On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Bob Snyder wrote:
> Of course, since you're doing this based on email that NAC sent, who has > been enjoined from "directly or indirectly" preventing the customer from > using their IP space, you may be opening NAC up to further liability. Of course, using this line of reasoning, NACs original email to the list could easily be argued to be an indirect intervention. If I were the TRO holder, and my announcement started to become a new bogon, I'd be at the judges doorstep with the entire NANOG thread in my hand :-/ //Alif
