Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Graham Johnston]

For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on our 
network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more 
detailed results.

I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely have 
a local instance of:

* Speedtest.net

* Sourceforge.net/speedtest

* Dslreports.com/speedtest

Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?

Thanks,
Graham

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Steven Miano]

fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.

...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
speedtest..net|com than some of those others.

There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston 
wrote:

> For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on
> our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more
> detailed results.
>
> I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely
> have a local instance of:
>
> * Speedtest.net
>
> * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>
> * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>
> Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>
> Thanks,
> Graham
>
>


-- 
Miano, Steven M.
http://stevenmiano.com

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Josh Reynolds]

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
Netflix open connect appliance.

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote:

> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.
>
> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
> speedtest..net|com than some of those others.
>
> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston 
> wrote:
>
> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net
> on
> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include
> more
> > detailed results.
> >
> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely
> > have a local instance of:
> >
> > * Speedtest.net
> >
> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
> >
> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest
> >
> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Graham
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Miano, Steven M.
> http://stevenmiano.com
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Mike Hammett]

Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with someone 
actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS hops away from 
Netflix. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "Steven Miano"  
Cc: "NANOG"  
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G 
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a 
Netflix open connect appliance. 

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote: 

> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page. 
> 
> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to 
> speedtest..net|com than some of those others. 
> 
> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew). 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston  
> wrote: 
> 
> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net 
> on 
> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include 
> more 
> > detailed results. 
> > 
> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
> > have a local instance of: 
> > 
> > * Speedtest.net 
> > 
> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest 
> > 
> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest 
> > 
> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why? 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Graham 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Miano, Steven M. 
> http://stevenmiano.com 
> 

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Steven Miano]

First, you only get down from fast.com not up - so the up/down is a bit
suspect there.

Second, this is a more 'real world' test than iperf - if you want to ensure
that your NIC is operating at the rated speed I'd imagine you'd have the
ability to setup an iperf target and check Layer2/Layer3 transfer
speeds/etc.

Third, you should really look into that if you are 1 hop away and getting
that type of speed. Clearly you deserve better. ;-)

80Mbps result (with comparison link if you don't like that one):
http://i.imgur.com/Cnr92Ag.png - of course I'm on a 240Mbps WAN connection:

*Last Result:*
Download Speed: *236960* kbps (29620 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: *22991* kbps (2873.9 KB/sec transfer rate)
Latency: *12* ms
Jitter: *2* ms
12/5/2016, 10:57:56 AM

(Those results are from my provider in the Tampa Bay area at:
speedtest.bhn.net).

~Steven

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Josh Reynolds  wrote:

> A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
> server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
> Netflix open connect appliance.
>
> On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote:
>
>> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.
>>
>> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
>> speedtest..net|com than some of those others.
>>
>> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net
>> on
>> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include
>> more
>> > detailed results.
>> >
>> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can
>> likely
>> > have a local instance of:
>> >
>> > * Speedtest.net
>> >
>> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>> >
>> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>> >
>> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Graham
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miano, Steven M.
>> http://stevenmiano.com
>>
>


-- 
Miano, Steven M.
http://stevenmiano.com

Re: Acquiring unused IP range. Some questions

[Tony Tauber]

It would be helpful also if the whois record is updated with the Origin AS
listed.
See ARIN's post on the topic: https://www.arin.net/resources/originas.html

Tony

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> > My question is, what do they and we need to do to accomplish that in
> > the proper way, so that the internet at large would accept the
> advertisement
> > from a different ASN,
>
> The internet in terms of IP Prefix advertisements is a 'Trust' based
> system.
>
>
> > and not view as some sort of hijacking, etc.
>
> The difference between Hijacking vs a valid advertisement is the simple
> LOA document a.k.a having permission to do so..
>
>
> >  I am guessing they may need to update some RADB or something like that,
> but i’ll be
> > honest my knowledge of how those things work and their complete function
> is
> > pretty slim.
>
>
> Only if you are using it for yourself or if your upstream is using it to
> create their prefix Filter lists.
> RADB is not the only RRDB provider, ARIN also provides this service
>
> > This would be a short term thing as we expect the purchase process to
> complete
> > pretty quickly, but it would be advantageous to us to be able to
> advertise the
> > space immediately.  We just want to make sure we start off on the right
> foot.
> >
>
> All you need is permission from the IP block owner (LOA) and the
> appropriate upstream filters to be setup or opened.
> Which could be a manual process (provide them a copy of the LOA) or could
> be a 'Trust' based using RRDB Record which someone has to create and update.
>
> Best of luck.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "William McLendon" 
> > To: "nanog list" 
> > Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 5:43:57 PM
> > Subject: Acquiring unused IP range.  Some questions
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > we are about to acquire a block of IP’s from another organization that
> has
> > unused space, and being fairly new to these procedures, I was hoping for
> some
> > guidance.
> >
> > We have already been pre-approved by ARIN for the block size we are
> acquiring,
> > and finalizing the deal with the current owner of the address space.
> First
> > question is, once they initiate the transfer request to transfer the IP
> range
> > to us, how long does that typically take for ARIN to complete?
> >
> > Secondly, our relationship with the IP block owner is a very good one,
> such that
> > I think they would be ok with us advertising this block before we
> technically
> > own it.  My question is, what do they and we need to do to accomplish
> that in
> > the proper way, so that the internet at large would accept the
> advertisement
> > from a different ASN, and not view as some sort of hijacking, etc.  I am
> > guessing they may need to update some RADB or something like that, but
> i’ll be
> > honest my knowledge of how those things work and their complete function
> is
> > pretty slim.
> >
> > This would be a short term thing as we expect the purchase process to
> complete
> > pretty quickly, but it would be advantageous to us to be able to
> advertise the
> > space immediately.  We just want to make sure we start off on the right
> foot.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Josh Reynolds]

I was thinking they tested up too, but still..

Never had good performance testing to them upon release. Good connectivity
with several diverse upstreams.

Always had better results with beta.speedtest.

YMMV

On Dec 5, 2016 9:59 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote:

> First, you only get down from fast.com not up - so the up/down is a bit
> suspect there.
>
> Second, this is a more 'real world' test than iperf - if you want to
> ensure that your NIC is operating at the rated speed I'd imagine you'd have
> the ability to setup an iperf target and check Layer2/Layer3 transfer
> speeds/etc.
>
> Third, you should really look into that if you are 1 hop away and getting
> that type of speed. Clearly you deserve better. ;-)
>
> 80Mbps result (with comparison link if you don't like that one):
> http://i.imgur.com/Cnr92Ag.png - of course I'm on a 240Mbps WAN
> connection:
>
> *Last Result:*
> Download Speed: *236960* kbps (29620 KB/sec transfer rate)
> Upload Speed: *22991* kbps (2873.9 KB/sec transfer rate)
> Latency: *12* ms
> Jitter: *2* ms
> 12/5/2016, 10:57:56 AM
>
> (Those results are from my provider in the Tampa Bay area at:
> speedtest.bhn.net).
>
> ~Steven
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Josh Reynolds 
> wrote:
>
>> A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
>> server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
>> Netflix open connect appliance.
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote:
>>
>>> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.
>>>
>>> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
>>> speedtest..net|com than some of those others.
>>>
>>> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston <
>>> johnst...@westmancom.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net
>>> on
>>> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include
>>> more
>>> > detailed results.
>>> >
>>> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can
>>> likely
>>> > have a local instance of:
>>> >
>>> > * Speedtest.net
>>> >
>>> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>>> >
>>> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>>> >
>>> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Graham
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Miano, Steven M.
>>> http://stevenmiano.com
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Miano, Steven M.
> http://stevenmiano.com
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Josh Reynolds]

There was an afmug thread about this exact issue several months ago.

On Dec 5, 2016 9:57 AM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with
> someone actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS
> hops away from Netflix.
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Reynolds" 
> To: "Steven Miano" 
> Cc: "NANOG" 
> Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems
>
> A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
> server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
> Netflix open connect appliance.
>
> On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano"  wrote:
>
> > fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.
> >
> > ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
> > speedtest..net|com than some of those others.
> >
> > There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston <
> johnst...@westmancom.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net
> > on
> > > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include
> > more
> > > detailed results.
> > >
> > > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can
> likely
> > > have a local instance of:
> > >
> > > * Speedtest.net
> > >
> > > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
> > >
> > > * Dslreports.com/speedtest
> > >
> > > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Graham
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Miano, Steven M.
> > http://stevenmiano.com
> >
>
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Hank Nussbacher]

On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote:

http://openspeedtest.com/

http://labs.comcast.com/beta-testing-a-new-open-source-speed-test

-Hank

> For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on our 
> network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more 
> detailed results.
>
> I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
> have a local instance of:
>
> * Speedtest.net
>
> * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>
> * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>
> Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>
> Thanks,
> Graham
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Mike Hammett]

Right, it's mostly ISPs that don't understand the BGP world or how speedtests 
work. I think, you, Paul and myself were the only ones participating that 
really knew. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "Mike Hammett"  
Cc: "NANOG"  
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 10:28:22 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 


There was an afmug thread about this exact issue several months ago. 


On Dec 5, 2016 9:57 AM, "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with someone 
actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS hops away from 
Netflix. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message - 

From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
To: "Steven Miano" < mian...@gmail.com > 
Cc: "NANOG" < nanog@nanog.org > 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G 
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a 
Netflix open connect appliance. 

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" < mian...@gmail.com > wrote: 

> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page. 
> 
> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to 
> speedtest..net|com than some of those others. 
> 
> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew). 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston < johnst...@westmancom.com > 
> wrote: 
> 
> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net 
> on 
> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include 
> more 
> > detailed results. 
> > 
> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
> > have a local instance of: 
> > 
> > * Speedtest.net 
> > 
> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest 
> > 
> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest 
> > 
> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why? 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Graham 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Miano, Steven M. 
> http://stevenmiano.com 
> 

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Mike Hammett]

A lot of people can't differentiate between what the test is testing, a bad 
test and connectivity issues producing bad results on an otherwise good test. 

I'd say that most of the time, it's the last category. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message -

From: "Mike Hammett"  
Cc: "NANOG"  
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 12:42:56 PM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 

Right, it's mostly ISPs that don't understand the BGP world or how speedtests 
work. I think, you, Paul and myself were the only ones participating that 
really knew. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message - 

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "Mike Hammett"  
Cc: "NANOG"  
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 10:28:22 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 


There was an afmug thread about this exact issue several months ago. 


On Dec 5, 2016 9:57 AM, "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with someone 
actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS hops away from 
Netflix. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

- Original Message - 

From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
To: "Steven Miano" < mian...@gmail.com > 
Cc: "NANOG" < nanog@nanog.org > 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM 
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems 

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G 
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a 
Netflix open connect appliance. 

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" < mian...@gmail.com > wrote: 

> fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page. 
> 
> ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to 
> speedtest..net|com than some of those others. 
> 
> There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew). 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston < johnst...@westmancom.com > 
> wrote: 
> 
> > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net 
> on 
> > our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include 
> more 
> > detailed results. 
> > 
> > I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
> > have a local instance of: 
> > 
> > * Speedtest.net 
> > 
> > * Sourceforge.net/speedtest 
> > 
> > * Dslreports.com/speedtest 
> > 
> > Are there others? What is your preferred one and why? 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Graham 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Miano, Steven M. 
> http://stevenmiano.com 
> 

Need contact info for AS1798 - State of Oregon

[Tyler Applebaum]

If you could contact me off-list, I'd appreciate it.


-  Tyler

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Mike]

On 12/5/2016 12:31 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote:
> 
> http://openspeedtest.com/
> 


Pegs my connection at 40.30 mbps upload.

I have Comcast 25/5.   My upload is usually in the 6 or 7 mbps range.

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Theodore Baschak]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Hank Nussbacher 
wrote:

> On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote:
>
> http://openspeedtest.com/
>
> http://labs.comcast.com/beta-testing-a-new-open-source-speed-test
>
> -Hank
>
>

I'm impressed that openspeedtest.com supports IPv6! I haven't noticed this
in too many speedtests yet, and its something I've been asked about on
occasion.


Theodore Baschak - AS395089 - Hextet Systems
https://ciscodude.net/ - https://hextet.systems/
http://mbix.ca/

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Janusz Jezowicz]

My company Speedchecker offers good alternative, we have HTML5 technology
as well as native SDKs for mobile such as iOS,Android and Windows

I can send more information about our measurement methodology, customer
base etc if required.

We did comparison of Fast.com and our technology few months ago here -
http://blog.speedchecker.xyz/2016/09/08/are-isps-still-throttling-netflix/

Regards,

Janusz Jezowicz
*Speedchecker Ltd*
*email*: jan...@speedchecker.xyz
*skype*: jezowicz
*phone*: +442032863573
*web*: www.speedchecker.xyz
The Black Church, St. Mary’s Place, Dublin 7, D07 P4AX, Ireland


On 5 December 2016 at 15:50, Graham Johnston 
wrote:

> For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on
> our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more
> detailed results.
>
> I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely
> have a local instance of:
>
> * Speedtest.net
>
> * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>
> * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>
> Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>
> Thanks,
> Graham
>
>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Nick Ryce]

For testing downloads, fast.com is pretty nice

Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications

(Commsworld Ltd T/A)

 

T: +44 (0) 330 121 1000

www.fluency.net.uk 

n...@fluency.net.uk

 



 

On 05/12/2016, 14:50, "NANOG on behalf of Graham Johnston" 
 wrote:

For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on 
our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more 
detailed results.

I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely 
have a local instance of:

* Speedtest.net

* Sourceforge.net/speedtest

* Dslreports.com/speedtest

Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?

Thanks,
Graham

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Eric Dugas]

I like nperf.com as I usually always get consistent results and you
can keep track of your results if you sign up. They only have one
server in Canada (hosted by OVH in Beauharnois) but you can host your
own like Ookla's Speedtest.net.

On 5 December 2016 at 15:37, Janusz Jezowicz  wrote:
> My company Speedchecker offers good alternative, we have HTML5 technology
> as well as native SDKs for mobile such as iOS,Android and Windows
>
> I can send more information about our measurement methodology, customer
> base etc if required.
>
> We did comparison of Fast.com and our technology few months ago here -
> http://blog.speedchecker.xyz/2016/09/08/are-isps-still-throttling-netflix/
>
> Regards,
>
> Janusz Jezowicz
> *Speedchecker Ltd*
> *email*: jan...@speedchecker.xyz
> *skype*: jezowicz
> *phone*: +442032863573
> *web*: www.speedchecker.xyz
> The Black Church, St. Mary’s Place, Dublin 7, D07 P4AX, Ireland
>
>
> On 5 December 2016 at 15:50, Graham Johnston 
> wrote:
>
>> For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on
>> our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more
>> detailed results.
>>
>> I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely
>> have a local instance of:
>>
>> * Speedtest.net
>>
>> * Sourceforge.net/speedtest
>>
>> * Dslreports.com/speedtest
>>
>> Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Graham
>>
>>

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

[Roland Dobbins]

On 5 Dec 2016, at 21:50, Graham Johnston wrote:


 What is your preferred one and why?




Thorough, reasonable teat methodology, allows one to store history, 
decent range of test servers worldwide.


---
Roland Dobbins