Re: IPv6 adoption in the past few days
False alarm. Sorry for vain hope (if there was any). IPv6 is back in normal. Seatbelts can be unfasten. T. On 6/24/13 2:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote: there is massive increase in IPv6 adoption (from 1.5% to 1.7%) in the past few days. luckily i had my seatbelt fastened randy
Re: Paetec PI space?
On 6/26/2013 5:11 PM, Adam Greene wrote: Thanks everyone. It sounds like (a) customer needs to clarify contract terms with Paetec, and (b) unless they have an ongoing relationship, the best long-term plan is to renumber. I did check reg dates on the blocks, and it is much more recent than the customer led me to believe (or than I interpreted) ... so I suspect this is less something which simply dropped off the map and more of an above-board and possibly ongoing relationship than I suspected. The customer does provide voice service, so there may be something going on behind the scenes which makes sense from an authoritative routing perspective. Thanks for your help. This customer seems to be responsible so I suspect I may not have all the details and overstated the issue. And just one more note to complicate things a little more for you. Paetec was acquired by Windstream last year. I hope that doesn't make it even harder for you to find answers to your questions from the service provider, but I suspect that it will. -- Dave Sparro
Re: Google's Geo IP Solution
perhaps more verbosely: Jeffrey, how can I be of assistance? Or did you already get worked out via another avenue? On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: yes? On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Jeff Harper jhar...@well.com wrote: Hello, If anyone on the list is from Google and involved with their GeoIP service, could you please contact me off list? I've been trying to get one IP address modified from Canada to the US. Every other main GeoIP has the location correctly, except Google. I've filled out their correction form multiple times over the last 4 months, but perhaps the form isn't reaching them? Thanks very much! -- Jeff Harper | www.well.com ip access-list extended jeff permit tcp any any eq intelligence deny tcp any any eq stupid-people
SixXS Contact
Are there any SixXS admins who read this list? I seem to have committed a faux pas with respect to requesting an account, and I'm not getting any responses to my attempts (to i...@sixxs.net) to clear up the issue. I appreciate the response, and apologize for this intrusion... _KMP
Re: SixXS Contact
Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points after committing a faux pas with respect to going negative from down v6 tunnels and deleting. Now to create a new tunnel I need positive ISK points and I'm stilling at -10 with no way to boost my numbers. :( Reset Points: AWJ11-SIXXS Oh Pretty please w/sugar on top. :) -Alby On 6/27/2013 10:17 AM, K. M. Peterson wrote: Are there any SixXS admins who read this list? I seem to have committed a faux pas with respect to requesting an account, and I'm not getting any responses to my attempts (to i...@sixxs.net) to clear up the issue. I appreciate the response, and apologize for this intrusion... _KMP
Re: SixXS Contact
Subject: Re: SixXS Contact Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:47:51AM -0400 Quoting Anthony Williams (alby.willi...@verizon.com): Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points after committing a faux pas with respect to going negative from down v6 tunnels and deleting. Now to create a new tunnel I need positive ISK points and I'm stilling at -10 with no way to boost my numbers. :( Reset Points: AWJ11-SIXXS Oh Pretty please w/sugar on top. :) Personally, even though I'm on the same IRC channel as one of the admins and could have all support I want, I went with HE. Zero trouble. Excellent service. I'm peering with them at work, as does my colo provider, så have great connectivity. And, in v6, renumbering is easy (RIGHT? ;) so swapping providers is no pain. Now, Owen, where's my T-shirt? ;-) -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 If Robert Di Niro assassinates Walter Slezak, will Jodie Foster marry Bonzo?? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: SixXS Contact
On 6/27/2013 3:43 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote: Subject: Re: SixXS Contact Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:47:51AM -0400 Quoting Anthony Williams (alby.willi...@verizon.com): Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points after committing a faux pas with respect to going negative from down v6 tunnels and deleting. Now to create a new tunnel I need positive ISK points and I'm stilling at -10 with no way to boost my numbers. :( Reset Points: AWJ11-SIXXS Oh Pretty please w/sugar on top. :) Personally, even though I'm on the same IRC channel as one of the admins and could have all support I want, I went with HE. Zero trouble. Excellent service. I'm peering with them at work, as does my colo provider, så have great connectivity. And, in v6, renumbering is easy (RIGHT? ;) so swapping providers is no pain. Now, Owen, where's my T-shirt? ;-) Yes it's a private service, yes it's run by volunteers, BUT SIXXS is publicly putting themselves forward as ambassadors for IPv6. The main target is to create a common portal to help company engineers find their way with IPv6 networks deploying IPv6 to their customers http://www.sixxs.net/faq/sixxs/?faq=enduser in a rapid and controllable fashion. (Sixxs website) and For whom? For everybody. The average joe and jane can use AICCU so that they can use IPv6 very quick and easy. (SIXXS website about us). I'm neither Joe nor Jane, nor am I Tom, Dick, or Harry, and quite frankly SIXXS has been abrasive and abusive in my attempt to use their service. Their stewardship of IPv6 is quite frankly horrible. When people on NANOG are complaining about lack of response, SIXXS responds with silence or we're a volunteer group. I was told to go screw myself because I'd had a work account years ago and tried to set up a personal one not even realizing the work account was still active (totally allowed by their TOS), my account was still canceled, and three weeks later Jeroen essentially told me I could go screw myself. I'm the community manager at Zenoss and I'd get fired for treating my users like that. I think it's _LONG_ past time we started asking how severely has SIXXS's negative behavior slowed the adoption of IPv6?, and is this behavior acceptable? For me, their service is long past worse than no service at all. Andrew
Re: Paetec PI space?
On Jun 26, 2013, at 4:40 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:06:10 -0400, Justin M. Streiner said: We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago. Is this a common situation? Does the customer risk having that space reclaimed by Paetec at some point, or is it safe to assume they will continue to be able to route trouble-free for years to come? They should plan to renumber out of that space in the very near future. This is an excellent time to plan to renumber into 2001:: if they haven't such plans already. :) Well, somewhere in 2000::/3, anyway… It might be somewhere within any of the following blocks: 2001:400::/23, 2001:1800::/23, 2001:4800::/23, 2600::/12, or 2610::/23, 2620::/23. All of which have been delegated to ARIN by IANA. As to the PI/PA question… There were PI blocks issued by LIRs (ISPs) in the years after the initial implementation of CIDR and before (and possibly for some time after) the creation of ARIN. My blocks 192.159.10.0/24 and 192.124.40.0/23 are examples of such blocks which were originally issued to me by Netcom and PSI, respectively. They are now correctly documented as Direct Assignments in the ARIN database and covered by LRSA (which I now regret given the recent fee restructuring). Owen
DNSResolvers.com will be shutdown
As per our post: http://blog.easydns.org/2013/06/27/dnsresolvers-open-resolvers-will-be-shut-down/ The DNSResolvers.com free and open public resolvers will be shut down, imminently (like tonight, if we get DDoS-ed against them again). We'll keep them up for awhile if we can so everybody can migrate off, but if you or somebody you care about is using them, please make other arrangements as fast as possible. thankyouverymuch - mark -- Mark Jeftovic mar...@easydns.com Founder CEO, easyDNS Technologies Inc. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 Read my blog: http://markable.com
Re: DNSResolvers.com will be shutdown
On 6/27/2013 10:00 PM, Mark Jeftovic wrote: As per our post: http://blog.easydns.org/2013/06/27/dnsresolvers-open-resolvers-will-be-shut-down/ The DNSResolvers.com free and open public resolvers will be shut down, imminently (like tonight, if we get DDoS-ed against them again). We'll keep them up for awhile if we can so everybody can migrate off, but if you or somebody you care about is using them, please make other arrangements as fast as possible. It will be interesting to see how people didn't know we were using them. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Service provider T1/PPP question
Hi Gang, This question isn't strictly operational, but I'm needing a little coaching. I am wanting to offer a broadband over T1 service and have the infrastructure in place for aggregation of many of these over channelized DS3. My desire is to simplify administration and require PPP / chap authentication, and allow ppp and ppp multilink with the minimum configuration on my side necessary, I'm thinking there could be a 'one size fits all' setup on my side. I'd love to connect with anyone providing a similar service in a cisco environment to compare notes and bounce ideas off of. Thanks. Mike-
