Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel
On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ snip ] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: David Ulevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to. [..and.. ] You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales folks that use this method. Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't quit trying to hump your leg. No matter how many times you tell them you're not going to do it they keep trying. The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the community at NANOG 41, which seemed to have wide support, contained a new provision to deal with this problem. Hopefully, the steering committee will step up to the plate and approve soon. -M
RE: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel
Just for the purpose of clarification - it was not the NANOG list that our salesperson was using. However, because the gentleman who brought it to our attention cc'd NANOG - we apologized here as well. Again -- very sorry for the distraction this created. Kind regards, Sherry Ollins Director of Sales Purchasing Choice Resale LLC 310.804.3266 Voice 310.943.0427 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.choiceresale.com AOL IM: SherryCHOICE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Hannigan Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: OT: Vendors Using NANOG for a Sales Channel On 10/26/07, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ snip ] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: David Ulevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Often times when I get these (and it's pretty often) I just take their email address and add it to my list of people we send out RFQs to. [..and.. ] You obviously haven't had the experiences that some have had with sales folks that use this method. Some are like the little Chihuahua that won't quit trying to hump your leg. No matter how many times you tell them you're not going to do it they keep trying. The AUP that we ( the NANOG MLC) presented to the community at NANOG 41, which seemed to have wide support, contained a new provision to deal with this problem. Hopefully, the steering committee will step up to the plate and approve soon. -M
Re: Can P2P applications learn to play fair on networks?
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Mohacsi Janos wrote: Agreed. Measures, like NAT, spoofing based accelerators, quarantining computers are developed for fairly small networks. No for 1Gbps and above and 20+ sites/customers. small is a relative term. Hong Kong is already selling 1Gbps access links to residential customers, and once upon a time 56Kbps was a big backbone network. Last month folks were complaining about ISPs letting everything through the networks, this month people are complaining that ISPs aren't letting everything through the networks. Does this mean next month we will be back the other direction again. Why artificially keep access link speeds low just to prevent upstream network congestion? Why can't you have big access links?
Comcast Contact
Can someone clueful from comcast.net contact me offlist please? Thank you. -G
