Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited

2012-09-01 Thread Bjørn Mork
Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us writes:

 What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?

There was some renewed interest recently (i.e. last year).  See the
discussion starting at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg180282.html

But do note davem's replies in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg180401.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg180646.html

Don't put too much into the fringe facility comment.  There have been
similar comments on e.g. IPv6, and that went in some time ago :-)

So in short: There is some interest and some people working on this in
a direction which has some hope of mainline integration.


Bjørn



Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited

2012-09-01 Thread Bjørn Mork
Edward Dore edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk writes:

 They used to publish the source for their 2.4 kernel on
 routerboard.com (in fact, it's still available at
 http://routerboard.com/files/linux-2.4.31.zip), but I've not seen
 anything for the 2.6 kernel however and the routerboard.com site was
 redesigned a little while ago, seemingly without the links as far as I
 can tell.

 It might be a case of you need to ask them for it. Would be
 interesting to see which bits are GPL.

There is no doubt that *all* bits of the Linux kernel are GPL.  Whether
vendors respect this is another question.  But Mikrotik most certainly
cannot distribute the Linux kernel, modified or not, without also
providing the full source code.


Bjørn



Re: Finding Name Servers (not NS records) of domain name

2012-09-01 Thread Anurag Bhatia
Thanks for helpful replies everyone!


I missed to understand Owen's reply here but he was kind and helpful enough
to explain me when I met him last week!

So simple logic of reading given name from right to left looking for
specific pattern (my old nameservers). I didn't realized that reading from
right to left digging NS for each zone coming in can pretty much solve the
issue.




On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lavanauts.orgwrote:

 On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Matthew Palmer wrote:

  I religiously use http://squish.net/dnscheck/ the moment I suspect *any*
 sort of DNS hinkiness.  Verbose, but *damn* if it doesn't hand me the
 answer
 practically every time.


 http://dnscheck.iis.se

 It's not as verbose and provides more direct diagnosis and recommendations
 on what needs fixing.

 Antonio Querubin
 e-mail:  t...@lavanauts.org
 xmpp:  antonioqueru...@gmail.com




-- 

Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com

Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21 |
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia|
Google+ https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854


Re: Color vision for network techs

2012-09-01 Thread Vadim Antonov
The simple solution for color perception issues is to carry some cheap 
red/green 3d glasses... they would make discriminating between LED colors as 
easy as closing one eye:)


Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider

2012-09-01 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:21 AM,  bill.ing...@t-systems.com wrote:
 I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal routing protocol is
 unnecessary.  Can you explain the reasoning behind this?  I understand
 the technical issue whereby GRE will allow multicast for EIGRP, OSPF,
 etc, but why not just redistribute into BGP?

 I work on a lot of MPLS CE routers, and in general you can accomplish
 anything you need by redistributing your internal routing protocol into
 BGP, and adjusting LP, MED and AS Prepend as needed.

 Thanks,
 Bill

So, rather than run an IGP between siteA and siteZ across
a GRE tunnel, you'd prefer to redistribute your IGP into BGP
at siteA, advertise those routes upstream...and at siteZ, accept
the routes in via BGP, and then redistribute them into the IGP
for the other routers at siteZ, and vice versa?

Or would you have every router at siteA and siteZ participate
in BGP, so that all the routers at siteZ get the routes from
siteA intact?

(choice B tends to have practical implications on what
network gear you can run within the sites; many devices
that will happily speak OSPF or EIGRP won't be quite so
happy participating in an iBGP mesh.  And choice A...well,
I think we all know the pitfall with choice A, so enough said
on that score).

Curious to hear the actual mechanism you'd use to make
this work in the real world.

Thanks!

Matt