IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread Joel Snyder


Hello.  I looked through the recent archives and didn't see this 
question addressed, so please excuse me if it has been beaten to death 
or is considered off-topic.


We have a UUnet link and a secondary provider.  The secondary provider 
has no IPv6 facilities.  UUnet (er, Verizon Business) has IPv6 clue, but 
there is an impenetrable wall between the customer and the clue which 
assures that there will be no IPv6 links or tunnels ever given to customers.


We would like to get an IPv6 tunnel to begin limited testing of IPv6 for 
customers.  Is there any IPv6-savvy ISP out there who will give/sell 
tunnels to other ISPs?


Experimentation with SixXS.NET has proven to be problematic, so I'd 
rather have a more stable and commercial relationship if possible.


As you might guess, our IPv6 traffic load is estimated to be between 
zero and unmeasurably small, but we'd still like to have it hover 
above the absolute zero mark.


Any help/pointers/advice/proposals gratefully solicited.

jms
--
Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One   Phone: +1 520 324 0494
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.opus1.com/jms


Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread William Herrin

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Joel Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We would like to get an IPv6 tunnel to begin limited testing of IPv6 for
  customers.  Is there any IPv6-savvy ISP out there who will give/sell
  tunnels to other ISPs?

  Experimentation with SixXS.NET has proven to be problematic, so I'd
  rather have a more stable and commercial relationship if possible.

Joel,

Give the folks at Hurricane Electric a shot if you haven't already:
http://tunnelbroker.net/

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3005 Crane Dr. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread Kevin Day



On Mar 22, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Joel Snyder wrote:


We would like to get an IPv6 tunnel to begin limited testing of IPv6  
for customers.  Is there any IPv6-savvy ISP out there who will give/ 
sell tunnels to other ISPs?


Experimentation with SixXS.NET has proven to be problematic, so I'd  
rather have a more stable and commercial relationship if possible.




You've got a few options.

First, if you're having a problem with SixXS, make sure you let them  
know. They're good guys there, and their support tends to be faster  
than some companies we've bought transit from. :) But, you're right,  
that isn't a commercial service and is more on the best effort side  
of things, instead of the SLA side. There are other services like  
SixXS that give out tunnels more-or-less automatically  
(tunnelbroker.net from Hurricane Electric, is the other big one), but  
that's also pretty much a best effort service.


If you're wanting more than an auto-created tunnel, because you want  
to run BGP or have your own space announced, or someone to yell at  
when it breaks, you'll probably need to find someone who will treat a  
tunnel like a customer connection.


Hurricane Electric was offering BGP over tunnels at one point, but I  
don't know if they still are. Sprint made an announcement years ago  
that they were offering free tunnels with BGP and treated them more or  
less like customer ports, but I don't know if that's still happening.  
If your use is really small, we've given some free tunnels as  
customers to a few ISPs, but I don't know if the level of support I'm  
offering is really what you're looking for either.


I don't know that anyone out there right now is doing a Tunnels for  
Dollars kinda situation, because it's so hard to support. If the v4  
path between you and the tunnel provider breaks, there's not always  
anything anyone can do about it.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IPv6_tunnel_brokers might be a  
good place to start.


-- Kevin



Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread Seth Mattinen


Kevin Day wrote:


Hurricane Electric was offering BGP over tunnels at one point, but I 
don't know if they still are. Sprint made an announcement years ago that 
they were offering free tunnels with BGP and treated them more or less 
like customer ports, but I don't know if that's still happening. If your 
use is really small, we've given some free tunnels as customers to a 
few ISPs, but I don't know if the level of support I'm offering is 
really what you're looking for either.




I can vouch that Sprint is still offering IPv6 with BGP over tunnels. 
I'm currently announcing my /48 with it, but I don't use it too much 
beyond testing/playing. I'm still waiting for it to become dual-stack, 
so if anyone from Sprint is reading this... ;)


~Seth



Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread Mike Leber


On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Kevin Day wrote:
 On Mar 22, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Joel Snyder wrote:
 
  We would like to get an IPv6 tunnel to begin limited testing of IPv6  
  for customers.  Is there any IPv6-savvy ISP out there who will give/ 
  sell tunnels to other ISPs?
 
  Experimentation with SixXS.NET has proven to be problematic, so I'd  
  rather have a more stable and commercial relationship if possible.
 
 
 You've got a few options.
 
 First, if you're having a problem with SixXS, make sure you let them  
 know. They're good guys there, and their support tends to be faster  
 than some companies we've bought transit from. :) But, you're right,  
 that isn't a commercial service and is more on the best effort side  
 of things, instead of the SLA side. There are other services like  
 SixXS that give out tunnels more-or-less automatically  
 (tunnelbroker.net from Hurricane Electric, is the other big one), but  
 that's also pretty much a best effort service.

FWIW, we handle the tunnelbroker.net tickets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the same
as customer tickets sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (same ticket
system).  We also follow up in the forums: http://tunnelbroker.net/forums

Since we provide /48s via a button and the ability to set your reverse DNS
servers in the tunnelbroker.net interface, those two sources of
traditional support tickets are reduced.

 If you're wanting more than an auto-created tunnel, because you want  
 to run BGP or have your own space announced, or someone to yell at  
 when it breaks, you'll probably need to find someone who will treat a  
 tunnel like a customer connection.

In our case: phone support and priority for network engineer attention.

 Hurricane Electric was offering BGP over tunnels at one point, but I  
 don't know if they still are. Sprint made an announcement years ago  
 that they were offering free tunnels with BGP and treated them more or  
 less like customer ports, but I don't know if that's still happening.

We review BGP tunnel requests manually to ensure that request came from
somebody at the actual AS owner.

We setup tunnels with BGP using specific routers in various locations,
that are separate from the auto-created tunnels.  We are gradually adding
geographically disperse BGP tunnel servers to provide closer endpoints for
users.

When possible Hurricane would prefer to give native IPv6 transit at an
exchange we have in common rather than giving IPv6 transit via a tunnel.
The vast majority of Hurricane's IPv6 peering is via native sessions.

 If your use is really small, we've given some free tunnels as  
 customers to a few ISPs, but I don't know if the level of support I'm  
 offering is really what you're looking for either.
 
 I don't know that anyone out there right now is doing a Tunnels for  
 Dollars kinda situation, because it's so hard to support.

We do.

We have customers with paid commercial IPv6 tunnels.  Some companies and
organizations can't or don't want to use free service.  Paying for service
gets phone support, help with custom configurations, engineering attention
to your specific use, and a sales rep to deploy more service.

Of course we provide and recommend native connectivity for transit
connections and colo.

Mike.

+- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -+
| Mike Leber Wholesale IPv4 and IPv6 Transit   510 580 4100 |
| Hurricane Electric Web Hosting  Colocation AS6939 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://he.net |
+---+



Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought

2008-03-22 Thread Jeroen Massar

Joel Snyder wrote:
[..]

Experimentation with SixXS.NET has proven to be problematic,


How so? It is always fun to read that people have 'problems', but it is 
even funnier then when the person's name isn't even listed in 
whois.sixxs.net and thus doesn't even have an account, nor am I able to 
even find a single email from either opus1 or your name, thus I really 
wonder what things are 'problematic' for you. You might be interested to 
try this marvelous thing called the World Wide Web, and read 
http://www.sixxs.net/contact/ and when you have done that, use this 
great invention called email to contact us, if you still have questions 
about things, that is why that page is there, clearly people are scared 
by it and don't dare to ask...


As you might guess, our IPv6 traffic load is estimated to be between 
zero and unmeasurably small, but we'd still like to have it hover 
above the absolute zero mark.


Then again, if you are a real ISP, you will have to do what everybody 
else in the business is doing:


 - get a block from ARIN (or your favorite local RIR :)
   http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/arin/ doesn't list you,
   thus you might want to start out there
 - arrange transit
   - this generally means you are going to pay for bits
 just like in the IPv4 world.
 - fix your routers and the rest of your network

Though SixXS is there to get people going in using IPv6, it definitely 
is not meant to support your full business process, if you require that, 
go pay somebody who can give you their full attention, there are lists 
in the FAQ with organizations who can do that for you for that purpose.


Greets,
 Jeroen



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

2008-03-22 Thread Andrew C Burnette


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip


http://www.einstein-website.de/z_kids/letterskids.html


That's cute Valdis, but did the little girl and Einstein force thousands of
people around the world to read their correspondence?  I whole-heartily
encourage and thank anyone willing to take the time to help the original
poster.  Off-list.

Andrew



Strange. I subscribed to numerous mailing lists. My mail reader's search 
function has been most enlightening when someone shared the answer with 
the group, which is often experienced by others, clueful or not, and 
honestly, easier to search than most mailing list archives. It's 
disingenuous to not share the answer, as anyone searching the archives 
will find the question unanwered and thus insurmountable, or they'll 
find a polite followup or pointer, and the benefit happens without 
additional email traffic


When did this become the debian support list anyway :-)  Or should we 
simply point folks to http://www.routergod.com/


To whomever started the thread with an actual question, don't be scared 
off. We're more like gentoo users than the other guys.  Here's a good 
general resource (I know there are better but some of my favorite links 
are lost in time, and encourage folks to share) 
http://www.private.org.il/tcpip_rl.html


Hey nanog committee, there's an idea. How about an operator's wiki? 
http://www.nanog.org/isp.html looks a bit weak given the overall bundled 
IQ floating around these parts?  (even an email submission link for good 
stuff might be a start.nanog-support seems too general for such)


Best regards,
andy


Re: default routes question or any way to do the rebundant

2008-03-22 Thread Randy Bush

 Hey nanog committee, there's an idea. How about an operator's wiki?

http://nanog.cluepon.net/

centralization is not a core feature of the internet :)

randy