Re: Youtube Outage
The reports I've seen showing it as a worldwide outage. On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:14 PM Nathan Brookfield < nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote: > Australia too…. > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Oliver O'Boyle > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM > *To:* marshall.euba...@gmail.com > *Cc:* North American Network Operators' Group > *Subject:* Re: Youtube Outage > > > > Same in Montreal. > > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks < > marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter. > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > > > > You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread. > > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG < > nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > >> > >> Is this widespread? > > > > > > > > > -- > > :o@> > > >
Re: Gmail down
saw it down as well. came back for me in < 5 minutes. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Josh Luthmanwrote: > Web interface is broken, downdetector sure sees activity. This attempt is > from mobile. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 >
Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house
In the US at least you have to authenticate with your Comcast credentials and not like a traditional open wifi where you can just make up an email and accept the terms of service. I also understand that it is a different IP than the subscriber. Based on this the subscriber should be protected from anyone doing anything illegal and causing the SWAT team to pay a visit. I haven't upgraded my gear though. Now..they are doing this on your electric bill and taking up space (albeit a small amount of it) in your home. Chuck On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote: Why am I not surprised? Whose fault would it be if your comcast installed public wifi would be abused to download illegal material or launch a botnet, to name some random fun one could have on your behalf. :-/ (apologies if this was posted already, couldn't find an email about it on the list) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/10/disgruntled_ customers_lob_sueball_at_comcast_over_public_wifi/ A mother and daughter are suing Comcast claiming the cable giant's router in their home was offering public Wi-Fi without their permission. Comcast-supplied routers broadcast an encrypted, private wireless network for people at home, plus a non-encrypted network called XfinityWiFi that can be used by nearby subscribers. So if you're passing by a fellow user's home, you can lock onto their public Wi-Fi, log in using your Comcast username and password, and use that home's bandwidth. However, Toyer Grear, 39, and daughter Joycelyn Harris – who live together in Alameda County, California – say they never gave Comcast permission to run a public network from their home cable connection. In a lawsuit [PDF] filed in the northern district of the golden state, the pair accuse the ISP of breaking the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and two other laws. Grear – a paralegal – and her daughter claim the Xfinity hotspot is an unauthorized intrusion into their private home, places a vast burden on electricity bills, opens them up to attacks by hackers, and degrades their bandwidth. Comcast does not, however, obtain the customer's authorization prior to engaging in this use of the customer's equipment and internet service for public, non-household use, the suit claims. Indeed, without obtaining its customers' authorization for this additional use of their equipment and resources, over which the customer has no control, Comcast has externalized the costs of its national Wi-Fi network onto its customers. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages for themselves and on behalf of all Comcast customers nation-wide in their class-action case – the service was rolled out to 20 million customers this year. -- Earthquake Magnitude: 4.8 Date: 2014-12-10 22:10:36.800 UTC Date Local: 2014-12-10 13:10:36 PST Location: 120km W of Panguna, Papua New Guinea Latitude: -6.265; Longitude: 154.4004 Depth: 35 km | e-quake.org
Re: Craigslist hacked?
Not seeing that here The local site and the general http;// www.craigslist.org both look to be going to the correct site. On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
Re: Facebook down?
W. PA. too. Looks pretty widespread. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, aUser au...@mind.net wrote: Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon. Mobile too. Sent from my iPhone 5S. On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote: This message has no content.
Re: 100G wave pricing in Pennsylvania
It's a big state. Which part? Pittsburgh, Philadelphia or some point in between? On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Edward Roels edwardro...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking for rough pricing or even carriers that can provide a 100G wave in Pennsylvania. If you have some insight into how pricing scales between 10G and 100G offerings (e.g. 100G is usually 5-6x the cost of a 10G), I'm also interested. Off-list replies are welcome. Thanks, Ed
Re: Spam from Telx
I didn't even respond. I think many of these high-pressure-aggressive-types always have an answer like that conveniently vague enough as to give them an out. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: \o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this George from telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin* I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact information had come from an opt in email broker. It's going to be one of those days jms
Re: Spam from Telx
I've been getting voicemails from someone, leaving a first name only saying they have question that only I can answer. Dangling bait like that is a big red flag so they don't get a callback. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Mark Andrews wrote: I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back, stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact information had come from an opt in email broker. It's going to be one of those days It's a little hard to says that with a straight face when it has a copy of the message posted to nanog attached. It's even more amusing when your company is already listed in the pdf. The message I got was a bit more sanitized. Guess I was lucky ;) jms
Re: Common operational misconceptions
Original poster who started thread said he would. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote: If you do, please share it. Thank you. -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 2/17/2012 9:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, -Hammer- wrote: This list is awesome. Is anyone consolidating it? I'm still catching up on the thread I was thinking of making a checklist out of it. - Jared
Re: Common operational misconceptions
Not understanding RFC1918. Actually got read the riot act by someone because I worked for an organization that used 10.0.0.0/8 and that was their network and they owned it. Chuck 2012/2/15 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp Mark Andrews wrote: This doesn't prove that IPv6 is not operational. All it proves is people can misconfigure things. How do operators configure their equipments to treat ICMP packet too big generated against multicast and unicast? Note that, even if they do not enable inter-subnet multicast in their domains, the ICMP packets may still transit over or implode within their domains. Note also that some network processors can't efficiently distinguish ICMP packets generated against multicast and unicast. Masataka Ohta
Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US
Having worked on plenty of industrial and other control systems I can safely say security on the systems is generally very poor. The vulnerabilities have existed for years but are just now getting attention. This is a problem that doesn't really need a bunch of new legislation. It's an education / resource issue. The existing methods that have been used for years with reasonable success in the IT industry can 'fix' this problem. Industrial Controls systems are normally only replaced when they are so old that parts can no longer be obtained. PC's started to be widely used as operator interfaces about the time Windows 95 came out. A lot of those Win95 boxes are still running and have been connected to the network over the years. And... if you can destroy a pump by turning it off and on too often then somebody engineered the control and drive system incorrectly. Operators (and processes) do stupid things all the time. As the control systems engineer your supposed to deal with that so that things don't go boom. -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015 === There are still industrial control machines out there running MS-DOS. As you said not replaced until you can't get parts anymore. Chuck
Re: Severe Packet loss
Cogent had some planned maintenance during the 2-4a timeframe. Furthermore there was some sluggishness and packet loss for some of my customers that *seemed* to be centered around Ashburn, VA around 9-9:30 but cleared up before I could get a good look at it or even before where it was situated. Chuck On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.orgwrote: On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Gary Steers wrote: Is anyone else having major issue's tonight/this morning? We our having issue's and our upstream provider is reporting route flaps, the say its affecting quite a few networks but just checking if anyone else is having issue's??? You'll generally get more helpful responses from NANOG and other forums if you provide more detail than major issue's[sic] and route flaps. People will be more inclined to help or offer suggestions if you provide details and have done some research into the problem already. For example: What major issues were you seeing? Can those issues be defined with traceroutes, snapshots of BGP route views, reproducible difficulties in reaching a particular site, etc? What other carriers were reporting problems? Can you provide a source and destination address that is having connectivity issues? When you say our upstream provider, are you single-homed or multi-homed? Speaking from my own little corner of the world, I haven't seen any major connectivity problems here in the past 24 hours. jms
Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt affected (not N.A.)
+1 On Oct 12, 2011 11:51 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:52:02 CDT, -Hammer- said: What kills me is what they have told the public. The lost a core switch. I don't know if they actually mean network switch or not but I'm pretty sure any of us that work on an enterprise environment know how to factor N+1 just for these types of days. And then the backup solution failed? I'm not buying it either. Yeah, and that extra comma in the one config file that didn't make a difference when you tested the failover in the lab *never* makes a difference when it hits in the production network, right? Or they changed the config of the primary and it didn't get propogated just right to the backup, or they had mismatched firmware levels on blades in the blades on the primary and backup switches, so traffic that didn't tickle a bug on the primary blades caused the blade to crash on the backup, or... Anybody on this list who's been around long enough probably has enough We should have had N+2 because the N+1'th device failed too stories to drain *several* pitchers of beer at a good pub... I've even had one case where my butt got *saved* from a ohnosecond-class whoops because the N+1'th device *was* crashed (stomped a config file, it replicated, was able to salvage a copy from a device that didn't replicate because it was down at the time).
Re: 365x24x7
I've had it done in places where I work where you'll have 3 rotations working 12 hour shifts. In a 2 week pay period they get their 80 hours in a blend 36 one week and 44 the next. It gives some nice consecutive days off time which also doubles as a retention tool for some employees. You might have to get creative to have all the days work out but it can be done. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:14 AM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote: If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I need to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the required 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation? thoughts, experience? Mike -- = Charles L. Mills Email: w3y...@gmail.com = Need server hosting, DR or colocation services? See me!
Cleveland or Columbus Colocation?
Can anyone from these areas recommend someone? I know Expedient is in Cleveland but would like others to look at as well. Feel free to contact me off list. Chuck
Re: RIP Justification
Loss of using VLSM's is a big thing to give up. You can go to RIPv2 and get that however. Would work for small networks to stay under the hop-count limit as it is still distance-vector. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote: On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Jesse Loggins wrote: A group of engineers and I were having a design discussion about routing protocols including RIP and static routing and the justifications of use for each protocol. One very interesting discussion was surrounding RIP and its use versus a protocol like OSPF. It seems that many Network Engineers consider RIP an old antiquated protocol that should be thrown in back of a closet never to be seen or heard from again. Some even preferred using a more complex protocol like OSPF instead of RIP. I am of the opinion that every protocol has its place, which seems to be contrary to some engineers way of thinking. This leads to my question. What are your views of when and where the RIP protocol is useful? Please excuse me if this is the incorrect forum for such questions. RIP has one property no modern protocol has. It works on simplex links (e.g. high-speed satellite downlink with low-speed terrestrial uplink). Is that useful? I don't know, but it is still a fact. -- TTFN, patrick -- = Charles L. Mills Westmoreland Co. ARES EC Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI Email: w3y...@gmail.com
Re: XO Routing
The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their peers. Chuck. On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, Stefan Molnar ste...@csudsu.com wrote: Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. Stefan
Re: Cogent issues
A lot of our traffic hits VZ as well and goes either to DC or points in NY. Been happening off and on since Labor Day weekend. CM On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote: We've been noticing high latency for some time with Verizon (UUNET) connections at least through the NY area. On 09/08/2010 10:34 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Anyone notice any issues with Cogent? Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple of other carriers.
Cogent issues
Anyone notice any issues with Cogent? Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple of other carriers.
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
I think he was actually quoting the movie. They always called Harvey Korman's character Hedy and he'd always correct them with That's Hedley in a most disapproving tone. You had to have watched that movie way too many times (much to my wife's chagrin) to catch the subtle joke. On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote: Actually, no. Not from the Mel Brooks movie. Hedy Lamarr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr Hedy Lamarr (November 9, 1914 - January 19, 2000) was an Austrian-born American actress and engineer. Though known primarily for her film career as a major contract star of MGM's Golden Age, she also co-invented an early form of spread spectrum communications technology, a key to modern wireless communication.[1] Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139 -Original Message- From: John Lightfoot [mailto:jlightf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:05 AM To: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com; 'Simon Perreault' Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? That's Hedley. -Original Message- From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com [mailto:bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: Simon Perreault Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote: On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote: On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound connection for anonymity purposes. That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of. not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection. --bill
Re: Posting from freebie E-mail Accounts
We are not allowed to post from work email accounts to lists such as these as well. The CISO's reasoning (and he may have a point...) is that we might ask the list Hey...I can't figure out why my Cisco $MODEL router is doing this when I upgrade to $VERSION of IOS. Then someone trolling to hack you knows you have one of them in your network running that version of code. It still may be easy enough to extrapolate where you work from your personal email using other publicly available methods but On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote: I'm betting more then a few of use free mail accts to keep this separate from our work mail. If your really having that much issue, config your mail server to drop it yourself or unsub Seriously -jim yes posted from gmail acct. Ditto. - - ferg +1 (posting from gmail account) +2 (also from gmail) free anti spam, no need for antivirus, free storage, spam don't go to my official address, don't have to make backups, can read from anywhere, mostly used for email lists. The problem is the source not what service he/she uses, trolls will be trolls regardless of what freebie fqdn they use. Jorge
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
I love war stories. I once got chewed out by a colleague ? from another organization because we were using their address space. We were using 10.0.0.0/8. Explanation of NAT and RFC1918 was met with a deer in the headlights look. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Matt Shadbolt matt.shadb...@gmail.com wrote: I once had a customer who for some reason had all their printers on public addresses they didn't own. Not advertising them outside, but internally whenever a user browsed to a external site that happened to be one of the addresses used, they would just receive a HP or Konica login page :) They didn't mind though. No idea if they've changed it since. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote: On 3/18/2010 14:30, William Allen Simpson wrote: On 3/18/10 2:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: Does anyone know if the University of Michigan or Cisco are going be updating their systems and documentation to no longer use 1.2.3.4 ? http://www.google.com/search?q=1.2.3.4+site%3Acisco.com I know that the University of Michigan utilize 1.2.3.4 for their captive portal login/logout pages as recently as monday when I was on the medical campus. Dunno about cisco. med.umich.edu seems to run their own stuff, separately from umich.edu, and quite badly. I've complained about their setup repeatedly over the past several years. No traction. Is it something about Medical Schools? When we were first putting together the campus network, Surgery was running a Token Ring (I thought Vampire Tap was a fitting item for their inventory) running in Class D space as I recall. Should we try again, jointly? ;-) Towards the end, there were people who insisted I must rout their net to the Internets. I declined. -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. (A republic, using parliamentary law, protects the minority.) Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml -- = Charles L. Mills Westmoreland Co. ARES EC Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI Email: w3y...@gmail.com
Re: Latency quesstion
That could be a lot of things. Without a network drawing and access to the devices to dig further it is difficult to say. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dennis Dayman dennis-li...@thenose.net wrote: have a friend who has 21 floors of a building in DFW, multiple switches, etc and they started to have latency issues this weekend where half if not all packet are being dropped to folder shares, printers, etc. Suggestions on how they can troubleshoot that? call in a company to help identify it? -Dennis
IPv6 enabled carriers?
Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today? I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but anything outside of testbed environments and trials as in Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is available. I'm being tasked with coming up with an IPv6 migration plan for a data center. Mostly interested in if ATT, Level3, GLBX, Saavis, Verizon Business and Qwest are capable as those are the typical ones I deal with. Thanks...Chuck
Re: Network Ring
The power of google http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_Automatic_Protection_Switching Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no What is EAPS?
XO - a Tier 1 or not?
Trying to sort through the marketecture and salesman speak and get a definitive answer. I figure the NANOGers would be able to give me some input. Is XO Communications a Tier 1 ISP? I'd say no based on all research and googling that I've done but they seem to meet some of the criteria (some != all and therefore not Tier 1). Any help here? Thanks as always. Chuck
Re: Level3 funkiness
Can't get to level3.net 63.211.236.36 or www.level3.net 4.68.95.28 from Pittsburgh either and I peer directly with level3 with a full BGP feed. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM, J. Oquendo s...@infiltrated.net wrote: Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via Level3? I can't even reach the main website from who knows how many networks I've tried. Also friends and former colleagues have tried to reach the site to no avail. One of my machines on ATT: # traceroute level3.net traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 4 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.105.58) 11.285 ms 21.702 ms 21.477 ms 5 ggr2.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.141) 12.712 ms 10.194 ms 16.393 ms 6 so-8-0-0.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.127.149) 9.975 ms 10.019 ms 10.833 ms 7 vlan79.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.126) 10.162 ms 10.189 ms 14.474 ms 8 ae-71-71.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.69) 15.763 ms 11.166 ms 9.725 ms 9 ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.93) 16.139 ms 30.616 ms 16.275 ms 10 ae-64-64.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.178) 15.684 ms ae-74-74.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.182) 21.870 ms ae-84-84.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.186) 28.729 ms 11 ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.157) 17.035 ms ae-62-62.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.145) 17.041 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.149) 21.940 ms 12 ae-2-2.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.69) 31.671 ms 42.407 ms 45.774 ms 13 ae-1-100.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.113) 31.922 ms 32.115 ms 38.135 ms 14 ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net (4.69.132.61) 75.265 ms 67.528 ms 67.937 ms 15 ge-9-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.35) 62.587 ms !H ge-9-1.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.99) 62.543 ms !H ge-9-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.163) 75.797 ms !H (From Texas through Above.net) $ traceroute level3.net|tail -n 1 traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 11 ge-6-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.131) 21.473 ms !H * ge-6-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.3) 21.547 ms !H Confirmed it can't be reached from Travelers Ins, The Hartford, none of my connections. Anyone else seeing issues? I'm seeing drop off from clients going through their Atlanta interconnects with Charter and two other providers, which I can't make sense of. I DO KNOW they experienced some sort of issue with a TDM switch or so they said... Very broad statements: We know teh interwebs are down please stand by I know websites are one thing, but the chances of the website going down, a TDM switch being wacky and now clients traversing their networks complaining all at once seems a little out of the ordinary. =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently. - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x5CCD6B5E --