UPS and generator interaction?

2004-03-29 Thread Brian (nanog-list)

Does anyone know of a way to get a UPS to trigger a generator to start, and
to switch over to the generator power automatically or does this type of
thing just not exist?  

Right now we've got a APC Symmetra UPS at 12kva, with no generator.  The UPS
keeps us running for about 45 minutes, which just isn't enough time.  I
called APC, but they didn't seem to have any type of automatic solution.
Their method is to hook it up to a switch, and manually change the feed to
the UPS from the building power to the generator power and back, but it sure
would be nice to have something more automated (to save me from running like
a madman when the UPS page wakes me up at 4am).

I'd be very grateful to hear of any solutions that you guys have come up
with in this arena.  Also, any recommendations for generators?  I'm not
looking for something huge, just something that can be mounted on a roof.
If I have to pour diesel into it every couple hours, that's fine too.

Thanks in advance,
Brian


RE: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Brian (nanog-list)
Title: RE: Personal Co-location Registry





 
Kelly Stezer wrote: 


| Personally, I recently priced intel server systems from a 
| variety of major
| vendors including Dell, Compaq/HP, IBM, and Sun (intel-based).
| All of them offered (proprietary?) ethernet-based remote management.
| None offered serial management.
 
Dell poweredge servers have had console redirection to serial port for a while.
I can't recall how far back, and I haven't personally used them, but they're definitely there.


http://docs.us.dell.com/docs/systems/pe650/en/ug/n1515ab0.htm


"Console redirection allows you to manage a host (local) system from a client (remote) system by redirecting keyboard input and text output through a serial port. You cannot redirect graphic output. You can use console redirection for tasks such as configuring BIOS or RAID settings."

That comes from the documentation for a current dell poweredge 650 1U 


When purchasing the 1U's, another thing that must be figured into the final cost are the rack rails and mounting hardware.  Not all servers play well with different vendor's racks, not all rails work with all rack types.  You may not always get the rails with an ebay purchase, and a rack full of 1u's without rails is a management nightmare.  

That brings up a whole other issue, cable management.  If you've ever worked with a bunch of 1Us, keeping the cabling from pinching other cabling is really tough (1u doesn't give you much room).  I can imagine what a rack full of 1U's from varying vendors with different cable management systems would be like.  Pull one server out for maintenance, yank the cables of the machine below it.  Big fat KVM cables wouldn't be needed so that would limit it to ethernet, console, and power cable(s), so it might not be too bad.  And then again, this isn't mission critical stuff, and the charter was for a "publicly usable personal 1u" aimed at the lowest price




Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses

2004-02-02 Thread Brian (nanog-list)
Title: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses





Any ideas how (or why) the following traceroutes are leaking private RFC1918 addresses back to me when I do a traceroute?

Maybe try from your side of the internet and see if you get the same types of responses.


It's really strange to see 10/8's and 192.168/16 addresses coming from the public internet.  Has this phenomenon been documented anywhere?  Connectivity to the end-sites is fine, it's just the traceroutes that are strange.

(initial few hops sanitized)


[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# traceroute www.ibm.com
traceroute: Warning: www.ibm.com has multiple addresses; using 129.42.17.99
traceroute to www.ibm.com (129.42.17.99), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  (---.---.---.---)  2.481 ms  2.444 ms  2.379 ms
 2  (---.---.---.---)  17.964 ms  17.529 ms  17.632 ms
 3  so-1-2.core1.Chicago1.Level3.net (209.0.225.1)  17.891 ms  17.985 ms  18.026 ms
 4  so-11-0.core2.chicago1.level3.net (4.68.112.194)  18.272 ms  18.109 ms  17.795 ms
 5  so-4-1-0.bbr2.chicago1.level3.net (4.68.112.197)  17.851 ms  17.859 ms  18.094 ms
 6  so-3-0-0.mp1.stlouis1.level3.net (64.159.0.49)  23.095 ms  22.975 ms  22.998 ms
 7  ge-7-1.hsa2.stlouis1.level3.net (64.159.4.130)  23.106 ms  23.237 ms  22.977 ms
 8  unknown.level3.net (63.20.48.6)  24.264 ms  24.099 ms  24.154 ms
 9  10.16.255.10 (10.16.255.10)  24.164 ms  24.108 ms  24.105 ms
10  * * *



[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# traceroute www.att.net
traceroute: Warning: www.att.net has multiple addresses; using 204.127.166.135
traceroute to www.att.net (204.127.166.135), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  (---.---.---.---)  2.404 ms  2.576 ms  2.389 ms
 2  (---.---.---.---)  17.953 ms  18.170 ms  17.435 ms
 3  500.pos2-1.gw10.chi2.alter.net (63.84.96.9)  18.077 ms *  18.628 ms
 4  0.so-6-2-0.xl1.chi2.alter.net (152.63.69.170)  18.238 ms  18.321 ms  18.213 ms
 5  0.so-6-1-0.BR6.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.64.49)  18.269 ms  18.396 ms  18.329 ms
 6  204.255.169.146 (204.255.169.146)  19.231 ms  19.042 ms  18.982 ms
 7  tbr2-p012702.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.11.209)  20.530 ms  20.542 ms  23.033 ms
 8  tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.46)  26.904 ms  27.378 ms  27.320 ms
 9  tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.9.141)  27.194 ms  27.673 ms  26.677 ms
10  gbr1-p10.bgtmo.ip.att.net (12.122.4.69)  26.606 ms  28.026 ms  26.246 ms
11  12.122.248.250 (12.122.248.250)  27.296 ms  28.321 ms  28.997 ms
12  192.168.254.46 (192.168.254.46)  28.522 ms  30.111 ms  27.439 ms
13  * * *
14  * * *