Re: SDH Fiber Problem

2011-09-20 Thread Daniel Holme
On 19 September 2011 10:20, jacob miller mmzi...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I have triend to do a ping with the DF bit set.
 Maximum am able to get to is 1600.
 This am guessing is because of the fact I have set the mtu size on My 
 interface to 1600.

You could extend this test by sending TCP packets across to simulate
the HTTP flow, ideally looking at the packets as they come in at the
other end. At least this way you're closer to replicating the problem
than just using ICMP.

If this doesn't get you anywhere, and as you can get ICMP packets of
1600byte across the link then have you thought about looking elsewhere
for the problem? Potentially further up the path to the Internet?

-- 
Daniel Holme



Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

2010-11-20 Thread Daniel Holme
On 19 November 2010 13:14, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote:
 If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.

I like that, but maybe a chomp (although that might annoy some perl 
ruby people)... then maybe when all 2bytes are zeros and we expel them
from the address with a double colon, we should call that a fart.

-- 
Daniel Holme



Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

2010-11-20 Thread Daniel Holme
On 20 Nov 2010, at 13:42, Daniel Holme dan.ho...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 19 November 2010 13:14, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote:
 If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
 
 I like that, but maybe a chomp (although that might annoy some perl 
 ruby people)... then maybe when all 2bytes are zeros and we expel them
 from the address with a double colon, we should call that a fart.

On a more serious note, apologies for throwing in more suggestions this late in 
the game. Especially now some documentation has been drafted, but has anybody 
thought of using 'munch' for 2bytes. It just seems to ring right for me.

--
Daniel Holme