Re: Spiffy Netflow tools?

[Michael Krygeris]

Disclaimer: Am Plixer engineer.
If you want to take it for a spin, you can download a fully functional
OVA/QCOW2 30 day eval from the plixer website. I can also get you access to
an AWS AMI as well.
I don’t want to turn this into an Ad. So DM if you need any info/access.

Mike Krygeris

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:52 AM Babak Farrokhi  wrote:

> Plixer is also interesting.
>
> nfdump works great with NetFlow but support for IPFIX is somehow limited
> to basics.
>
>
> --
> Babak
>
>
> On 13 Mar 2018, at 3:20, Fredrik Korsbäck wrote:
>
> > On 2018-03-13 00:24, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Howdy!
> >>
> >> Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are
> >> using?
> >>
> >> Kentik is cool. Are they the only SaaS based flow digester? I don’t
> >> seem to see any others.
> >>
> >> Also curious about on-prem solutions as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Mike
> >>
> >
> > Kentik is probably top of the foodchain right now.
> >
> > But they are certainly not alone in the biz. Ontop of my head...
> >
> > * Flowmon
> > * Talaia
> > * Arbor Peakflow
> > * Deepfield
> > * Pmacct + supporting toolkit
> > * NFsen/Nfdump/AS-stats
> > * Put kibana/ES infront of any collector
> > * Solarwinds something something
> > * Different vendor toolkits
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > hugge
>

Re: Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS

[Tim Jackson]

You can either attach the end of the l2circuit to an LT interface, or a PS
interface.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/tgregory.org/2016/07/10/pseudowire-headend-termination-pwht-for-juniper-mx/amp/

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/pseudowire-subscriber-interfaces-overview.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/usage-guidelines/services-configuring-logical-tunnel-interfaces.html



On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, 9:27 AM Ben Bartsch  wrote:

> When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and  ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2
> pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI.  I'm trying to do
> the same thing on a Juniper MX 480/960 and it does not appear to be
> supported (for LDP at least - MP-BGP might be supported).  We could do
> either VPWS or VPLS on the PE device handoff to the CE (layer 2 only).
> JTAC has somewhat confirmed this is not supported for LDP, but they only do
> break/fix, not new config.  We do not have professional services (we are
> broke).
>
> Any Juniper routerheads out there that have seen this done using LDP
> without having to hairpin on the MX?
>
> Thanks, y'all.
>
> -ben
>

Juniper MX - Routed pseudowire using LDP - VPWS or VPLS

[Ben Bartsch]

When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and  ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2
pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI.  I'm trying to do
the same thing on a Juniper MX 480/960 and it does not appear to be
supported (for LDP at least - MP-BGP might be supported).  We could do
either VPWS or VPLS on the PE device handoff to the CE (layer 2 only).
JTAC has somewhat confirmed this is not supported for LDP, but they only do
break/fix, not new config.  We do not have professional services (we are
broke).

Any Juniper routerheads out there that have seen this done using LDP
without having to hairpin on the MX?

Thanks, y'all.

-ben

Re: TWC/Charter/Spectrum contact off-list ? (Reverse DNS issue)

[Brandon Applegate]

> On Mar 16, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Ross Vandegrift  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:04:12AM -0400, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>> I had success with this issue about 2 years ago when some TWC folks
>> contacted me.  I don’t know if those folks are still with TWC/Charter
>> here in the end of 2017 - hence posting on NANOG.  The tl;dr is IPv6
>> reverse DNS issues.  It was broken, got fixed, and seems to have
>> broken again recently.
> 
> Did you ever get a response or make progress?  I got a ticket escalated
> to engineering in mid-December about 2606:6000::/32.  Just learned from
> support that it was closed without a resolution.

I did and did (response and progress (fix actually)).  I will shoot you who 
helped me offlist.

--
Brandon Applegate - CCIE 10273
PGP Key fingerprint:
0641 D285 A36F 533A 73E5  2541 4920 533C C616 703A
"For thousands of years men dreamed of pacts with demons.
Only now are such things possible."



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

NSR / NSF

[Hari .]

Checking on best practice being followed with regards to enabling NSF or NSR or 
both on ASR 9k. Which option can be beneficial and considered to be a standard 
approach.


Thanks!