Re: SORBS?!
Some of the IP's I manage got blacklisted and its true they were spamming and Sorbs had a very valid reason for blacklisting them. I got this response response from sorbs after resolving the problem amicably. Sorbs responded well on time. *Your request appear to have been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message. Please note: If your IP address has been delisted (marked as 'Inactive'), it will take up to 2 hours to get from the database to all the SORBS DNS servers. Changes to the database are exported to the DNS zone files periodically, not immediately after every change. Furthermore, after the updated database contents have been exported to the DNS zone files, it will then take up to 48 hours for the outdated DNS information to be removed from DNS caches around the world - none of these are in SORBS' control. Please do not reply to this call with problems not related to this ticket or your request will be ignored. * *On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Chris Conn cc...@b2b2c.ca wrote: * *Hello, Is anyone from SORBS still listening? We have a few IP addresses here and there that are listed, one in particular that has been for a spam incident from over a year ago. The last spam date is 03/05/2011 according to their lookup tools.* * We don't have access to their Net Manager even if our ARIN POC corresponds to the account on their system we opened a while ago. We use their ISP feedback form and never get any responses back.* * Is SORBS still relevant and functional?* * Sincerely,* Chris Conn B2B2C.ca -- Samson Oduor
RE: SORBS?!
Now, if we could only teach Senderbase that if their customers receive 'questionable' smtp traffic from 1 IP address in a /24 it doesn't mean that all IP addresses in that /24 are malicious we'd really be living it up in 2012. -Original Message- From: Sam Oduor [mailto:sam.od...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:56 AM To: Chris Conn Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: SORBS?! Some of the IP's I manage got blacklisted and its true they were spamming and Sorbs had a very valid reason for blacklisting them. I got this response response from sorbs after resolving the problem amicably. Sorbs responded well on time. *Your request appear to have been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message. Please note: If your IP address has been delisted (marked as 'Inactive'), it will take up to 2 hours to get from the database to all the SORBS DNS servers. Changes to the database are exported to the DNS zone files periodically, not immediately after every change. Furthermore, after the updated database contents have been exported to the DNS zone files, it will then take up to 48 hours for the outdated DNS information to be removed from DNS caches around the world - none of these are in SORBS' control. Please do not reply to this call with problems not related to this ticket or your request will be ignored. * *On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Chris Conn cc...@b2b2c.ca wrote: * *Hello, Is anyone from SORBS still listening? We have a few IP addresses here and there that are listed, one in particular that has been for a spam incident from over a year ago. The last spam date is 03/05/2011 according to their lookup tools.* * We don't have access to their Net Manager even if our ARIN POC corresponds to the account on their system we opened a while ago. We use their ISP feedback form and never get any responses back.* * Is SORBS still relevant and functional?* * Sincerely,* Chris Conn B2B2C.ca -- Samson Oduor
SIP Carrier Consolidation
Anyone here that have gone through the process of SIP trunking consolidation care to comment offline on Whom do you utilize? What has been your experience operationally? What was your experience during transition/implementation? Thank you ahead of time.
RE: SORBS?!
This is often the only way to get peoples attention and get action. Providers dont care about individual /32's and will let them sit around and spew nigerian scams and pill spams without any consequences. But they will care about a /24. -Dan On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Drew Weaver wrote: Now, if we could only teach Senderbase that if their customers receive 'questionable' smtp traffic from 1 IP address in a /24 it doesn't mean that all IP addresses in that /24 are malicious we'd really be living it up in 2012. -Original Message- From: Sam Oduor [mailto:sam.od...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:56 AM To: Chris Conn Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: SORBS?! Some of the IP's I manage got blacklisted and its true they were spamming and Sorbs had a very valid reason for blacklisting them. I got this response response from sorbs after resolving the problem amicably. Sorbs responded well on time. *Your request appear to have been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message. Please note: If your IP address has been delisted (marked as 'Inactive'), it will take up to 2 hours to get from the database to all the SORBS DNS servers. Changes to the database are exported to the DNS zone files periodically, not immediately after every change. Furthermore, after the updated database contents have been exported to the DNS zone files, it will then take up to 48 hours for the outdated DNS information to be removed from DNS caches around the world - none of these are in SORBS' control. Please do not reply to this call with problems not related to this ticket or your request will be ignored. * *On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Chris Conn cc...@b2b2c.ca wrote: * *Hello, Is anyone from SORBS still listening? We have a few IP addresses here and there that are listed, one in particular that has been for a spam incident from over a year ago. The last spam date is 03/05/2011 according to their lookup tools.* * We don't have access to their Net Manager even if our ARIN POC corresponds to the account on their system we opened a while ago. We use their ISP feedback form and never get any responses back.* * Is SORBS still relevant and functional?* * Sincerely,* Chris Conn B2B2C.ca -- Samson Oduor
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com wrote: I too had with nesol years ago. It required special phone calls to special people to update. Customer support never knew what was going on regarding or IPvWhat?. I suspect all of the people there that know about these types of things have moved on. Netsol has been leaking people since their sale to web.com last year, from actual layoffs and fear of the same. ~matt How long did it take them? We have had a request in for records for a domain for over a week now, and nothing in whois yet.
Re: SORBS?!
On 05/04/2012 17:48, goe...@anime.net wrote: But they will care about a /24. I'm curious as to why they would want to stop at /24. If you're going to take the shotgun approach, why not blacklist the entire ASN? Nick
Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
SIP trunking consolidation is buzzword heavy and context-light. What problem are you trying to solve and at what scale? Do you have a requirement to have the provider be a traditional TDM-based organization or is an aggregator sufficient? How price-sensitive are you? At fairly small scale (10 DIDs including some 877 numbers, feeding to Asterisk) I've had fine luck with http://voip.ms/ But your requirements may vary... -r Elijah Savage esav...@digitalrage.org writes: Anyone here that have gone through the process of SIP trunking consolidation care to comment offline on Whom do you utilize? What has been your experience operationally? What was your experience during transition/implementation? Thank you ahead of time.
Re: SORBS?!
That's probably a better idea. I moved into a /24 ip block that was SWIPed to me that they reported was dynamic cable/DSL users (no spam history, mind you). Didn't matter, I couldn't send e-mail. When trying to get it delisted I had a TTL on the zone that was incompatible with their standards (for DR failover purposes) and was unwilling to maintain a TTL of how many ever hours they wanted as it didn't fit the company's requirements. I ended up just getting a new IP block from the ISP as they gave up on resolving it too. Kind of a waste, but it worked. I relocated to there instead. 1 year later they updated my ticket and delisted it. On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 05/04/2012 17:48, goe...@anime.net wrote: But they will care about a /24. I'm curious as to why they would want to stop at /24. If you're going to take the shotgun approach, why not blacklist the entire ASN? Nick
Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
Thank you for the reply. Yes an aggregator, large deployment. Initially this is discovery, though price is always important it is most about understanding operations and implementation at this point. - Original Message - From: Robert E. Seastrom r...@seastrom.com To: Elijah Savage esav...@digitalrage.org Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 1:44:22 PM Subject: Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation SIP trunking consolidation is buzzword heavy and context-light. What problem are you trying to solve and at what scale? Do you have a requirement to have the provider be a traditional TDM-based organization or is an aggregator sufficient? How price-sensitive are you? At fairly small scale (10 DIDs including some 877 numbers, feeding to Asterisk) I've had fine luck with http://voip.ms/ But your requirements may vary... -r Elijah Savage esav...@digitalrage.org writes: Anyone here that have gone through the process of SIP trunking consolidation care to comment offline on Whom do you utilize? What has been your experience operationally? What was your experience during transition/implementation? Thank you ahead of time.
Re: SIP Carrier Consolidation
I have to respond with the sentiments of Robert: large is a very relative term. Also, are we talking about origination or termination here? How many minutes a day of each? What's your ACD? What are your top destinations? If it's bursty like a call center how many concurrent calls? You can't get any real answers without providing relevant information. On Apr 5, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Elijah Savage wrote: Thank you for the reply. Yes an aggregator, large deployment. Initially this is discovery, though price is always important it is most about understanding operations and implementation at this point.
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:26:11AM -0700, George B. wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com wrote: I too had with nesol years ago. It required special phone calls to special people to update. Customer support never knew what was going on regarding or IPvWhat?. I suspect all of the people there that know about these types of things have moved on. Netsol has been leaking people since their sale to web.com last year, from actual layoffs and fear of the same. ~matt How long did it take them? We have had a request in for records for a domain for over a week now, and nothing in whois yet. 2002, it took 3hrs. /bill
