Re: XO as a provider

[Andy]

Really good performance from where we sit in Salt Lake.


On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Bil Herd wrote:

 Anyone have positive or negative experiences with XO as a 'tier1'
 provider? We are re-evaluating our backbone connections and looking for
 new where appropriate.

 Bil Herd - INS

Re: XO as Backbone provider - try again

[Paul Vixie]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bil Herd) writes:

 Anyone have positive or negative experiences with XO as a 'tier1'
 provider? We are re-evaluating orur backbone connections.

xo seems to have pretty good splay and we've seen no congestion or instability.
-- 
Paul Vixie

XO as a provider

[Bil Herd]

Anyone have positive or negative experiences with XO as a 
'tier1' provider? We are re-evaluating our backbone connections and looking for new where 
appropriate.
Bil Herd - INS

XO as Backbone provider - try again

[Bil Herd]

Sorry for the HTML post (boo, hiss)

Anyone have positive or negative experiences with XO as a 'tier1' provider? We are 
re-evaluating orur backbone connections.

Bil Herd - INS

Re: XO as Backbone provider - try again

[alex]

 Sorry for the HTML post (boo, hiss)
 
 Anyone have positive or negative experiences with XO as a 'tier1'
 provider? We are re-evaluating orur backbone connections.

Consensus opinion of friends and associates:

OK network, but they will take forever and a day to install anything at
all.

Example: a rack + handoff -in their colo- is 55 days and counting.

-alex