ftp.cisco.com broken ?

2003-10-07 Thread Ezequiel Carson 

hi, 

can you resolve ftp.cisco.com?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# ping ftp.cisco.com
ping: unknown host ftp.cisco.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]#


something is wrong here

ezequiel.

Re: cisco site down?

2003-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Carson 

i was using galeon 1.3.5

now it seems to be working..
 
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 12:26, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> 
> > hi,
> > can anyone use cisco site?
> > 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet www.cisco.com 80
> > Trying 198.133.219.25...
> > Connected to www.cisco.com.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > Connection closed by foreign host.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
> > 
> > ezequiel.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> doesn't work from UK either...
> 
> mozilla say 'document contains no data!
> 
> borken..:-(

RE: [nanog]: cisco site down?

2003-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Carson 

it seems to be working now. uhmm strange.. it was getting "Document
contains no valid data.." something like this.


ezeq,



On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 12:25, Tomas Daniska wrote:
> the same here
> 
> --
> 
> deejay  
> 
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Ezequiel Carson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: 6. októbra 2003 17:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [nanog]: cisco site down?
> > 
> > 
> > hi,
> > can anyone use cisco site?
> > 
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet www.cisco.com 80
> > Trying 198.133.219.25...
> > Connected to www.cisco.com.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > Connection closed by foreign host.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
> > 
> > ezequiel.
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

cisco site down?

2003-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Carson 

hi,
can anyone use cisco site?


[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet www.cisco.com 80
Trying 198.133.219.25...
Connected to www.cisco.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

ezequiel.

Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media

2002-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Carson 


Can you create another segment with 172.16.16? May be another dotq1q
interface?.


Regards
Ezequiel

On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 13:44, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> 
> Background: 
> Router A and B are connected via a common ethernet segment 1. Router A
> uses 10.10.10.1/30, and Router B uses 10.10.10.2/30. Router B also has
> another subnet configured for ethernet segment 1; 172.16.16.0/24.
> 
> When I setup a situation like the above, with Router B advertising the
> 172.16.16.0/24 to router A, router A sees a next hop of 10.10.10.2.  This
> is not good since packets from A going to the 172.16.16 subnet get sent to
> Router B, which then ARPs the desitnation, instead of just being ARPed by
> router A.
> 
> I don't want to turn on ICMP redirects on B since they're insecure and
> ugly.  I've also made sure I'm not using next-hop self.  Is there a way to
> make this work?
> 
> Ralph Doncaster
> principal, IStop.com 
> 
> 
>