Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG

2003-06-28 Thread Mary Grace
NANOG:
This message was posted originally on the isp-bgp list, and I was told that 
it should have been posted on one of the network operator lists or a Cisco 
list if I really wanted advice on Cisco equipment from veteran network 
operators who have used this equipment extensively in the past for this 
application.  Please, forgive me if this is not appropriate, but I hope 
that you will consider it appropriate and not flame me for my ignorance
Mary Grace!
***

Thank you most graciously for the incredible knowledge that God has given 
you, and to everyone that has responded so generously to this message that 
we posted this past week, regarding routers for T3 circuits!

I am thankful to you all for sharing your knowledge in response to such a 
newbie question that I was almost ashamed to ask of you.

Since the last email, Mother Superior has talked to our generous 
contributor from the company who is a T3 circuit provider, and explained 
this list's advice regarding how it was such a mismatch between a T3 in 
one port and a T1 in the other and how BGP isn't really designed to 
perform well in a multi-homed situation with such a large difference in 
bandwidth between the two ports.

Thanks to your advice, and the wisdom of our MS, the provider has agreed to 
donate to our small teaching seminary and convent TWO DS3/T3 45 Mb/s 
point-to-point HDLC circuits, homed into two different exchange points in 
two different major cities (NAPs).

So, is it still true that we do not need anything more powerful than a 4500 
or 4700 to run this system?  I believe that is true if we take default 
routes advertised by the upstream on both sides, and the two diverse-path 
circuits ARE being advertised out of the same upstream AS, but is it still 
true if we were nuts enough to want to take full routes anyway from this 
same provider?  And why would we even want to take full routes?  It is true 
that, despite the gracious gift of the two DS3 circuits, we don't have much 
money to buy a router and so we want to find our what Cisco part numbers 
are needed for whichever model will support two DS3/T3 and one or two 
100base ethernet connections into our internal IP space.

Thanks again, and may God bless you all in many rich ways :-)

Your most thankful and humble servant before God,

Mary Grace



At 03:45 PM 6/24/03 -0700, Mike wrote:
Yeah, but 3600's are at least 3-4x more expensive than a 4500 or 4700.

Mike

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Brian Thoman wrote:

:| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:48:26 -0400
:| From: Brian Thoman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| Subject: [isp-bgp] Re: Newbie Cisco upgrade question,
:|  apologies in advance:-)
:|
:| Wouldn't a 3640 or 3660 off of eBay do the same trick?  We ran two 
DS3's off a 3640 for a while with maxed out RAM.  It worked for us.
:|
:| -- Original Message --
:| From: Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| Date:  Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
:|
:| If you're looking for really inexpensive, and don't need full routes, get
:| a 4500/4700 and put a HSSI card in it. With an external CSU, and cable,
:| you could probably get the whole package for $600-750 on ebay.
:| 
:| Otherwise, I would suggest looking at a 7100 series (7120 or 7140) with a
:| built in DS-3 port (or two). Those can be had for dirt cheap on ebay. They
:| have all the processing power of a comparable 7200, but they're a
:| smaller form factor and don't have as many port adapter slots (which it
:| doesn't sound like you need, anyhow).
:| 
:| Mike
:| 
:| 
:| On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
:| 
:| :| Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:54:12 + (GMT)
:| :| From: E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| :| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| :| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:| :| Subject: [isp-bgp] Re: Newbie Cisco upgrade question,
:| :|  apologies in advance :-)
:| :|
:| :| MG Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 20:43:03 -0400
:| :| MG From: Mary Grace
:| :|
:| :|
:| :| MG Our tiny little non-profit religious network has been using a 
pair of T1
:| :| MG lines running BGP4 for  multihoming to two diverse-path 
upstream ASNs for
:| :| MG many years now.  We have our own portable IP address space and 
ASN (of
:| :| MG course), and have just decided to install our first DS3, 
because a new
:| :|
:| :| I think that's the first tiny little non-profit religious
:| :| network I've ever heard of that had/needed that kind of
:| :| bandwidth.  You could run a moderate ISP using that...
:| :|
:| :|
:| :| MG upstream is offerring us $30 per month per meg port for a full
:| :| MG HDLC-encapsulated point-to-point DS3 (yippee!).
:| :| MG
:| :| MG Our quandary is where to go to ask people with lots of clue on 
BGP4/eBGP to
:| :| MG tell us what the least expensive Cisco router we must buy to 
replace the
:| :| MG tired little 2600 series we currently have.  The router, which 
need not be
:| :| MG as race-car fast as a 7206VXR NPE400

Routes down to yahoo.com, etc. from Wash DC?

2002-05-20 Thread Mary Grace


IS it just us out hereon the Right Coast in the Washington DC area, but are
a number of routes to the Bay Area and Southern California down?  We can't
get traceroutes through or customer connections to www.yahoo.com, while
other like www.msn.com and http://home.netscape.com come in just fine.   

Is it www.yahoo.com, maybe?

Just wondering, as I narrowly veer close to the edge of being on-topic.
  :-)

Mary Grace




Re: OT: Changing NIC handle info

2002-05-10 Thread Mary Grace


$27 per year savings?  Over $35?  OpenSRS sells its resellers regs for $10,
not $8.

Are you saying you pay $8 and not $10 to OpenSRS for .com, .net, .org ?  Or
that you pay $10 and only charge them $8?

At 05:28 PM 5/10/02 -0700, you wrote:

On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:59AM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
 
 On Fri, 10 May 2002, Adam McKenna wrote:
 
  They've begun making the templates harder and harder to find.  I don't
know
  if this is on purpose (although I suspect it is).
 
 Ofcourse it is. Only ask the admin-c (clueless client) for approval to
 transfer (not the tech-c, whose email address actually works and who is
 in fact moving the domain) and you're almost guaranteed that the transfer
 request will fail to deliver. If it does deliver, make it hard by needing 
 a reply within 96 hours. Also, losing a few emails, like a modify for
 the admin-c by the tech-c if the expire date of the domain is only a week
 away works wonders too.

It's nice not having to deal with that BS anymore.  All of my domains are in
OpenSRS, and for the ones that aren't I let the customers manage themselves.

It usually doesn't take much convincing to get them to switch, especially at
a savings of $27 per year.

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA
http://flounder.net/publickey.html |  38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A