RE: YouTube Video Streaming

2012-05-18 Thread Leigh Porter

 I would like to get some input for the following problem we face with
 YouTube video streaming.
 We are an ISP in Singapore and peer with Google at Equinix and SOX
 (Singapore Open Exchange), For about 2 weeks we have been facing choppy
 streaming or continuous buffering on various YouTube videos. These
 problem videos are streamed at HD or original quality.
 Our troubleshooting narrow down to those bad videos being streamed to
 us from outside Singapore. We contacted Google support, they are
 confused too, as why we are served from a cache server in Poland on one
 of the videos. The case has been escalated within Google, unfortunately
 no update from them since.
 
 Not all YouTube videos are bad through us, some 45 minutes videos can
 fully buffered within seconds on HD or original quality, of course the
 IP we streamed for these videos are through our local peering with
 Google.

I have seen similar issues, some videos work fine but others seem to stop after 
either a few minutes or half way through. The same behaviour is seen on various 
computers, the same video stops at the same place.

I didn't have time and could not be bothered to look into it at the time and 
kind of put it down to one of those things that will be fixed later. 

So I'd be really interested in what the outcome is!

--
Leigh Porter


__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__



Re: pbx recco

2012-05-18 Thread Thilo Bangert
yate hasnt been mentioned, which i am using successfully in multiple roles.

http://yate.null.ro/pmwiki/

they have a distro similar to freepbx at http://www.freesentral.com/

however, we are currently evaluating sip:provider CE, which may be more than 
you need, but definitively worth a look.

http://www.sipwise.com/products/spce/

its an open source softswitch implementation, which has made tremendous 
progress in recent releases.

kind regards
Thilo



Re: YouTube Video Streaming

2012-05-18 Thread Alex Brooks
Hi,

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Thames tha...@viewqwest.com wrote:
 I would like to get some input for the following problem we face with YouTube 
 video streaming.
 We are an ISP in Singapore and peer with Google at Equinix and SOX (Singapore 
 Open Exchange), For about 2 weeks we have been facing choppy streaming or 
 continuous buffering on various YouTube videos.

I don't know how big you are, but have you considered joining the
Google Global Cache http://ggcadmin.google.com/ggc ?  It may help in
the future with issues like this.

It seems odd that Google aren't doing much with this, they are usually
quite obsessive when it comes to reducing latency and other issues
over their peering connections.

Alex



RE: Commerical Backup Solutions

2012-05-18 Thread Jamie Bowden
BackupExec was a Seagate product Symantec bought prior to their purchase of 
Veritas.  I've been using NetBackup for over a decade now (originally in Irix 
and Solaris heavy environments, but these days on Windows and Linux for the 
most part). Symantec are a pain the ass to deal with, but the core NetBackup 
functionality is still stable and reliable (and BackupExec has been brought 
into parity in many ways with NetBackup over the years, but still lacks some 
features and functions its bigger brother handles).  The master server role can 
be anywhere in your topology and the media server role is separated out and can 
exist across multiple hosts and locations.  Management can be done from any 
approved host running the management console software.  Tivoli and Legato are 
pretty similar feature, functionality, and being expensive, though I wouldn't 
wish Legato on anyone.

-- 
Jamie Bowden(ja...@photon.com)
Sr. Sys. Admin. (703) 243-6613 x3848
Photon Research Associates, Inc.
1616 Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, VA 22209


 -Original Message-
 From: Josh Baird [mailto:joshba...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:02 PM
 To: Thomas York
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: Commerical Backup Solutions
 
 We have used Symantec's BackupExec (Veritas) in several locations but
 have standardized on IBM's Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM).  Not a fan of
 IBM, but it works, and it works well.  Be prepared to drop some
 serious coin, though.  We currently use it to do tape backups for over
 800+ servers (Linux, AIX, Windows).
 
 Josh
 
 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Thomas York strate...@fuhell.com
 wrote:
  We use Barracuda Yosemite backup with about 10 locations all over the
  world, using disk to disk (single disks via esata and to SANs) and
 disk to
  tape (both libraries and single drives). Very rarely do we have
 issues.
  Barracuda support isn't as good as Yosemite's (Barracuda bought them)
 but
  still not bad. Also, the site wide license is a steal! Get a demo, it
 might
  fit the bill.
 
  --Thomas York
  On May 17, 2012 6:59 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  We used Acronis and it was a nightmare as was their off-shored
 support
  model. Never again... Wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole.
 
  Switched to Iron Mountain LiveVault which backs everything up over
 the
  wire. It has basic reporting functions but not extremely granular.
  http://ironmountain.com/services/democenter/livevault/player.html
 
  Barracuda also seems to have a nice product. Though, i've never used
 it:
  http://www.barracudanetworks.com/ns/products/backup_overview.php
 
  -Mike
 
  On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
  wrote:
 
   Hey folks.
  
  
  
   I'm hoping for some input from operational folks on backup
 solutions for
   servers.  We are looking for a commercial backup solution with a
 nice
   reporting dashboard etc.
  
  
  
   It must support full/incremental backups on Windows and various
 flavors
  of
   Linux.  We would also be looking for bare metal image/recovery
 abilities.
  
  
  
   To date, we've been fond of Acronis until we got the quote for it
 ..
   Initially we would be looking at 50-80 servers and growing it up
 from
  there
   to probably 150-200 boxes.  Some of these servers are
 geographically
   dispersed.
  
  
  
   At the moment we have been using Bacula but it lacks bare metal
 options
  and
   doesn't have any nice reporting options (Executive Dashboard etc)
  
  
  
   Thanks for any input,
  
  
  
   Paul
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  --
  Mike Lyon
  408-621-4826
  mike.l...@gmail.com
 
  http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
 




RE: Commerical Backup Solutions

2012-05-18 Thread Scott Berkman
Add Seagate's Evault to your list:

http://www.evault.com/

Has the support for BMR, Windows (including agents for Exchange and MSSQL),
Linux, encryption, vault replication, VADP, etc.

They also have a partner program for service providers (my employer happens
to be one).

I've personally used the product across multiple companies all the way back
to before Seagate bought them out, and I view it as one of the most mature
offerings on the market, and support has always been great.

Good luck!

-Scott

-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart [mailto:p...@paulstewart.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 6:53 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Commerical Backup Solutions

Hey folks.

 

I'm hoping for some input from operational folks on backup solutions for
servers.  We are looking for a commercial backup solution with a nice
reporting dashboard etc.

 

It must support full/incremental backups on Windows and various flavors of
Linux.  We would also be looking for bare metal image/recovery abilities.

 

To date, we've been fond of Acronis until we got the quote for it ..
Initially we would be looking at 50-80 servers and growing it up from there
to probably 150-200 boxes.  Some of these servers are geographically
dispersed.

 

At the moment we have been using Bacula but it lacks bare metal options and
doesn't have any nice reporting options (Executive Dashboard etc)

 

Thanks for any input,

 

Paul

 

 

 





RE: Commerical Backup Solutions

2012-05-18 Thread Scott Berkman
I wanted to add that I've had some recent experience with Asigra (and
specifically pitting it against Evault), and they are currently a little
behind in VADP and other VMWare related feature sets, and their Linux
distribution support is very limited (basically no support for anything but
RedHat).  They also charge extra for the web console.

Overall for our needs, Evault beat out Asigra, but there isn't anything
horribly wrong with Asigra's product either.

-Scott

-Original Message-
From: Blake Pfankuch [mailto:bl...@pfankuch.me] 
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:31 PM
To: Josh Baird; Thomas York
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Commerical Backup Solutions

First, I work for a managed service provider.  We support a large number of
traditional and over the wire backup solutions.  We have used Symantec
Backup Exec, eVault, Acronis, Intronis, Asigra, Heroware (newer solution
more DR focused) and many more I've purged from my memory.

I have been using BE since it was Veritas starting in about 2003.  Backup
Exec is GREAT if you have a premise Disk server with Tape archive, or even a
remote over fast WAN.  Acronis is nice, but not easy to manage historically.
Intronis get not only a no, but a hell no please die now.  Asigra is
probably one of my favorites.  You spend the cash for it, but it works
right, it integrates with everything, depending on if you get it from a
reseller or run your own vault, you get good reporting options and BMR is
easy as pie.  Heroware has great DR and versioning options but its still
growing.  Small datacenter platform, I like it a lot.

Aiming at Asigra a little more there are many vendors that offer over the
wire backup using this.  Most of them price by the gig, but based on what
you are doing you could probably do a peer replication where you run your
own vault locally to back up to, and then integrate that to one of many
providers to get your off site.  Asigra offers decent compression and
integration into Windows and nix tools for open file and such.  We have used
Asigra to backup up anything from nt4 to 2008r2, nix, bsd, as400, esx and
esxi.  All the backup stuff is included.  You get the base software you get
the ability to back up everything it can, with the exception of Message
Level backup and restore in Exchange, and file level within SharePoint which
require another service to be enabled.  The UI has its moments of clunky,
but it has gotten WAY better over the past few years.  Reporting options are
great, as is file growth trending.  Restores are tricky the first time, but
its just a learning curve like any other app.

As far as BMR restores on above products I've pretty much done them all.  We
do a lot of SMB work so many times single server, often SBS.  I have done
single DC, Exchange servers, mysql servers, file and print servers and many
more.  By far the trickiest ones are the Windows Small Business Servers
based solely on the fact they can be complicated to work with as they have
Windows, AD, Exchange, SQL, RWW and SharePoint on 1 box.  If you have ever
done a BMR of an SBS server 2000/2003/2008/2011 if everything isn't perfect
you might as well rebuild.  All of these assume you have a well managed
backup solution which is getting all the data needed for a full restore of
course.

Backup Exec its possible and its not that hard.  EVault in theory, but the
process can be difficult.  Acronis does a very nice job of it.  Intronis
don't bother, spend the time working on a resume because a BMR from this is
probably a career changing event.  I had to attempt it for one customer, I
got the data I needed gave it the proverbial finger and built a new server
to move it onto.  

Asigra makes it really easy.   I have done about 5 (about 18 in our company
total) SBS full restores.  You have to jump through a few hoops, but we
fully restored a failed SBS 2003 server onto a VM while replacement hardware
came in in 12 hours, including line of business SQL app, Exchange, AD and
about 200gb of data.

Heroware is very similar in theory.  It works off a replication technology
(DoubleTake backend) which does snapshots within the replication.  Heroware
is designed to have an appliance per 10-50 servers depending on size and
load so it might not scale to the size you are looking.  

Dollars to doughnuts if I had the option, I would do Asigra every time if I
had the budget from the customer for the offsite.  Why?  Many of the
resellers out there even guarantee they can do a 24 or 48 hour RTO of a full
environment assuming they have the correct backed up date.  It just works
that well.  I have done 2 5+ server environments restore the whole thing
from backups with no problems in 24 hours or less onto mismatched hardware
as well.  Keep in mind we are working with customers with user counts
between 10 and 150 in most cases and usually about $1 per gig  because they
are lower size.  I've heard rumors of people getting as low as 25 cents a
gig, but I cant speak to that.

Yes, I resell 

Re: YouTube Video Streaming

2012-05-18 Thread Dan White

On 05/18/12 10:37 +0800, Thames wrote:

I would like to get some input for the following problem we face with
YouTube video streaming.

We are an ISP in Singapore and peer with Google at Equinix and SOX
(Singapore Open Exchange), For about 2 weeks we have been facing choppy
streaming or continuous buffering on various YouTube videos. These problem
videos are streamed at HD or original quality.  Our troubleshooting narrow
down to those bad videos being streamed to us from outside Singapore. We
contacted Google support, they are confused too, as why we are served from
a cache server in Poland on one of the videos. The case has been escalated
within Google, unfortunately no update from them since.

Not all YouTube videos are bad through us, some 45 minutes videos can
fully buffered within seconds on HD or original quality, of course the IP
we streamed for these videos are through our local peering with Google.

-Thames


Thames,

We went through something similar here about a year ago. It took around two
weeks for Google engineers to resolve the trouble, however, the problem has
popped up once or twice since then.

Here is a post from the nanog archives that describes a workaround, where
you relay youtube dns queries to another DNS resolver in your area that
does not experience the problem:

http://seclists.org/nanog/2011/May/21

--
Dan White



need help about bgd and ospf

2012-05-18 Thread Deric Kwok
Hi all

Can I have questions about bgp and ospf

1/ Do I have to redistrt bgd in ospf to make ospf to know which
upstrem bgp routers to go out

2/ If yes, how many routes can ospf database handle as one full bgp
table is about 400,000 routes

3/ When we have 8 ospf routers to run redistrubt bgp, ls it 8 x
400,000 routes in ospf database?

4/ If not redistribted bgp, how ospf to know which upstream to go out

Thank you for your help



Re: need help about bgd and ospf

2012-05-18 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Nope, run iBGP, have only next-hops in OSPF.

Regards,
Jeff

On May 18, 2012, at 19:14, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all
 
 Can I have questions about bgp and ospf
 
 1/ Do I have to redistrt bgd in ospf to make ospf to know which
 upstrem bgp routers to go out
 
 2/ If yes, how many routes can ospf database handle as one full bgp
 table is about 400,000 routes
 
 3/ When we have 8 ospf routers to run redistrubt bgp, ls it 8 x
 400,000 routes in ospf database?
 
 4/ If not redistribted bgp, how ospf to know which upstream to go out
 
 Thank you for your help
 



Re: need help about bgd and ospf

2012-05-18 Thread Barry Greene
Hi Deric,

I would strongly suggest that you watch a couple of the NANOG tutorials on 
routing. The would help you answer these and other questions. 

Go to this page - http://www.nanog.org/meetings/archive/ - pick a meeting and 
find the BGP tutorial. There are a few taught each year. 

Barry

Sent from my iPad

On May 18, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all
 
 Can I have questions about bgp and ospf
 
 1/ Do I have to redistrt bgd in ospf to make ospf to know which
 upstrem bgp routers to go out
 
 2/ If yes, how many routes can ospf database handle as one full bgp
 table is about 400,000 routes
 
 3/ When we have 8 ospf routers to run redistrubt bgp, ls it 8 x
 400,000 routes in ospf database?
 
 4/ If not redistribted bgp, how ospf to know which upstream to go out
 
 Thank you for your help
 



Weekly Routing Table Report

2012-05-18 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith pfsi...@gmail.com.

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 19 May, 2012

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  409230
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:  173889
Deaggregation factor:  2.35
Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 199573
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 41033
Prefixes per ASN:  9.97
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   33202
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   15654
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:5481
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:137
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.5
Max AS path length visible:  30
Max AS path prepend of ASN (36992)   22
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:   365
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 132
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:   2716
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:2350
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:5960
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:2
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:106
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2550061936
Equivalent to 151 /8s, 254 /16s and 219 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   68.8
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   68.9
Percentage of available address space allocated:   99.9
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   92.7
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  174827

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:   100170
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   32430
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.09
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:   96619
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:39919
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4690
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   20.60
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   1242
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:728
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.7
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 22
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:212
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  644826304
Equivalent to 38 /8s, 111 /16s and 68 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 81.8

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 131072-132095, 132096-133119
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 175/8, 180/8,
   182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8,
   219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:151240
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:76711
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.97
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   121762
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 50992
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:15113
ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 8.06
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:

Level3 Issues

2012-05-18 Thread Scott Wolfe
Anyone having BGP issues in and out of Level3 in the past 30 minutes?

--ScottW


Re: Level3 Issues

2012-05-18 Thread Bill Blackford
I see a few drops in ATLN

-b


On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Scott Wolfe scott.wo...@cybera.net wrote:
 Anyone having BGP issues in and out of Level3 in the past 30 minutes?

 --ScottW



-- 
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.



Re: Level3 Issues

2012-05-18 Thread Steven Saner
On 05/18/2012 03:17 PM, Scott Wolfe wrote:
 Anyone having BGP issues in and out of Level3 in the past 30 minutes?
 
 --ScottW
 

No BGP issues via Kansas City, but looks like somewhat less than normal
amount of traffic.

Steve

-- 
--
Steven Saner ssa...@hubris.net  Voice:  316-858-3000
Director of Network Operations  Fax:  316-858-3001
Hubris Communicationshttp://www.hubris.net



BGP Update Report

2012-05-18 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report
Interval: 10-May-12 -to- 17-May-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS982975456  3.6%  62.7 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet 
Backbone
 2 - AS840268093  3.2%  34.6 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom
 3 - AS702929621  1.4%  13.3 -- WINDSTREAM - Windstream 
Communications Inc
 4 - AS24560   28898  1.4%  31.7 -- AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti 
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia Services
 5 - AS12479   26694  1.3% 381.3 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
 6 - AS32528   24694  1.2%4938.8 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 7 - AS178524617  1.2%  13.2 -- AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec 
Communications, Inc.
 8 - AS845220123  0.9%  29.7 -- TE-AS TE-AS
 9 - AS25620   19727  0.9% 116.7 -- COTAS LTDA.
10 - AS580019376  0.9%  72.3 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD 
Network Information Center
11 - AS13118   19205  0.9% 533.5 -- ASN-YARTELECOM OJSC Rostelecom
12 - AS815114216  0.7%  17.4 -- Uninet S.A. de C.V.
13 - AS383 12128  0.6% 120.1 -- AFCONC-BLOCK1-AS - 754th 
Electronic Systems Group
14 - AS755211929  0.6%  11.8 -- VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel Corporation
15 - AS17974   11779  0.6%   9.7 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT 
Telekomunikasi Indonesia
16 - AS31148   10984  0.5%  15.4 -- FREENET-AS FreeNet ISP
17 - AS36167   10402  0.5% 103.0 -- NETRIPLEX01 - NETRIPLEX LLC
18 - AS11664   10180  0.5%  39.0 -- Techtel LMDS Comunicaciones 
Interactivas S.A.
19 - AS650310176  0.5%  16.8 -- Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V.
20 - AS9583 9985  0.5%  13.6 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS447988115  0.4%8115.0 -- PERVOMAYSK-AS PP 
SKS-Pervomaysk
 2 - AS166525809  0.3%5809.0 -- RISEUP - Riseup Networks
 3 - AS573435456  0.3%5456.0 -- DIGIMAT-AS Digimat s.r.l.
 4 - AS32528   24694  1.2%4938.8 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 5 - AS207752640  0.1%2640.0 -- GETIT GETIT Internet GmbH
 6 - AS32482  0.1% 366.0 -- UMNIAH Umniah Mobile Company
 7 - AS7219 1282  0.1%1282.0 -- ASNTULIX - Tulix Systems, Inc.
 8 - AS369481932  0.1% 966.0 -- KENIC
 9 - AS55665 884  0.0% 884.0 -- STMI-AS-ID PT Sampoerna 
Telemedia Indonesia
10 - AS190451708  0.1% 854.0 -- DIRECTCOM - Direct 
Communications Cable LLC
11 - AS21452 795  0.0% 795.0 -- skannet-ibadan
12 - AS42281 794  0.0% 794.0 -- RACHFAHL-IT-AS Rachfahl 
IT-Solutions GmbH  Co.KG
13 - AS5430 6128  0.3% 766.0 -- FREENETDE freenet 
Datenkommunikations GmbH
14 - AS29126 746  0.0% 746.0 -- DATIQ-AS Datiq B.V.
15 - AS328905134  0.2% 733.4 -- BTC-AS-1 - Beehive Telephone 
Company, Inc.
16 - AS9821  718  0.0% 718.0 -- DOST-PH-AP Department of 
Science and Technology
17 - AS406771223  0.1% 611.5 -- GLOBALAIR-COM - Globalair.com
18 - AS132631767  0.1% 589.0 -- HAYATNET-AS HayatNet Bilgi ve 
Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S
19 - AS491821136  0.1% 568.0 -- BTENGAGEIT BT ENGAGE IT Limited
20 - AS27667 557  0.0% 557.0 -- Universidad Autonoma de la 
Laguna


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 109.161.64.0/19   18741  0.8%   AS13118 -- ASN-YARTELECOM OJSC Rostelecom
 2 - 130.36.34.0/2412339  0.6%   AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 3 - 130.36.35.0/2412339  0.6%   AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 4 - 41.43.147.0/24 9960  0.4%   AS8452  -- TE-AS TE-AS
 5 - 91.202.212.0/228115  0.4%   AS44798 -- PERVOMAYSK-AS PP 
SKS-Pervomaysk
 6 - 62.36.252.0/22 8007  0.4%   AS12479 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
 7 - 62.36.249.0/24 6467  0.3%   AS12479 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
 8 - 62.36.241.0/24 6066  0.3%   AS12479 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
 9 - 62.36.210.0/24 5909  0.3%   AS12479 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
10 - 199.254.238.0/24   5809  0.3%   AS16652 -- RISEUP - Riseup Networks
11 - 91.231.179.0/245456  0.2%   AS57343 -- DIGIMAT-AS Digimat s.r.l.
12 - 194.63.9.0/24  5325  0.2%   AS1273  -- CW Cable and Wireless Worldwide 
plc
13 - 202.56.215.0/243582  0.2%   AS24560 -- AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti 
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia Services
14 - 69.54.109.0/24 3565  0.2%   AS7018  -- ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT Services, 
Inc.
15 - 182.64.0.0/16  3345  0.1%   AS24560 -- AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti 
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia Services
16 - 217.194.224.0/20   2640  0.1%   AS20775 -- GETIT GETIT Internet GmbH
17 - 193.105.129.0/24   2482  0.1%   AS3 -- UMNIAH Umniah Mobile Company

The Cidr Report

2012-05-18 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri May 18 21:12:46 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
11-05-12410225  240868
12-05-12410475  240522
13-05-12410127  241239
14-05-12410740  240953
15-05-12410599  240761
16-05-12410522  241112
17-05-12411045  241394
18-05-12411873  241338


AS Summary
 41157  Number of ASes in routing system
 17189  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  3414  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS6389 : BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc.
  112440288  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 18May12 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 412447   241411   17103641.5%   All ASes

AS6389  3414  196 321894.3%   BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
   BellSouth.net Inc.
AS7029  3407 1889 151844.6%   WINDSTREAM - Windstream
   Communications Inc
AS4766  2608 1122 148657.0%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS22773 1607  135 147291.6%   ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
   Cox Communications Inc.
AS18566 2094  703 139166.4%   COVAD - Covad Communications
   Co.
AS28573 1858  497 136173.3%   NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A.
AS4323  1585  385 120075.7%   TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
   inc.
AS10620 1911  805 110657.9%   Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS1785  1905  802 110357.9%   AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
   Communications, Inc.
AS4755  1577  534 104366.1%   TATACOMM-AS TATA
   Communications formerly VSNL
   is Leading ISP
AS7303  1435  446  98968.9%   Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS7552  1173  224  94980.9%   VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
   Corporation
AS26615  902   32  87096.5%   Tim Celular S.A.
AS8151  1486  673  81354.7%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS18101  947  158  78983.3%   RELIANCE-COMMUNICATIONS-IN
   Reliance Communications
   Ltd.DAKC MUMBAI
AS17974 1924 1162  76239.6%   TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
   Telekomunikasi Indonesia
AS4808  1109  350  75968.4%   CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
   network China169 Beijing
   Province Network
AS9394   834  153  68181.7%   CRNET CHINA RAILWAY
   Internet(CRNET)
AS13977  770  121  64984.3%   CTELCO - FAIRPOINT
   COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AS2118   658   14  64497.9%   RELCOM-AS OOO NPO Relcom
AS3356  1100  463  63757.9%   LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
AS30036 1417  786  63144.5%   MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS -
   Mediacom Communications Corp
AS17676  691   75  61689.1%   GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS19262  995  398  59760.0%   VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon Online
   LLC
AS22561 1016  424  59258.3%   DIGITAL-TELEPORT - Digital
   Teleport Inc.
AS24560 1027  450  57756.2%   AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
   Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
   Services
AS4780   832  258  57469.0%   SEEDNET Digital United Inc.
AS3549  1006  444  56255.9%   GBLX Global Crossing Ltd.
AS22047  582   31  55194.7%   VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.
AS8452  1302  759  54341.7%   TE-AS TE-AS

Total  43172144892868366.4%   Top 30 total


Possible Bogus Routes

10.86.64.32/30   AS65530 -Private Use AS-

Re: NANOG 55 DNS Track

2012-05-18 Thread Mehmet Akcin
Hello again,

I wanted to follow up and let NANOG community know the detailed plans for DNS 
Track.

Session will take place on Tuesday, June 5, 2012 from 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM
in Salon A-C

NANOG DNS BoF 90mins

5 Mins Introductions - Mehmet
15 Mins Steve Crocker - Chair, FCC CSRIC Working Group 5, DNSSEC Implementation 
Practices for ISPs
10 Mins PCH Update - Robert Martin-Legène
10 Mins Verisign Update - Duane Wessels
10 Mins ICANN Update - Dave Knight
10 Mins Comcast Update - Chris Ganster
10 Mins ISC Update - Peter Losher
20 Mins QA - regarding presentations  more.

if you have any questions please feel free to contact me, looking forward to 
see you all there.

Mehmet

On May 2, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:

 Hello everyone,
 
 NANOG 55 will take place in Vancouver , Canada June 3-6 , 2012. I will send 
 more information about DNS Track timing and details of the track later.
 
 I am sending this email to ask NANOG attendees to help us organize a better 
 track by letting us know what topics they want to see covered about DNS.
 
 We are also inviting parties who are DNS Software providers,  service 
 providers, experts, and researchers to join and present about what they think 
 is interesting. Please contact me directly if you want to briefly bring 
 something interesting about DNS to this Track's and their attendees 
 attention. 
 
 Since the whole track will be 90mins and we want to allow as much as talks to 
 take a place it would be good idea to limit any specific talk to 15 mins and 
 keeping it really operational , brief and clear would be great idea.
 
 as I said earlier as soon as track details are decided,  I will send a second 
 e-mail to let the community know. thank you for your interest.
 
 mehmet