Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Matt Ghali wrote: Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do? matt ghali I think at this point it becomes a matter of if they're not listed, blacklist them. It could potentially be a huge filter set, but there's so much crap coming from that corner of the globe anyway that this just gives a good, solid, hard fast reason. Needless to say, I'm joining the list specifically for the purpose of commenting on the above. -Dan On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:19:19 +1000, George Michaelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an important announcement on the implementation of APNIC approved proposal prop-007-v001 regarding privacy of customer assignment records. The proposal document, presentation, minutes, and discussion are available at: http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-007-v001.html -- I wish the Real World would just stop hassling me! -Matchbox 20, Real World, off the album Yourself or Someone Like You Dan Mahoney Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---
Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Matt Ghali wrote: Oh look. http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954. And there's already a blacklist ready and waiting. -Dan Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do? matt ghali On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:19:19 +1000, George Michaelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an important announcement on the implementation of APNIC approved proposal prop-007-v001 regarding privacy of customer assignment records. The proposal document, presentation, minutes, and discussion are available at: http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-007-v001.html -- Let me tell you something about regrowing your dead wife Lucy, Harry. It's probably illegal, potentially dangerous, and definitely crazy. -Harry nods- Vincent Spano, as Boris in Creator. Dan Mahoney Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---
Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954. RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, running on the SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51). How can any other whois service be in violation of that? Joe
Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is sitting in the RFC Editor's queue. It removes all of the policy language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current status of RFC 954). regards, Ted Hardie At 6:00 PM -0400 9/23/04, Joe Abley wrote: On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954. RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, running on the SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51). How can any other whois service be in violation of that? Joe
