Bet on with my boss

2002-06-26 Thread Rizzo Frank


Hello Jane,

My boss and I had a bet you'd post to NANOG at least five times today 
without contributing anything worthwhile.  Thanks to you, I'm $20 richer.

You can ignore me if you want. That's 
okay.  

 
   
  
 
Frank




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-25 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane



Martin Hannigan wrote:
 
 Regards,
 
 --
 Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Boston, MA  http://www.fugawi.net
 
 On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vincent J. Bono wrote:
 
 
  We recently had a piece of equipment fail outside of Bronson, FL.  This was
  in a regeneration hut, 50 miles from almost anywhere useful.  There is no
  cellular service and no POTs in the HUT.  The closest employee was a woman
  who although bright was not very familiar with the equipment installed.
  Because the management channel (IP) was still working to the site, an
  engineer here in Quincy, MA was able to step her through fixing the problem
  using nothing but IRC and two-way pager.  It took her 35 minutes to correct
  the issue.
 
  Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
  running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
  still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.
 
  -vb
 
 Regards,
 
 --
 Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Boston, MA  http://www.fugawi.net
 
 On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vincent J. Bono wrote:
 
  Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
  running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
  still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.
 
 That's it. I'm giving semaphore classes at the BBQ. :)

BBQ? really? When? Where?

Jane

begin:vcard 
n:Pawlukiewicz;Jane
tel;cell:703 517-2591
tel;fax:703 289-5814
tel;work:703 289-5307
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Booz Allen Hamilton;Visit us on the Internet: a href=http://boozallen.com;BoozOnline/a 
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Jane Pawlukiewicz
end:vcard



Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-23 Thread E.B. Dreger


JW Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
JW From: Joe Wood


JW My understanding is that there are two orderwire circuits on
JW any (vendor supported) SONET transmission system, E1 and E2.
JW E1 allows for SOH orderwire between SONET sections (Regen
JW sites/Huts), E2 allows for LOH orderwire between SONET line
JW terminating equipment (adm).

If all else fails, read the manual...

Yes, E1 and E2 are the DS0 channels of which I was thinking.


Eddy
--
Brotsman  Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 + (GMT)
From: A Trap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or you are likely to
be blocked.




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-22 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane


Hi Greg

Gregory Hicks wrote:
 
  Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:22:29 -0100
  From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: steve uurtamo [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Bet on with my boss
 
  [...]
 
  No. That's not what the bet is about. Sorry.
 
  The bet was if I could stop the various SPEWS threads.
 
 [...]
 
 Actually, the moderator (list 'owner') for nanog told the instigator to quit or
 '... off the list...'
 
they say, timing is everything. And COB Friday was the bet, of course,
cob friday on what continent was never discussed so . . .

Jane



Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane

Hi,

How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
arises, can we solve it without the phones?

Just curious.

You can ignore me if you want. That's okay.

Jane

begin:vcard 
n:Pawlukiewicz;Jane
tel;cell:703 517-2591
tel;fax:703 289-5814
tel;work:703 289-5307
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Booz Allen Hamilton;Visit us on the Internet: a href=http://boozallen.com;BoozOnline/a 
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Jane Pawlukiewicz
end:vcard



Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Scott Francis

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 03:37:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 Hi,
 
 How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
 arises, can we solve it without the phones?

If the network is down, the phone is critical. For any complicated problem,
the phone is also critical. If the phone network is down too, a cell phone
may also be important.

There's no substitute for an actual face-to-face conversation, either.
-- 
Scott Francis   darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager  sfrancis@ [work:] t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7  illum oportet crescere me autem minui



msg02912/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Jim Popovitch


 -Original Message-
 From: Pawlukiewicz Jane

 Hi,

 How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
 arises, can we solve it without the phones?


on 9/11 most telco lines into and out of NYC were congested or
non-functioning.  Even cell phones were impacted because they ultimately use
wirelines.  But, not withstanding all of the telco problems AIM, IRC,
and email worked best for communications.

Now, whether or not you would be able to solve problems without vocal
communications remains to be seen.  Ultimately it revolves around having the
ability to adequately define the problem in writing as well as having good a
reader ready to interpret your message.

-Jim P.





Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Andy Dills


On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:

 Hi,

 How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
 arises, can we solve it without the phones?

 Just curious.

 You can ignore me if you want. That's okay.

I probably should take your advice, but that's an interestingly ambiguous
question so I'll indulge on a slow Friday afternoon. Anything to derail
that spews thread.

phone is a tricky word. By phone do you mean an actual handset? Or do
you mean a handset with a pots line? Or does your definition include
voip? Or do you mean phone to encompass all audio communication devices?
Or do you mean phones to represent the entire PSTN?

What kind of situation are you referring to? A small bowel accident? Or a
fiber cut? Your kid got in a fight at school? Or are most of your frame
relay circuits bouncing?

Basically, anybody can answer whatever they want based on the lack of
detail in the question. I'd love to take both sides of the bet so I can
collect from both you and your boss...

Andy


Andy Dills  301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLCwww.xecu.net

Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access





Re[2]: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Richard Welty



On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:42:23 -0700 Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 03:37:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
  How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
  arises, can we solve it without the phones?
 
 If the network is down, the phone is critical. For any complicated
 problem,
 the phone is also critical.

and in particular, one point that the inexperienced often overlook, but
probably 99% of the readership of this list is familiar with, is that a
modem in a remote equipment cabinet is a good thing, as when you blow a
router config and it stops talking to the network, dialing into it via
said modem is the only quick path to saving your job.

richard
--
Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
  Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security





Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane

Oh you made me laugh ...

thanks,

Jane

Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
 
 On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
  arises, can we solve it without the phones?
 
  Just curious.
 
  You can ignore me if you want. That's okay.
 
  Jane
 
 To me, personally, as an individual and not speaking as an
 admin, i could give a damn. Try not to use the flipping things
 except very rarely, irritating nuisances they are.
 
 To me, speaking as someone who works as a clec/cable company/isp,
 they're purty damn important. Phones can save lives. Without them,
 its damn hard to reach emergency service so nearly every house now
 has one. But the internet, you can get by just fine without it now.
 It doesn't yet have a killer app ;)
 
 sam

begin:vcard 
n:Pawlukiewicz;Jane
tel;cell:703 517-2591
tel;fax:703 289-5814
tel;work:703 289-5307
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Booz Allen Hamilton;Visit us on the Internet: a href=http://boozallen.com;BoozOnline/a 
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Jane Pawlukiewicz
end:vcard



Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane



Andy Dills wrote:
 
 On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
  arises, can we solve it without the phones?
 
  Just curious.
 
  You can ignore me if you want. That's okay.
 
 I probably should take your advice, but that's an interestingly ambiguous
 question so I'll indulge on a slow Friday afternoon. Anything to derail
 that spews thread.
 
 phone is a tricky word. By phone do you mean an actual handset? Or do
 you mean a handset with a pots line? Or does your definition include
 voip? Or do you mean phone to encompass all audio communication devices?
 Or do you mean phones to represent the entire PSTN?
 
 What kind of situation are you referring to? A small bowel accident? Or a
 fiber cut? Your kid got in a fight at school? Or are most of your frame
 relay circuits bouncing?
 
 Basically, anybody can answer whatever they want based on the lack of
 detail in the question. I'd love to take both sides of the bet so I can
 collect from both you and your boss...

I bet you could.

By phone I mean PSTN and by situation, I mean something involving a
SNAFU on your network (excuse me, IP network), another network your
network depends on.

Clear?
 
 Andy
 
 
 Andy Dills  301-682-9972
 Xecunet, LLCwww.xecu.net
 
 Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access

Thanks for not ignoring me ;)

Jane

BTW, what does FIARK mean?

begin:vcard 
n:Pawlukiewicz;Jane
tel;cell:703 517-2591
tel;fax:703 289-5814
tel;work:703 289-5307
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Booz Allen Hamilton;Visit us on the Internet: a href=http://boozallen.com;BoozOnline/a 
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Jane Pawlukiewicz
end:vcard



Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Stephen Sprunk


Thus spake Pawlukiewicz Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
 arises, can we solve it without the phones?

 Just curious.

The problem is typically locating the person you need to communicate with, not
the medium.

Telephone has the advantage of speed, and IM/IRC has the advantage of easy
multitasking.  Probably a draw in many situations.

S




RE: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread James


IM/IRC/email also has the ability to copy/paste text, so it's a lot
easier than trying to tell someone something complex over the phone
(command to type in, circuit ID, TT# or such).

- James

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On 
 Behalf Of Stephen Sprunk
 Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:38 PM
 To: Pawlukiewicz Jane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Bet on with my boss
 
 
 
 Thus spake Pawlukiewicz Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some 
 situation that 
  arises, can we solve it without the phones?
 
  Just curious.
 
 The problem is typically locating the person you need to 
 communicate with, not the medium.
 
 Telephone has the advantage of speed, and IM/IRC has the 
 advantage of easy multitasking.  Probably a draw in many situations.
 
 S
 




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Vincent J. Bono


We recently had a piece of equipment fail outside of Bronson, FL.  This was
in a regeneration hut, 50 miles from almost anywhere useful.  There is no
cellular service and no POTs in the HUT.  The closest employee was a woman
who although bright was not very familiar with the equipment installed.
Because the management channel (IP) was still working to the site, an
engineer here in Quincy, MA was able to step her through fixing the problem
using nothing but IRC and two-way pager.  It took her 35 minutes to correct
the issue.

Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.

-vb



- Original Message -
From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:37 PM
Subject: Bet on with my boss


 Hi,

 How important is the phone to you? I mean, given some situation that
 arises, can we solve it without the phones?

 Just curious.

 You can ignore me if you want. That's okay.

 Jane




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Martin Hannigan






Regards,

--
Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boston, MA  http://www.fugawi.net

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vincent J. Bono wrote:


 We recently had a piece of equipment fail outside of Bronson, FL.  This was
 in a regeneration hut, 50 miles from almost anywhere useful.  There is no
 cellular service and no POTs in the HUT.  The closest employee was a woman
 who although bright was not very familiar with the equipment installed.
 Because the management channel (IP) was still working to the site, an
 engineer here in Quincy, MA was able to step her through fixing the problem
 using nothing but IRC and two-way pager.  It took her 35 minutes to correct
 the issue.

 Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
 running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
 still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.

 -vb




Regards,

--
Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boston, MA  http://www.fugawi.net

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vincent J. Bono wrote:

 Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
 running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
 still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.

That's it. I'm giving semaphore classes at the BBQ. :)






Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Pawlukiewicz Jane




steve uurtamo wrote:
 
 especially with the you can ignore this if you want to, i'd
 have to say that the most interesting part of your question
 was that the bet is not neccesarily related to the question
 itself.
 
 my guess is that you guys bet on how many responses the question
 would generate.
 
 :)
 

No. That's not what the bet is about. Sorry. 

The bet was if I could stop the various SPEWS threads.

But I am actually curious about this. Because, you see, genuity, as I
understand it, restored phone service to lower manhattan post 9/11
through voice over ip. And I was just wondering how they would fix a
shafu with the internet if the only phone service was Voice over IP. And
that got me thinking about this whole convergence, you know, when we all
migrate to a packet switched network and the telcos are all bankrupt.
And I wondered if anyone else needs/hates the phone the way I do.

That's all.

I think I stopped the spews thread.

Thanks for your support.

Jane
 s.



Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread blitz


We have this wonderful invention called two-way radio. (grin) Our repeater 
has an autopatch, so you can hold a conversation from any landline to the 
mobile unit in the field or vice versa. Its been real helpful, like when 
aligning microwave dishes.

At 18:04 6/21/02 -0400, you wrote:

We recently had a piece of equipment fail outside of Bronson, FL.  This was
in a regeneration hut, 50 miles from almost anywhere useful.  There is no
cellular service and no POTs in the HUT.  The closest employee was a woman
who although bright was not very familiar with the equipment installed.
Because the management channel (IP) was still working to the site, an
engineer here in Quincy, MA was able to step her through fixing the problem
using nothing but IRC and two-way pager.  It took her 35 minutes to correct
the issue.

Harder than with a phone?  Yes.  Impossible?  No.  Without that IP channel
running?  It would have taken closer to an hour and a half by my guess but
still doable.  Smoke signals or semaphore?  I won't hazard a guess.

-vb

Some sort of orderwire channel might be helpful in this situation as well, 
as long as the fiber is up, youll have a voice grade line to the NOC.




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread E.B. Dreger


b Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:43:30 -0400
b From: blitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]


b Some sort of orderwire channel might be helpful in this
b situation as well, as long as the fiber is up, youll have a
b voice grade line to the NOC.

SONET provides for a (couple?) DS0 channels in the headers.


Eddy
--
Brotsman  Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 + (GMT)
From: A Trap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or you are likely to
be blocked.




Re: Bet on with my boss

2002-06-21 Thread Jim Hickstein


 It took her 35 minutes to correct the issue.
  ^^

That's my Rule of Nine, to wit: It takes nine times as long over the 
phone as it does in person.  Where it consists of fixing something by 
typing commands.

I fixed a bunch of badly destroyed disk mirrors once, at 3 a.m., with my 
eyes closed, lying in bed.  Took 45 minutes.  Would have taken 5 minutes if 
I were driving.  (But it couldn't reach the machine directly myself, so I 
stayed in bed and talked someone else through it.)