Re: Cogent Communications
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 23:15:25 -0700, Todd Crane said: > Last time I called them on a Friday night, it was because they announcing > (not originating but bad nevertheless) the IPv6 default route. I'm tempted to say that forwarding it is even worse than originating it, because it proves they weren't sanity checking what somebody else gave them... pgpAbnRO7Wbv_.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ARIN down?
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Daniel Corbe wrote: An announcement went out on arin-announce yesterday (but you might not be able to follow the link if you canÿÿt reach list.arin.net): http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-announce/2016-March/001963.html tl;dr: Massive DDoS. Usual affair. Welcome to the Internet. Anyone know how big really? One org's "Massive DDoS" is another's "oh, is someone sending us some extra DNS traffic again?" -- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route | therefore you are _ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_
Re: Cogent Communications
As a Cogent customer, I say ‘good luck’ Last time I called them on a Friday night, it was because they announcing (not originating but bad nevertheless) the IPv6 default route. The NOC “engineer” I spoke with adamantly insisted that there was nothing wrong with this. After about a half hour I gave up. The next morning, another tech, wanted an error message or a route as an example. It wasn’t until Monday morning that they blocked the route. All I know is that when our contract is up, I can assure you, we won’t make the same mistake twice. > On Mar 25, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Jason Canadywrote: > > As a Cogent customer, I'm sure I can get you in touch with someone. Have you > tried emailing supp...@cogentco.com ? If not, email me off list and I'll > find someone you can speak to. > > - Jason > > On 3/24/16 4:20 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: >> Does anyone have a NOC/SOC contact for Cogent? I found a improperly >> secured router on the Internet and I'd like to report it. >> >> Thank you, >> Brandon Vincent > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: Oh dear, we've all been made redundant...
On 3/25/2016 09:39, Bryan Bradsby wrote: Uggghhh. I've always hated this 'reboot, see if it fixes it' methodology. If the CPEs can't recover from error conditions correctly, they shouldn't be used. I blame Microsoft for making this concept acceptable. Chuck I was getting 20% TCP packet loss between two of my unix boxes on the TWC route from my house to work, so I called support. I used lft - like tcptraceroute - both directions, to identify a TWC backbone router in Dallas as the problem. I then used the TWC looking glass to show the same result. I was told i needed to reboot my router to troubleshoot. I offered to reboot my router, after he rebooted his router in Dallas ;) Conversation with one of my daughters earlier about a problem in her office today (short summary as I recall it): Changes made to their VOIP system the night before, stuff broken the next day. She tried to get "support" to look at the changes made, "support" would not do anything until she had rebooted everything including the microwave, I guess. Back in the day--my main trouble shooting strategy was to identify all the things that had changed since it last worked the way it was supposed to. The big trouble with that approach is that everybody and their pet spider will decide which changes are "important". -- sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)