Re: IPv6 on SOHO routers?
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote: The only ADSL one listed Billion 7402R2 doesn't _actually_ do IPv6 yet, but it might if they release software for it! Which would be nice as we sell them to customers and would love to magically turn on IPv6 to them one day. Hi MMC, You might want to contribute to http://au.billion.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=10042 and suggest to them that Internode wants this release for their customers. Mark.
Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs)
William Allen Simpson wrote: Marshall Eubanks wrote: I used to count the proportion of Mac laptops in the room (or, at least, my row) to pass the time when I was bored. I remember at the 1999 Washington IETF I saw exactly one, and I could hear people whisper about it around me. I used to attend with various Powerbook flavors over the years. I'm sure that I wasn't the only person with a Mac at IETF in 1999. I snuck my SO into the terminal room with her Mac, too So there was two of us at least :) I probably still had my Blackbird. Mark.
Re: IPv6 news
On 14/10/2005, at 3:35 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote: Here's a challange, have NTP server attached directly to a good clock and a IPv6 network. Is there anyone who can talk to it using IPv6 on the Nanog list? (Time20.Stupi.SE, 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020) yoyo$ ntpdate -q 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020 server 2001:440:1880:1000::20, stratum 1, offset 0.001079, delay 0.37489 15 Oct 20:30:06 ntpdate[11313]: adjust time server 2001:440:1880:1000::20 offset 0.001079 sec yoyo$ traceroute6 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020 traceroute to 2001:0440:1880:1000::0020 (2001:440:1880:1000::20) from 2001:388:4000:4002:200:e2ff:fea5:80fe, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets 1 gigabitethernet0-2.er2.aarnet.cpe.aarnet.net.au (2001:388:4000:4002:20f:23ff:fea3:ec00) 0.288 ms 0.223 ms 0.14 ms 2 ge-1-0-3.bb1.a.adl.aarnet.net.au (2001:388:1:2003:212:1eff:fe92:d201) 0.428 ms 0.428 ms 0.377 ms 3 so-0-1-0.bb1.a.mel.aarnet.net.au (2001:388:1:6::2) 9.225 ms 9.256 ms 9.205 ms 4 so-0-1-0.bb1.b.syd.aarnet.net.au (2001:388:1:a::2) 50.35 ms 40.85 ms 57.739 ms 5 so-0-0-0.bb1.a.lax.aarnet.net.au (2001:388:1:15::2) 168.519 ms 168.575 ms 168.497 ms 6 ge-2-7.a00.lsanca17.us.ra.verio.net (2001:418:4000:5000::9) 173.056 ms 168.829 ms 168.807 ms 7 * * * 8 p16-1-1-3.r20.mlpsca01.us.bb.verio.net (2001:418:0:2000::1a1) 179.239 ms 179.162 ms 179.176 ms 9 xe-1-1.r02.mlpsca01.us.bb.verio.net (2001:418:0:2000::35) 179.159 ms 179.229 ms 179.211 ms 10 fa-0-0-0.r00.mlpsca01.us.b6.verio.net (2001:418:0:700f::b600) 179.289 ms 179.25 ms 179.216 ms 11 tu-0.sprint.mlpsca01.us.b6.verio.net (2001:418:0:4000::4a) 180.563 ms 180.6 ms 180.513 ms 12 sl-s1v6-nyc-t-1001.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:1005::2) 252.605 ms sl-bb1v6-nyc-t-1001.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:100b::1) 251.836 ms sl-s1v6-nyc-t-1001.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:1005::2) 252.652 ms 13 sl-bb1v6-sto-t-102.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:100d::2) 401.242 ms sl-bb1v6-sto-t-101.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:1012::1) 347.852 ms sl-bb1v6-sto-t-102.sprintv6.net (2001:440:1239:100d::2) 401.301 ms 14 2001:7f8:d:fb::34 (2001:7f8:d:fb::34) 364.019 ms 418.652 ms 367.302 ms 15 2001:440:1880:1::2 (2001:440:1880:1::2) 401.974 ms 367.857 ms 419.025 ms 16 2001:440:1880:1::12 (2001:440:1880:1::12) 353.331 ms 422.397 ms 367.951 ms 17 2001:440:1880:1000::20 (2001:440:1880:1000::20) 401.24 ms 349.339 ms 401.704 ms yoyo$ It might be closer if we turned up IPv6 with Sprint but are they native yet? Mark.
Re: The Cidr Report
Jerry Pasker wrote: Until there's deep shame, or real financial incentive to not being listed as a member of the dirty 30, nothing is going to happen in terms of aggregation. I sometimes wonder if this list is seen as some sort of hit parade of potential peers and if that is the case then perhaps another list acknowledging the largest players with the best aggregation might also be in order. Mark.
Re: Cisco HFR
Leo Bicknell wrote: I don't think Reuters was impressed: From http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/nm/20040525/tc_nm/tech_cisco_router_dc_2 ] Routers, which look like pizza boxes piled atop each other, are one of ] the most boring pieces of equipment to look at, but probably the most ] crucial as they are used to direct information and data on a network. You can't go past the on/off switches on our Prockets. No boring switch gear there :-) Mark.
Re: Whois software run by Lacnic and BR?
Hank Nussbacher wrote: The whois server at the .BR registry (also the NIR for Brazil) doesn't provide country information because it's implicit as it only provide information for Brazil. Implicit is fine for humans but for automated scripts, couldn't it be made to have country=BR for all your inetnum entries? When I was running a whois server we discovered that not all local people appeared to want to use a local address. Some of them had head offices used for billing, and the like, that was in a different country so having the country code was useful even for humans. Mark.
Re: from Dave Farber's list: Ireland to regulate peering
The Australian regulator is also examining Internet Interconnection. See URL:http://www.accc.gov.au/telco/int_intercon_280403.doc. Mark.
Re: ASN registry?
At 10:45 AM +1000 20/8/02, Philip Smith wrote: Note that the delegation records for some of the ASNs assigned before APNIC and the RIPE NCC existed have been moved to the latter databases. Telstra is but one example. (I agree it might be more helpful if a query on whois.arin.net displayed a message saying go look at whois.apnic.net rather than saying No match.) AS1851 is correctly redirected so I suspect that someone at ARIN just forgot the pointer for AS1221. Mark.
Re: RADB mirroring
At 1:35 PM -0700 20/5/02, Randy Bush wrote: An IRR not mirrored by the RADB (to act as a member) and not mirroring every RR mirrored by the RADB (to hijack the top level) seems pointless. auto-config tools, such as ratoolset, do not use the mirrored data, only the origin data. one specifies the list of registries to search. so, mirroring by the irr is neither necessary nor sufficient, though it can be convenient for lookup by wetware. I think you will find that they can be configured to use different sources but they are at the same registry so you need to find a registry that mirrors all the sources you want to query. Mark.
