Re: IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-15 Thread Matt Ghali


On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Dul wrote:

So isn't this yet another reason why we need a rational PI policy, 
so organizations don't have make up reasons why they are LIRs.


I'm left wondering why the federal government doesnt simply create a 
single LIR for all fed agency assignments. But I'm sure that would 
never happen- it would require both cooperation and the sharing of 
authority. And it would simply be too logical, cost effective and 
efficient. Its too bad that such a policy wasn't required by the RIR 
involved.


matto

[EMAIL PROTECTED]darwin
  The only thing necessary for the triumph
  of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke


IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-14 Thread Jeroen Massar
I Ar Es,

At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen

--

OrgName:Internal Revenue Service 
OrgID:  IRS
Address: Constitution Ave. NW
City:   Washington
StateProv:  DC
PostalCode: 20224
Country:US

NetRange:   2610:0030:::::: -
2610:0030:::::: 
CIDR:   2610:0030::::::/32 
NetName:IRSNET6
NetHandle:  NET6-2610-30-1
Parent: NET6-2610-1
NetType:Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.TREAS.GOV
NameServer: NS2.TREAS.GOV
NameServer: NS21.TREAS.GOV
NameServer: NS1.CIS.FED.GOV
Comment:
RegDate:2006-02-13
Updated:2006-02-13



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-14 Thread Christopher L. Morrow


On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:

 I Ar Es,

 At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
 Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)

so.. this is surprising why? the us-gov mandate for ipv6 uptake will mean
lots of us-gov folks will be spinning up justifications that they are a
'service provider' and need a /32... cause they won't accept PA space (or
I don't think they will accept PA space as a long term solution) ...

or I might be smoking crack :) who knows.


Re: IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-14 Thread Andrew Dul

  ---Original Message---
  From: Christopher L. Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: IRS goes IPv6!
  Sent: 14 Feb '06 08:31  
  
  On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
  
   I Ar Es,
  
   At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
   Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)
  
  so.. this is surprising why? the us-gov mandate for ipv6 uptake will mean
  lots of us-gov folks will be spinning up justifications that they are a
  'service provider' and need a /32... cause they won't accept PA space (or
  I don't think they will accept PA space as a long term solution) ...

So isn't this yet another reason why we need a rational PI policy, so 
organizations don't have make up reasons why they are LIRs.



Re: IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-14 Thread Bruce Pinsky

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jeroen Massar wrote:
 I Ar Es,
 
 At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
 Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)
 


And who'd have thought they would be such late filers :-)


[IPv6 whois information for NET6-2001-49C8-1 ]
[whois.arin.net]

OrgName:US Department of the Interior
OrgID:  UDI-5
Address:625 Herndon Parkway
Address:MS 012
City:   Herndon
StateProv:  VA
PostalCode: 20170-5416
Country:US

NetRange:   2001:49C8:::::: -
2001:49C8::::::
CIDR:   2001:49C8::::::/32
NetName:USDOI
NetHandle:  NET6-2001-49C8-1
Parent: NET6-2001-4800-0
NetType:Direct Allocation
Comment:
RegDate:2005-11-10
Updated:2005-11-10



 Greets,
  Jeroen
 
 --
 
 OrgName:Internal Revenue Service 
 OrgID:  IRS
 Address: Constitution Ave. NW
 City:   Washington
 StateProv:  DC
 PostalCode: 20224
 Country:US
 
 NetRange:   2610:0030:::::: -
 2610:0030:::::: 
 CIDR:   2610:0030::::::/32 
 NetName:IRSNET6
 NetHandle:  NET6-2610-30-1
 Parent: NET6-2610-1
 NetType:Direct Allocation
 NameServer: NS1.TREAS.GOV
 NameServer: NS2.TREAS.GOV
 NameServer: NS21.TREAS.GOV
 NameServer: NS1.CIS.FED.GOV
 Comment:
 RegDate:2006-02-13
 Updated:2006-02-13
 


- --
=
bep

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD8ipJE1XcgMgrtyYRApkdAJ9oRi468Hv+I9xbiqx2OdA50a5eWACg8tRS
7KOT+k6IS8v4ArRo0Avs0NU=
=QGN4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: IRS goes IPv6!

2006-02-14 Thread Vicky Røde

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
 
 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote:
 
 
I Ar Es,

At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN.
Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;)
 
 
 so.. this is surprising why? the us-gov mandate for ipv6 uptake will mean
 lots of us-gov folks will be spinning up justifications that they are a
 'service provider' and need a /32... cause they won't accept PA space (or
 I don't think they will accept PA space as a long term solution) ...
 
 or I might be smoking crack :) who knows.
- --
resistance is futile, you will be assimilated :-)





regards,
/virendra

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD8sY0pbZvCIJx1bcRAu6vAJ0dlSiJvkDWkXtZ1oHIRZQrNRHqdACgscec
2GCg+nM2inuo62oBau4KEh0=
=bK4r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-