Re: IPv6 and CDN's

2021-11-03 Thread Max Tulyev
Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less 
traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address 
space. Isn't it?


22.10.21 20:19, Mark Tinka пише:



On 10/22/21 18:08, t...@pelican.org wrote:

I don't think it'll ever make money, but I think it will reduce 
costs.  CGNAT boxes cost money, operating them costs money, dealing 
with the support fallout from them costs money.  Especially in the 
residential space, where essentially if the customer calls you, ever, 
you just blew years' worth of margin.


The problem is accurately modelling cost reduction using native IPv6 in 
lieu of CG-NAT is hard when the folk that need convincing are the CFO's.


They are more used to "spend 1 to get 2". Convincing them to "save 2 by 
spending 1" - not as easy as one may think.


Mark.



Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA)

2021-11-03 Thread TJ Trout
I second this, most best effort Broadband cpe equipment will choke with
lots of concurrent connections

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 8:25 PM P C  wrote:

> If this is connection count related only, It is most likely an issue with
> the CPE (router), NAT table, or similar.
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:21 AM Neel Chauhan  wrote:
>
>> I tried that back in September, it didn't work. It doesn't happen on my
>> hop but the one after that. Even a second GPON connection shows the
>> issues if one is running the offending traffic.
>>
>> The issue occurs even if I'm using 50 Mbps out of my 940.
>>
>> It may be bufferbloat on CL's side but they keep denying the issue.
>>
>> I guess I'll have to break the bank and get Comcast Gigabit Pro.
>>
>> CenturyLink should just get bought out by another telco, like how
>> Cablevision got bought by Altice.
>>
>> -Neel
>>
>> On 2021-11-01 20:52, Ryan Hamel wrote:
>> > Neel,
>> >
>> > Sounds like buffer bloat.
>> >
>> > Run a speed test, whatever is your maximum for your download and upload
>> > take
>> > 10% away from it, and setup traffic shaping in OPNsense
>> > (https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/shaping.html) with those values. If
>> > the
>> > issue goes away, then you're exceeding the buffer of CenturyLink's
>> > device
>> > with the bursts of traffic.
>> >
>> > Ryan
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: NANOG  On Behalf Of
>> > Neel
>> > Chauhan
>> > Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 6:44 PM
>> > To: nanog@nanog.org
>> > Subject: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA)
>> >
>> > Hi NANOG Mailing List,
>> >
>> > I don't know if any of you work at CenturyLink/Lumen, very less on
>> > their
>> > Fiber network in Seattle, WA. However, here's my story.
>> >
>> > If I attempt to run certain applications that use 1000, or 1 TCP
>> > connections, I get latency spikes. It is based on how many connections,
>> > but
>> > also how much bandwidth is used. This means certain things like Tor
>> > relays
>> > are off limits to me (which I wish to run).
>> >
>> > On an idle connection, the PingPlotter outputs look like this:
>> > https://centurylinklatencyissues.com/image-000.png
>> >
>> > If I attempt to run BitTorrent with 1000 connections in Deluge,
>> > PingPlotter
>> > looks like this:
>> > https://centurylinklatencyissues.com/image-002.png
>> >
>> > Getting support, or even executive contacts to admit the issue hasn't
>> > worked. They all love to blame my equipment or applications, when CL
>> > routers
>> > also show the issue when I run the same things whereas my same exact
>> > OPNsense box on Google Fiber Webpass running Tor at another address had
>> > no
>> > issues whatsoever, and I can ping other Tor relays on CenturyLink AS209
>> > just
>> > fine (from a VPS).
>> >
>> > The most competent person I dealt with was actually one tech. He told
>> > me
>> > there was "capacity issues" in our neighborhood, and that's the reason
>> > for
>> > the issues. However, nothing was done about it afterwards, I'm guessing
>> > since I turned off my Tor relay after the visit to avoid complaints
>> > from
>> > family members.
>> >
>> > On an AT&T forum, people have said GPON gives latency spikes/packet
>> > loss on
>> > congestion:
>> >
>> https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r33242889-How-rare-is-GPON-XGSPON-saturatio
>> > n
>> >
>> > The capacity managers in Seattle are literally dragging their feet:
>> > it's
>> > 100x worse than AT&T's 802.1X. I know AT&T and CenturyLink don't
>> > compete,
>> > but if I had to choose between AT&T Fiber and CenturyLink, I'll take
>> > AT&T in
>> > a heartbeat, no ifs, no buts, even if I have to use AT&T's crappy
>> > router
>> > instead of my OPNsense box.
>> >
>> > Going back, do any of you who work at CenturyLink/Lumen can get me to
>> > the
>> > right people, hopefully the capacity managers in Seattle?
>> >
>> > I could go with Comcast, but it's either (a) 35 Mbps uploads or (b)
>> > $329/mo
>> > for "Gigabit Pro" with a 2-year contract and a steep install fee. I am
>> > seriously considering Gigabit Pro even if it breaks the bank, but hope
>> > I
>> > won't have to go there.
>> >
>> > I don't need 2 Gbps and would rather pay $65 than $329. 300-500 Mbps
>> > uploads
>> > when I need it is the sweet spot for me (even without Tor) which CL
>> > GPON
>> > should easily handle without a sweat. I also don't exactly
>> > **trust** Comcast, they're a horrible company in many metrics, but in
>> > some
>> > ways Comcast is more competent than CenturyLink.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Neel Chauhan
>>
>