the one bullet with your name on it that you
> have to worry about; it's the twenty thousand-odd rounds
> labeled `occupant.'"
>--Murphy's Laws of Combat
>
>

Internap power outage?

[Michael Loftis]

From hitting LiveJournal's home page there is/was a major Internap power 
outage?  Any details?  Related to Y! Financials outage?
--
Undocumented Features quote of the moment...
"It's not the one bullet with your name on it that you
have to worry about; it's the twenty thousand-odd rounds
labeled `occupant.'"
  --Murphy's Laws of Combat

$50,000 reward for Verizon cable cutter

[Sean Donelan]

Verizon is offering a $50,000 reward for information about several
acts of cut cables in the last couple of months.  At least three lines
were cut in the last week.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/13/verizon_seeking_information_about_cable_cutter/

Nortel

[Erik Haagsman]

Looking for some advice regaring Nortel Optera SW versions and SP
boards, please reply off-list (and no...not for free, hourly rate is no
prob :-)

Cheers,

-- 
---
Erik Haagsman
Network Architect
We Dare BV
tel: +31.10.7507008
fax: +31.10.7507005
http://www.we-dare.nl

Weekly Routing Table Report

[Routing Table Analysis]

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 15 Jan, 2005

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  153359
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:   90003
Unique aggregates announced to Internet:  73829
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18787
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   16317
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:7641
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:2470
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 80
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.5
Max AS path length visible:  19
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 8
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 16
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   1365929640
Equivalent to 81 /8s, 106 /16s and 110 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   36.9
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   59.6
Percentage of available address space allocated:   61.9
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:   71169

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:30377
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   14775
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:   28417
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:14569
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:2192
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:646
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:330
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.4
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  171452544
Equivalent to 10 /8s, 56 /16s and 40 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 78.2

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
   23552-24575
APNIC Address Blocks   58/7, 60/7, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 85730
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:52065
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:65406
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 23973
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9797
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:3533
ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 967
Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.3
Max ARIN Region AS path length visible:  16
Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet:   238498048
Equivalent to 14 /8s, 55 /16s and 49 /24s
Percentage of available ARIN address space announced:  71.1

ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106
   2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153
   3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466
   7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407
   18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591,
   26624-27647,29695-30719, 31744-33791
ARIN Address Blocks24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/7, 72/8, 198/7, 204/6,
   208/7 and 216/8

RIPE Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 29121
Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation:20079
Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks:26017
Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 17055
RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 6214
RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:3319
RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1048
Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.1
Max RIPE Region AS path length visible:  19
Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet:   184494528
Equivalent to 10 /8s, 255 /16s and 41 /24s
Percentage 

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

[Paul Vixie]

> > That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.
> 
>   Really?  Thats news to me. 
> 
>   RFC 2672, Non-Terminal DNS Name Redirection, is still
>   a proposed standard .

yes, and ISC-TN-2002-1 (see www.isc.org/pubs/tn/) is still timely.
-- 
Paul Vixie

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

[Todd Vierling]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> > > That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.
> >
> > No, its A6 that is to be depreciated (and too bad because its superior
> > to ), but last I heard DNAME stays as standard RR.
>
> Cue DJB's "kill A6" page
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html

Well, A6 is not DNAME; the only relation is that A6 needed DNAME in the
reverse lookup direction.

DNAME is quite useful in the forward lookup direction, particularly since
synthesizing CNAMEs for older resolvers is part of the requirement.  It
allows moving of an entire subdomain wholesale from one parent to another
without creating a flurry of CNAMEs.  This helps even more if you have a
wildcard subdomain in there.  8-)

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Apologies for Off-Topic Posting

[Claydon, Tom]

I apologize to everyone here for posting yesterday on an inappropriate
topic, which I have since moved to cisco-nsp. 

Thanks,
 
= TC
 
--
Tom Claydon, IT/ATM Network Engineer
Dobson Telephone Company

Re: Cisco 7513 & Bandwidth Points

[Rodney Dunn]

Noel, Tom,

There are limitations on the 75xx's depending on the
RSP/VIP setup you have.

It's a distributed platform that does software
based forwarding when running in dCEF mode.
All packet are switched by the VIPs and never
touch the RP.  Therefore the switching capacity
is a function of the speed of the VIPs and the
features you have enabled in the packet path
(ACL's, QOS, etc..).

The short answer is there isn't a bandwidth concept
like there is with the 72xx.  However, you can
overload the VIP with the right PA combination and
features. The matrix of performance will depend on
the features, ppps, and VIP type.

There have been extensive discussions
about this on cisco-nsp so if there are further questions
I'd suggest we move it over there and I can add more.

Thanks,
Rodney

On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:09:28PM -0500, Noel Montales wrote:
> 
> On-List replies perhaps may be usefull.. Or could you post a summary of
> your findings?
> 
> Regards,
> Noel Montales
> 
> Claydon, Tom said:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are moving from a Cisco 7206 to a 7513, and I was wondering if we
> > will be limited by bandwidth points on the 7513 (as we are with the
> > 7206). From the sparse documentation I've found so far, it doesn't
> > appear that this limitation exists in the 7513, correct?
> >
> > Off-list replies are welcomed.
> >

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine]

> The current pretense of "privacy" is nothing more than a convenient
> mechanism for registrars to pad their wallets and evade responsible
> for facilitating abuse.

As an aside, I used a (wicked big) competitor's "privacy" service to
regsiter a domain for a political worker who wanted to whistleblow
but not be identified.

My customer could now use a web log service such as Duncan Black did
under the name of "atrios", and obtain casual (but not subpoena-proof)
data protection (non-publication of customer profile data).

Broadly I agree that "privacy" as a product under contract law is not
a better solution than data protection as a right under human rights.
However, data protection isn't as available to all potential registrants.

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

[Mark Andrews]

> That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.
> 
> Owen

Really?  Thats news to me. 

RFC 2672, Non-Terminal DNS Name Redirection, is still
a proposed standard .

If you are thinking about RFC 3363, Representing Internet
Protocol version 6 (IPv6) Addresses in the Domain Name
System (DNS).  It does NOT deprecate DNAME.  There is no
UPDATES RFC 2672 at the top.  I was well aware that it
didn't deprecate DNAME when it passed through the WG.  I
would have complained long and loudly if it did.

Mind you, in hind site, I should have a strongly argued
that section 4 of RFC 3363 just be deleted.  All it has
done is generate confusion about the status of DNAME and
to top that the opening sentence contains assertions which
don't hold water once you think about them a little bit.

DNAME is just as useful with nibbles in the reverse tree as
it was with bitlabels.

Take RFC 2874, DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation
and Renumbering, and redo the examples with nibbles.  Everything
just works.

To renumber the reverse you need to get the appropriate
DNAME records updated.  You don't need to re-establish several
levels of delegation under IP6.INT.  Yes I expect the RIRs to
add DNAMES not NS records at some point in the future for IP6.INT.

For the forward part all the end systems just register their
new addresses in the DNS using UPDATE.

Mark.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonym

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine]

> Because there is no data protection on many databases (such as ".com"
> registrars who are forced to sell the data if requested), people lie
> when registering, because it is the only tool they have to protect
> their privacy.

Yup. Our ICANN contracts both require us to sell bulk registrant data,
and require us to maintain :42 and :80 (FORM+POST) whois servers, both
unconditionally, to satisfy the trademarks interest group.

The "perfect open whois to fight spam" claim exchanges 40,000,000 valid
(or not dysfunctional in this particular context) for two or more orders
of magintude smaller invalid and dysfunctional (in this partuclar context)
addresses.

Because registrar-registrar predation via whois data mining is a reality,
registrars rate limit or otherwise attempt an ACL on both :43 and :80 whois
service, and data format variation is a form of defense. It prevents the
marginals who can't write a simple parser from theft via slamming the
registrants.

And since no one who wants whois data who isn't stealing registrants is
paying us, grand unifying schemes aren't a registrar insterest. Again,
look to the marks people, now accompanied by the new "total information"
law enforcement people for the primary actors. As I've previously pointed
out, neither of those two interest groups is fundamentally interested in
SMTP.

> Fix the data protection problem and you'll have a better case to force
> people to register proper information.

Bingo!

The Cidr Report

[cidr-report]

This report has been generated at Fri Jan 14 21:44:24 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
07-01-05149489  102971
08-01-05149513  103003
09-01-05149570  103031
10-01-05149549  103027
11-01-05149748  102959
12-01-05149201  102941
13-01-05149254  103118
14-01-05149708  103136


AS Summary
 18676  Number of ASes in routing system
  7641  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  1416  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS7018 : ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services
  90137600  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS721  : DNIC DoD Network Information Center


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 14Jan05 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 149691   1031374655431.1%   All ASes

AS18566  7657  75899.1%   CVAD Covad Communications
AS4134   830  197  63376.3%   CHINANET-BACKBONE
   No.31,Jin-rong Street
AS4323   829  235  59471.7%   TWTC Time Warner Telecom
AS721   1095  598  49745.4%   DNIC DoD Network Information
   Center
AS27364  442   33  40992.5%   ARMC Armstrong Cable Services
AS22773  422   25  39794.1%   CXA Cox Communications Inc.
AS6197   826  452  37445.3%   BNS-14 BellSouth Network
   Solutions, Inc
AS7018  1416 1067  34924.6%   ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services
AS6478   480  149  33169.0%   ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services
AS1239   927  619  30833.2%   SPRN Sprint
AS9929   338   35  30389.6%   CNCNET-CN China Netcom Corp.
AS17676  389   87  30277.6%   JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK Japan
   Network Information Center
AS22909  421  123  29870.8%   CMCS Comcast Cable
   Communications, Inc.
AS4766   545  274  27149.7%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS21502  2743  27198.9%   ASN-NUMERICABLE NUMERICABLE is
   a cabled network in France,
AS14654  2647  25797.3%   WAYPOR-3 Wayport
AS9443   366  121  24566.9%   INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus
   Telecommunications
AS6140   375  133  24264.5%   IMPSA ImpSat
AS4355   300   64  23678.7%   ERSD EARTHLINK, INC
AS2386   848  620  22826.9%   ADCS-1 AT&T Data
   Communications Services
AS25844  244   17  22793.0%   SASMFL-2 Skadden, Arps, Slate,
   Meagher & Flom LLP
AS6198   446  224  22249.8%   BNS-14 BellSouth Network
   Solutions, Inc
AS9583   561  339  22239.6%   SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
AS15270  243   36  20785.2%   PDP-14 PaeTec.net -a division
   of PaeTecCommunications, Inc.
AS3602   314  111  20364.6%   SPCA Sprint Canada Inc.
AS5668   428  238  19044.4%   CIH-12 CenturyTel Internet
   Holdings, Inc.
AS6517   309  123  18660.2%   YIPS Yipes Communications,
   Inc.
AS19632  1919  18295.3%   Metropolis Intercom
AS9498   232   52  18077.6%   BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET
   LTD.
AS9304   210   38  17281.9%   HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison
   Global Communications

Total  15330 6036 929460.6%   Top 30 total


Possible Bogus Routes

24.246.0.0/17AS7018  ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services
24.246.38.0/24   AS25994 NPGCAB NPG Cable, INC
24.246.128.0/18  AS7018  ATTW AT&T WorldNet Services
64.17.32.0/24AS5024  BRIDGE-75 BridgeNet, LC
64.17.33.0/24AS5024  BRIDGE-75 BridgeNet, LC
64.17.37.0/24AS5024  BRIDGE-75 BridgeNet, LC
64.46.27.0/24AS8674  NETNOD-IX Netn