Re: Anything going on in Atlanta, GA?

[William Petrisko]

Switch and Data was reporting power issues at 56 Marietta
earlier.  Don't know if it was isolated to their suite, or
more widespread.

bill

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:51:36PM -0500, Dean, Matt wrote:
> Good evening,
> 
>  
> 
> I'm currently seeing a routing loop in Atlanta, GA.  I've contacted the
> ISP with no response yet.  Just curious if anyone knows if there's
> something major going on there.  My traceroute is below.
> 
>  
> 
> Tracing route to shs01.mdeinc.ca [207.210.113.61]
> 
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
> 
>  
> 
>   1 1 ms 2 ms 2 ms  corpnet-rtr01.ba01.mdeinc.ca
> [10.143.5.1]
> 
>   2 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms  mdei-rci-border-rtr01.ba01.mdeinc.ca
> [10.99.99.5]
> 
>   317 ms13 ms15 ms  10.231.36.1
> 
>   416 ms13 ms13 ms  gw01.bawk.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> [66.185.90.193]
> 
>   513 ms13 ms16 ms  gw01.bawk.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> [66.185.83.253]
> 
>   614 ms13 ms13 ms  gw01.basp.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> [66.185.82.6]
> 
>   715 ms15 ms18 ms  gw02.mtnk.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> [66.185.81.209]
> 
>   815 ms15 ms15 ms  66.185.80.41
> 
>   932 ms31 ms32 ms  igw01.vaash.phub.net.cable.rogers.com
> [66.185.80.190]
> 
>  1036 ms37 ms37 ms  POS2-1.ar2.DCA3.gblx.net
> [208.51.239.201]
> 
>  1151 ms54 ms51 ms
> NLAYER-COMMUNICATIONS-INC.ge-4-1-0.410.ar4.ATL1.gblx.net [206.41.25.230]
> 
>  12   267 ms76 ms   122 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  13 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  1454 ms50 ms56 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  15 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  1652 ms53 ms53 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  17 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  1854 ms64 ms51 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  19 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  2052 ms53 ms52 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  21 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  2253 ms53 ms54 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  23 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  2453 ms51 ms54 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  25 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  2654 ms51 ms56 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  27 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  2853 ms66 ms56 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  29 *** Request timed out.
> 
>  3052 ms52 ms56 ms  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net
> [209.51.149.105]
> 
>  
> 
> Trace complete.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
>  
> 
> Matt Dean, MCP, MCDST, MCPS, MCNPS
> 
> Cremto Inc. Integrated Technology Consulting
> 
> 530 Adelaide St. West, Unit 6133
> 
> Toronto, Ontario M5V 2K7
> 
> Canada
> 
> (416) 619-0472
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 

Re: Fiber cut in SJ

[William Petrisko]

> - Forwarded message from George William Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> 
> So... is mail not getting in/out from Nanog right now,
> or is the fairly major fiber cut in San Jose not newsworthy
> on the operational list anymore?

Should be :)

L3 fiber cut in SJC/Sunnyvale area, 552 pairs, ETR 4:45 GMT.

bill

Real-world Force10 opinions?

[William Petrisko]

Can anyone offer any real-world Force10 E-series opinions?

L3, 10GE, GE, POS, BGP, and IS-IS is what we will be evaluating them
for.  Any opinions, gotchas or other advice would be appreciated.

Looking through the archives, I see that there have a been a
few similar questions in the past year or two, but no replies.

I can summarize to the list if others are interested.

thanks
bill

Re: Campus size Wireless LAN

[William Petrisko]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Brandon Pinsky wrote:
>   I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently.  It's pretty nice.  The 
> throughput is good over a .75 mile link.  I was able to successfully 
> push ~20Mbps with an iperf test.  Installation was easy relative to 
> some of the other equipment we have installed.  The feed line is UTP 
> and the radio gets power over the UTP cable.  The uplink interface is 
> 100BaseT which is easy.  My only complaint is that it is not remotely 
> manageable.  You have to have direct console to make any config changes 
> which means taking the link down.  We have another .11a system in 

I believe that this is fixed in the latest release of code...

bill

> production made by RadioLan and it is plagued by the same design flaw.  
> Stupid... I'd like to compare it to the Cisco one.  I bet it is more 
> manageable.
> 
> BJ
> 
> On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
> 
> >
> > Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless
> > connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile?
> > It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper.  Looking for the good
> > bad and ugly.  Thanks in advance!
> >
> > -Eric
> 

-- 
Bill Petrisko