Re: Verizon connectivity issues

[Christopher Morrow]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Ryan Ruuska  wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We have heard from many of our customers in the Northeast region,
> specifically PA, MD, and VA who have difficulty connecting to our website

there's probably vz customer folk on-list, maybe 'what should they
test for you' would be nice? :)

> (very slow loading times).  We have noticed that if our data center
> provider specifically routes our outbound traffic over Hurricane Electric
> rather than XO Communications, that connectivity is restored to normal for
> our customers.  The HE path goes from Salt Lake City to Denver where it is
> handed off to TeliaSonera, and they send it to Chicago where it gets handed
> off to Verizon.  This works great and generally has a ping response of
> 20-25ms less than the bad route as posted below from one of our servers:
>
> Tracing route to pool-108-52-xxx-xxx.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
>  [108.52.xxx.xxx]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>
>   1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms  172.xxx.xxx.xxx (Internal IP)
>   2<1 ms10 ms<1 ms  209-41-xxx-xxx.c7dc.com [209.41.xxx.xxx]
>   3<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms  e1-5.rt08.gp1.c7dc.com [192.41.0.97]
>   4 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms  ip65-46-51-113.z51-46-65.customer.algx.net
>  [65.46.51.113]
>   519 ms18 ms19 ms  vb1611.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net
>  [216.156.0.5]
>   621 ms18 ms18 ms  207.88.14.226.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.226]
>   718 ms18 ms18 ms  206.111.6.122.ptr.us.xo.net [206.111.6.122]
>   Verizon owned device with an XO IP address
>   887 ms86 ms87 ms  b100.phlapa-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net
> [130.81.209.187]
>   Next hop goes from CA to PA, probably just hidden routing info
>   9 *** Request timed out.
>  1088 ms89 ms90 ms  pool-108-52-xxx-xxx.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
>  [108.52.xxx.xxx]
>
> As you can see, XO sends this traffic from Salt Lake City to San Jose where
> it is handed off to Verizon.  We've worked with XO and determined that
> there are no connectivity issues along their path, which seems to point to
> an issue within Verizon's network.  I have a couple of tickets open with
> Verizon at the moment on behalf of some of our customers, but we have had
> trouble breaking through Tier 1.
>
> Our first thought was saturation of the peering point, but XO states that
> the link between hops 6 and 7 is using 5Gbps out of 20Gbps capacity, and
> the latency on hop 7 (the Verizon owned device with an XO IP) seems normal
> whenever we test.
>
> Any Verizon engineers out there willing to take a quick peek at this route
> for any obvious issues?  It would be a lot easier for us if Verizon
> provided Looking Glass servers, but alas...

they have route data sent to routeviews at least...

Request for Verizon Engineer regarding 206.111.6.122 (San Jose)

[Ryan Ruuska]

Can someone contact me regarding an issue with connectivity from this hop
in San Jose to customers in Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania?  The DNS
says it is an XO IP but it is actually a Verizon owned device.

Thank you,
Ryan

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Alexandru Suciu]

Can't wait to see the postmortem report on this one.

On 8/27/2014 3:05 PM, Adam Greene wrote:

Came back for us, too, at about 7am.

Outage was a biggie this time:

https://news.yahoo.com/time-warner-cable-suffering-massive-nationwide-outage
-110549606.html


-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Coulson
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:59 AM
To: Rick Coloccia
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?

Just came back up for me.

Sent from my iPad


On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rick Coloccia  wrote:

BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am.

We now sit at their mercy


--
Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene" 

wrote:

Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:

Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234] over a maximum of 30
hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms  10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
227 ms 6 ms 5 ms  cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
[24.29.112.25]
312 ms 8 ms 7 ms  rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.74]
4 9 ms 9 ms12 ms  rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.137]
5 9 ms10 ms 8 ms  rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.222]
6 *** Request timed out.
7 *** Request timed out.
8 *** Request timed out.
9 *** Request timed out.

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick
Coloccia
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?

My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is
our upstream.

--
Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:

David,

I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the
moment that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.

-rob
On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard"

wrote:


Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is
not currently in bgp.
http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting
an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one
office; couldn't reach anyone by phone.

Thanks,

David

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Tom Beecher]

All of WNY seems to be dead. Craps out what looks like inside TWC, so looks 
like they lost something big.

---
Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com
On August 27, 2014 at 6:43:12 AM EDT, Rick Coloccia  
wrote:
My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am. TWC is our 
upstream.

--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau wrote:
>
> David,
>
> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the moment
> that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
>
> -rob
> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard"
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
>> business connections? One of our offices is down and the route is not
>> currently in bgp. http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
>> hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
>> couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>

Broken IPv6 firmware on U-Verse 3801HGV

[Ivan Kozik]

I noticed that AT&T released some firmware with IPv6 support back in
May for their 3801HGV (and related) gateways.  To try this out, I
factory-reset my 3801HGV (still on version 6.9) and it installed the
6.11 firmware about 10 minutes later.  I then used the obscure page at
https://esupport.att3.2wire.com/online-tool/compat-index.jsp to
request an IPv6 address ("wait 48 hours" it said) and got a routable
IPv6 address in just a few minutes.

All for naught, though.  With IPv6 enabled, the 3801HGV crashed and
rebooted about once an hour.   After unchecking "IPv6 LAN Enabled" in
http://192.168.1.254/xslt?PAGE=C_2_6 everything went back to normal.

If anyone from AT&T is listening, I'm happy to help diagnose your
firmware problems.

Ivan

Verizon connectivity issues

[Ryan Ruuska]

Hello all,

We have heard from many of our customers in the Northeast region,
specifically PA, MD, and VA who have difficulty connecting to our website
(very slow loading times).  We have noticed that if our data center
provider specifically routes our outbound traffic over Hurricane Electric
rather than XO Communications, that connectivity is restored to normal for
our customers.  The HE path goes from Salt Lake City to Denver where it is
handed off to TeliaSonera, and they send it to Chicago where it gets handed
off to Verizon.  This works great and generally has a ping response of
20-25ms less than the bad route as posted below from one of our servers:

Tracing route to pool-108-52-xxx-xxx.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
 [108.52.xxx.xxx]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms  172.xxx.xxx.xxx (Internal IP)
  2<1 ms10 ms<1 ms  209-41-xxx-xxx.c7dc.com [209.41.xxx.xxx]
  3<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms  e1-5.rt08.gp1.c7dc.com [192.41.0.97]
  4 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms  ip65-46-51-113.z51-46-65.customer.algx.net
 [65.46.51.113]
  519 ms18 ms19 ms  vb1611.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net
 [216.156.0.5]
  621 ms18 ms18 ms  207.88.14.226.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.226]
  718 ms18 ms18 ms  206.111.6.122.ptr.us.xo.net [206.111.6.122]
  Verizon owned device with an XO IP address
  887 ms86 ms87 ms  b100.phlapa-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net
[130.81.209.187]
  Next hop goes from CA to PA, probably just hidden routing info
  9 *** Request timed out.
 1088 ms89 ms90 ms  pool-108-52-xxx-xxx.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
 [108.52.xxx.xxx]

As you can see, XO sends this traffic from Salt Lake City to San Jose where
it is handed off to Verizon.  We've worked with XO and determined that
there are no connectivity issues along their path, which seems to point to
an issue within Verizon's network.  I have a couple of tickets open with
Verizon at the moment on behalf of some of our customers, but we have had
trouble breaking through Tier 1.

Our first thought was saturation of the peering point, but XO states that
the link between hops 6 and 7 is using 5Gbps out of 20Gbps capacity, and
the latency on hop 7 (the Verizon owned device with an XO IP) seems normal
whenever we test.

Any Verizon engineers out there willing to take a quick peek at this route
for any obvious issues?  It would be a lot easier for us if Verizon
provided Looking Glass servers, but alas...

Thank you,
Ryan

Re: Ebay/Paypal blocking HTTP access based on SORBS DUHL / Spamhaus PBL

[Tarko Tikan]

hey,


Yeah - funny…it's been years since I heard of specific Estonian issues (and 
caveat - I am estonian and know
Tarko).  Back in 2007 there were plenty of problems but many have been cleaned 
up.  Some took a few years.


Still waiting for examples. I can say for sure that none of the major 
operators in Estonia are spam friendly (and  or ignore abuse related 
issues. There might be one or two hosting/content operators, mostly with 
Russian origins, but even they have grown up.


I'm well connected in local community - if you do have specific 
complaints, let me know.



Tarko - have you got this resolved yet?


Nope :(

--
tarko

Re: Ebay/Paypal blocking HTTP access based on SORBS DUHL / Spamhaus PBL

[Merike Kaeo]

On Aug 21, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Tarko Tikan  wrote:

> hey,
> 
>> My home IP is in both the PBL and the SORBS DUL and I have no trouble
>> using ebay or paypal.
> 
> Thanks for confirmation.
> 
>> Given that the problem range is in Estonia, I expect that it's some
>> combination of abuse from the specific range and general issues with
>> traffic from Estonia.
> 
> What makes you say that? Any specific examples of trouble you are getting 
> from Estonian networks?


Yeah - funny…it's been years since I heard of specific Estonian issues (and 
caveat - I am estonian and know
Tarko).  Back in 2007 there were plenty of problems but many have been cleaned 
up.  Some took a few years.

Tarko - have you got this resolved yet?  If not, send me private email and I'll 
get you connected with additional people
who may be able to help.

- merike


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Chris Garrett]

The issue reported on our side was impact to TW from a L3 maintenance that 
caused the issue. No details beyond that to share unfortunately 

On Aug 27, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Irwin, Kevin  wrote:

> TCAM? Those of you with TW, how many routes are they advertising to you
> via BGP?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/27/14, 9:56 AM, "Jay Ashworth"  wrote:
> 
>> I had a CNN breaking news email on my phone about this when I woke up,
>> their backbone apparently was down from 2 ish to 4 ish AM.
>> 
>> On August 27, 2014 6:17:00 AM EDT, David Hubbard
>>  wrote:
>>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
>>> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
>>> currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
>>> hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
>>> couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> David
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> 
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to 
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or 
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this 
> in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.
> 

Re: centurylink chi2 and level3 -- network issues

[SML]

On 27 Aug 2014, at 10:01, Nick wrote:

Is anyone else having network issue over the past week with 
centurylink and their peer level3?


I spoke with centurylinks noc team. They are not being helpful and 
blame level3. I'm seeing period of high packet loss and poor 
throughput speeds. From what I can tell. Its a problem between qwest 
and level3 border routers.


CL is an upstream of our provider. We complained about this to our 
provider, and our upstream complained to CL. CL's response was that this 
is an oversubscription problem due to a CL customer violating its ToS, 
and CL's lawyers were involved.


That was two or three months ago.

...sigh...

centurylink chi2 and level3 -- network issues

[Nick]

Is anyone else having network issue over the past week with centurylink 
and their peer level3?


I spoke with centurylinks noc team. They are not being helpful and blame 
level3. I'm seeing period of high packet loss and poor throughput 
speeds. From what I can tell. Its a problem between qwest and level3 
border routers.



 HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best 
Wrst StDev


2. cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net0.0%   6630.5   0.8   0.4  35.0 
  2.9
 3. vlan52.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net   2.7%   662  196.0 196.5 192.2 
209.2   1.5

 4. ???
 5. ae-46-46.ebr2.Washington1.Level3  1.8%   662  196.8 196.0 191.2 
201.1   1.1


[not the complete traceroute]

At the moment, I moved most of my traffic from centurylink. The 
remaining services are being greatly impacted by the poor network 
performance.


What do you think my next steps should be?


Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

- Nick

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Irwin, Kevin]

TCAM? Those of you with TW, how many routes are they advertising to you
via BGP?

Kevin



On 8/27/14, 9:56 AM, "Jay Ashworth"  wrote:

>I had a CNN breaking news email on my phone about this when I woke up,
>their backbone apparently was down from 2 ish to 4 ish AM.
>
>On August 27, 2014 6:17:00 AM EDT, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>>Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
>>business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
>>currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>>shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
>>hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
>>couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>David
>
>--
>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact 
the sender and destroy any copies of this document.

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Jay Ashworth]

I had a CNN breaking news email on my phone about this when I woke up, their 
backbone apparently was down from 2 ish to 4 ish AM.

On August 27, 2014 6:17:00 AM EDT, David Hubbard 
 wrote:
>Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
>business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
>currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
>hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
>couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>
>Thanks,
>
>David

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

RE: Time Warner outage?

[Adam Greene]

Came back for us, too, at about 7am.

Outage was a biggie this time:

https://news.yahoo.com/time-warner-cable-suffering-massive-nationwide-outage
-110549606.html


-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Coulson
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:59 AM
To: Rick Coloccia
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?

Just came back up for me. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rick Coloccia  wrote:
> 
> BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am.
> 
> We now sit at their mercy
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene" 
wrote:
>> 
>> Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:
>> 
>> Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234] over a maximum of 30 
>> hops:
>> 
>> 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms  10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
>> 227 ms 6 ms 5 ms  cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
>> [24.29.112.25]
>> 312 ms 8 ms 7 ms  rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.74]
>> 4 9 ms 9 ms12 ms  rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.137]
>> 5 9 ms10 ms 8 ms  rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.222]
>> 6 *** Request timed out.
>> 7 *** Request timed out.
>> 8 *** Request timed out.
>> 9 *** Request timed out.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick 
>> Coloccia
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?
>> 
>> My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is 
>> our upstream.
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:
>>> 
>>> David,
>>> 
>>> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the 
>>> moment that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
>>> 
>>> -rob
>>> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or 
 business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is 
 not currently in bgp.
 http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
 shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting 
 an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one 
 office; couldn't reach anyone by phone.
 
 Thanks,
 
 David
>> 

Re: Time Warner outage?

[David Coulson]

Just came back up for me. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rick Coloccia  wrote:
> 
> BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am.
> 
> We now sit at their mercy
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene"  wrote:
>> 
>> Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:
>> 
>> Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234]
>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>> 
>> 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms  10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
>> 227 ms 6 ms 5 ms  cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
>> [24.29.112.25]
>> 312 ms 8 ms 7 ms  rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.74]
>> 4 9 ms 9 ms12 ms  rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.137]
>> 5 9 ms10 ms 8 ms  rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com
>> [69.193.225.222]
>> 6 *** Request timed out.
>> 7 *** Request timed out.
>> 8 *** Request timed out.
>> 9 *** Request timed out.
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick Coloccia
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?
>> 
>> My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is our
>> upstream.
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:
>>> 
>>> David,
>>> 
>>> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the 
>>> moment that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
>>> 
>>> -rob
>>> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or 
 business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is 
 not currently in bgp.  
 http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
 shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting 
 an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one 
 office; couldn't reach anyone by phone.
 
 Thanks,
 
 David
>> 

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Rick Coloccia]

BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am.

We now sit at their mercy


--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene"  wrote:
> 
> Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:
> 
> Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234]
> over a maximum of 30 hops:
> 
>  1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms  10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
>  227 ms 6 ms 5 ms  cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
> [24.29.112.25]
>  312 ms 8 ms 7 ms  rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com
> [69.193.225.74]
>  4 9 ms 9 ms12 ms  rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com
> [69.193.225.137]
>  5 9 ms10 ms 8 ms  rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com
> [69.193.225.222]
>  6 *** Request timed out.
>  7 *** Request timed out.
>  8 *** Request timed out.
>  9 *** Request timed out.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick Coloccia
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?
> 
> My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is our
> upstream.
> 
> --
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:
>> 
>> David,
>> 
>> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the 
>> moment that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
>> 
>> -rob
>> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or 
>>> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is 
>>> not currently in bgp.  
>>> http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting 
>>> an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one 
>>> office; couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> David
> 

RE: Time Warner outage?

[Adam Greene]

Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC:

Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms  10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49]
  227 ms 6 ms 5 ms  cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com
[24.29.112.25]
  312 ms 8 ms 7 ms  rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.74]
  4 9 ms 9 ms12 ms  rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.137]
  5 9 ms10 ms 8 ms  rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com
[69.193.225.222]
  6 *** Request timed out.
  7 *** Request timed out.
  8 *** Request timed out.
  9 *** Request timed out.

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick Coloccia
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Time Warner outage?

My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is our
upstream.

--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:
> 
> David,
> 
> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the 
> moment that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
> 
> -rob
> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or 
>> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is 
>> not currently in bgp.  
>> http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting 
>> an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one 
>> office; couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> David
>> 

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Rick Coloccia]

My whole campus (~1 users) is down... Since roughly 6am.  TWC is our 
upstream.

--
Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau  wrote:
> 
> David,
> 
> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the moment
> that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.
> 
> -rob
> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
>> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
>> currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
>> hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
>> couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> David
>> 

Re: Time Warner outage?

[David Coulson]

I've have residential twc in Cleveland. My router has an ip in the 
104.139.34/24 network that isn't being advertised via bgp anymore either. I can 
still trace route out from here half a dozen hops, so seems like an 
edge/peering issue somewhere. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:17 AM, David Hubbard  
> wrote:
> 
> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
> currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
> hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
> couldn't reach anyone by phone.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David

Re: Time Warner outage?

[Rob Barbeau]

David,

I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down at the moment
that uses a time warner business connection for internet access.

-rob
On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" 
wrote:

> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
> business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
> currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
> hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
> couldn't reach anyone by phone.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>

Time Warner outage?

[David Hubbard]

Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner residential or
business connections?  One of our offices is down and the route is not
currently in bgp.  http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable
shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side starting an
hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue than just my one office;
couldn't reach anyone by phone.

Thanks,

David

RPKI

[Pelsser Cristel]

Hi,

With Daniele Iamartino, we are validating BGP routes with the objects stored in 
the RPKI.

On 2014/07/26, for the routes at the LINX RouteViews monitor, we observe the 
following set of prefixes that are announced both with the correct origin AS 
and a wrong origin AS. There are very few of them. 
We believe they could be anycast where there is no ROA for some origin ASs or 
they could be misconfiguration/attacks.

RIB Dump time: 2014/08/26 08:00 UTC

prefix,valid AS,invalid AS
5.128.0.0/14,31200,50923
37.19.8.0/21,49964,198585
94.199.232.0/21,49413,5089
179.61.194.0/23,61440,37692
190.94.182.0/24,262195,18678
193.42.215.0/24,30880,50827
193.227.174.0/24,9051,24634
195.69.144.0/22,1200,41313
200.35.183.0/24,26617,27742
213.192.242.0/23,8903,12541
217.113.242.0/24,197860,20721
217.113.244.0/24,197860,20721
217.113.245.0/24,20721,197860
2a02:2928::/32,39288,197530

Prefixes containing private AS numbers

prefix,valid AS,invalid AS
176.56.192.0/19,8426,65489
185.36.76.0/22,8426,65489
194.45.46.0/24,286,64951
2a00:fd00::/32,29695,65026


Any feedback is welcome,

Cristel

Fwd: Call for Presentations RIPE 69

[Filiz Yilmaz]

Dear Colleagues,

Please note the approaching RIPE 69 deadline, 31 August 2014.

Kind regards

Filiz Yilmaz
RIPE PC Chair
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-meetings/pc



-- Forwarded message --
From: Filiz Yilmaz 
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:48 PM
Subject: Call for Presentations RIPE 69
To: "ripe-l...@ripe.net" , "nanog@nanog.org" <
nanog@nanog.org>


Dear colleagues,

Please find the CFP for RIPE 69 in London below.

The deadline for submissions is 31 August 2014.

Please also note that speakers do not receive any extra reduction or
funding towards the meeting fee at the RIPE Meetings.

Kind regards

Filiz Yilmaz
RIPE PC Chair
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-meetings/pc


-

Call for Presentations

A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers, network
operators and other interested parties get together. Although the meeting
is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to meet and network
with others in their field.

RIPE 69 will take place from 3- November 2014 in London, UK.

The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) is now seeking content proposals from the
RIPE community for the plenary session presentations, BoFs (Birds of a
Feather sessions), panels, workshops, tutorials and lightning talks at RIPE
69. The PC is looking for presentations covering topics of network
engineering and operations, including but not limited to:

• IPv6 deployment
• Managing IPv4 scarcity in operations
• Commercial transactions of IPv4 addresses
 • Data centre technologies
• Network and DNS operations
• Internet governance and regulatory practices
 • Network and routing security
• Content delivery
• Internet peering and mobile data exchange

Submissions

RIPE Meeting attendees are quite sensitive to keeping presentations
non-commercial, and product marketing talks are strongly discouraged.
Repeated audience feedback shows that the most successful talks focus on
operational experience, research results, or case studies. For example,
presenters wishing to describe a commercial solution should focus on  the
underlying technology and not attempt a product demonstration.

The RIPE PC accepts proposals for different presentation formats, including
plenary session presentations, tutorials, workshops, BoFs (Birds of a
Feather sessions) and lightning talks. See the full descriptions of these
formats at
https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/

Presenters who are proposing a panel or BoF are encouraged to include
speakers from several (perhaps even competing) companies and/or a neutral
facilitator.

In addition to presentations selected in advance for the plenary, the RIPE
PC also offers several time slots for “lightning talks”, which are selected
immediately before or during the conference.

The following general requirements apply:

- Proposals for plenary session presentations, BoFs, panels, workshops and
tutorials must be submitted for full consideration no later than 31 August
2014, using the meeting submission system at
https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/guidelines/. Proposals submitted after
this date will be considered on a space-available basis.

-  Lightning talks should also be submitted using the meeting submission
system (https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/submission-form/) and can be
submitted just days before the RIPE Meeting starts or even during the
meeting week. The allocation of lightning talk slots will be announced in
short notice – in some cases on the same day but often one day prior to the
relevant session.

- Presenters should indicate how much time they will require.
See more information on time slot allocations per presentation format at
https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/

- Proposals for talks will only be considered by the PC if they contain at
least draft presentation slides (slides may be updated later on). For
panels, proposals must contain a clear description, as well as the names of
invited panelists, presenters and moderators.

- Due to potential technical issues, it is expected that most, if not all,
presenters/panelists will be physically present at the RIPE Meeting.

If you have any questions or requests concerning content submissions,
please email pc [at] ripe [dot] net.

-