I do this and it only holds limited data before rolling over so it works
fine providing you sample regular and dont have -too- many macs
--
Stephen J. Wilcox
IP Services Manager, Opal Telecom
http://www.opaltelecom.co.uk/
Tel: 0161 222 2000
Fax: 0161 222 2008
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Daniska Tomas wrote:
>
> you will get the accounting cache exhausted soon if you don't poll&clean it
>frequently...
>
> --
>
> Tomas Daniska
> systems engineer
> Tronet Computer Networks
> Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
> tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
>
> A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing first.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 20. júna 2002 17:17
> > To: Mitchell, Dan
> > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
> >
> >
> >
> > interface (gig|fast)ethernet1/0
> > ip account mac (in|out)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:48:34AM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring
> > bandwidth by IP? My
> > > original thought was 1 switch port = 1 IP, but in the case
> > of virtual IP's
> > > on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more
> > and more of a
> > > demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can
> > bill their customer
> > > accordingly.
> > >
> > > Any recommendations?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > Dan Mitchell
> > > Internet Systems Engineer - Boston
> > > AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com
> > > 781.478.1857 Direct Line
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements
> > are only mine.
> >
>