6in4/6to4/6over4/etc (Was: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?)
Nathan Ward wrote: [..] > I think someone wrote a draft explaining this a while back.. not sure > where or what it was called. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6in4 = proto-41 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6to4 = proto-41 with 2002::/16 dst http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/6rd= proto-41 with own 6to4 prefix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6over4 = 6 over 4-multicast (*) Or for a list which also contains a few others: http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=comparison Greets, Jeroen * = the only one I really don't get and never saw used ;) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
On 14/07/2009, at 4:23 AM, Rick Ernst wrote: Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning. I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal 6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6 sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd ask here as well. Are there any 4to6 gateway available? I have assigned v6 space. Because I'm pedantic, 6to4 and 6in4 are two different things. It sounds like you want 6in4. They use the same encapsulation, but 6to4 has specific magic in how the outer IPv4 destination is built, taken from the inner IPv6 destination address. 6over4 is different again. I think someone wrote a draft explaining this a while back.. not sure where or what it was called. -- Nathan Ward
Re: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.
What release are you running? We are currently at 3.6.2 (as recommended by Cisco (our SE and some upper levels)). On 7/13/09 6:15 PM, "Dan Snyder" wrote: > We also have a couple running full tables of BGP with XR code and they have > been running solid for a couple of years now with no problems. > > -Dan > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Scott Berkman wrote: >> We have 2 12k's on our borders and both are running IOS GS code, but are >> rock solid. >> >> -Scott >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net] >> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:20 PM >> To: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR. >> >> Is anyone on the list running the Cisco 12000 Series routers with XR? We >> have a couple of these in our network and are having a few issues with them. >> >> Specifically the line cards will reboot for some unknown reason >> (12000-SIP-501). We recently replaced one of the cards and the new hardware >> (<6mo old) is doing the same thing. >> >> Anyone have issues with these routers? >> -- >> Jim Wininger >> >> >> >> > > -- Jim Wininger Indiana Fiber Network Desk - 317-777-7114 Cell - 317-432-7609 Office - 317-280-4636 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any attachment) is intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named recipient (or person authorized to deliver it to the named recipient). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized person. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system including any attachment without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by return e-mail.
Re: MGE UPS Systems
ryan.sla...@tac.com wrote: > Take this with the grain of salt that I do not work for APC, but for a > sister company. The word that I have heard is that they are in no rush > to discontinue any of the product line. In fact rumor is that APC was > very happy to have the MGE products available to them for sale to > customers. As a side note I have several MGE UPS in service and have > had zero problem getting support and maintenance from APC for them. > Interesting. The reason I ask is that I'm kind of attracted to the MGE Galaxy and its paralleling N+1 capability. I had a bad experience with a frame shorting out a few years ago after it went into bypass but didn't shut off the inverter output; hilarity ensued. It seems like the Galaxy and Smart VT overlap, although the Galaxy has better specs on paper. I was also recommended a Symmetra PX 80kW frame. I asked my rep and they were kind of ambiguous about the MGE line, hence my redirect of the question here. ~Seth
Re: Please do not CC NANOG when e-mailing Dean Anderson [was: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?]
How about, "Don't reply to Dean Anderson". :-) On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > [SNIP] > > Everyone, > > Please do not CC nanog@nanog.org when replying to one of Dean Anderson's > ... uh ... missives[*]. We do not see the original, so by replying and > CC'ing the list, you are helping him get his ... er ... message[*] to a > wider audience. And if you have actually read any of his ... umm ... > posts[*], then you should realize that is to the list's detriment. > > I'd suggest the same for other lists too, but definitely for NANOG related > stuff. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > [*] I have been very careful to not call them what they really are for fear > of the MLC. :) > > >
Re: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.
We also have a couple running full tables of BGP with XR code and they have been running solid for a couple of years now with no problems. -Dan On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Scott Berkman wrote: > We have 2 12k's on our borders and both are running IOS GS code, but are > rock solid. > >-Scott > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:20 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR. > > Is anyone on the list running the Cisco 12000 Series routers with XR? We > have a couple of these in our network and are having a few issues with > them. > > Specifically the line cards will reboot for some unknown reason > (12000-SIP-501). We recently replaced one of the cards and the new hardware > (<6mo old) is doing the same thing. > > Anyone have issues with these routers? > -- > Jim Wininger > > > > >
Re: MGE UPS Systems
See, now thats what I like to hear after an acquisition like this. You expect a certain redundancy but to have it said that, "we're not merely interested in the underlying technology, we like the products just the say they are and have no plans to change them (except maybe to standardize the management software interface," or something along those lines is a darned good thing. 'cause lemme tell ya, I like the MGE systems I have and am very glad to hear that APC thinks MGE gear is just ducky. -Wayne On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 03:51:11PM -0500, ryan.sla...@tac.com wrote: > Take this with the grain of salt that I do not work for APC, but for a > sister company. The word that I have heard is that they are in no rush > to discontinue any of the product line. In fact rumor is that APC was > very happy to have the MGE products available to them for sale to > customers. As a side note I have several MGE UPS in service and have > had zero problem getting support and maintenance from APC for them. > > RS > > --- Wayne Bouchard w...@typo.org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
RE: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.
We have 2 12k's on our borders and both are running IOS GS code, but are rock solid. -Scott -Original Message- From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:20 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR. Is anyone on the list running the Cisco 12000 Series routers with XR? We have a couple of these in our network and are having a few issues with them. Specifically the line cards will reboot for some unknown reason (12000-SIP-501). We recently replaced one of the cards and the new hardware (<6mo old) is doing the same thing. Anyone have issues with these routers? -- Jim Wininger
RE: MGE UPS Systems
Take this with the grain of salt that I do not work for APC, but for a sister company. The word that I have heard is that they are in no rush to discontinue any of the product line. In fact rumor is that APC was very happy to have the MGE products available to them for sale to customers. As a side note I have several MGE UPS in service and have had zero problem getting support and maintenance from APC for them. RS
RE: MGE UPS Systems
We asked our local APC rep that exact question last week. He told us that the MGE line of UPSes fill a whole that APC doesn't have in their own lineup, and they will continue being sold as the product for folks absolutely require a typical double-conversion online UPS. As opposed to the 'hybrid' model of the Symmetra... It didn't sound to me like they were planning on getting rid of the MGE line at this point. - Erik -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:43 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: MGE UPS Systems I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. ~Seth
RE: MGE UPS Systems
> Or are you talking about Eaton's? > > http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/SearchResults/CT_136576 History (as I recall it). Schneider Electric bought MGE late 2003 Schneider Electric bought APC late 2006 (and merges APC/MGE product line, which has overlap) Schneider Electric sold "small" MGE product line to Eaton late 2007 (these are the office/small business type UPSs, as I recall, and overlapped the APC consumer/office/small business offerings). I do not know the plans regarding how Schneider Electric will deal with the remaining overlap in the high end APC/MGE UPS business.
RE: MGE UPS Systems
> We have 3 big Comet systems, and we're absolutely delighted with > them. Their service is the best we receive from any vendor we deal > with. I'll second that. We have a 50 KVA MGE Comet and it has been rock solid, and their support is excellent.
RE: MGE UPS Systems
While I still have a bunch of MGE Comet systems running, we did take one electrical room and replace them with Symmetra PX's, It did require some conduit work as they were moved from the wall to the center (but they are not as deep as a Comet) , to give the required cleareances. These are not your typical bottom of the rack units (although they come in their own racks). We have them equipped for 125KVA Love the Comet's, I would check with APC regarding product lifecycle. -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:43 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: MGE UPS Systems I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. ~Seth
Cisco 12000 series routers and IOS XR.
Is anyone on the list running the Cisco 12000 Series routers with XR? We have a couple of these in our network and are having a few issues with them. Specifically the line cards will reboot for some unknown reason (12000-SIP-501). We recently replaced one of the cards and the new hardware (<6mo old) is doing the same thing. Anyone have issues with these routers? -- Jim Wininger
Re: MGE UPS Systems
Or are you talking about Eaton's? http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/SearchResults/CT_136576 Dixon, Justin a écrit : I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. ~Seth It looks like they are still available in the product selector on the APC website. http://www.apc.com/products/category.cfm?id=13 http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=361 http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=365 If you're wondering about long term someone from their sales dept. can probably tell you if they plan to keep the product line or discontinue it.
Re: MGE UPS Systems
> > I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS > systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into > APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my > facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for > normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so > great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with > your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. I heard the MGE product set was designed to replace the "typical/old" UPS product sets, like the Silcon Series, and that APC branded units would be concentrated on the "Symmetra" product line. Keep in mind the Symmetras above around 30kva are self contained units that are really racked in the same rack as other equipment.
Please do not CC NANOG when e-mailing Dean Anderson [was: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?]
[SNIP] Everyone, Please do not CC nanog@nanog.org when replying to one of Dean Anderson's ... uh ... missives[*]. We do not see the original, so by replying and CC'ing the list, you are helping him get his ... er ... message[*] to a wider audience. And if you have actually read any of his ... umm ... posts[*], then you should realize that is to the list's detriment. I'd suggest the same for other lists too, but definitely for NANOG related stuff. -- TTFN, patrick [*] I have been very careful to not call them what they really are for fear of the MLC. :)
Re: MGE UPS Systems
We have 3 big Comet systems, and we're absolutely delighted with them. Their service is the best we receive from any vendor we deal with. On 13-Jul-09, at 3:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. ~Seth
RE: MGE UPS Systems
> I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS > systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into > APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my > facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for > normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so > great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with > your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. > > ~Seth It looks like they are still available in the product selector on the APC website. http://www.apc.com/products/category.cfm?id=13 http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=361 http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=365 If you're wondering about long term someone from their sales dept. can probably tell you if they plan to keep the product line or discontinue it.
MGE UPS Systems
I'm curious if anyone might know what the future of the MGE line of UPS systems are. My concern is that they're dead-end since being merged into APC, and APC wanting to sell me APC stuff. The problem I face is that my facility was designed with separate equipment spaces, which is great for normal electrical gear that can be backed against a wall, but not so great for a product which is designed for the "everything goes in with your racks" mindset. Any insight would be appreciated. ~Seth
H3C Switches/Routers
Nanog, I was just looking at the H3C 12500 enterprise product for which I received a slideshow presentation on its features and comparisons to Nexus 7018, Foundry/Brocade RX32, Juniper EX8218 and Force10 E1200. It does not look like they have a significant market share but make a lot of bold claims on side-by-side comparisons to comparable products from their competition. Is anyone using H3C products (enterprise or otherwise) here at all? If so, what are your thoughts on them? Are there any noticeable drawbacks? Performance issues? Support? Just an overall summary would be nice. Thanks, Justin Krejci
3rd Party Router Comparisons and Testing
Hello all, I was wondering if anyone has a good, trusted, non-partial source for 3rd party testing and/or comparisons of the major routing hardware vendors. I'm willing to pay for a subscription / membership to an organization if the information is well assembled recent. Specifically, I'd like (love) to see a comparison between Juniper MX series, Cisco 6500/7600 series, Brocade XMR/MLX series, and any others that I don't even know about. If your company has recently (say the past 18 months?) completed an analysis and you can provide the results, I can keep them private (this is only for my use, not official decision making). Does anyone happen to have a source they would be willing to pass along? Thanks in advance for any suggestions! -- Brad Fleming Kansas Research and Education Network
Re: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
Multiple responses of tunnelbroker.net. Couldn't have been any easier to setup and get going. Thanks! On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Chad Burnham wrote: > Rick, > > I use this one: > > http://www.tunnelbroker.net/ > > Free! > > Chad > > -Original Message- > From: Rick Ernst [mailto:na...@shreddedmail.com] > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:24 AM > To: NANOG > Subject: Public/testing 4to6 gateway? > > Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning. > > I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal > 6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6 > sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd > ask here as well. Are there any 4to6 gateway available? I have assigned > v6 > space. > > Thanks, >
NANOG 47 announcements
Folks, A few announcements: (i).Thank everyone again for attending NANOG 46. The NANOG 46 survey is open for one more week. If you haven't taken the survey yet, please see http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=MHjaY6hu6bwNs_2bpmca_2fc_2fQ_3d_3d (ii). Exciting news about NANOG 47 in Dearborn. The NANOG PC has been working with ARIN and the results are an exciting CFP. Please see http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/callforpresent.php (iii). Registration is open for NANOG 47. Please see https://nanog.merit.edu/registration. (iv). The NANOG 47 hotel link is up. Please see http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/hotel.php (v).NANOG 47 Meeting sponsorships are now being accepted (as always, sponsorship is critical to NANOG's success). Please see http://nanog.org/sponsors. We're looking forward to seeing you all in in Dearborn. Dave (for the NANOG PC) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics
Yeah, just don't ask a certain female sales person there for more than a few quotes without buying... I was utterly embarrassed while dealing with NHR - never been told off by a commissioned sales person before. Requested a series of quotes on a Cisco GSR and made it very clear we already had a preferred supplier, but that I would give NHR a chance in the quotes. Their pricing was off a bit and the job went to a competitor - she freaked out on me. I have never dealt with them since. It was the most immature dealing with a company I have ever encountered, and this goes back several years now - and I'm still pissed. When I took this to their management team I was promised a phone call from their CEO and never got it. Since I talked to a senior management person and asked to removed from their internal lists - had *many* of their sales people continue to call and pester me. They finally got that part right and have not heard from anyone since (nor do I EVER wish to). Paul -Original Message- From: Ballard, Eric [mailto:eric.ball...@suddenlink.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:39 PM To: Chad Burnham; Adam Rothschild; Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics All, I would like to second the vote for NHR(Network Hardware). I have purchased from Joe Zender there for years and the support, price, warranty, and quality has been outstanding. I placed his contact info below, because it is truly a rare thing when I can say he is a great sales person. Thanks Eric Joe Zender Network Hardware Resale Phone: 805-690-3723 Fax: 805-690-1835 AIM - zenderNHR Yahoo! - nhr_joezender jzen...@networkhardware.com www.networkhardware.com -Original Message- From: Chad Burnham [mailto:cburn...@du.edu] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:07 AM To: Adam Rothschild; Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics HI, We have been very happy with Champion and NHR for such equipment: http://www.championone.net/ & http://www.networkhardware.com/ Stellar pricing and support. Chad Chad D Burnham Telecommunications Network Planner University Technology Services - Network Services University of Denver 2100 S. High St. #112 Denver, CO 80210 USA Desk Phone: 303-871-4441 Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657 FAX: 303-871-2298 -Original Message- From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:asr+na...@latency.net] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 PM To: Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: Re: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle wrote: > I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY > optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these > particular items up significantly just to provide their own > sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd prefer if we can to procure from the > OEM (or their reseller). Is this a situation where any company who's > a signatory to the MSA produces suitable modules, or are there > particular OEMs to prefer (or avoid)? > > If it matters, the prime platform we're looking to plug optics into is > the WS-X6708-10G module for a 6500/7600. I'd suggest looking at FluxLight (www.fluxlightinc.com) for this. Their sales and support process is nothing short of stellar, and pricing is a fair medium between "paying too much for vendor optics" and "fly-by-night eBay imports". To wit, all of their products Just Worked without ever needing Cisco's infamous 'service unsupported-transceiver' vendor lock override. -a "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
Re: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
Hello Rick, try traceroute to 192.88.99.1 (192.88.99.1), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 yttrium.anul.nsa (7.19.30.39) 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 2 217.0.116.228 (217.0.116.228) 47 ms 46 ms * 3 217.0.78.50 (217.0.78.50) 58 ms 46 ms 45 ms 4 217.239.40.177 (217.239.40.177) 48 ms 51 ms 49 ms 5 tenge2-2.cr3.fra3.content-core.net (193.159.227.138) 47 ms 48 ms 48 ms 6 Tenge2-4-42.cr2.FRA3.content-core.net (212.123.123.137) 49 ms * 70 ms So my gateway is inetnum:212.123.122.0 - 212.123.123.255 netname:IP-PARTNER descr: IP Exchange GmbH descr: Am Tower 5 descr: 90475 Nuernberg remarks:INFRA-AW country:DE I guess your traceroute goes somewhere else. Kind regards Peter Rick Ernst wrote: > Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning. > > I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal > 6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6 > sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd > ask here as well. Are there any 4to6 gateway available? I have assigned v6 > space. > > Thanks, -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Rimbacher Strasse 16 D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher +49(6209)795-816 (Telekom) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: pe...@peter-dambier.de http://www.peter-dambier.de/ http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/ ULA= fd80:4ce1:c66a::/48
RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics
All, I would like to second the vote for NHR(Network Hardware). I have purchased from Joe Zender there for years and the support, price, warranty, and quality has been outstanding. I placed his contact info below, because it is truly a rare thing when I can say he is a great sales person. Thanks Eric Joe Zender Network Hardware Resale Phone: 805-690-3723 Fax: 805-690-1835 AIM - zenderNHR Yahoo! - nhr_joezender jzen...@networkhardware.com www.networkhardware.com -Original Message- From: Chad Burnham [mailto:cburn...@du.edu] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:07 AM To: Adam Rothschild; Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics HI, We have been very happy with Champion and NHR for such equipment: http://www.championone.net/ & http://www.networkhardware.com/ Stellar pricing and support. Chad Chad D Burnham Telecommunications Network Planner University Technology Services - Network Services University of Denver 2100 S. High St. #112 Denver, CO 80210 USA Desk Phone: 303-871-4441 Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657 FAX: 303-871-2298 -Original Message- From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:asr+na...@latency.net] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 PM To: Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: Re: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle wrote: > I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY > optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these > particular items up significantly just to provide their own > sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd prefer if we can to procure from the > OEM (or their reseller). Is this a situation where any company who's > a signatory to the MSA produces suitable modules, or are there > particular OEMs to prefer (or avoid)? > > If it matters, the prime platform we're looking to plug optics into is > the WS-X6708-10G module for a 6500/7600. I'd suggest looking at FluxLight (www.fluxlightinc.com) for this. Their sales and support process is nothing short of stellar, and pricing is a fair medium between "paying too much for vendor optics" and "fly-by-night eBay imports". To wit, all of their products Just Worked without ever needing Cisco's infamous 'service unsupported-transceiver' vendor lock override. -a
RE: Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
Rick, I use this one: http://www.tunnelbroker.net/ Free! Chad -Original Message- From: Rick Ernst [mailto:na...@shreddedmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:24 AM To: NANOG Subject: Public/testing 4to6 gateway? Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning. I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal 6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6 sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd ask here as well. Are there any 4to6 gateway available? I have assigned v6 space. Thanks, smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Public/testing 4to6 gateway?
Either they don't exist, or my Google-fu is particularly bad this morning. I'm trying to get my toes wet with IPv6. I've established an internal 6to4/4to6 tunnel. I'd also like to have a testbed for access to public v6 sites. I'm also trying to find some clue at my upstreams, but figured I'd ask here as well. Are there any 4to6 gateway available? I have assigned v6 space. Thanks,
RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics
Try http://www.advantageoptics.com/. Ric. Softlayer. www.softlayer.com. -Original Message- From: Chad Burnham [mailto:cburn...@du.edu] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:07 AM To: Adam Rothschild; Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics HI, We have been very happy with Champion and NHR for such equipment: http://www.championone.net/ & http://www.networkhardware.com/ Stellar pricing and support. Chad Chad D Burnham Telecommunications Network Planner University Technology Services - Network Services University of Denver 2100 S. High St. #112 Denver, CO 80210 USA Desk Phone: 303-871-4441 Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657 FAX: 303-871-2298 -Original Message- From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:asr+na...@latency.net] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 PM To: Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: Re: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle wrote: > I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY > optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these > particular items up significantly just to provide their own > sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd prefer if we can to procure from the > OEM (or their reseller). Is this a situation where any company who's > a signatory to the MSA produces suitable modules, or are there > particular OEMs to prefer (or avoid)? > > If it matters, the prime platform we're looking to plug optics into is > the WS-X6708-10G module for a 6500/7600. I'd suggest looking at FluxLight (www.fluxlightinc.com) for this. Their sales and support process is nothing short of stellar, and pricing is a fair medium between "paying too much for vendor optics" and "fly-by-night eBay imports". To wit, all of their products Just Worked without ever needing Cisco's infamous 'service unsupported-transceiver' vendor lock override. -a The contents of this email message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error; any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this message and all associated attachments.
RE: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics
HI, We have been very happy with Champion and NHR for such equipment: http://www.championone.net/ & http://www.networkhardware.com/ Stellar pricing and support. Chad Chad D Burnham Telecommunications Network Planner University Technology Services - Network Services University of Denver 2100 S. High St. #112 Denver, CO 80210 USA Desk Phone: 303-871-4441 Mobile Phone: 303-520-5657 FAX: 303-871-2298 -Original Message- From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:asr+na...@latency.net] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 PM To: Duane Waddle Cc: na...@merit.edu Subject: Re: OEMs for X2 10G LAN PHY optics On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle wrote: > I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY > optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these > particular items up significantly just to provide their own > sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd prefer if we can to procure from the > OEM (or their reseller). Is this a situation where any company who's > a signatory to the MSA produces suitable modules, or are there > particular OEMs to prefer (or avoid)? > > If it matters, the prime platform we're looking to plug optics into is > the WS-X6708-10G module for a 6500/7600. I'd suggest looking at FluxLight (www.fluxlightinc.com) for this. Their sales and support process is nothing short of stellar, and pricing is a fair medium between "paying too much for vendor optics" and "fly-by-night eBay imports". To wit, all of their products Just Worked without ever needing Cisco's infamous 'service unsupported-transceiver' vendor lock override. -a Chad Burnham.vcf Description: Binary data smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: AT&T and having two BGP peers
Use a /30 across the circuit and do multihop BGP using other IPs. On Friday 10 July 2009 13:48:15 Jay Nakamura wrote: > We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from AT&T but they insist that > they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can > only have /30 they say. Has anyone been able to successfully talk > them in to bending their rule? If so, how? > > I know this should have been negotiated before signing a contract but > I was unfortunately not in the loop... :( > > It seems like a ridiculous bureaucratic restriction.
