Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-22 Thread Russel Callen

i've started taking pictures of the places i've worked, since I was proud
of one...and entertained by another.  you can decide which is which:

http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Cogent/IMGP0320
http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Cogent/IMGP0322

http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_LAN_rack
http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/LAN_2
http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_rack_front_1
http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_LAN_back

Eric Kuhnke said:

 Sometimes illustrating the way a job should *not* be done is a  powerful
 educational tool.  I have collected a gallery of messy and ridiculous
 cabling jobs:

 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling

 my favorite (not horrible, but funny):
 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling/cables

 Anonymous submissions can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , equipment
 labels and faces will be blurred if requested.





Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-22 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox

Sorry this is a bit blurred being from my phone but this is recent from 
telehouse london, the area under the floor is about 2ft6 deep

http://www.thedogsbollocks.co.uk/pictures/opalpops/P7090001.JPG


On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Russel Callen wrote:

 
 i've started taking pictures of the places i've worked, since I was proud
 of one...and entertained by another.  you can decide which is which:
 
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Cogent/IMGP0320
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Cogent/IMGP0322
 
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_LAN_rack
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/LAN_2
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_rack_front_1
 http://gallery.arxys.net/gallery/Rivien/main_LAN_back
 
 Eric Kuhnke said:
 
  Sometimes illustrating the way a job should *not* be done is a  powerful
  educational tool.  I have collected a gallery of messy and ridiculous
  cabling jobs:
 
  http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling
 
  my favorite (not horrible, but funny):
  http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling/cables
 
  Anonymous submissions can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , equipment
  labels and faces will be blurred if requested.
 
 
 
 




Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-17 Thread Eric Kuhnke
The messy cabling gallery has become a victim of its own success

Load on the server (P4/2.0, 512MB) was up to 65, making things nearly 
unusable.  I took it down for fear that the URL would get spread to 
Slashdot or similar places.  It'll be back up in a few days, hopefully.

David Lesher wrote:
Someone claiming to be me said:


http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/

It's a building near the Hill. 

There's a fiber mux in there somewhere. Other switches are
hanging from duct tape above...


ooops -- sorry...

http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/66-666





good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Pekka Savola

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, John Kinsella wrote:
 Always liked the work my fellow coworkers at Globix used to do - I don't
 have any shots of SJC or NYC online (too bad - a few projects I went to
 alot of trouble on to show the rest how it should be done ;) ), but
 here's one of our demo panels from LHR:
 
 http://thrashyour.com/lhr1-wiringdemo.jpg
 
 And yeah, most of what was under the floors in all the DCs looked like
 that, and yeah I hear for strict cat5 regs that they shouldn't be
 velcroed together like that.  Wire wraps were never used (only velcro),
 bundles are laid down so that shortest is on the bottom side, longest
 on the top.

Now, we've seen a few pics of good cabling as well.

However, I'm forced to ask which kind of good cabling is possible in 
a dynamic environment when you plug in/out, change, etc. the cables.  
This seems to invariably lead to total chaos :-).

For example, consider the case of a patch panel of 200 plugs, where
you'd have to wire cables to 20 different physical locations (where
the switches/routers are)?  How do you manage that elegantly, at the 
patch panel side and the switch/router side?  :-)

I mean, it's fine if you take 100 cables, and wire them between the
patches and the switches (or the racks if you have the patch
cross-connect there) in bulk, but consider the case where you have 15
different switches (different subnets), a computer moving in/out of
the room in a daily basis etc.  You can't just go around wiring like
http://thrashyour.com/lhr1-wiringdemo.jpg or
http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg

How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)

-- 
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings




Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Robert A. Hayden



On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Pekka Savola wrote:

 Now, we've seen a few pics of good cabling as well.
 
 However, I'm forced to ask which kind of good cabling is possible in 
 a dynamic environment when you plug in/out, change, etc. the cables.  
 This seems to invariably lead to total chaos :-).

You hire one wiring nazi.  Never let them take vacation or sick time, and 
make sure all changes go through them.  If he needs help, you let him hire 
and train his junior nazis.

 How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)

And keep the engineers out of there! 

:-)




Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Daniel Karrenberg

On 17.12 19:07, Pekka Savola wrote:
 
 How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)

My own 25 years of experience boil down to: 

Try to plan for expansion as well as possible when designing,
then periodically start over and completely re-build the messy parts.

The period of starting over depends on the pain level of the planned
outages this may cause and the general pain caused by the state of things.  

All clever plans I have seen in this area have not lasted more than about 2-3 
years. It seems very difficult to predict where the growth is and how it 
happens.

I admit this is a slightly cynical view but such is life. 
What I dread most, are situations where no-one takes the responsibility
for starting over when it is really necessary and everybody suffers. 

Daniel


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-17 Thread Alex Yuriev

 
 http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg
 
 http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg

Isn't it amazing how clean cabling in nearly empty collos and mmrs looks?

Alex



Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Alex Yuriev

 How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)

It is not that difficult *if* the money is spent in a short term to make
sure that no ugly and silly stuff is crated in a longer(long) term.

Strategically pre-running certain parts of the facility with cat5/fiber to
minimize the dynamic portion of interconnect is a really good way to
reduce the mess.

Alex




Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread John Kinsella

On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:07:13PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
 How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)

You hide the spiders nest with lots of panduit covers? ;)

Honestly, I think it comes down to two things:  Planning before
implementation - you pre-wire your net gear to patch panels before it
goes into production;  This keeps most hands off the back end stuff
except for the occasional test to verify that a patch is working.  This
same planning goes into a second set of patch panels which you terminate
in the racks, that removes another major part of one-off cable pulls.
Rack server, crosconnect to top of rack, back to your patch panels,
cross connect to network patch panel, you're set.

Second part is, as mentioned, have some wiring nazis.  I worked with a
guy a few years ago who kept spare cat 5 in labeled bins for 3', 6', and
12' lengths for red, blue, green and yellow colors.  Each one was
wrapped a certain way without using ties so you could just reach in and
pull one out - He'd go mad if you just threw a cable back in there. :)
I still wrap my spare cables like that without even thinking about it.
You get one or two people like that who have pride in their datacenter,
and your issues are taken care of. :)

John


Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Henry Linneweh
Any good software out there for cable documenting and even routing and for 
ECO when things are changed?

-Henry

Alex Yuriev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)It is not that difficult *if* the money is spent in a short term to makesure that no ugly and silly stuff is crated in a longer(long) term.Strategically pre-running certain parts of the facility with cat5/fiber tominimize the "dynamic" portion of interconnect is a really good way toreduce the mess.Alex

Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pekka Savola wrote:

| On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, John Kinsella wrote:
|
|Always liked the work my fellow coworkers at Globix used to do - I don't
|have any shots of SJC or NYC online (too bad - a few projects I went to
|alot of trouble on to show the rest how it should be done ;) ), but
|here's one of our demo panels from LHR:
|
|http://thrashyour.com/lhr1-wiringdemo.jpg
|
|And yeah, most of what was under the floors in all the DCs looked like
|that, and yeah I hear for strict cat5 regs that they shouldn't be
|velcroed together like that.  Wire wraps were never used (only velcro),
|bundles are laid down so that shortest is on the bottom side, longest
|on the top.
|
|
| Now, we've seen a few pics of good cabling as well.
|
| However, I'm forced to ask which kind of good cabling is possible in
| a dynamic environment when you plug in/out, change, etc. the cables.
| This seems to invariably lead to total chaos :-).
|
| For example, consider the case of a patch panel of 200 plugs, where
| you'd have to wire cables to 20 different physical locations (where
| the switches/routers are)?  How do you manage that elegantly, at the
| patch panel side and the switch/router side?  :-)
|
One of the things we did was to not allow cabling directly to the switches
and routers.  We would always extend switch and router ports to structured
wiring infrastructure and then do patching from structured panel to
structured panel.  This would insure that clean wiring technique was
employed near the gear and that cables would not cross cards making them
inaccessible in the event of failure.  It also isolated the dynamic portion
of the wiring infrastructure to patch fields and away from user cabinets
and network gear.
| I mean, it's fine if you take 100 cables, and wire them between the
| patches and the switches (or the racks if you have the patch
| cross-connect there) in bulk, but consider the case where you have 15
| different switches (different subnets), a computer moving in/out of
| the room in a daily basis etc.  You can't just go around wiring like
| http://thrashyour.com/lhr1-wiringdemo.jpg or
| http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg
|
| How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
|
You also have to plan for plenty of cable management.  In our patch fields
we had cable mgmt at the top, the middle, the bottom, and the left and
right sides of each rack.  Took extra room and required extra racks, but it
helped mitigate sloppy patch jobs.  Additionally, we kept a ton of extra
patch cords of various lengths around.  We had preplanned the necessary
lengths and instituted a color coding scheme to denote different services
running through the cables.
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQE/4J+tE1XcgMgrtyYRAhkcAKDaVC3UQX2thJc4sbQSw2o+2D98RACeIT3b
Wd2JEKAT56/0BRR4eQsMjZQ=
=RPyz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-17 Thread Richard Irving
Oh...

 Had to take a potshot, didn't we ?

 FWIW, we are near filled now, and
we managed to Keep the Faith...
Alex Yuriev wrote:
http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg

http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg
Isn't it amazing how clean cabling in nearly empty collos and mmrs looks?
  The real Key is to let the s/Soup/Cabling/g Nazi keep control
of the situation...
  And keep the Suits out of it, no matter how much they whine.

Oh, we just need to slap up a temporary...

 NEIN!

 NIX!

 Das is Verbotten!

 NO SOUP FOR YOU!

  ;)

Alex



Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Randy Bush

the most long-term stable cable dress i see is in cookie-cutter pops,
where the provider cranks them out fully pre-wired and all the same.

you live in a dynamic environment?  unplanned change either makes
messes or large amounts of rework.  there ain't no magic pill.

randy



Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henry Linneweh wrote:

| Any good software out there for cable documenting and even routing and for
| ECO when things are changed?
|
I've looked at ITRACS (www.itracs.com) and Telsoft's stuff
(http://telsoft-solutions.com/cable.html) before.
ITT also has LANSense which is based on ITRACS.  See
http://www.ittnss.com/kb/kb.asp?id=82catid=86skbid=82
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQE/4KxtE1XcgMgrtyYRAqp9AKClTJ3TqsQSnFYNjLU82CFsDctr8ACdHfOZ
tcE+n4uOy0zFFJ09mehw54Q=
=EU/l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: good cabling in real environments [Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things]

2003-12-17 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Kinsella wrote:

| On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 07:07:13PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
|
|How do you do good cabling in dynamic, real environments? :-)
|
|
| You hide the spiders nest with lots of panduit covers? ;)
|
| Honestly, I think it comes down to two things:  Planning before
| implementation - you pre-wire your net gear to patch panels before it
| goes into production;  This keeps most hands off the back end stuff
| except for the occasional test to verify that a patch is working.  This
| same planning goes into a second set of patch panels which you terminate
| in the racks, that removes another major part of one-off cable pulls.
| Rack server, crosconnect to top of rack, back to your patch panels,
| cross connect to network patch panel, you're set.
|
I've even found some examples of some of that and posted them at
http://www.pinskyfamily.org/dcstuff/
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQE/4LQbE1XcgMgrtyYRAjR+AKCpCx+zs/ck+52GzSnbyVruM/r45ACcD4SO
u59oMBKiEuEAtkqXWw/qeio=
=zd7o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Christopher McCrory

Hello...


On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 15:12, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
 Sometimes illustrating the way a job should *not* be done is a  powerful 
 educational tool.  I have collected a gallery of messy and ridiculous 
 cabling jobs:
 

Maybe someone here has pictures of the meetme room at one wilshire from
the last several years.  By far the messiest cabling I have ever seen in
any datacenter.  (but it's getting better :)




 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling
 
 my favorite (not horrible, but funny):
 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling/cables
 
 Anonymous submissions can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , equipment 
 labels and faces will be blurred if requested.
-- 
Christopher McCrory
 The guy that keeps the servers running
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pricegrabber.com
 
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.



Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread SG

Christopher,

 Hello...


 Maybe someone here has pictures of the meetme room at one wilshire from
 the last several years.  By far the messiest cabling I have ever seen in
 any datacenter.  (but it's getting better :)


Someone did take some pictures and were posted today ;)

 --
 Christopher McCrory
  The guy that keeps the servers running

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pricegrabber.com

 Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
 no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
 no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.






Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Grant A. Kirkwood

Charles Sprickman said:
 On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Grant A. Kirkwood wrote:

 Someone in our office (who'll remain nameless) took these yesterday:

 http://www.tnarg.org/mmr.html

 What does this sign say?

 http://www.tnarg.org/mmr_pics/100_0118.JPG

NOTICE

WHEN RUNNING FIBER THROUGH THIS UNIT, THERE MUST BE ENOUGH SLACK IN YOUR
CABLE TO WRAP HALF WAY AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THIS PULL BOX. IF YOUR CABLE
RUNS STRAIGHT ACROSS THE MIDSECTION WITH NO SLACK, THEN IT WILL BE REMOVED
FROM THE UNIT AT YOUR EXPENSE. YOUR COOPERATION IS APPRECIATED.

MMR MANAGEMENT

 And are we looking up, down, left, right...  I just can't figure out what
 this mess is:

 http://www.tnarg.org/mmr_pics/100_0123.JPG

Looking up, into one of the smaller fiber trays. :)

Grant


-- 
Grant A. Kirkwood - grant(at)tnarg.org
Fingerprint = D337 48C4 4D00 232D 3444 1D5D 27F6 055A BF0C 4AED


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Tom (UnitedLayer)

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, John Kinsella wrote:
 Another suggestion, although I'd be surprised to see it...anybody got
 a shot from under PBI's datacenter floor when it was at 2nd and Folsom
 in SF (across 2nd from SNFC21)?

Heh, its actually in SF21 now.
I got to see it a few months ago, I believe I saw 10 foot+ racks, packed
to the ceiling with gear.
There were step ladders everywhere...



Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread haesu

Now that you've educated the world about messy cabling jobs that should _not_ be done,
perhaps you or someone else should now post _CLEAN_ cabling jobs that everyone should
follow examples of :-)

Thanks for the good pictures btw. Some of them are actually funny hehe


On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:12:20PM -0800, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
 
 Sometimes illustrating the way a job should *not* be done is a  powerful 
 educational tool.  I have collected a gallery of messy and ridiculous 
 cabling jobs:
 
 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling
 
 my favorite (not horrible, but funny):
 http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling/cables
 
 Anonymous submissions can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , equipment 
 labels and faces will be blurred if requested.

-- 
James Jun (formerly Haesu)
Network Operations
TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
Consulting, IPv4  IPv6 colocation, web hosting, network design  implementation
http://www.towardex.com  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: (978)394-2867  | Office: (978)263-3399 Ext. 170
Fax: (978)263-0033   | AIM: GigabitEthernet0
NOC: http://www.twdx.net | POC: HAESU-ARIN, HDJ1-6BONE


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Richard Irving
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that you've educated the world about messy cabling jobs that should _not_ be done,
perhaps you or someone else should now post _CLEAN_ cabling jobs that everyone should
follow examples of :-)


http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg

http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg

Just a couple humble suggestions.


Thanks for the good pictures btw. Some of them are actually funny hehe

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:12:20PM -0800, Eric Kuhnke wrote:

Sometimes illustrating the way a job should *not* be done is a  powerful 
educational tool.  I have collected a gallery of messy and ridiculous 
cabling jobs:

http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling

my favorite (not horrible, but funny):
http://gallery.colofinder.net/shameful-cabling/cables
Anonymous submissions can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , equipment 
labels and faces will be blurred if requested.





Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread John Kinsella

Always liked the work my fellow coworkers at Globix used to do - I don't
have any shots of SJC or NYC online (too bad - a few projects I went to
alot of trouble on to show the rest how it should be done ;) ), but
here's one of our demo panels from LHR:

http://thrashyour.com/lhr1-wiringdemo.jpg

And yeah, most of what was under the floors in all the DCs looked like
that, and yeah I hear for strict cat5 regs that they shouldn't be
velcroed together like that.  Wire wraps were never used (only velcro),
bundles are laid down so that shortest is on the bottom side, longest
on the top.

John

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:24:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now that you've educated the world about messy cabling jobs that should _not_ be 
 done,
 perhaps you or someone else should now post _CLEAN_ cabling jobs that everyone should
 follow examples of :-)


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Richard Irving
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Richard Irving wrote:
http://new.onecall.net/timages/cat5patch.jpg
Is that one really Cat. 5 compliant?  (Tails out of the sheath look
too long one some of them.)
  Routine Spin Downs created that (extended) Telco standard, we just
  carried it over to Data structured wiring, as well.
  :\

Whole lot prettier than some of the other pictures though.

 http://new.onecall.net/timages/dsxcabling.jpg


Looks like an old-fashioned Western job--dint think anybody still
working knew how to do that.
  8-)



Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread Richard Irving
Sharif Torpis wrote:
 uh-oh, what's this?

 http://new.onecall.net/timages/wanrack.jpg
  Hehehe.. :}

  The -old- building, and Telecom WAN room, circa early 1990's,
  late 1980's, and a bank of auto-ops from before the time
  when there was such a thing as a 1U server.
  new.onecall.net is actually a misnomer,
  the actual -new- site (www) has minimal detail
  Programmers keep the old web site around,
  under the name new, (Programmer Humor, eh ?)
  which has a few pictures
  snapped during the building of the -=new=- facility.
  :P







Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread David Lesher




http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/


It's a building near the Hill. 

There's a fiber mux in there somewhere. Other switches are
hanging from duct tape above...



-- 
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead20915-1433


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread David Lesher

Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
 
 
 Now that you've educated the world about messy cabling jobs that should _not_ be 
 done,
 perhaps you or someone else should now post _CLEAN_ cabling jobs that everyone should
 follow examples of :-)
 
 Thanks for the good pictures btw. Some of them are actually funny hehe

Look for Terry Kennedy's ny.net




-- 
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead20915-1433


Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things

2003-12-16 Thread David Lesher

Someone claiming to be me said:

 http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/
 
 It's a building near the Hill. 
 
 There's a fiber mux in there somewhere. Other switches are
 hanging from duct tape above...

ooops -- sorry...

http://www.tux.org/wb8foz/66-666


-- 
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead20915-1433