--- Barrett Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see any v6 glue there... Rather than having > conversations > about transition to IPv6, maybe we should be sure it > works natively > first? It's rather ironic to think that for v6 DNS > to work an > incumbent legacy protocol is still required. Consider that Windows XP (and server 2k3) will not, under any circumstance, send a DNS request over IPv6, and yet they were widely considered "IPv6 compliant." Consider also how long it took to get a working way of telling autoconfigured hosts about which DNS servers to use (without manually entering 128-bit addresses). To me, the above show that the bulk of the actual deployments were in dual-stack or tunnel environments, and greenfield implementations were few and far between. There's a surprising amount of unexplored "here be dragons" territory in IPv6, given how long some very smart people have been working on it. -David Barak David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
