Re: Choicepoint [was: Re: Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft]

2005-02-17 Thread Jim Popovitch

Update:

ChoicePoint's problem could affect up to 400,000 now.

Identity Theft Bigger Than First Thought:
http://www.wgst.com/cc-common/local_news_common.html?
ID=20050217034315feed=local

-Jim P.

On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 20:15 +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
 
 Yes, this _is_ much worse.  :-/
 
 Thinking out loud here, but one's imagination runs
 wild at the prospect of how much it will take before
 more credence is given to a serious top-to-bottom security
 infrastructure revamp.
 
 And holding these firms $responsible_ ...
 
 $.02,
 
 - ferg
 
 -- Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 It gets worse:
 
   Database giant gives access to fake firms
   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6969799/
 
 ---Rsk
 
 --
 Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
  Engineering Architecture for the Internet
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Choicepoint [was: Re: Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft]

2005-02-15 Thread Rich Kulawiec

It gets worse:

Database giant gives access to fake firms
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6969799/

---Rsk


Re: Choicepoint [was: Re: Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft]

2005-02-15 Thread Fergie (Paul Ferguson)


Yes, this _is_ much worse.  :-/

Thinking out loud here, but one's imagination runs
wild at the prospect of how much it will take before
more credence is given to a serious top-to-bottom security
infrastructure revamp.

And holding these firms $responsible_ ...

$.02,

- ferg

-- Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It gets worse:

Database giant gives access to fake firms
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6969799/

---Rsk

--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Choicepoint [was: Re: Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft]

2005-02-15 Thread Chip Mefford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
|
| Yes, this _is_ much worse.  :-/
|
| Thinking out loud here, but one's imagination runs
| wild at the prospect of how much it will take before
| more credence is given to a serious top-to-bottom security
| infrastructure revamp.
|
| And holding these firms $responsible_ ...
Not likely.
This is totally off-the-cuff noise,
but I find it much more credible that there
was no criminal break in at Choicepoint.
This is Choicepoint pre-explaining how certain
records got into unauthorsied hands.
Choicepoint/Seisint is a pretty controversial
outfit, and pretty much always has been.
Just google for big-boss Hank Asher
This whole outfit smells to high heaven.
How this is germane to nanog, I'm not too sure.
my .01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCEl8P0STXFHxUucwRAskiAJ913AgOuhCxojOJI8WeCCWfeGbF3ACeL6sU
+r8xJ56qhmiamYUpcqXkkRs=
=KCvy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-