Eurid suspends more than 74,000 .eu domain names
I think this operationally impact some people http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972 -Henry
more on Net Neutrality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5538363 enjoy :-) regards, /virendra -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFExk/jpbZvCIJx1bcRAuC9AJ4nmNhEVtv7ONVCn+PPjhxUFXf8ZQCcDtjF Pm8gl8bnMgaG/8iyncwlKMs= =rAxX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: Hot weather and power outages continue
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: 24 July 2006 13:27 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Hot weather and power outages continue I've always been a fan of being able to force 100% economizer and chiller loop bypass emergency operation; it won't keep you cool but will help keep your data center from turning into an Easy-Bake Oven(tm). But that failure operating mode is rarely part of the standard HVAC programming. Sean, Can you elaborate on what you mean by force 100% economizer and chiller loop bypass emergency operation Thanks, Sam
Re: Eurid suspends more than 74,000 .eu domain names
Henry Linneweh wrote: I think this operationally impact some people http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972 I doubt it. 74,000 less domain parked pages most likely. -mark -- Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Founder President, easyDNS Technologies Inc. ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 fx. +1-(866) 273-2892
Re: Hot weather and power outages continue
My assumption is that it means it isn't going to keep things cold, but it will keep the air flowing to prevent a 'server sauna'.-brandonOn 7/25/06, Sam Stickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: 24 July 2006 13:27 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Hot weather and power outages continue I've always been a fan of being able to force 100% economizer and chiller loop bypass emergency operation; it won't keep you cool but will help keep your data center from turning into an Easy-Bake Oven(tm). But that failure operating mode is rarely part of the standard HVAC programming. Sean,Can you elaborate on what you mean by force 100% economizer and chillerloop bypass emergency operationThanks,Sam-- Brandon GalbraithEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: brandong00Voice: 630.400.6992A true pirate starts drinking before the sun hits the yard-arm. Ya. --thelost
Re: Hot weather and power outages continue
Brandon Galbraith wrote: My assumption is that it means it isn't going to keep things cold, but it will keep the air flowing to prevent a 'server sauna'. On 7/25/06, Sam Stickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: 24 July 2006 13:27 To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Hot weather and power outages continue I've always been a fan of being able to force 100% economizer and chiller loop bypass emergency operation; it won't keep you cool but will help keep your data center from turning into an Easy-Bake Oven(tm). But that failure operating mode is rarely part of the standard HVAC programming. Sean, Can you elaborate on what you mean by force 100% economizer and chiller loop bypass emergency operation Thanks, Sam When I was in charge of such things, there was a way to circulate evaporator tower water n the chilled water loop to remove some of the heat, if you had enough power to run the two pumps. -- Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/
Re: Eurid suspends more than 74,000 .eu domain names
On 7/25/06, Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this operationally impact some people http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972 Typosquatters and domain name speculators typically dont have anything other than pages stuffed full of clickthrough ads on domains they glom onto. No operational impact in sweeping all that dross out. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Eurid suspends more than 74,000 .eu domain names
Would that many of those in the US would go away... On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:48:44AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: On 7/25/06, Henry Linneweh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this operationally impact some people http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9001972 Typosquatters and domain name speculators typically dont have anything other than pages stuffed full of clickthrough ads on domains they glom onto. No operational impact in sweeping all that dross out. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Wayne Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
Global Crossing Contact / BGP and SONET interaction question
Two somewhat intertwined questions. I'll ask the second part first. I buy transit from Global Crossing and another carrier on HDLC encapsulated DS3's. Recently my BGP session has started flapping on the GX circuit... It looks something like this: Jul 21 21:17:43.731 UTC: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 67.17.168.73 6/6 (cease) 0 bytes Jul 21 21:17:43.731 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Down BGP Notification received Jul 21 21:18:25.439 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Up Jul 21 21:29:52.315 UTC: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 67.17.168.73 6/6 (cease) 0 bytes Jul 21 21:29:52.315 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Down BGP Notification received Jul 21 21:30:38.511 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Up Jul 21 21:31:34.411 UTC: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 67.17.168.73 6/6 (cease) 0 bytes Jul 21 21:31:34.411 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Down BGP Notification received Jul 21 21:32:20.535 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Up Jul 21 21:32:52.547 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Down Peer closed the session Jul 21 21:33:32.703 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Up There are no other log entries during the periods when this occur. Unfortunately this causes enough prefix flaps that any prefixes which are preferred through GX are damped for like a half hour by certain providers as my BGP routes get added/withdrawn through the GX link. GX claims (although I'm not sure they really know) that these are caused by SONET ring switches. I can believe this, since I haven't seen any real circuit flaps, and my understanding is that a SONET switch should generally be fast enough that you normally won't see the transition other than perhaps an error counter or two cranking up. However, it seems strange that I'm getting a 6/6 (cease) notification which I read as configuration change from their router. GX also seems to be at a loss to explain why my BGP is flapping - other than to point at the SONET switches. I guess I'm trying to find out if someone on the list recognizes what this might be so I can perhaps help GX find and fix this. I'm also kinda curious as to whether or not typically a SONET ring switch event would actually propagate into a router in such a way that BGP would try to shut down the BGP sessions. I'm just having a hard time visualizing how a supposedly below-layer-two switch would cause bgp to reset in this manner. Not being a SONET expert even by any long stretch of the imagination leaves me with some holes here, but I thought the whole goal of SONET when used to provide DS3 circuits was to hide the ring switches as much as possible from the DS3 circuits - realizing that framing may be hard to preserve on a ring switch which would cause momentary loss of sync or similar - which usually shows up as an error instead of a interface flap. And finally, does anyone have a contact within GX with a clue? So far I'm not sure I've talked to anyone who knows anything but how to spell BGP. I'd really like to talk to someone about the real cause of these flaps and try to resolve them so they don't reoccur. -forrest
RE: Global Crossing Contact / BGP and SONET interaction question
Forrest: snip Recently my BGP session has started flapping on the GX circuit... It looks something like this: Jul 21 21:33:32.703 UTC: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 67.17.168.73 Up There are no other log entries during the periods when this occur. Unfortunately this causes enough prefix flaps that any prefixes which are preferred through GX are damped for like a half hour by certain providers as my BGP routes get added/withdrawn through the GX link. snip I don't have an answer to the root cause of your problem, and I'm not looking for a discussion on route dampening (there are enough debates on this issue to make your head spin), but may I suggest you raise your hold timers to prevent your BGP sessions from going down on short disturbances as these? -forrest Randy
