Re: Europe IP Transit Provider Ideas ?

[Jean Delestre]

If you want good connectivity with up to 20/30 gigs of traffic you should
check IP-Max in Geneva  (25091)

They are very well connected in Europe

Le mar. 30 juin 2020 à 22:31, Michel 'ic' Luczak  a
écrit :

> 5511
>
> On 30 Jun 2020, at 13:14, James Braunegg 
> wrote:
>
> We currently take full table feeds from Telia, GTT, Cogent, Retn,
> tisparkle (Seabone) we are also looking at adding NTT in the USA and maybe
> also in Europe but any other recommendations ?
>
>
>

[NANOG-announce] Explore the best of NANOG 79!

[NANOG News]

Our first fully-virtual conference may be over, but the hours of archived
talks + tutorials, keynotes + panels are just waiting to be explored. We've
gathered up all the very best of NANOG 79, just for you. Scroll on to learn
more!

View Agenda 
View Attendees


*Virtual Webcast *
Whether virtual or IRL, we live-stream every conference so you can return
to any recorded presentation you’d like at any time — from a panel that
examined networks' responses to Covid-19, to talks + keynotes exploring the
"death of the Internet," IPv6 adoption over Internet exchanges, and Dynamic
Flooding in supernodes. You'll find a curated selection of videos on NANOG
TV  + the full webcast
on our YouTube
channel , with
hours of insights from some of the brightest minds in network engineering,
operations, and architecture.

*Keynotes*
"The Net has died many times. In fact it started dead, according to the
mindset of a number of folks." — Scott Bradner

Didn't get to tune in to Tom Daly and Scott Bradner's keynotes? Be sure to
check them out on NANOG TV
! Tom's keynote
"Becoming Disconnected," discussed the evolution of application delivery
based on the progression of underlying transport from telephone
switchboards to today’s 400G ethernet. Scott's keynote, "Death of the
Internet, GIF at 11," explored the many times the Internet has been
declared dead, and what each of those "deaths" have to teach us.

*Community Meeting *
NANOG's success depends on the collective expertise of its dynamic
community! Miss out on the NANOG 79 Virtual Community Meeting? Watch the
recording

to hear more from Executive Director Edward McNair, Board Chair Tina
Morris, and PC Chair Vincent Celindro on the progress we made in 2019 + the
first half of 2020, plus stats on our first fully-virtual conference.

*Call for Presentations*
Share your insights at a future NANOG meeting, with a presentation that
brings your research + ideas to life. The NANOG PC accepts proposals on a
rolling basis, and would love to see yours! Learn More


*Our community is the best! *
The NANOG Staff, Board of Directors, and Program Committee would like to
thank each and every attendee + sponsor + virtual exhibitor for making
NANOG 79 an amazing experience — your continued support means everything to
us!

*Planning to attend NANOG 80? *
We'd love to hear from you! The health and safety of the NANOG community is
our top priority, and your insights are extremely valuable in our efforts
to continue providing the safest conference experiences possible. We look
forward to hearing your thoughts via the NANOG 80 Survey
.
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
NANOG-announce@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

Anyone from Airtel or Tata on list? DNS block issue on search engine

[John Von Essen]

Starting yesterday, we’ve noticed the search engine DuckDuckGo being blocked 
via DNS in India. Specifically, users using Airtel or Tata DNS servers. Other 
search engines are fine (Bing, etc.,.). I know alot of blocking is occurring in 
India recently, but I think the net was incorrectly cast over this one. Its not 
all ISPs in India, so far just Airtel and Tata.


$ dig @122.166.234.70 duckduckgo.com

; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> @122.166.234.70 duckduckgo.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 7316
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4000
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;duckduckgo.com.IN  A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
rpz.airtelblack.com.262 IN  SOA rpz.airtelblack.com. 
hostmaster.rpz.airtelblack.com. 2360 3 3 2419200 604800


$ dig @59.163.126.38 duckduckgo.com

; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> @59.163.126.38 duckduckgo.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36722
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4000
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;duckduckgo.com.IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
duckduckgo.com. 10800   IN  A   127.0.0.1

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Microsoft SNDS contact with a clue?

[Edward Dore]

I’ve come to the conclusion that there's no-one with a clue at Microsoft SNDS. 
For well over a year I’ve been trying to get them to fix a bug in JMRP which 
means that we can’t add one of our authorised ranges from SNDS to the existing 
JMRP feed (which works for all of the other ranges), but on the rare occasion 
when they can actually be bothered to reply unfortunately no-one there seems to 
be able to read.

Edward Dore 
Freethought Internet 

> On 25 Jun 2020, at 20:05, Brian Rak via NANOG  wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, that's the generic SNDS support email I have been talking to.  
> They don't appear to be able to actually fix anything.
> 
> On 6/25/2020 3:03 PM, Udeme Ukutt wrote:
>> Brian, try msn-s...@microsoft.com . It's been 
>> awhile I've had to use it, but it's worth a shot.
>> 
>> Udeme 
>> Postmaster at LinkedIn 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:00 PM Brian Rak via NANOG > > wrote:
>> Is there anyone around from Microsoft that can help me with a SNDS 
>> verification issue?
>> 
>> I'm having problems where the verification system is trying to use the 
>> wrong WHOIS server, and the responses I'm getting from support don't 
>> really indicate they understand the issue.
>> 
>> I also have a different problem where I have a /17 and support keeps 
>> telling me I need to go and verify all the /23's within it... which is 
>> going to take quite awhile.
>> 
>> 

Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

[Mark Tinka]

On 1/Jul/20 09:10, James Bensley wrote:

> True, but what's changed in two weeks with regards to LDv6 and SR?
>
> What was your use case / requirement for LDv6 - to remove the full
> table v6 feed from your core or to remove IPv4 from your IGP or both?

Give me a year to work this and report back, hopefully at a NANOG
lectern near you :-).

Mark.

Re: Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

[James Bensley]

On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 22:07, Mark Tinka  wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30/Jun/20 20:37, James Bensley wrote:
>
> > Mark, does someone have a gun to your head? Are you in trouble? Blink
> > 63 times for yes, 64 times for no ;)
>
> You're pretty late to this party, mate...

True, but what's changed in two weeks with regards to LDv6 and SR?

What was your use case / requirement for LDv6 - to remove the full
table v6 feed from your core or to remove IPv4 from your IGP or both?

Cheers,
James.