Re: what the heck do i do now?

2007-02-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:13:08PM -0500,
 Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
 a message of 52 lines which said:

192.0.2.0/24 - This block is assigned as TEST-NET for use in
documentation and example code.  It is often used in conjunction with
domain names example.com or example.net in vendor and protocol
documentation.  Addresses within this block should not appear on the
public Internet.
 
 That /24 doesn't show up in BGP

It SHOULD NOT show up, but it does (ROSPRINT-AS, AS2854, does announce
it and, among others, routeviews.org sees it).




Re: what the heck do i do now?

2007-02-06 Thread Jon Lewis


On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:


On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:13:08PM -0500,
Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 52 lines which said:


   192.0.2.0/24 - This block is assigned as TEST-NET for use in
   documentation and example code.  It is often used in conjunction with
   domain names example.com or example.net in vendor and protocol
   documentation.  Addresses within this block should not appear on the
   public Internet.

That /24 doesn't show up in BGP


Somebody clipped the unless something is broken part of that statement.


It SHOULD NOT show up, but it does (ROSPRINT-AS, AS2854, does announce
it and, among others, routeviews.org sees it).


So the simple conclusion is ROSPRINT-AS is broken.  BTW, that route 
doesn't seem to propogate very far.  I don't see it via Level3, Above.net, 
or TWTC.  What I do see when looking at my incoming distribute list is 
that someone seems to keep trying to announce exactly 192/8.


--
 Jon Lewis   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net|
_ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_


Re: No DNS operations BOF at NANOG39

2007-02-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:03:57AM -0500,
 Keith Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
 a message of 14 lines which said:

 If anyone would still like to have a DNS operations discussion in
 Toronto,

Yes, but it was not necessary to destroy half of the DNS this night
just to have a discussion :-)



Covad Atlanta DSL Outage

2007-02-06 Thread Berkman, Scott
FYI
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:15 AM

Subject: NOTIFICATION - DSL Outage, TT# 2681396, NE - ATLNGAHP

Outage Description:

Radius Server failure at the ATLNGAHP Central Office, in ATLANTA, GA.

Covad Trouble Ticket# 2681396 has been opened for a regional outage.
Covad technicians are investigating issues.

Covad Network Weather Report will be updated hourly during this service
interruption.

An update status message will be sent every 60 minutes until service
restoration.

Please contact the NOC and reference Trouble Ticket# 2681396 for any
questions.

Covad Network Operations Center 1-888-801-6285 opt 1, email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Service Impact Status:

Total customers impacted: N/A (specific Partner customer count listed
below) Outage Start: 2/6/2007 7:00AM Pacific Time Estimated Time of
Resolution (ETR): Unknown 

 

Outage Duration: 14 min.

 


Scott Berkman CCNP
404-975-0097
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers

2007-02-06 Thread Roy


Its amazing how reporters has to butcher technology information to make 
it understood by their editors


http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/02/06/internet.attacks.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories


Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers

2007-02-06 Thread Rob Thomas


Its amazing how reporters has to butcher technology information to  
make it understood by their editors


http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/02/06/internet.attacks.ap/ 
index.html?eref=rss_topstories


Ugh, yeah.  Things look pretty good presently.

   http://www.cymru.com/monitoring/dnssumm/index.html

--
Rob Thomas
Team Cymru
http://www.cymru.com/
cmn_err(do_panic, Out of coffee!);