Re: Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing...

2005-04-15 Thread Mark Radabaugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chance Whaley wrote:
| Sorry about that. Didn't look in detail. Saw the UDP port 6257 and
| stopped.
|
| The mcast is coming from someplace upstream from
| fastethernet-0-0.genoa-gw.amplex.net  (that is if I did my mcast
| MAC to mcast IP conversion right). Without knowing your topology
| and seeing more traffic it's kinda hard to figure out.
|
|
| If you want to send more traffic captures I will be happy to look
| at them.
|
| .chance
|
The destination mac address the routers start using is
01:00:5e:76:6c:7e.  The 01:00:5e is the ethernet multicast header.
The 76:6c:7e is supposed to be the lower 23 bits of the Ethernet
multicast address - which translates to 118.108.126.With the 23
bits from the multicast spec for encoding the IP address 118 is the
correct conversion of 246 with the high bit stripped off.
The gateway on this subnet is 64.246.108.126 (netmask is 255.255.255.0
but originally was .128 - hence the odd spot for the gateway).
The routers decided to convert a mangled unicast packet to a multicast
packet - for them to then loop on it is even stranger.  It makes for a
pretty good DOS attack.   2 or more of these routers in a broadcast
domain can get ugly in a hurry.
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCX3F2g0PQSWMG2wsRAhYaAKCDeTpKF1QuDhX82rQIOpPTQW4xwACggXhd
uHRnFxzmWbrfHSvZGS9ljrs=
=IcaN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing...

2005-04-14 Thread Mark Radabaugh
So which one of the gods of Multicast would like to take a look at a 
short tcpdump and tell me if the multicast broadcast storm is a problem 
with the protocol, the Microsoft implementation, or just a really weird 
coincidence?

We run a fixed wireless network that for various reasons is bridged.  
Yes - it's a crappy design and we are working on changing it but that's 
not really the point.  I have been trying to track down a broadcast 
storm that shows up on the network intermittently.  I finally managed to 
capture the start of one tonight.

The process starts with a slightly mangled packet (intentional?  - can't 
tell yet) with the 'multicast promiscuous bit' set.  All of the 
customers with Microsoft routers (and one Belkin) then rewrite the 
mangled packet into a multicast packet, decriment the TTL, and forward 
it back out the interface it came in on.  This process then repeats with 
each of the Microsoft routers responding to the packets from the other 
routers and sending them out again.  With 4 of these routers it manages 
to generate 20,000+ packets before all of the TTL's drop to 0.

Needless to say this results in a little bit of a performance hit.   I 
have blocked Multicast at several points on the network so the problem 
should be gone for now.  The tcpdump file is at 
http://www.amplex.net/images/multicast.cap

Mark Radabaugh
Amplex