PPPoE PPP authentication attempts
Hi Everyone, Please can someone assist me with this wierdness DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:42.001 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:43.953 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:43.953 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:47.601 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:47.601 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:49.041 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:49.041 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:54.225 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:54.225 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:55.569 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:55.569 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:28:57.261 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:28:57.265 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:29:01.357 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:29:01.361 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server2:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:29:03.825 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:29:03.825 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server1:1812,1813 has returned. Apr 9 2009 21:29:07.833 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding. Apr 9 2009 21:29:07.833 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 has returned. I can ping all the rad server's with >2ms, the server's are working fine as there are many more nas's using them. Any thought's? Regard, Bruce
Re: SPEEDS
Hi Thomas, Please paste me a traceroute to google.com Regards, Bruce On Monday 13 April 2009 3:45:10 pm Matikiti, Thomas wrote: > Wazup Bruce - I'm a bit concerned about our speeds here even today when > they are two people in the office I still find myself struggling to > browse the internet due to slow speeds. We should investigate our link's > performance when there is no one in the office because for it remains > the same - slow. > > Regards, > Tom > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender , then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International on behalf of the local > KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International is a Swiss > cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International > provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is > a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member > firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > >
Re: SPEEDS
I certainly agree that its only the two you Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) 30 second input rate 16000 bits/sec, 9 packets/sec 30 second output rate 9000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec 51056 packets input, 28961683 bytes KPMG-BR#sh clock 15:48:52.249 GMT Mon Apr 13 2009 A significant difference as compared to peak hours On Monday 13 April 2009 3:45:10 pm Matikiti, Thomas wrote: > Wazup Bruce - I'm a bit concerned about our speeds here even today when > they are two people in the office I still find myself struggling to > browse the internet due to slow speeds. We should investigate our link's > performance when there is no one in the office because for it remains > the same - slow. > > Regards, > Tom > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender , then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International on behalf of the local > KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International is a Swiss > cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International > provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is > a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member > firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > >
Re: SPEEDS
Kindly disregard my last it was sent in error.
Re: SPEEDS
My sincerest apologies guys, this really wasn't intended to end up here. Bruce On Monday 13 April 2009 4:08:06 pm robbie.ja...@regions.com wrote: > please stop posting this to nanog. much appreciated. > > > > > Bruce Anthony > Grobler >om> nanog@nanog.org > cc > 04/13/2009 09:05 > AMSubject >Re: SPEEDS > > Please respond to > br...@yoafrica.co > m > > > > > > > I certainly agree that its only the two you > > Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) > 30 second input rate 16000 bits/sec, 9 packets/sec > 30 second output rate 9000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec > 51056 packets input, 28961683 bytes > > KPMG-BR#sh clock > 15:48:52.249 GMT Mon Apr 13 2009 > > A significant difference as compared to peak hours > > On Monday 13 April 2009 3:45:10 pm Matikiti, Thomas wrote: > > Wazup Bruce - I'm a bit concerned about our speeds here even today when > > they are two people in the office I still find myself struggling to > > browse the internet due to slow speeds. We should investigate our link's > > performance when there is no one in the office because for it remains > > the same - slow. > > > > Regards, > > Tom > > > > > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > > e-mail > > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication > > in > > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send > > to > > > the original sender , then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of > > it. > > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on > > it, > > > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in > > this > > > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other > > information > > > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or > > error-free, > > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International on behalf of the local > > KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International is a > > Swiss > > > cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of > > independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International > > provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International > > is > > > a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. > > > > Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG > > member > > > firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. > > > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > AntiVirus software.
