Urgent, need bandwidth in Blue Springs, Missouri
I've got a customer's point-to-point 50M that has taken too long to install and is averaging 5M throughput. If someone can drop a solid 50-100M DIA in Blue Springs, Missouri, I'd like to hear from you. Email me directly. Thanks in advance.
BGP Update Report
BGP Update Report Interval: 05-Sep-13 -to- 12-Sep-13 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS982942604 2.0% 44.7 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone 2 - AS840234467 1.6% 36.5 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom" 3 - AS28624 33602 1.6% 154.1 -- Oops Telecom 4 - AS27738 31818 1.5% 55.1 -- Ecuadortelecom S.A. 5 - AS476625610 1.2% 8.8 -- KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom 6 - AS43418 23032 1.1% 338.7 -- ANTIDOT Pryama Mova TOV 7 - AS56042 20320 1.0% 725.7 -- CMNET-SHANXI-AP China Mobile communications corporation 8 - AS20940 19375 0.9% 57.0 -- AKAMAI-ASN1 Akamai International B.V. 9 - AS941618963 0.9%2107.0 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 10 - AS28573 18913 0.9% 14.8 -- NET Serviços de Comunicação S.A. 11 - AS477516004 0.8%4001.0 -- GLOBE-TELECOM-AS Globe Telecoms 12 - AS580015365 0.7% 73.5 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD Network Information Center 13 - AS949814993 0.7% 14.1 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd. 14 - AS915514228 0.7% 42.3 -- QNET QualityNet General Trading & Contracting Co. 15 - AS17974 11318 0.5% 4.3 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 16 - AS36998 10974 0.5% 6.9 -- SDN-MOBITEL 17 - AS18403 10441 0.5% 20.4 -- FPT-AS-AP The Corporation for Financing & Promoting Technology 18 - AS50710 10425 0.5% 43.4 -- EARTHLINK-AS EarthLink Ltd. Communications&Internet Services 19 - AS443410201 0.5% 377.8 -- ERX-RADNET1-AS PT Rahajasa Media Internet 20 - AS486129642 0.5% 964.2 -- RTC-ORENBURG-AS CJSC "Comstar-Regions" TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix) Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS6629 8877 0.4%8877.0 -- NOAA-AS - NOAA 2 - AS532298861 0.4%8861.0 -- Industrias Arteb S.A 3 - AS194064494 0.2%4494.0 -- TWRS-MA - Towerstream I, Inc. 4 - AS7202 8167 0.4%4083.5 -- FAMU - Florida A & M University 5 - AS477516004 0.8%4001.0 -- GLOBE-TELECOM-AS Globe Telecoms 6 - AS6174 7058 0.3%3529.0 -- SPRINTLINK8 - Sprint 7 - AS373672850 0.1%2850.0 -- CALLKEY 8 - AS322447287 0.3%2429.0 -- LIQUID-WEB-INC - Liquid Web, Inc. 9 - AS941618963 0.9%2107.0 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 10 - AS423344016 0.2%2008.0 -- BBP-AS Broadband Plus s.a.l. 11 - AS191111555 0.1%1555.0 -- NATURES-BOUN - NBTY, Inc. 12 - AS142879238 0.4%1539.7 -- TRIAD-TELECOM - Triad Telecom, Inc. 13 - AS343444540 0.2%1513.3 -- THE-PORT-OF-TILBURY-LONDON-LTD The Port Of Tilbury London Ltd 14 - AS551001447 0.1%1447.0 -- GTCNA - The Glenmede Trust Company National Association 15 - AS279415572 0.3%1393.0 -- CONSULNETWORK LTDA 16 - AS480681148 0.1%1148.0 -- VISONIC Visonic Ltd 17 - AS496754460 0.2%1115.0 -- SKBKONTUR-AS CJSC Production Company "SKB Kontur" 18 - AS486129642 0.5% 964.2 -- RTC-ORENBURG-AS CJSC "Comstar-Regions" 19 - AS47582 824 0.0% 824.0 -- KRAFT-S-TOGLIATTI Kraft-S JSC 20 - AS61033 814 0.0% 814.0 -- MALI-TEHNIC-AS MALI TEHNIC S.R.L. TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name 1 - 61.95.239.0/2411442 0.5% AS9498 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd. 2 - 202.154.17.0/24 10079 0.4% AS4434 -- ERX-RADNET1-AS PT Rahajasa Media Internet 3 - 92.246.207.0/249627 0.4% AS48612 -- RTC-ORENBURG-AS CJSC "Comstar-Regions" 4 - 203.118.224.0/21 9477 0.4% AS9416 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 5 - 203.118.232.0/21 9459 0.4% AS9416 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 6 - 192.58.232.0/248877 0.4% AS6629 -- NOAA-AS - NOAA 7 - 186.251.232.0/23 8861 0.4% AS53229 -- Industrias Arteb S.A 8 - 120.28.62.0/24 8188 0.4% AS4775 -- GLOBE-TELECOM-AS Globe Telecoms 9 - 222.127.0.0/24 7806 0.3% AS4775 -- GLOBE-TELECOM-AS Globe Telecoms 10 - 115.170.128.0/17 6207 0.3% AS4847 -- CNIX-AP China Networks Inter-Exchange 11 - 214.26.204.0/244851 0.2% AS5800 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD Network Information Center 12 - 103.249.162.0/24 4801 0.2% AS45634 -- SPARKSTATION-SG-AP 10 Science Park Road 13 - 69.38.178.0/24 4494 0.2% AS19406 -- TWRS-MA - Towerstream I, Inc. 14 - 46.17.204.0/24 4456 0.2% AS49675 -- SKBKONTUR-AS CJSC Production Company "SKB Kontur" 15 - 64.187.64.0/23 4408 0.2% AS16608 -- KENTEC - Kentec Communications, Inc. 16
The Cidr Report
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 13 21:13:29 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date PrefixesCIDR Agg
06-09-13481151 272368
07-09-13481017 272389
08-09-13480918 272309
09-09-13481062 272267
10-09-13481035 272608
11-09-13481628 272545
12-09-13481404 272990
13-09-13481601 273148
AS Summary
45125 Number of ASes in routing system
18565 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
4176 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS7029 : WINDSTREAM - Windstream Communications Inc
118059232 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').
--- 13Sep13 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
Table 481622 273180 20844243.3% All ASes
AS6389 3068 65 300397.9% BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
AS28573 3250 468 278285.6% NET Serviços de Comunicação
S.A.
AS17974 2675 194 248192.7% TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
Telekomunikasi Indonesia
AS7029 4176 2027 214951.5% WINDSTREAM - Windstream
Communications Inc
AS4766 2923 932 199168.1% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS22773 2044 141 190393.1% ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
Cox Communications Inc.
AS18566 2065 468 159777.3% COVAD - Covad Communications
Co.
AS3356 3242 1721 152146.9% LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
AS36998 1862 394 146878.8% SDN-MOBITEL
AS4323 2957 1524 143348.5% TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
inc.
AS10620 2559 1158 140154.7% Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS18881 1430 69 136195.2% Global Village Telecom
AS7303 1708 457 125173.2% Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS4755 1770 592 117866.6% TATACOMM-AS TATA
Communications formerly VSNL
is Leading ISP
AS7552 1188 138 105088.4% VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
Corporation
AS22561 1196 212 98482.3% DIGITAL-TELEPORT - Digital
Teleport Inc.
AS1785 2011 1156 85542.5% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
Communications, Inc.
AS18101 983 181 80281.6% RELIANCE-COMMUNICATIONS-IN
Reliance Communications
Ltd.DAKC MUMBAI
AS4808 1159 401 75865.4% CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
network China169 Beijing
Province Network
AS11830 866 117 74986.5% Instituto Costarricense de
Electricidad y Telecom.
AS701 1532 802 73047.7% UUNET - MCI Communications
Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon
Business
AS7545 2076 1351 72534.9% TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom
Limited
AS13977 850 143 70783.2% CTELCO - FAIRPOINT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AS6147 740 41 69994.5% Telefonica del Peru S.A.A.
AS8402 1671 975 69641.7% CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom"
AS8151 1294 603 69153.4% Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS855733 55 67892.5% CANET-ASN-4 - Bell Aliant
Regional Communications, Inc.
AS6983 1152 483 66958.1% ITCDELTA - ITC^Deltacom
AS24560 1090 424 66661.1% AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
Services
AS7738
Re: DNS Reliability
On 2013-09-13, at 16:01, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > On 13-09-12 21:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: > >> I expect 100.000% >> >> I'll accept 99.999% or better. > > At these numbers, one has to start to count failover time. Before really any part of this thread makes sense, you have to describe exactly what you mean by "available". Joe
Re: DNS Reliability
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:01:51PM -0400, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > On 13-09-12 21:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: > > > I expect 100.000% > > > > I'll accept 99.999% or better. > > At these numbers, one has to start to count failover time. A "system" > can be disaster tolerant but take 2 hours to recover fully, or it could > also recover within a couple of seconds. It depends on architecture and > available services. And in networking, you also need to consider > internal and external routing update propagation times. > > from where? to where? what % of the Internet is _not_ reachable from my DNS service at any given time? why is that acceptable? and more importantly, who's job is it to fix/stablize the net so these "remote" locations can reach my DNS service? "we will answer 100% of the valid DNS queries we receive." /bill
Re: DNS Reliability
On 13-09-12 21:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: > I expect 100.000% > > I'll accept 99.999% or better. At these numbers, one has to start to count failover time. A "system" can be disaster tolerant but take 2 hours to recover fully, or it could also recover within a couple of seconds. It depends on architecture and available services. And in networking, you also need to consider internal and external routing update propagation times.
Weekly Routing Table Report
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith . Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 14 Sep, 2013 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary BGP routing table entries examined: 466731 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 188606 Deaggregation factor: 2.47 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 232076 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 44957 Prefixes per ASN: 10.38 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 35133 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 16260 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:5898 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:160 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.7 Max AS path length visible: 30 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 36992) 22 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 5814 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:1930 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 5026 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:3926 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 12187 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:1 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:424 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2642434644 Equivalent to 157 /8s, 128 /16s and 90 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 71.4 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 71.4 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 95.0 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 163699 APNIC Region Analysis Summary - Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 110762 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 33625 APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.29 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 112750 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:46637 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4870 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 23.15 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1219 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:833 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.7 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 24 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:673 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 727657280 Equivalent to 43 /8s, 95 /16s and 43 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 85.0 APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-63999, 131072-133631 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:161603 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:81243 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.99 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 162192 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 75506 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:15873 ARIN Prefixes per ASN:10.22 ARIN Region origin ASes annou
Re: DNS Reliability
Tolerance for failure; I like it. Eric - I'm interested in an accepted norm of loss of queries made to the cache tier. Yes, when I provide a 'service' to a client (don't really care about SLA) i'm interested in what the accepted norm or guidance is on % loss on queries -- because this drives my architecture, right? Marco - I think 'lost queries' in this instance is simply, wait for it.the full UDP session. Yes yes, session is bad to say, but service request completed through middle-boxes are tracked as sessions. So thats what I'm looking for; what is the general consesus for reliability all other things equal. Sure, you have the factor of UDP, retry, path, etc. etc. etc.but I think Larry hit the nail on the head - whats my clients[aggregate of] tolerance before Evil ensues. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 9/13/2013 2:14 AM, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote: > >> On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: >> >>> On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote: >>> Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected. >>> A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. >>> >>> I expect 100.000% >>> >>> I'll accept 99.999% or better. >>> >>> >> It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here >> or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries). >> > > > > I do not ever set any amount of failure as an objective. I usually have a > specified tolerance for failure. If for some odd circumstance I wan to > discard queries, that would involve knowing exactly what happened to > them--not loosing them. > > > > > -- > Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics > of System Administrators: > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to > learn from their mistakes. > (Adapted from Stephen Pinker) > > -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
Re: DNS Reliability
On 9/13/2013 2:14 AM, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote: On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote: Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected. A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. I expect 100.000% I'll accept 99.999% or better. It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries). I do not ever set any amount of failure as an objective. I usually have a specified tolerance for failure. If for some odd circumstance I wan to discard queries, that would involve knowing exactly what happened to them--not loosing them. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Re: DNS Reliability
On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: > On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote: >> Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected. > A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. > > I expect 100.000% > > I'll accept 99.999% or better. > It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries). -- Marco
