Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread bill

 thanks.  but I use 127.0.0.0/8 for other stuff. Hope you don't mind.

 For those interested in seeing how this has evolved, and what exactly 
 this particular accreditation database provides, our query pages have 
 been expanded, and include a link to the full suggested DNSL data 
 response codes.
 
 The codes we use at present include:
 
 127.0.0.1  Listed in IADB
 127.0.1.255Vouched listing
...
list elided.

--bill


Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:48:45 PST, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. [EMAIL PROTECTED]  said:

 127.3.100.3Accepts unverified sign-ups, gives chance to opt out

 127.3.100.5Has opt-in confirmation mechanism
 127.3.100.6Has and uses opt-in confirmation mechanism

 127.3.100.10   All mailing list mail is confirmed opt-in

Hmm.. this is loads of fun if you're running a Listserv that has several
thousand lists defined, and not all of them have the same policies (for
instance, although the vast majority of our lists are 'confirmed opt-in', we
have several lists that are bulk-loaded with database extracts for captive
audience lists such as all freshmen, all grad students, and so on).

Also, the pricing seems a bit whacked - are you *really* expecting sites that
have less than 30 customers to pay $200/month?  I know a *lot* of people
who have formed collectives of 10-15 people who chip in and get a 1U at
a colo

It's totally unclear how you can encode an individual listing - that
whole stuff to the left of the @ sign thing is rather unhandy...

I'll skip the estimates of the cash flow generated if the database gets big
enough to be useful, but I suspect that Verisign might have competition



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

Also, the pricing seems a bit whacked - are you *really* expecting 
sites that
have less than 30 customers to pay $200/month?  I know a *lot* of 
people
who have formed collectives of 10-15 people who chip in and get a 1U at
a colo

They are not email service providers;  if you are talking about a site 
which only publishes non-commercial mailing lists, they would probably 
fall under the newsletter publisher rate, which is $10.00/month.

Anne



Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread Michael . Dillon

The codes we use at present include:
127.0.0.1Listed in IADB

Hmmm... listed in my /etc/hosts as well. 
Am I IADB compliant?

It's interesting to see how everyone tries to 
reinvent LDAP on top of DNS and/or BGP instead of 
just using the LDAP protocol itself. Somehow
the world has gotten the idea that LDAP is an
addressbook protocol when, in fact, it is a fairly
generic distributed hierarchical database access
protocol.

IMHO there are two right ways to publish
these types of databases. One is to use LDAP
and the other is to use an XML protocol like
XML-RPC or SOAP. Overloading DNS as a generic
database query protocol is just a plain bad
idea. At least both LDAP and XML support the
concept of a schema which defines the data
being transmitted in an unambiguous way
and ensures that it can be correctly parsed
and decoded.

--Michael Dillon





Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.


  127.3.100.3  Accepts unverified sign-ups, gives chance to opt out
 
  127.3.100.5  Has opt-in confirmation mechanism
  127.3.100.6  Has and uses opt-in confirmation mechanism
 
  127.3.100.10 All mailing list mail is confirmed opt-in
 
 Hmm.. this is loads of fun if you're running a Listserv that has
 several thousand lists defined, and not all of them have the same
 policies (for instance, although the vast majority of our lists are
 'confirmed opt-in', we have several lists that are bulk-loaded with
 database extracts for captive audience lists such as all freshmen,
 all grad students, and so on).

In a case like this we would list any IPs from which *only* come 
confirmed lists separately, so that they would get the 127.3.100.10 
listing.  Otherwise we would look at the lowest common denominator 
and use that data code response.


 Also, the pricing seems a bit whacked - are you *really* expecting
 sites that have less than 30 customers to pay $200/month?  I know a
 *lot* of people who have formed collectives of 10-15 people who chip
 in and get a 1U at a colo

I've already answered this on the fly, separately, but it bears 
repeating.  If you are talking about non-commercial mailing lists, 
that would probably qualify for the newsletter publisher rate, which 
is only $10/month.

It's also critical that people understand that you are now talking 
about *being listed* in IADB, not about querying IADB, which is 
always free (We've heard from at least one list member who thought 
these rates being talked about were to *query* the list).
 
 It's totally unclear how you can encode an individual listing - that
 whole stuff to the left of the @ sign thing is rather unhandy...

Are you asking about is there a data response code for individual? 
 There *could* be, but we determined that in the scheme of things 
which most receiving systems care about, it doesn't matter.  What 
matters is the type of mail they send.  

Anne



Re: Update on Querying IADB

2004-03-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [17/03/04 17:34 +]:
 The codes we use at present include:
 127.0.0.1Listed in IADB
 
 Hmmm... listed in my /etc/hosts as well. 
 Am I IADB compliant?

Am i missing something or isn't this a standard dns block / white list
implementation?  I don't run a large public dnsbl but I do serve out dnsbl
zones for my own use.

Should dns{b|w}ls be deployed using LDAP / SOAP now?

srs