RE: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2005-01-02 Thread David Hares

Sensatronics (www.sensatronics.com) makes a unit (Model E16) that does a, b
with easy to add jumpers, c,d, and e.

Dave 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Alex Rubenstein
 Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 1:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices
 
 
 
 I'm sure if you peruse the archives, you'll see that I post 
 about this about every year. The answer to your question is 
 'No, I haven't found what I am looking for yet.'
 
 However, the quest I am on is slightly different.
 
 I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.
 
 
 a) Reasonably small. This probably wouldn't be rack mounted; 
 it'd be wall mounted, desk mounted, celing mounted, etc.
 
 b) Powered by PoE.
 
 c) Is SNMPable over Ethernet. NOT RS232 or serial, or 
 anything archaic like that. Not MODBUS. It's 2004, people.
 
 d) Provides Temperature and Humidity.
 
 e) Has 4 or so input contact sensors (connections to AC units, etc.)
 
 f) Has 4 or so output contact sensors.
 
 
 Help.
 
 
 
 
 -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
 --Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
 
 
 
 




Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-03 Thread Christopher X. Candreva

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Brandon Butterworth wrote:

 Ethernet is cheap and trivial, drop some
 code in one of these (cpu is built into the
 rj45 socket)
 
 http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport.html

Cheap is relative.  These are showing about $50 each, Considering your 
average MCU is under $10, and smaller ones under $5, this can be equal to 
or more than the rest of your device.


==
Chris Candreva  -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
http://www.westnet.com/


Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Jeroen Massar
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:12 -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
 
 I'm sure if you peruse the archives, you'll see that I post about this 
 about every year. The answer to your question is 'No, I haven't found what 
 I am looking for yet.'
 
 However, the quest I am on is slightly different.
 
 I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.
 
 
 a) Reasonably small. This probably wouldn't be rack mounted; it'd be wall 
 mounted, desk mounted, celing mounted, etc.
 
 b) Powered by PoE.
 
 c) Is SNMPable over Ethernet. NOT RS232 or serial, or anything archaic 
 like that. Not MODBUS. It's 2004, people.
 
 d) Provides Temperature and Humidity.
 
 e) Has 4 or so input contact sensors (connections to AC units, etc.)
 
 f) Has 4 or so output contact sensors.

I think what you are looking for is something like this:
http://alexandria.paf.se/ietf-59/001598_G

And folks: it does IPv6 *ONLY* and was, during that ietf reachable
globally, so you could telnet into it ;)

There is this large IPv6 toy setup somewhere in Japan and they seem to
have all kinds of these devices and thus I think if you want one of
these kind of toys you will have to look into that direction...

Greets,
 Jeroen



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Michael . Dillon

 I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.
 a) Reasonably small. This probably wouldn't be rack mounted; it'd be 
wall 
 mounted, desk mounted, celing mounted, etc.
 b) Powered by PoE.
 c) Is SNMPable over Ethernet. NOT RS232 or serial, or anything archaic 
 like that. Not MODBUS. It's 2004, people.
 d) Provides Temperature and Humidity.
 e) Has 4 or so input contact sensors (connections to AC units, etc.)
 f) Has 4 or so output contact sensors.

Sorry Alex, but I think you are barking up
the wrong tree. A cheap simple temperature
and humidity sensor would be built around
a PIC chip and would use a serial bus
to communicate status. Since this is 2004
that would be an I2C serial bus, but in
reality an RS-232 daisy chain would suit
this application just fine.

When you add Ethernet as a requirement
then you are asking for an I/O interface
that is more complex and more expensive
than the basic temp/hum recorder on the
PIC. However, it definitely is possible
to do this and many people have done so.

I suggest that you go to a company like
http://www.edtp.com and tell them what you
want and how many you would buy in the 
next year as well as an estimate of how
many they could REALISTICALLY sell to
other companies in 2005. When you look at
the prices on his website, remember they
are single unit hobbyist prices. I think
that a PIC board built around his packet
whacker Ethernet would do what you want
and could easily be powered with PoE
and be installed in a box with flexible
mounting options. If you can't get what
you want from this company, then start
looking for people who do PIC development.

You might even be able to get a college
sophomore to design and manufacture these
for you for some spare pocket money. The
PIC code including TCP/IP stack, is readily
available through googling. The only area
where you might have to compromise is
SNMP since I think most people who do
this are trying to make PIC web servers.
But it's simple to run a custom SNMP proxy
on a server if you need to hook this
into your management system.

Please report back on what you find.
I think a lot of people would be interested
in this type of unit.

--Michael Dillon



Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Brandon Butterworth

 Sorry Alex, but I think you are barking up
 the wrong tree.

 When you add Ethernet as a requirement
 then you are asking for an I/O interface
 that is more complex 

Ethernet is cheap and trivial, drop some
code in one of these (cpu is built into the
rj45 socket)

http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport.html

talk ibutton on the serial port and you're done.

 and more expensive
 than the basic temp/hum recorder on the PIC.

Ethernet or don't bother. Serial is so last century. 

brandon


RE: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Roy


I was at a trade show yesterday and they had some interesting boxes for
remote control.  They don't meet your spec but someone might be interested.
This box has serial and digital control connections but works via GPRS
rather than Ethernet.  Makes an interesting back door that could be
independent of any other connections you have.

http://www.atop.com.tw/e/product/SG6103.htm

Roy Engehausen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alex Rubenstein
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices




I'm sure if you peruse the archives, you'll see that I post about this
about every year. The answer to your question is 'No, I haven't found what
I am looking for yet.'

However, the quest I am on is slightly different.

I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.


a) Reasonably small. This probably wouldn't be rack mounted; it'd be wall
mounted, desk mounted, celing mounted, etc.

b) Powered by PoE.

c) Is SNMPable over Ethernet. NOT RS232 or serial, or anything archaic
like that. Not MODBUS. It's 2004, people.

d) Provides Temperature and Humidity.

e) Has 4 or so input contact sensors (connections to AC units, etc.)

f) Has 4 or so output contact sensors.


Help.




-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --





RE: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread David Lesher


I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.

I'd add:

g) Inexpensive, so it can be widely deployed.



A Basic Stamp might be the platform for such; but I've
retired from hardware hacking projects. I'd suggest queries to
sci.electronics.design in hopes of finding someome interested.



-- 
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead20915-1433


RE: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Michael . Dillon

 g) Inexpensive, so it can be widely deployed.

That's why I suggested talking to a college
sophomore. This is the kind of thing that 
electronics engineering students do for
a 3rd year project.

 A Basic Stamp might be the platform for such;

I don't think that a Stamp or PICAXE will work.
These are PIC devices with built-in BASIC
interpreters. To do the SNMP, you need an 
IP stack on the device and that really has
to be done in assembly language. All of the
PIC projects I have seen interfacing to
Ethernet or to RS-232 IP interfaces, have
been done in assembly.

As I said, 99% of the design work on this 
is available out there on the web. You just
need someone willing to put it all together
and manufacture the boxes.

For an alternative approach, have a look 
at Netguardian. http://www.dpstele.com/products/ne/netguardian/
High capacity SNMP Alarm connector, NEBS 3, etc.

--Michael Dillon



Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Owen DeLong
I don't know if they're here yet, but, PICs with builitin Ethernet are
definitely on the way.  I'm not that much of a hardware geek, but, some
of the hardware geeks I know have bee talking about these for a while
in terms that make me think they're expecting samples any day.
Owen
--On Thursday, December 2, 2004 11:42 AM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:


I am looking for a device that meets the following criteria.
a) Reasonably small. This probably wouldn't be rack mounted; it'd be
wall
mounted, desk mounted, celing mounted, etc.
b) Powered by PoE.
c) Is SNMPable over Ethernet. NOT RS232 or serial, or anything archaic
like that. Not MODBUS. It's 2004, people.
d) Provides Temperature and Humidity.
e) Has 4 or so input contact sensors (connections to AC units, etc.)
f) Has 4 or so output contact sensors.
Sorry Alex, but I think you are barking up
the wrong tree. A cheap simple temperature
and humidity sensor would be built around
a PIC chip and would use a serial bus
to communicate status. Since this is 2004
that would be an I2C serial bus, but in
reality an RS-232 daisy chain would suit
this application just fine.
When you add Ethernet as a requirement
then you are asking for an I/O interface
that is more complex and more expensive
than the basic temp/hum recorder on the
PIC. However, it definitely is possible
to do this and many people have done so.
I suggest that you go to a company like
http://www.edtp.com and tell them what you
want and how many you would buy in the
next year as well as an estimate of how
many they could REALISTICALLY sell to
other companies in 2005. When you look at
the prices on his website, remember they
are single unit hobbyist prices. I think
that a PIC board built around his packet
whacker Ethernet would do what you want
and could easily be powered with PoE
and be installed in a box with flexible
mounting options. If you can't get what
you want from this company, then start
looking for people who do PIC development.
You might even be able to get a college
sophomore to design and manufacture these
for you for some spare pocket money. The
PIC code including TCP/IP stack, is readily
available through googling. The only area
where you might have to compromise is
SNMP since I think most people who do
this are trying to make PIC web servers.
But it's simple to run a custom SNMP proxy
on a server if you need to hook this
into your management system.
Please report back on what you find.
I think a lot of people would be interested
in this type of unit.
--Michael Dillon

--
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.


pgpAXTV7mxhoi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: My yearly post about environmental monitoring devices

2004-12-02 Thread Robert E . Seastrom


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 When you add Ethernet as a requirement then you are asking for an
 I/O interface that is more complex and more expensive than the basic
 temp/hum recorder on the PIC.

Or not.

http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport.html

(no, it doesn't support POE, but that's an easy hack fi you think about it).

---Rob