Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-11 Thread Michael . Dillon

 If a VOIP provider wants to avoid the label of telephony carrier, they 
 should be strictly end-to-end service with no connection into the global 

 PSTN infrastructure. An example of this would be enterprise internal 
phone 
 systems, designed to propagate calls within a single corporate entity. 

Other examples are the INOC-DBA service which many
NANOG members use http://www.pch.net/inoc-dba/
And both SIPPhone http://www.sipphone.com and 
Free World Dialup http://www.pulver.com/fwd/ have
been operating in a similar way for a couple of 
years. These last two are now expanding by also
offering PSTN connectivity, but they are rooted
in a non-PSTN VoIP service.

Many groups are setting up their own similar
systems based on the ready availability of 
SIP compatible phones and PBX software like
Asterisk http://www.asterisk.org. The Internet
is fundamentally a network of IP routers. The 
PSTN is fundamentally a network of voice switches.
A PBX is a small voice switch. Asterisk is software
that provides PBX functionality on a UNIX PC therefore
using Asterisk and the Internet, anyone can build their
own network of voice switches for whatever purpose they
want.

I'm surprised there are not more smaller PC's 
offering this as some kind of an add-on service.
Once you have a sizeable customer base using 
always-on broadband, why not help your customers
set up always-on voice services. Of course in the 
absence of such support from ISPs, there is a vacuum
which Skype is attempting to fill using non-standard
software.

--Michael Dillon



Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread Jay R. Ashworth

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:03:11PM -, Neil J. McRae wrote:
  Companies like Vonage are signing up subscribers because they 
  provide real phone service connecting you to copperline 
  subscribers on the real phone network. That is their business 
  model. Verizon could sell exactly the same sort of service to 
  subscribers in California leveraging the Internet last mile 
  in exactly the same way as Vonage.
  Vonage and Verizon are just phone companies, not VoIP companies.
 
 Michael - you've been drinking way to much coffee today.

Naw; Michael has it exactly right, and more power to him.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer  Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth  AssociatesThe Things I Think'87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

  If you can read this... thank a system adminstrator.  Or two.  --me


Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread David Barak


--- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:03:11PM -, Neil J.
 McRae wrote:
   Companies like Vonage are signing up subscribers
 because they 
   provide real phone service connecting you to
 copperline 
   subscribers on the real phone network. That is
 their business 
   model. Verizon could sell exactly the same sort
 of service to 
   subscribers in California leveraging the
 Internet last mile 
   in exactly the same way as Vonage.
   Vonage and Verizon are just phone companies, not
 VoIP companies.
  
  Michael - you've been drinking way to much coffee
 today.
 
 Naw; Michael has it exactly right, and more power to
 him.

I think the final nail in this coffin is the Vonage
banner ad/masthead which describes them as the
broadband phone company.

If they're going to claim to be a phone company, it's
reasonable that phone company regulations regarding
911, outage reporting, etc should all apply to them.


David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com

NEW ALBUM, The Sound and the Furry available at
http://www.cdbaby.com/thefranchise



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 


Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread Christian Kuhtz



 I think the final nail in this coffin is the Vonage
 banner ad/masthead which describes them as the
 broadband phone company.
 
 If they're going to claim to be a phone company, it's
 reasonable that phone company regulations regarding
 911, outage reporting, etc should all apply to them.

But it's broadband!  Shsh.  It's an information service. It's IP.  These
are not the packets you're looking for.

;)

What all this really shows is just how outdated the regulatory framework
really is.  Once VoIP (or whatever the application formerly known as VoIP)
stops looking like a PSTN emulation, this will get only more absurd than it
already is.

So, what I'm saying is that it is silly to measure these issues by ill
fitting frameworks.  So, please, lets not force this emerging technology to
look like PSTN even though it happens to right now.  Does PSTN style outage
reporting even make sense for a voice application?  I think you can argue
that it makes little operational sense nor provides much value for the
consumer.

IMHO, the real problem with 911  VoIP isn't that VoIP breaks PSTN E911.  It
is that 911 has not evolved to deal with mobility and is so PSTN centric.
Instead of evolving, we keep trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
There's a whole ball of wax of location aware services (driven by an end
point and not the network) buried under it, not just E911.  [One could argue
Vonage etc are doing nobody a favor by looking so PSTN'ish.. ;) ]

And we need to have a regulatory framework which encourages operators to
evolve, rather than locking them into a managed economy.

Regards,
Christian

PS: I only speak for myself, and I can't do jack squat about this silly
legal disclaimer below.  (Thanks Randy)


*

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged 
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking 
of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 117




RE: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread Hannigan, Martin


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
 Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:35 AM
 To: nanog@merit.edu
 Subject: Re: Vonage service suffers outage
 
 
 
 
 No, what makes this newsworthy is exactly what Om Malik
 says: VoIP is being oversold.
 
 http://www.gigaom.com/2005/03/06/voip-has-serious-problems/
 
 - ferg

Could be, but it's driving a broadband bonanza in the Caribbean.
People love it and are moving from sat to cable just to get the
VoIP service.


-M



Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread Bill Nash
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
I think the final nail in this coffin is the Vonage
banner ad/masthead which describes them as the
broadband phone company.
But it's broadband!  Shsh.  It's an information service. It's IP.  These
are not the packets you're looking for.
;)
What all this really shows is just how outdated the regulatory framework
really is.  Once VoIP (or whatever the application formerly known as VoIP)
stops looking like a PSTN emulation, this will get only more absurd than it
already is.
I disagree that the regulatory framework is outdated, but instead offer 
that the classification of IP networks has changed as new services have 
arisen, and been embraced by, the consumer.

I don't purchase POTS service for my home. I have cable internet, and 
that's it. I don't even purchase cable TV service. Just a data feed. A la 
carte, I purchase VOIP service from whoever I want. It stops being a mere 
broadband information service the instant it connects to global PSTN.

If a VOIP provider wants to avoid the label of telephony carrier, they 
should be strictly end-to-end service with no connection into the global 
PSTN infrastructure. An example of this would be enterprise internal phone 
systems, designed to propagate calls within a single corporate entity. 
They could then purchase PSTN connectivity, or VOIP access to such, from a 
company who IS labelled as a telephony carrier, if they want to accept and 
send calls to the outside world.

This could something as small as a legal office running VOIP internally 
for phone system/contact management, call centers deploying pure IP 
networks for all internal services, or any other *end user*.

If you're transiting VOIP traffic, intentionally because that's your 
product, or incidentally because you're an IP transit carrier and you've 
agreed to pass that traffic, you are, by definition if not by intent, a 
telephony carrier. This includes Vonage, as a VOIP-PSTN gateway, and 
*each of the ISPs they connect to*, having agreed to sell them service. 
Propagate through peering agreements, et voila: The Internet is part of 
the global PSTN network.

If there's anything that's going to kill VOIP as a viable consumer 
platform, it will be ISP/NSP unwillingness to fall under the telecomms 
regulatory structure. For companies with existing networks and peering 
agreements, it may very well be too late to change. VOIP has grown fast 
enough that customers will begin shifting in droves if ISPs start 
announcing they won't transit or support VOIP. The impact on revenue is 
significant enough, in my opinion, that CEOs, or shareholders, for that 
matter, won't be willing to give it up.

- billn


RE: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-10 Thread Hannigan, Martin

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Bill Nash
 Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:57 PM
 To: Christian Kuhtz
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Vonage service suffers outage
 
 
 
 On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
 
  I think the final nail in this coffin is the Vonage
  banner ad/masthead which describes them as the
  broadband phone company.
 
  But it's broadband!  Shsh.  It's an information 
 service. It's IP.  These
  are not the packets you're looking for.
 
  ;)
 
  What all this really shows is just how outdated the 
 regulatory framework
  really is.  Once VoIP (or whatever the application formerly 
 known as VoIP)
  stops looking like a PSTN emulation, this will get only 
 more absurd than it
  already is.
 
 
 I disagree that the regulatory framework is outdated, but 
 instead offer 
 that the classification of IP networks has changed as new 
 services have 
 arisen, and been embraced by, the consumer.
 
 I don't purchase POTS service for my home. I have cable internet, and 
 that's it. I don't even purchase cable TV service. Just a 
 data feed. A la 
 carte, I purchase VOIP service from whoever I want. It stops 
 being a mere 
 broadband information service the instant it connects to global PSTN.

It's called Triple Play, voice, data, video.


-M


Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Fergie (Paul Ferguson)


Amidst all the hoopla w.r.t. port blocking their service,
this outage couldn't have come at a worse time, methinks.

The outage on Friday left about half of its 500,000
subscribers without phone service for about 45 minutes
and ... was caused by a glitch with a software upgrade
on Thursday night.

http://www.detnews.com/2005/technology/0503/07/tech-109316.htm

- ferg

--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Jon Lewis

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:

 Amidst all the hoopla w.r.t. port blocking their service,
 this outage couldn't have come at a worse time, methinks.

 The outage on Friday left about half of its 500,000
 subscribers without phone service for about 45 minutes
 and ... was caused by a glitch with a software upgrade
 on Thursday night.

 http://www.detnews.com/2005/technology/0503/07/tech-109316.htm

Nice story, but it doesn't explain why they had a similar looking outage
at roughly the same time the day before.  Maybe it wasn't quite the first
issue they've ever had related to software upgrades.

--
 Jon Lewis   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net|
_ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_


Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Randy Bush

 Amidst all the hoopla w.r.t. port blocking their service,
 this outage couldn't have come at a worse time, methinks.

 The outage on Friday left about half of its 500,000
 subscribers without phone service for about 45 minutes
 and ... was caused by a glitch with a software upgrade
 on Thursday night.

 http://www.detnews.com/2005/technology/0503/07/tech-109316.htm
 
 Nice story, but it doesn't explain why they had a similar looking outage
 at roughly the same time the day before.  Maybe it wasn't quite the first
 issue they've ever had related to software upgrades.

of course none of us have ever had customer-affecting 'issues'
with software upgrades, system outages, ...

that's what makes this so newsworthy

randy



Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Fergie (Paul Ferguson)


No, what makes this newsworthy is exactly what Om Malik
says: VoIP is being oversold.

http://www.gigaom.com/2005/03/06/voip-has-serious-problems/

- ferg


-- Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Amidst all the hoopla w.r.t. port blocking their service,
 this outage couldn't have come at a worse time, methinks.

 The outage on Friday left about half of its 500,000
 subscribers without phone service for about 45 minutes
 and ... was caused by a glitch with a software upgrade
 on Thursday night.

 http://www.detnews.com/2005/technology/0503/07/tech-109316.htm
 
 Nice story, but it doesn't explain why they had a similar looking outage
 at roughly the same time the day before.  Maybe it wasn't quite the first
 issue they've ever had related to software upgrades.

of course none of us have ever had customer-affecting 'issues'
with software upgrades, system outages, ...

that's what makes this so newsworthy

randy



Re: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Michael . Dillon

 No, what makes this newsworthy is exactly what Om Malik
 says: VoIP is being oversold.

Let's be clear here. Vonage is not a VoIP company.
They do not offer a VoIP service. They are a phone
company that offers a type of phone service which
leverages VoIP to handle the last mile connection
to subscribers. Many other phone companies such as
Verizon or Qwest leverage VoIP in the interLATA or 
international parts of their network. They aren't VoIP
companies either.

For true VoIP companies look at XTen who make a 
VoIP softphone or Grandstream who makes physical
VoIP telephones or Digium who sponsor the Asterisk
PBX software.

VoIP is just a suite of protocols that can run over
anybody's IP network.

Companies like Vonage are signing up subscribers because
they provide real phone service connecting you to
copperline subscribers on the real phone network. That
is their business model. Verizon could sell exactly the
same sort of service to subscribers in California leveraging
the Internet last mile in exactly the same way as Vonage.
Vonage and Verizon are just phone companies, not VoIP
companies.

--Michael Dillon



RE: Vonage service suffers outage

2005-03-07 Thread Neil J. McRae

 Companies like Vonage are signing up subscribers because they 
 provide real phone service connecting you to copperline 
 subscribers on the real phone network. That is their business 
 model. Verizon could sell exactly the same sort of service to 
 subscribers in California leveraging the Internet last mile 
 in exactly the same way as Vonage.
 Vonage and Verizon are just phone companies, not VoIP companies.

Michael - you've been drinking way to much coffee today.