Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
Stephen Wilcox wrote: Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for a /28 it does become a consideration to the customer as to if they _REALLY_ need it Where would this money go to? Pete
Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
Petri Helenius wrote: Stephen Wilcox wrote: Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for a /28 it does become a consideration to the customer as to if they _REALLY_ need it Where would this money go to? To ip-squatters. Get your allocation now and turn it into gold tommorow. p2p people will be happy if they can get rid of their tunnels. With rfc 1918 addresses for all there will be no more filesharing, voip, spam and troyans. Cheers Peter and Karin -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Rimbacher Strasse 16 D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher +49(6209)795-816 (Telekom) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/ http://www.cesidianroot.com/
Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote: Petri Helenius wrote: Stephen Wilcox wrote: Now, if you suddenly charge $2.50/mo to have a public IP or $15/mo for a /28 it does become a consideration to the customer as to if they _REALLY_ need it Where would this money go to? you could subsidise all those v6 rollouts everyone is talking about ;p seriously, figuring out what to do with some spare money shouldnt be a big concern.. if we dont pool it centrally under collective authority then what pete says below will happen: To ip-squatters. Get your allocation now and turn it into gold tommorow. p2p people will be happy if they can get rid of their tunnels. With rfc 1918 addresses for all there will be no more filesharing, voip, spam and troyans. really? because p2p doesnt work behind NAT, and computers behind NAT dont get infected? this is the Internet today and NAT has no effect on the above. Steve
Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
Stephen Wilcox wrote: On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote: p2p people will be happy if they can get rid of their tunnels. With rfc 1918 addresses for all there will be no more filesharing, voip, spam and troyans. really? because p2p doesnt work behind NAT, and computers behind NAT dont get infected? this is the Internet today and NAT has no effect on the above. I am pessimistic. The malware will find its way. It is port 25 smtp that goes away and takes part of the spam away too. Ways have been found to drill holes into NAT-routers and firewalls, but they are working only as long as it is only you who wants to break out of the NAT. As soon as the mainstream has only left rfc 1918 addresses p2p will stop. I see lots of p2p-ers already communicating via IPv6 tunnels. They are prepared. Kind regards Peter and Karin -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Rimbacher Strasse 16 D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher +49(6209)795-816 (Telekom) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/ http://www.cesidianroot.com/
94/8, 95/8 allocated to the RIPE NCC
Hi, The IANA IPv4 registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of two /8 IPv4 blocks to the RIPE NCC in July 2007: 94/8 and 95/8. You can find the IANA IPv4 registry at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space Please update your filters as appropriate. Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
