Re: hijack chronology: was [ YouTube IP Hijacking ]
Martin A Brown writes: Late last night, after poring through our data, I posted a detailed chronology of the hijack as seen from our many peering sessions. I would add to this that the speed of YouTube's response to this subprefix hijack impressed me. For a Sunday afternoon, yes, not bad. Here's a graphical version of the timeline: http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/bgplay.cgi?prefix=208.65.153.0/24start=2008-02-24+18:46end=2008-02-24+21:05 As discussed earlier in this thread, this is really the same old song--it simply has a new verse now. (How many of our troubadors know all of the verses since AS 7007?) Probably someone is busy working on the new NANOG song with an extending refrain (AS7007, ..., AS17557, when will we ever learn?). -- Simon.
hijack chronology: was [ YouTube IP Hijacking ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, Late last night, after poring through our data, I posted a detailed chronology of the hijack as seen from our many peering sessions. I would add to this that the speed of YouTube's response to this subprefix hijack impressed me. As discussed earlier in this thread, this is really the same old song--it simply has a new verse now. (How many of our troubadors know all of the verses since AS 7007?) Best, - -Martin [0] http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/02/pakistan_hijacks_youtube.shtml - -- Martin A. Brown --- Renesys Corporation --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgf-0.72 (http://linux-ip.net/sw/pine-gpg-filter/) iD8DBQFHwtYodXQGngQsWbkRAv1PAKDB0w1OjRmKjF7027ccZJzuzyboKQCgwxFt V8CNr0Nzw2lqx0O5vk3uHKo= =GUic -END PGP SIGNATURE-
