AS3257 / AS4436 / GTT Contact re route hijack

2023-01-13 Thread Adam Blackington
Can someone from GTT contact me off-list about this?  GTT is not an
upstream carrier for me  and the NOC doesn't seem to understand the
issue

Thank for your help. :)

Adam

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 8:47 AM GTT NOC  wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> As part of our ongoing improvements to enhance security measures for our
> customers, we no longer accept Request tickets via email. We request you to
> please log into our EtherVision <https://ethervision.gtt.net/> portal to
> open your ticket, it will then be picked up accordingly by our engineers.
> You can view a quick tutorial  on our Ethervision portal here
> <https://learn.gtt.net/EV_Focus_On_Ticketing.html>.
>
>
>
> EtherVision <https://ethervision.gtt.net/> also allows
> you to check the status of existing tickets as well as access our Service
> Assurance contact information.
>
>
> If you do not have an EtherVision <https://ethervision.gtt.net/> login, 
> please contact
> your GTT account administrator or submit a request through our website
> <https://ethervision.gtt.net/sign-in>.
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Danish Aga
>
> Service Desk Analyst
>
> Client Portal: https://ethervision.gtt.net/
>
> GTT NOC: n...@gtt.net
>
> [image: image]
>
> --
> *From:* LionLink NOC 
> *Sent:* 12 January 2023 07:02
> *To:* GTT NOC 
> *Subject:* Route Hijack - 23.29.58.0/24
>
> *NOTE:* This is an external message. Please use caution when replying,
> opening attachments or clicking on any links in this e-mail.
> Hello GTT NOC,
>
> I am unsure why, but it appears you are advertising a netblock that I am
> assigned (199.116.84.0/24).  Can you please stop advertising my netbook
> <https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-199-116-84-0-2/pft?s=199.116.84.1>?
>
>
>
> [image: Screen Shot 2023-01-12 at 1.50.35 AM.png]
> [image: Screen Shot 2023-01-12 at 1.51.07 AM.png]
>
>
> *NOTICE: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is
> addressed and may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the
> contrary, any opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not
> represent the official view of GTT Communications Inc or any of its
> affiliates. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
> Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents
> to any other person. All quotes, offers, proposals and any other
> information in the body of this email is subject to, and limited by, the
> terms and conditions, signed service agreement and/or statement of work*
>

Very Best Regards,

Adam


*Adam Blackington, PSM, NSA*
Managing Partner

*LionLink Networks | *Infrastructure Solutions That Power The Enterprise
ablacking...@lionlink.net email  *| * (571) 482.1490 direct

Service Desk:  (844) DATA-CENTER, Option 2 or  supp...@lionlink.net


Re: Google Speed Test

2022-12-29 Thread Adam Blackington
https://www.speedtest.cloud
are also GCP endpoints.

Adam

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:55 PM Dave Taht  wrote:

> Waveform leverages cloud flare's CDN.
>
> I have a worldwide fleet of iperf, netperf, flent and irtt servers folk
> are welcome to use, as I don't trust the web best tests
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 11:44 AM Douglas Fischer 
> wrote:
>
>> I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube.
>> I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test.
>>
>> I looked quickly to see if I could find it... But I couldn't find it.
>>
>> Em qua., 28 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Mike Hammett 
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity
>>> to a particular network that's something laypeople could do. I could host
>>> something in GCP myself, but cloud is expensive.
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ]
>>> [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL ] [
>>> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb ] [
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions ] [
>>> https://twitter.com/ICSIL ]
>>> [ http://www.midwest-ix.com/ | Midwest Internet Exchange ]
>>> [ https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix ] [
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange ] [
>>> https://twitter.com/mdwestix ]
>>> [ http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/ | The Brothers WISP ]
>>> [ https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [
>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ]
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Douglas Fernando Fischer
>> Engº de Controle e Automação
>>
>


Re: Suggestions for managed DNS provider?

2013-02-15 Thread Adam Blackington
+1 for DME these guys are fantastic.


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Raj Jalan r...@rajlog.com wrote:

 http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com
 Cost effective. We use it for some level of failover and load sharing as
 well.

 -Raj Jalan
 @rjalan2 http://twitter.com/rjalan2

 On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:58 PM, David Hubbard 
 dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:

  Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
  Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
  alternatives.  Cost effective would be nice, but stable under attack is
  better.
 
  Thanks,
 
  David