Re: The day SORBS goes away ...

2012-04-14 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On 13 Apr 2012 22:01:14 -, John Levine said:
   dnslists  = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
   : rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \

 Are you paying Trend for access to these?  If not, you're not getting
 any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.

Do they return a canned answer that says don't block, or do you get
to wait for a DNS timeout?


pgp2Zxd1WYlnR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: IPv6 Launch day preparation

2012-04-14 Thread Mukom Akong T.
Interesting setup you have there!! From the session, do you have
configs for the different scenarios that were tested and what kind of
'issues' were unearthed?

Regards

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Pierre-Yves Maunier na...@maunier.org wrote:
 http://g6.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ipv6-launch-lab.pdf



-- 
Mukom Akong [Tamon]
__

“We don't LIVE in order to BREATH. Similarly WORKING in order to make
MONEY puts us on a one way street to irrelevance.“


[In Search of Excellence  Perfection] - http://perfexcellence.org
[Moments of TechXcellence] - http://techexcellence.net
[ICT Business Integration] - http://ibiztech.wordpress.com
[About Me] - http://about.me/perfexcellence



Re: The day SORBS goes away ...

2012-04-14 Thread John R. Levine

 dnslists  = dialups.mail-abuse.org \
 : rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org \


Are you paying Trend for access to these?


yes, i have an arrangement


I used to pay (not very much) but realized several years ago that after 
using the Spamhaus lists, MAPS didn't catch anything useful.


Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of The Internet for Dummies,
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly



Re: The day SORBS goes away ...

2012-04-14 Thread Randy Bush
i have not tested to see who catches what.  not really into spam
research.  just trying to reduce it for a server.

randy



Re: The day SORBS goes away ...

2012-04-14 Thread John Levine
 Are you paying Trend for access to these?  If not, you're not getting
 any answers from them and they're not blocking anything.

Do they return a canned answer that says don't block, or do you get
to wait for a DNS timeout?

Is there some reason you're asking random people rather than spending
the 30 seconds needed to find out for yourself?

R's,
John



Re: Most energy efficient (home) setup

2012-04-14 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net said:
 There may be a performance penalty using raid4, because it uses one 
 parity disk. Although that system looks like it can be useful for some 
 purposes it looks less ideal for home use. Also I don't see how it would 
 allow you to install your own OS.

For read-mostly storage, there's no penalty as long as there's no disk
failure.  The parity drive wouldn't even spin up for reads.
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.



Re: Most energy efficient (home) setup

2012-04-14 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
 The current Mac mini Server model sports an i7 2.0GHz quad-core CPU
 and up to 16GB RAM (see OWC for that, IIRC).  Two drives, up to 750GB
 each, or SSD's if you prefer.

The Mac mini server is quite intringuing with that low power
requirement . Unfortunately...  16 GB   _Non-ECC_ memory.  I sure
would not want to run a  NAS VM  on a server  with non-ECC memory that
cannot correct single-bit errors,  at least  with any data I cared
much about..

When you have such a large quantity of RAM, single-bit/fade errors
caused by background irradiation happen often, although at a fairly
low rate. Usually on a workstation it's not an issue,  because there
is not a massive quantity of idle memory.

If you're running this 24x7 with VMs and Non-ECC memory,  it's only a
question of time,
before silent memory corruption results in one of the VMs.

And silent memory corruption can make its way to the filesystem,  or
applications'  internal saved data structures  (such as the contents
of a VM's registry database).

True can be partially mitigated with backups;  but the idea of  VMs
blue-screening or ESXi  crashing with purple screen  every 3 or 4
months sounds annoying.

 12 frickin' watts when idle.  Or thereabouts.  Think about 40 watts
 when running full tilt, maybe a bit more.

-- 
-JH