RE: Advice regarding Cisco/Juniper/HP

2010-06-25 Thread Jason Gurtz
 pretty quick.  I think what we do using about 10 people in a Cisco
 environment would be closer to 20 in an HP and Juniper environment, so
 those additional salaries and benefits need to be a factor.

I hear you on the HP stuff, but are you saying that Juniper equipment also
shows a higher failure rate?  Or, are you saying they require a higher
staffing rate for different reasons?

Just wondering, since Juniper is trumpeting running the stock exchange and
all.

~JasonG



Re: Advice regarding Cisco/Juniper/HP

2010-06-25 Thread Ray Soucy
Poor choice of words, Juniper does fine.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com wrote:
 pretty quick.  I think what we do using about 10 people in a Cisco
 environment would be closer to 20 in an HP and Juniper environment, so
 those additional salaries and benefits need to be a factor.

 I hear you on the HP stuff, but are you saying that Juniper equipment also
 shows a higher failure rate?  Or, are you saying they require a higher
 staffing rate for different reasons?

 Just wondering, since Juniper is trumpeting running the stock exchange and
 all.

 ~JasonG





-- 
Ray Soucy

Epic Communications Specialist

Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526

Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/



Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread Eric Williams
This issue has been resolved by breaking up the /22 into /24's.  Thanks to 
all for the advise.

Maybe next time I will take someone's advise and advertise one of ATT's 
/8's.





From:
Eric Williams/Connectria
To:
nanog@nanog.org
Date:
06/24/2010 02:37 PM
Subject:
ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident


ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet 
accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are advertising 
my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody out 
there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have them 
stop advertising my /22 ASAP



Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread Richard Barnes
I wonder how much of the de-aggregation in the routing table is
attributable to issues like this?


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Eric Williams ewilli...@connectria.com wrote:
 This issue has been resolved by breaking up the /22 into /24's.  Thanks to
 all for the advise.

 Maybe next time I will take someone's advise and advertise one of ATT's
 /8's.





 From:
 Eric Williams/Connectria
 To:
 nanog@nanog.org
 Date:
 06/24/2010 02:37 PM
 Subject:
 ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident


 ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet
 accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are advertising
 my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody out
 there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have them
 stop advertising my /22 ASAP





RE: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread Dennis Burgess
Have you found a contact at ATT to get this stopped? 

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS


-Original Message-
From: Eric Williams [mailto:ewilli...@connectria.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:56 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

This issue has been resolved by breaking up the /22 into /24's.  Thanks
to all for the advise.

Maybe next time I will take someone's advise and advertise one of ATT's
/8's.





From:
Eric Williams/Connectria
To:
nanog@nanog.org
Date:
06/24/2010 02:37 PM
Subject:
ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident


ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet 
accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are
advertising 
my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody
out 
there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have
them 
stop advertising my /22 ASAP




Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dennis Burgess
dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
 Have you found a contact at ATT to get this stopped?

I'm fairly certain JayB at least reads nanog... the OP didn't mention
if this was 7018, 7132 or the ATT_ENS AS with the route though :(

 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Williams [mailto:ewilli...@connectria.com]
 Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:56 AM
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

 This issue has been resolved by breaking up the /22 into /24's.  Thanks
 to all for the advise.

 Maybe next time I will take someone's advise and advertise one of ATT's
 /8's.





 From:
 Eric Williams/Connectria
 To:
 nanog@nanog.org
 Date:
 06/24/2010 02:37 PM
 Subject:
 ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident


 ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet
 accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are
 advertising
 my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody
 out
 there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have
 them
 stop advertising my /22 ASAP






Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread Larry Blunk


  Looks like the prefix in question is 208.91.48.0/22
and it was briefly announced by 7018 yesterday, but
that announcement seems to be gone now.   I see 11734
is announcing 208.91.48.0/22 + 208.91.48.0/24 now,
but not 208.91.49.0/24 - 208.91.51.0/24.




On 06/25/2010 10:17 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dennis Burgess
dmburg...@linktechs.net  wrote:
   

Have you found a contact at ATT to get this stopped?
 

I'm fairly certain JayB at least reads nanog... the OP didn't mention
if this was 7018, 7132 or the ATT_ENS AS with the route though :(

   

-Original Message-
From: Eric Williams [mailto:ewilli...@connectria.com]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 8:56 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

This issue has been resolved by breaking up the /22 into /24's.  Thanks
to all for the advise.

Maybe next time I will take someone's advise and advertise one of ATT's
/8's.





From:
Eric Williams/Connectria
To:
nanog@nanog.org
Date:
06/24/2010 02:37 PM
Subject:
ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident


ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet
accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are
advertising
my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody
out
there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have
them
stop advertising my /22 ASAP



 
   





Re: Advice regarding Cisco/Juniper/HP

2010-06-25 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:12:57AM -0400, Jason Gurtz wrote:
  pretty quick.  I think what we do using about 10 people in a Cisco
  environment would be closer to 20 in an HP and Juniper environment, so
  those additional salaries and benefits need to be a factor.

How many switches/users are we talking about that you need 10-20 
people to manage?

 I hear you on the HP stuff, but are you saying that Juniper equipment also
 shows a higher failure rate?  Or, are you saying they require a higher
 staffing rate for different reasons?
 
 Just wondering, since Juniper is trumpeting running the stock exchange and
 all.

I can vouch for the fact that the batch of Juniper EX-PWR-930-AC 
modular power supplies shipped around June/July last summer had some 
quality issues.  We've replaced about 10 so far (out of about 140) in 
the year we've had them.  Presumably they've fixed this on new 
batches.  It's a good thing we sprang for the redundant power supply 
modules in those switches.

Compare this to the Nortel (now Avaya) BayStack 55xx line where we've 
had approximately 0 built-in power supply and maybe 2-3 unit failures 
for other reasons in the last 3 years.



ARIN's RESTful Whois Directory Service Available 26 June

2010-06-25 Thread Mark Kosters
Apologies for the duplicate email but want to keep you informed about 
 changes occurring at ARIN. This particular upgrade may be of interest to 
 those who are not subscribed to arin-announce.

- Forwarded message from Member Services i...@arin.net -

From: Member Services i...@arin.net
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:00:42 -0400
To: arin-annou...@arin.net arin-annou...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN's RESTful Whois Directory Service Available 26 
June

ARIN is deploying an improved Whois service called Whois-RWS on 26 June 
2010. Included in the deployment are the following services that provide 
the general public with access to ARIN's registration data.

* a RESTful Web Service (RWS)
* a NICNAME/WHOIS port 43 service
* a user-friendly web site (http://whois.arin.net)

When using Whois-RWS you will notice some differences in behavior for 
certain queries and corresponding result sets on the NICNAME/WHOIS TCP 
port 43 service. These minor differences are documented at:

https://www.arin.net/resources/whoisrws/whois_diff.html

ARIN's Directory Service for registration data has used the 
NICNAME/WHOIS protocol since its inception. The limitations of the 
NICNAME/WHOIS protocol are well known and documented in RFC3912.
Whois-RWS was created as an alternative to the ARIN Whois and will 
provide much richer functionality and capability to the community.

Whois-RWS can easily be integrated into command line scripts, or it can 
be used with a web browser, which makes it applicable for programmatic 
consumption and accessible for interactive use. ARIN will continue to 
maintain services for the NICNAME/WHOIS protocol on TCP/43. This is 
achieved by using a proxy service to translate traditional ARIN Whois 
queries into Whois-RWS queries. However, ARIN recommends use of the 
RESTful Web Service.

Those who choose to use the Whois-RWS Proxy will find it has many 
features unavailable over the existing Whois service, including:

* Support for new query types such as CIDR queries
* Better feedback for ambiguous queries
* More finely scoped record type queries
* Options for NICNAME/WHOIS clients that re-interpret traditional 
parameters used by ARIN's service.
* RESTful URL references, useful for embedding into documents and e-mail
* Better grouping of record types and delineation of results

Another major benefit is that data from ARIN's registration database is 
distributed to the Whois-RWS servers many times throughout the day, 
versus the once-a-day update of ARIN's previous Whois service. Changes 
will be reflected more quickly through Whois-RWS, so query results will 
be more current than the previous Whois service.

ARIN continues to welcome community participation on the Whois-RWS 
mailing list, and we invite you to subscribe and provide feedback to:

http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-whoisrws

Regards,


Mark Kosters
Chief Technical Officer
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

- End forwarded message -



Re: ATT BGP - Advertising my network on accident

2010-06-25 Thread joel jaeggli

just fyi,

identifying the prefix in question and the origin AS will likely result 
in a lot more potentially useful eyeballs looking at including those 
that can take action.


joel

On 2010-06-24 12:37, Eric Williams wrote:

ATT is currently advertising my address space to the internet
accidentally via BGP which they should not be.  Since they are advertising
my address space on accident, we are dead in the water.  Does anybody out
there work for ATT or know of the number I can call in order to have them
stop advertising my /22 ASAP






Weekly Routing Table Report

2010-06-25 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith p...@cisco.com.

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 26 Jun, 2010

Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  323205
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:  149101
Deaggregation factor:  2.17
Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 158363
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 34231
Prefixes per ASN:  9.44
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   29720
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   14411
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4511
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:108
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   3.6
Max AS path length visible:  24
Max AS path prepend of ASN (41664)   21
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:   295
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 112
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:642
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 757
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:159
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2251743840
Equivalent to 134 /8s, 54 /16s and 226 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   60.8
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   65.5
Percentage of available address space allocated:   92.8
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   83.4
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  154204

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:78033
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   26885
APNIC Deaggregation factor:2.90
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:   74858
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:33140
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4081
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   18.34
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   1117
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:639
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:3.6
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  525628704
Equivalent to 31 /8s, 84 /16s and 117 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 78.3

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079
   55296-56319, 131072-132095
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  43/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,
61/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 175/8, 180/8,
   182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8,
   219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:133710
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:69226
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.93
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   106681
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 41819
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:13744
ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 7.76
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:5271
ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1349
Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.4
Max ARIN Region AS path length visible:  22
Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet:   729671968
Equivalent to 43 /8s, 125 /16s and 233 /24s
Percentage of available ARIN address 

BGP Update Report

2010-06-25 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report
Interval: 17-Jun-10 -to- 24-Jun-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS24400   64871  4.5%5405.9 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
 2 - AS980862064  4.4% 827.5 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 3 - AS14420   54652  3.8% 117.3 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE 
TELECOMUNICACIONES CNT S.A.
 4 - AS18910   29562  2.1%1847.6 -- BIG-SANDY-BROADBAND-INC - Big 
Sandy Broadband Inc
 5 - AS30890   26695  1.9%  61.4 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom s.r.l.
 6 - AS35805   18262  1.3%  28.8 -- SILKNET-AS SILKNET AS
 7 - AS580015672  1.1%  69.7 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD 
Network Information Center
 8 - AS12880   13091  0.9% 163.6 -- DCI-AS DCI Autonomous System
 9 - AS32528   11954  0.8%3984.7 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
10 - AS27065   10562  0.7%  87.3 -- DNIC-ASBLK-27032-27159 - DoD 
Network Information Center
11 - AS10474   10319  0.7%2063.8 -- NETACTIVE
12 - AS478839945  0.7% 153.0 -- KKTCELL-AS KIBRIS MOBILE 
TELEKOMUNIKASYON LTD.
13 - AS9829 9794  0.7%  51.8 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet 
Backbone
14 - AS359319752  0.7%3250.7 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO 
HOLDINGS INC
15 - AS279689101  0.6%  97.9 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE 
TELECOMUNICACIONES CNT S.A.
16 - AS454649020  0.6% 209.8 -- NEXTWEB-AS-AP Room 201, TGU Bldg
17 - AS277578756  0.6%  76.1 -- CORPORACION NACIONAL DE 
TELECOMUNICACIONES CNT S.A.
18 - AS8452 8138  0.6%   7.8 -- TEDATA TEDATA
19 - AS156567846  0.6% 170.6 -- ANET Anet Iletisim A.S.
20 - AS145227623  0.5%  30.5 -- Satnet


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS24400   64871  4.5%5405.9 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
 2 - AS32528   11954  0.8%3984.7 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 3 - AS359319752  0.7%3250.7 -- ARCHIPELAGO - ARCHIPELAGO 
HOLDINGS INC
 4 - AS278732315  0.2%2315.0 -- Compañia Goly, S.A.
 5 - AS10474   10319  0.7%2063.8 -- NETACTIVE
 6 - AS18910   29562  2.1%1847.6 -- BIG-SANDY-BROADBAND-INC - Big 
Sandy Broadband Inc
 7 - AS303722775  0.2%1387.5 -- SBS-NEWARK-CA - SIEMENS 
BUSINESS SERVICES
 8 - AS980862064  4.4% 827.5 -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 9 - AS55482 783  0.1% 783.0 -- DIGITAL-WAVE-MY Level 12 Menara 
Sunway, Jalan Lagoon Timur,
10 - AS11613 683  0.1% 683.0 -- U-SAVE - U-Save Auto Rental of 
America, Inc.
11 - AS28052 635  0.0% 635.0 -- Arte Radiotelevisivo Argentino
12 - AS165521384  0.1% 461.3 -- TIGGEE - Tiggee LLC
13 - AS30402 796  0.1% 398.0 -- HARRIS - Harris Interactive Inc.
14 - AS104452358  0.2% 336.9 -- HTG - Huntleigh Telcom
15 - AS3 313  0.0% 120.0 -- SUEZ-AS Elektrownia Polaniec SA 
Grupa GDF SUEZ Energia Polska
16 - AS39780 303  0.0% 303.0 -- TECNOCOM-NET AS for Tecnocom TE
17 - AS20293 595  0.0% 297.5 -- WU - WESTERN UNION COMPANY
18 - AS45647 587  0.0% 293.5 -- LBCBANK-AS-AP LBC Development 
Bank
19 - AS418641641  0.1% 273.5 -- MIBA-AS SC MIBA TELECOM 2002 SRL
20 - AS38596 265  0.0% 265.0 -- INNODATA-MDE-AS-PH 
Innodata-ISOGEN, Inc


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 111.10.2.0/24 12326  0.8%   AS9808  -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 2 - 111.10.3.0/24 12324  0.8%   AS9808  -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 3 - 111.10.4.0/24 12316  0.8%   AS9808  -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 4 - 111.10.0.0/24 12316  0.8%   AS9808  -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 5 - 111.10.1.0/24 12315  0.8%   AS9808  -- CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile 
Communication Co.Ltd.
 6 - 117.131.0.0/1710820  0.7%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
 7 - 120.204.0.0/1610674  0.7%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
 8 - 196.2.16.0/24 10277  0.7%   AS10474 -- NETACTIVE
 9 - 221.181.64.0/187639  0.5%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
10 - 117.136.8.0/24 7426  0.5%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
11 - 117.135.128.0/18   7103  0.5%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile Communications Co.,Ltd.
12 - 117.135.0.0/17 7101  0.5%   AS24400 -- CMNET-V4SHANGHAI-AS-AP Shanghai 
Mobile 

The Cidr Report

2010-06-25 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 25 21:11:44 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
18-06-10325632  201656
19-06-10326044  201847
20-06-10326275  201809
21-06-10326227  202163
22-06-10326263  201899
23-06-10326578  202351
24-06-10326853  202535
25-06-10326998  202479


AS Summary
 34702  Number of ASes in routing system
 14744  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  4468  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS4323 : TWTC - tw telecom holdings, inc.
  95976768  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 25Jun10 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 327010   202472   12453838.1%   All ASes

AS6389  3910  293 361792.5%   BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
   BellSouth.net Inc.
AS4323  4468 1746 272260.9%   TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
   inc.
AS4766  1847  496 135173.1%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS22773 1165   70 109594.0%   ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
   Cox Communications Inc.
AS4755  1313  245 106881.3%   TATACOMM-AS TATA
   Communications formerly VSNL
   is Leading ISP
AS17488 1319  318 100175.9%   HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
   Cable Internet
AS6478  1283  325  95874.7%   ATT-INTERNET3 - ATT WorldNet
   Services
AS18566 1059  121  93888.6%   COVAD - Covad Communications
   Co.
AS8151  1463  565  89861.4%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS19262 1130  274  85675.8%   VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon
   Internet Services Inc.
AS10620 1057  234  82377.9%   Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS7545  1346  570  77657.7%   TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet
   Pty Ltd
AS8452  1162  408  75464.9%   TEDATA TEDATA
AS5668   872  131  74185.0%   AS-5668 - CenturyTel Internet
   Holdings, Inc.
AS4808   829  234  59571.8%   CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
   network China169 Beijing
   Province Network
AS4804   678   84  59487.6%   MPX-AS Microplex PTY LTD
AS7303   746  179  56776.0%   Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS35805  644   92  55285.7%   SILKNET-AS SILKNET AS
AS7018  1506  959  54736.3%   ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT WorldNet
   Services
AS3356  1183  662  52144.0%   LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
AS4780   684  163  52176.2%   SEEDNET Digital United Inc.
AS1785  1795 1292  50328.0%   AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
   Communications, Inc.
AS28573 1003  504  49949.8%   NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A.
AS17676  572   81  49185.8%   GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS9443   559   75  48486.6%   INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus
   Telecommunications
AS7552   613  130  48378.8%   VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
   Corporation
AS7011  1135  654  48142.4%   FRONTIER-AND-CITIZENS -
   Frontier Communications of
   America, Inc.
AS7738   477   30  44793.7%   Telecomunicacoes da Bahia S.A.
AS24560  923  486  43747.3%   AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
   Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
   Services
AS36992  641  211  43067.1%   ETISALAT-MISR

Total  37382116322575068.9%   Top 30 total


Possible Bogus Routes

31.0.0.0/16  AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC