Re: Ready to get your federal computer license?

2009-08-28 Thread David Temkin
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Hiers, David  wrote:

> Governments already license stock brokers, pilots, commercial drivers,
> accountants, engineers, all sorts of people whose mistakes can be measured
> in the loss of hundreds of lives and millions of dollars.
>
>
> http://sip-trunking.tmcnet.com/topics/security/articles/63218-bill-give-president-emergency-power-internet-raises-concerns.htm
>
>
> Good times
>
>
>
> David Hiers
>
> CCIE (R/S, V), CISSP
> ADP Dealer Services
>


It would appear as though your employer should be amongst the first to
apply...

http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Tools-Security%98hold/ADP-Duped-Into-Disclosing-Data/

-Dave (who long ago learned to not post contentious stuff from his
employers' e-mail)


Re: IPv6 in the ARIN region

2009-10-13 Thread David Temkin
I contacted 209 yesterday (due to the ongoing Cogent/174 silliness) and it
seems like they are willing to turn up customer-facing v6, but have made it
a sales process (versus a technical request) and so that complicates things.

-Dave

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Seth Mattinen  wrote:

> New thread: who will route the full IPv6 table? So far I'm seeing PI
> /48's out of 2620:0:/23 from:
>
> NTT, 2914
> AT&T, 7018
> Sprint, 1239 and 6175
> Hurricane, 6939
> Level 3, 3356
> Global Crossing, 3549
> Qwest, 209
>
> Did I miss anyone? Qwest only carries one route (out of 4 total) though,
> don't know if that's an exception or they only have one ARIN PI customer.
>
> ~Seth
>
>


Re: Cogent input

2009-06-17 Thread David Temkin
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:14:31AM -0400, kris foster wrote:
>> Simply untrue, at the Peering BOF yesterday Cogent said they are
>> rolling this out.
>
> They saw my "How to deploy IPv6 in 30 minutes or less" tutorial on
> Sunday and apparently it actually worked. Unfortunately I neglected to
> mention the important "acquire connectivity to the global routing table"
> step (I assumed it was implied, but I guess it wasn't), but if you're
> down with their 5 v6 routes as "transit" you should be golden. :)
>
> --
> Richard A Steenbergen        http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
>
>

Nary a route...

dtem...@jnrt-edge01.sv1> show route table inet6.0 aspath-regex ".* 174 .*"

inet6.0: 1914 destinations, 5528 routes (1914 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

dtem...@jnrt-edge01.sv1>

-Dave



Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

2009-07-26 Thread David Temkin
Perfectly reachable from AT&T in NY:

ny01-rtr#traceroute img.4chan.com

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27)

  1 12.94.163.57 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  2 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.238) [MPLS: Label 16370 Exp 0] 8 msec 8
msec 8 msec
  3 ggr4.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.25) 8 msec 8 msec 4 msec
  4 192.205.34.50 16 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  5 0.xe-5-0-3.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.10) 36 msec 4 msec 8 msec
  6 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.57.81) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
  7 POS7-0.GW4.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.61) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
  8 oversee-gw.customer.alter.net (65.223.29.34) 76 msec 80 msec 80 msec
  9 208.73.208.10 80 msec 80 msec 76 msec
 10 img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec

Are you sure this isn't just a technical/routing issue versus a blocking
issue?  Seems like everyone's out to make a sensationalist story out of this
when it's unlikely that anyone's awake at AT&T on a Sunday afternoon who
could/would make such a change.

-Dave

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:47 PM, jamie  wrote:

> img.4chan.org is the biggest site - I've already received six replies on
> top
> of the list-replies confirming (b/c they saw this problem mentioned on
> sites/blogs) filtering.
>
> technical information, traces, bgp views (esp. from singly-homed T
> customers), etc, encouraged
>
> -jamie
>
>
> >>
> > I don't see a below below.
> >
>


Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

2009-07-26 Thread David Temkin
Someone just pointed out that I dumbassedly tracerouted to img.4chan.com,
which is a linkfarm.

img.4chan.org is also reachable from AT&T in NY:

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 207.126.64.182, timeout is 2 seconds:
.!..!
Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 164/196/228 ms
ny01-rtr#



Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to img.4chan.org (207.126.64.182)

  1 12.94.163.57 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  2 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.238) [MPLS: Label 16377 Exp 0] 8 msec 8
msec 8 msec
  3 ggr7.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.97) 8 msec 4 msec 8 msec
  4 192.205.35.10 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  5 cr1-tengig-0-8-3-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.198.13) 4 msec 8 msec 4
msec
  6 cr1-pos-0-3-2-3.dallas.savvis.net (204.70.192.82) 48 msec 44 msec 44
msec
  7  *  *  *
  8 er1-te-3-1.dallasequinix.savvis.net (204.70.204.149) 48 msec 44 msec 44
msec
  9 208.175.175.22 164 msec 172 msec 120 msec
 10 unknown.xeex.net (216.152.253.26) 48 msec 48 msec 48 msec


However, it's equally as unhealthy from Comcast:

--- img.4chan.org ping statistics ---
110 packets transmitted, 77 packets received, 30% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 62.635/233.576/639.919/96.254 ms


So, enough with the conspiracy theories already.

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM, David Temkin  wrote:

> Perfectly reachable from AT&T in NY:
>
> ny01-rtr#traceroute img.4chan.com
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27)
>
>   1 12.94.163.57 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   2 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.238) [MPLS: Label 16370 Exp 0] 8 msec
> 8 msec 8 msec
>   3 ggr4.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.25) 8 msec 8 msec 4 msec
>   4 192.205.34.50 16 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   5 0.xe-5-0-3.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.10) 36 msec 4 msec 8 msec
>   6 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.57.81) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
>   7 POS7-0.GW4.LAX1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.61) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
>   8 oversee-gw.customer.alter.net (65.223.29.34) 76 msec 80 msec 80 msec
>   9 208.73.208.10 80 msec 80 msec 76 msec
>  10 img.4chan.com (208.73.210.27) 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
>
> Are you sure this isn't just a technical/routing issue versus a blocking
> issue?  Seems like everyone's out to make a sensationalist story out of this
> when it's unlikely that anyone's awake at AT&T on a Sunday afternoon who
> could/would make such a change.
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:47 PM, jamie  wrote:
>
>> img.4chan.org is the biggest site - I've already received six replies on
>> top
>> of the list-replies confirming (b/c they saw this problem mentioned on
>> sites/blogs) filtering.
>>
>> technical information, traces, bgp views (esp. from singly-homed T
>> customers), etc, encouraged
>>
>> -jamie
>>
>>
>> >>
>> > I don't see a below below.
>> >
>>
>
>


Re: Netflix Advice

2013-12-23 Thread David Temkin
Hi Warren,

Unfortunately there's no way to cache at the client end on servers that we
do not control for various reasons (not all technical).  You can reach out
to me at dtemkin(at)netflix.com if you'd like to discuss further.

Regards,
-Dave


On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Warren Bailey <
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:

> Client/remote side.
>
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
>
>
>  Original message 
> From: Brandon Galbraith 
> Date: 12/23/2013 7:37 AM (GMT-09:00)
> To: Warren Bailey 
> Cc: NANOG 
> Subject: Re: Netflix Advice
>
>
> Are you looking to cache it at your ground station? Or on the client side?
>
> brandon
>
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Warren Bailey
>  wrote:
> > Dear NANOG Gods,
> >
> > Has anyone heard of a nifty way to cache the netflix library without
> using their Open Connect Appliance? I am not trying to dodge copyrights, or
> even dodge the netflix service, I am simply trying to find a way to store
> the netflix library remotely for users behind satellite connections. If any
> of you have figured this out, or if there is a Netflix person out there
> listening, feel free to contact me offline.
> >
> > Thanks a lot, and have a Merry Christmas!
> >
> > //warren
>


Call for Presentations: NANOG 57 in Orlando, FL

2012-11-08 Thread David Temkin
NANOG Community,

I know that we all just left Dallas after NANOG 56, but the NANOG Program 
Committee is already hard at work preparing for NANOG 57 in Orlando!  

The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold their 57th 
meeting in Orlando, FL on February 4th through the 6th.  Of special note, this 
is the first meeting that will have a fully Monday through Wednesday agenda.  
Our host, CyrusOne is eagerly awaiting welcoming you to the Renaissance Orlando 
at SeaWorld.

The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for presentations, panels, 
tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials for the NANOG 57 program. We 
invite presentations highlighting issues relating to technology already 
deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work 
with operators to present real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's 
products and interoperability. NANOG 57 submissions are welcome at  
http://pc.nanog.org  

For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please see 
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/callforpresentations.html

This will also be our first meeting after the 2012 WCIT in early December, and 
we expect topical and timely presentations regarding the results

When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important dates in 
mind: 

Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:  10-December-2012
Final Slides Due: 
7-January-2013
Draft Program Published:14-January-2013 
Final Agenda Published: 18-January-2013 

Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org 

Looking forward to seeing everyone in Orlando! 

-Dave Temkin

Call for Presentations: NANOG 57 in Orlando, FL

2012-11-25 Thread David Temkin
Just a friendly reminder that the RFP for NANOG 57 is approaching in just over 
two weeks.

Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin

On Nov 8, 2012, at 11:48 AM, David Temkin  wrote:

> NANOG Community,
> 
> I know that we all just left Dallas after NANOG 56, but the NANOG Program 
> Committee is already hard at work preparing for NANOG 57 in Orlando!  
> 
> The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold their 57th 
> meeting in Orlando, FL on February 4th through the 6th.  Of special note, 
> this is the first meeting that will have a fully Monday through Wednesday 
> agenda.  Our host, CyrusOne is eagerly awaiting welcoming you to the 
> Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld.
> 
> The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for presentations, 
> panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials for the NANOG 57 
> program. We invite presentations highlighting issues relating to technology 
> already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the Internet. Vendors are 
> encouraged to work with operators to present real-world deployment 
> experiences with the vendor's products and interoperability. NANOG 57 
> submissions are welcome at  http://pc.nanog.org  
> 
> For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please see 
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/callforpresentations.html
> 
> This will also be our first meeting after the 2012 WCIT in early December, 
> and we expect topical and timely presentations regarding the results
> 
> When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important dates 
> in mind: 
> 
> Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:  10-December-2012
> Final Slides Due: 
> 7-January-2013
> Draft Program Published:
> 14-January-2013 
> Final Agenda Published: 
> 18-January-2013 
> 
> Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org 
> 
> Looking forward to seeing everyone in Orlando! 
> 
> -Dave Temkin



Final Reminder: Call for Presentations: NANOG 57 in Orlando, FL

2012-12-09 Thread David Temkin
NANOG Community,

The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold their 57th
meeting in Orlando, FL on February 4th through the 6th.  Of special note,
this is the first meeting that will have a fully Monday through Wednesday
agenda.  Our host, CyrusOne is eagerly awaiting welcoming you to the
Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld.

The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for presentations,
panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials for the NANOG 57
program. We invite presentations highlighting issues relating to technology
already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the Internet. Vendors are
encouraged to work with operators to present real-world deployment
experiences with the vendor's products and interoperability. NANOG 57
submissions are welcome at  http://pc.nanog.org 

For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please
see 
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/callforpresentations.html

This will also be our first meeting after the 2012 WCIT in early December,
and we expect topical and timely presentations regarding the results

When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important dates
in mind:

Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:  10-December-2012
Final Slides Due:
  7-January-2013
Draft Program Published:
14-January-2013
Final Agenda Published:
18-January-2013

Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org

Looking forward to seeing everyone in Orlando!

-Dave Temkin


Reminder: NANOG 57 is the first Monday-Wednesday program

2012-12-20 Thread David Temkin
NANOG Community,

Just a reminder that the upcoming NANOG in Orlando, FL will be our first
Monday to Wednesday program, beginning with tutorials on Monday morning at
9AM and concluding at approximately 6PM on Wednesday.  There will be no
program on Sunday.

Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin
For the NANOG Program Committee


Re: Netflix transit preference?

2012-12-29 Thread David Temkin
Hi all,

We (Netflix) reached out to Randal off-list to explain how our
transit/peering methodology works.

Feel free to reach out to peer...@netflix.com for questions like this in
the future.

-Dave

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom  wrote:

>
> Jeff Kell  writes:
>
> > On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k  wrote:
> >>
> >>> (We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
> >>> peering. And they have no POP close.)
> >> Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask them for kit to put on-net?
> >> 
> >
> > The last time we asked, their criteria was ~2.0gbps, so he doesn't have
> > enough qualifying traffic.
> >
> > Has anyone looked at a Qwilt?  http://www.qwilt.com/
>
> MiM-ing streaming media providers is filed under "encourage my
> competitors to do this".  It's likely to make your phone ring.
>
> -r
>
>
>
>


Preliminary NANOG Topic List Posted - NANOG 57 in Orlando, FL

2013-01-07 Thread David Temkin
All,

The preliminary topic list for NANOG 57 in Orlando, FL has been posted at
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/agenda.php

We will continue to update this as we confirm speakers and presentations
for this upcoming conference.

Also, as a reminder - standard registration ends on January 10th and the
price rises from $525 to $600, so if you intend on coming please register
ASAP.

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


NANOG 58 - New Orleans - Call For Presentations is open!

2013-03-01 Thread David Temkin
*Fresh off of a great NANOG 57 in Orlando, your program committee is
already working hard to provide a world-class program for NANOG 58 in NOLA
- New Orleans, Louisiana - one of my favorite destinations in the world.*
*
*
*As a reminder, we will be following the same Monday-Wednesday program that
we started at NANOG 57, with Tutorials beginning Monday morning and closing
with the Peering Track (and potentially a social) on Wednesday evening. *
*
*
*We look forward to seeing everyone in The Big Easy!*
*



The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 58th
meeting in New Orleans on June 3rd - 5th, 2013  Verizon Terremark will host
NANOG 58. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for
presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, keynote materials, and
the NOGLab experience for the NANOG 58 program. We invite presentations
highlighting issues relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be
deployed in the Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to
present real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and
interoperability via the program and as part of the NOGLab.   NANOG 58
submissions are welcome at http://pc.nanog.org.

About NANOG
NANOG is the premier meeting for network operators in North America.
Meetings provide a forum for information exchange among network operators,
engineers, and researchers. NANOG meets three times each year, and includes
panels, presentations, tutorial sessions, tracks, informal BOFs, and a
NOGLab which features interoperability demonstrations. NANOG attendees
include operators from networks of all sizes, enterprise operators, peering
coordinators, transport and switching equipment vendors, and network
researchers. NANOG attendees will share ideas and interact with leaders in
the field of network operations, discuss current operational events and
issues, and learn about state-of-the-art operational techniques.

Materials from NANOG 58 will be archived at:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog58/

Key Dates for NANOG 58

• CFP Opens for NANOG 58: 25-February-2013
• CFP Deadline #1: Presentation Abstracts Due: 8-April-2013
• CFP Deadline #2: Presentation Slides Due: 29-April-2013
• NANOG Highlights Page Posted: 22-April-2013
• Preliminary Topic List Posted: 26-April-2013
• Meeting Agenda Published: 13-May-2013
• Meeting Agenda Final sent to printer: 20-May-2013
• Lightning Talk Submissions Open (Abstracts Only): 2-June-2013
• Speaker FINAL presentations to PCTool or speaker-support: 31-May-2013
• On-Site Registration: 31-May-2013

The NANOG Program Committee seeks proposals for presentations, panels,
tutorial sessions, tracks, and BOFs in all areas of network operations,
including (but not limited to):

   - Power and facilities - Topics may include power reliability and
   engineering, green power, power efficiency, cooling, and facilities
   management.
   - Interconnections - Topics may include IXes, intra-building, MMR,
   metro-wide connections, peering, and transit purchasing tactics and
   strategies.
   - Security - Topics may include routing security, route filtering of
   large peers/customers, and inter-AS security and cooperation.
   - DNS - Topics may include using DNS data for network metrics, botnet
   discovery, and geolocation.
   - IPv6 - Topics may include real-world deployment challenges, Carrier
   Grade NAT, NAT-PT implementations that work and scale, and allocation
   strategies.
   - Content - Topics may include Distribution (p2p, IPTV), content payment
   models, content distribution technologies and networks, and
   storage/archiving.
   - Disaster recovery - Topics may include risk analysis, training,
   agencies, planning methods, hardware portability, key tools, transport
   audits, and other lessons learned.

In general, presentations are being sought by and for network operators of
all sizes. Presentations about difficult problems (and interesting
solutions) that you encounter in the course of your job are encouraged.

In addition, the Program Committee, through participation with other
organizations and vendor’s, will be programming a NOGLab experience.  The
topic of the NOGLab will be timely and feature real-world experiences faced
by operators of today’s Internet.

If you think you have an interesting topic but want some feedback or
assistance working it into a presentation, please email the Program
Committee chair (ch...@pc.nanog.org), and a representative on the Program
Committee will give you the feedback needed to work it into a presentation.
Otherwise, don't delay in submitting your talk, keynote, track, or panel
into the NANOG Program Committee tool, located at http://pc.nanog.org. For
more information about talk types and format, please see
http://nanog.org/presentations/guidelines/talktips.php


Re: AAAA's for www.netflix.com

2012-06-07 Thread David Temkin
Joly,

What do you mean?  www.netflix.com is dual stacked, which represents
availability of our website (and PC/Mac streaming clients) to100% of our
users who have IPv6.

-Dave

On Thursday, June 7, 2012, Joly MacFie wrote:

> well, something appears to be working..
>
> http://www.betterbroadbandblog.com/2012/06/world-ipv6-daywe-have-liftoff/
>
> Netflix moved up to second in the IPv6 list – as noted above, Netflix has
> been rolling out IPv6 coverage over the last few weeks.  Interestingly, it
> appears as if Netflix may have created its own IPv6-specific domain which
> is responsible for almost a third of all IPv6 traffic. If this is the case
> it might not be in full compliance with the spirit of World IPv6 Day, as
> the aim should have been for Netflix to operate one single domain with both
>  records for IPv6 and A records for IPv4.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Mark Andrews >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > In message <20120607165818.ga30...@srv03.cluenet.de >,
> Daniel Roesen
> > writes:
> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:52:29AM -0600, Dave Temkin wrote:
> > > > Just to close the loop on this - UltraDNS has an issue with CNAMEs
> and
> > > > their Directional DNS service.  We (Netflix) have applied a
> workaround
> > and
> > > > it appears stable.
> > >
> > > Hm, looking at http://v6launch.ripe.net/, whatever you changed didn't
> > > improve visibility of the , but decreased it.
> >
> > TTL's of zero don't help.  The A query has a TTL of 3600 in the
> > response the  query has a zero TTL.  This is rocket science.
> > This isn't hard to do correctly.  How to handle CNAMEs has been
> > specified 1/4 of a century.
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > --
> > > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de  -- dr@IRCnet --
> PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
> > >
> > --
> > Mark Andrews, ISC
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ---
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> --
> -
>


Re: AAAA's for www.netflix.com

2012-06-07 Thread David Temkin

On 6/7/12 10:23 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:11:20PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:

$ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com. A +norec +short
wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com.
$ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com.  +norec +short
dualstack.wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com.
$ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com. ANY +short +norec
$

Resolving www.netflix.com using ANY RRtype fails with an empty answer
section in the DNS response.

Which is just plain BROKEN.

Yup.


This DNS trickery seems to be from the "taking a shower, trying not
to get wet" department. And has adverse effects in corner cases. While
playing around, I had periods of time where I couldn't resolve the FQDN
at all, possibly due some caching of the empty response.

It's not DNS trickery.

The "trickery" is returning different CNAMEs for QTYPE=A and QTYPE=.
I'm not sure what's the goal of that is, but it's 4am here so I have an
excuse of not seeing the light. :)

Best regards,
Daniel

We've confirmed that UltraDNS had "additional" issues caused by the push 
that they fixed for the previously reported problem.  We are actively 
engaged with them to come to a resolution.


-Dave



Re: AAAA's for www.netflix.com

2012-06-08 Thread David Temkin

On 6/8/12 1:19 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:


Netflix may have created its own IPv6-specific domain which is
responsible for almost a third of all IPv6 traffic. If this is the
case it might not be in full compliance with the spirit of World
IPv6 Day, as the aim should have been for Netflix to operate one
single domain with both  records for IPv6 and A records for IPv4.


What about that?


I've asked Sandvine to explain exactly what this means.  We haven't 
created anything IPv6 specific, aside from starting to serve 100% of our 
IPv6 traffic from the Netflix CDN instead of our CDN partners, which is 
irrelevant to this actual exercise.





j

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:31 AM, David Temkin <mailto:d...@temk.in>> wrote:

> On 6/7/12 10:23 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:11:20PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>>
>>>> $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org <http://pdns3.ultradns.org> 
www.netflix.com <http://www.netflix.com>. A +norec +short
>>>> wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com 
<http://wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com>.
>>>> $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org <http://pdns3.ultradns.org> 
www.netflix.com <http://www.netflix.com>.  +norec +short
>>>> 
dualstack.wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com 
<http://dualstack.wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com>.
>>>> $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org <http://pdns3.ultradns.org> 
www.netflix.com <http://www.netflix.com>. ANY +short +norec

>>>> $
>>>>
>>>> Resolving www.netflix.com <http://www.netflix.com> using ANY 
RRtype fails with an empty answer

>>>> section in the DNS response.
>>>
>>> Which is just plain BROKEN.
>>
>> Yup.
>>
>>>> This DNS trickery seems to be from the "taking a shower, trying not
>>>> to get wet" department. And has adverse effects in corner cases. 
While
>>>> playing around, I had periods of time where I couldn't resolve 
the FQDN

>>>> at all, possibly due some caching of the empty response.
>>>
>>> It's not DNS trickery.
>>
>> The "trickery" is returning different CNAMEs for QTYPE=A and 
QTYPE=.

>> I'm not sure what's the goal of that is, but it's 4am here so I have an
>> excuse of not seeing the light. :)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>>
> We've confirmed that UltraDNS had "additional" issues caused by the push
> that they fixed for the previously reported problem.  We are actively
> engaged with them to come to a resolution.
>
> -Dave
>



--
---
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--
- 




Re: Google SDN slides @NANOG55

2012-06-12 Thread David Temkin

On 6/11/12 10:06 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Chris Boyd  wrote:

On Jun 11, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Ray Qiu wrote:


Hi,

Could someone please share the SDN slides that Google presented at
NANOG55?  It is still not on the web.  Thanks!


Please post a link to the list.  Thanks!

won't these just show up in time on the nanog site, like all other talks?

The author of this talk requested that their slides not be posted, which 
is a request we honor for all speakers.


Regards,
-Dave Temkin
(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)










NANOG 56 - Dallas, TX: Call For Presentations

2012-06-27 Thread David Temkin

NANOG Community,

After a great NANOG in Vancouver, BC, the survey results are in from 55 
and we are already assembling a world-class program for NANOG 56.


The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 56th 
meeting in Dallas, TX on October 21 - 23, 2012 and join with ARIN on 
October 24, 2012.  Terremark, a Verzion company, will be our host for 
NANOG 56. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for 
presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials 
for the NANOG 56 program. We invite presentations highlighting issues 
relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the 
Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to present 
real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and 
interoperability. NANOG 56 submissions are welcome at 
http://pc.nanog.org 


For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please 
see http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog56/callforpresentations.html



When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important 
dates in mind:



Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due: 06-August-2012
Final Slides Due:  
27-August-2012

Draft Program Published: 17-September-2012
Final Agenda Published: 1-October-2012

Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org

Looking forward to seeing everyone in Dallas!

-Dave Temkin

(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)


[NANOG-announce] Reminder: Call for Presentations Open for NANOG 56 in Dallas, TX

2012-07-23 Thread David Temkin

NANOG Community,

After a great NANOG in Vancouver, BC, the survey results are in from 55 
and we are already assembling a world-class program for NANOG 56.


The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 56th 
meeting in Dallas, TX on October 21 - 23, 2012 and join with ARIN on 
October 24, 2012.  Terremark, a Verzion company, will be our host for 
NANOG 56. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for 
presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials 
for the NANOG 56 program. We invite presentations highlighting issues 
relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the 
Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to present 
real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and 
interoperability. NANOG 56 submissions are welcome at 
http://pc.nanog.org 


For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please 
see http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog56/callforpresentations.html



   When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important 
dates in mind:



   Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due: 06-August-2012
   Final Slides Due:  27-August-2012
   Draft Program Published: 17-September-2012
   Final Agenda Published: 1-October-2012

   Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org

   Looking forward to seeing everyone in Dallas!

   -Dave Temkin

   (Chair, NANOG Program Committee)
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

NANOG 56 - Dallas, TX: Call For Presentations

2012-08-13 Thread David Temkin
Reminder - the CFP is still open, please submit presentations as soon as 
possible!


Regards,
-Dave Temkin
---

NANOG Community,

After a great NANOG in Vancouver, BC, the survey results are in from 55 
and we are already assembling a world-class program for NANOG 56.


The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 56th 
meeting in Dallas, TX on October 21 - 23, 2012 and join with ARIN on 
October 24, 2012.  Terremark, a Verzion company, will be our host for 
NANOG 56. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for 
presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials 
for the NANOG 56 program. We invite presentations highlighting issues 
relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the 
Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to present 
real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and 
interoperability. NANOG 56 submissions are welcome at 
http://pc.nanog.org 


For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please 
see http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog56/callforpresentations.html



When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important 
dates in mind:



Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:   06-August-2012
Final Slides Due:  
27-August-2012
Draft Program Published:
17-September-2012
Final Agenda Published:  
1-October-2012


Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org

Looking forward to seeing everyone in Dallas!

-Dave Temkin

(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)


Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

2011-09-01 Thread David Temkin
Randy,

How is that "getting paid"?  Receiving services in kind?

Don't know if you've ever done Habitat for Humanity, but you get a free
lunch, paid for by those who have given cash to support the cause and not
labor.

To bring it closer to home - we give our presenters a free admission -
should we also stop that?

-Dave
On Sep 1, 2011 3:27 PM, "Randy Bush"  wrote:
> i do not support getting paid for community service. a primrose path.
>
> randy
>


Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

2011-09-01 Thread David Temkin
On the flip side of this, many of our employers donate "our" time that they
are paying us for in order for us to serve NANOG with nary a benefit.  If
you take just committee calls for the PC alone, this is 48 hours a year - a
workweek.  Perhaps they should feel that this donation nets them something.

-Dave
On Sep 1, 2011 6:41 PM, "Jared Mauch"  wrote:
> I have had my registration fee refunded when I was a speaker when my
employer was happy to pay. This frustrated me when the meeting had low
registration and lost money.
>
> I'm fine with people getting it waived, but the idea of everyone showing
up for a "roll-call" so they can get in free is certainly not the case. This
is why I suggested the BoD would have the authority to waive the fee if
recommended by someone else. The reason is less important to me honestly.
>
> Then again, the bar for giving a bad talk is really low. People can just
put in that effort instead.
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 6:12 PM, David Temkin  wrote:
>
>> Randy,
>>
>> How is that "getting paid"? Receiving services in kind?
>>
>> Don't know if you've ever done Habitat for Humanity, but you get a free
>> lunch, paid for by those who have given cash to support the cause and not
>> labor.
>>
>> To bring it closer to home - we give our presenters a free admission -
>> should we also stop that?
>>
>> -Dave
>> On Sep 1, 2011 3:27 PM, "Randy Bush"  wrote:
>>> i do not support getting paid for community service. a primrose path.
>>>
>>> randy
>>>


Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

2011-09-01 Thread David Temkin
For context in this discussion, how many times have you personally accepted
free registration in return for presenting?

-Dave
 On Sep 1, 2011 8:13 PM, "Randy Bush"  wrote:
>> On the flip side of this, many of our employers donate "our" time that
>> they are paying us for in order for us to serve NANOG with nary a
>> benefit. If you take just committee calls for the PC alone, this is
>> 48 hours a year - a workweek. Perhaps they should feel that this
>> donation nets them something.
>
> it's "public service" not "public employment"
>
> randy


Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

2011-12-20 Thread David Temkin
Yes, sorry.  We will respond to all takers shortly; there was a flaw in 
our logic used to generate these numbers and wanted to ensure that we 
were painting an accurate picture.  We will have statistics out within a 
week, hopefully.


Thanks,
-Dave

On 12/16/11 9:55 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:

I'll take a guess they are back logged - they have been working on our traffic 
stats since a week before that posting made it to nanog list

--- Sent via IPhone

On 2011-12-16, at 9:16 AM, "Dennis Burgess"  wrote:


Same here.

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik&  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of "Learn RouterOS"



-Original Message-
From: Blake Hudson [mailto:bl...@ispn.net]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:11 AM
To: Dave Temkin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

Requests to this address appear to go unanswered?

Dave Temkin wrote the following on 12/11/2011 6:29 PM:

Feel free to contact peering@netflixcom - we're happy to provide
you with delivery statistics for traffic terminating on your network.

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Netflix

On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:

Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for
this, but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just
port 80 www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin
down the traffic to specific hosts in the CDN and say that this
traffic was netflix, while this traffic was the latest windows update
(remember this is often a shared hosting platform). We've done our
own testing and have come to a good solution which uses a combination
of nbar, packet marking, and netflow to come to a conclusion. On a
~160Mbps link, netflix peaks out between 30-50Mbps around 8-10PM

each

evening. The rest of the traffic is predominantly other forms of HTTP
traffic (including other video streaming services).


Martin Hepworth wrote the following on 12/3/2011 2:36 AM:

Also checkout Adrian Cockcroft presentations on their architecture
which describes how they use aws and CDns etc

Martin







Re: NANOG 58 - New Orleans - Call For Presentations is open!

2013-03-25 Thread David Temkin
Just a reminder that the RFP is still open for NANOG 58!

Regards,
-Dave

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, David Temkin  wrote:

> *Fresh off of a great NANOG 57 in Orlando, your program committee is
> already working hard to provide a world-class program for NANOG 58 in NOLA
> - New Orleans, Louisiana - one of my favorite destinations in the world.*
> *
> *
> *As a reminder, we will be following the same Monday-Wednesday program
> that we started at NANOG 57, with Tutorials beginning Monday morning and
> closing with the Peering Track (and potentially a social) on Wednesday
> evening. *
> *
> *
> *We look forward to seeing everyone in The Big Easy!*
> *
>
> 
>
> The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 58th
> meeting in New Orleans on June 3rd - 5th, 2013  Verizon Terremark will
> host NANOG 58. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for
> presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, keynote materials, and
> the NOGLab experience for the NANOG 58 program. We invite presentations
> highlighting issues relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be
> deployed in the Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to
> present real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and
> interoperability via the program and as part of the NOGLab.   NANOG 58
> submissions are welcome at http://pc.nanog.org.
>
> About NANOG
> NANOG is the premier meeting for network operators in North America.
> Meetings provide a forum for information exchange among network operators,
> engineers, and researchers. NANOG meets three times each year, and includes
> panels, presentations, tutorial sessions, tracks, informal BOFs, and a
> NOGLab which features interoperability demonstrations. NANOG attendees
> include operators from networks of all sizes, enterprise operators, peering
> coordinators, transport and switching equipment vendors, and network
> researchers. NANOG attendees will share ideas and interact with leaders in
> the field of network operations, discuss current operational events and
> issues, and learn about state-of-the-art operational techniques.
>
> Materials from NANOG 58 will be archived at:
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog58/<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/>
>  <http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/>
> Key Dates for NANOG 58
>
> • CFP Opens for NANOG 58: 25-February-2013
> • CFP Deadline #1: Presentation Abstracts Due: 8-April-2013
> • CFP Deadline #2: Presentation Slides Due: 29-April-2013
> • NANOG Highlights Page Posted: 22-April-2013
> • Preliminary Topic List Posted: 26-April-2013
> • Meeting Agenda Published: 13-May-2013
> • Meeting Agenda Final sent to printer: 20-May-2013
> • Lightning Talk Submissions Open (Abstracts Only): 2-June-2013
> • Speaker FINAL presentations to PCTool or speaker-support: 31-May-2013
> • On-Site Registration: 31-May-2013
>
> The NANOG Program Committee seeks proposals for presentations, panels,
> tutorial sessions, tracks, and BOFs in all areas of network operations,
> including (but not limited to):
>
>- Power and facilities - Topics may include power reliability and
>engineering, green power, power efficiency, cooling, and facilities
>management.
>- Interconnections - Topics may include IXes, intra-building, MMR,
>metro-wide connections, peering, and transit purchasing tactics and
>strategies.
>- Security - Topics may include routing security, route filtering of
>large peers/customers, and inter-AS security and cooperation.
>- DNS - Topics may include using DNS data for network metrics, botnet
>discovery, and geolocation.
>- IPv6 - Topics may include real-world deployment challenges, Carrier
>Grade NAT, NAT-PT implementations that work and scale, and allocation
>strategies.
>- Content - Topics may include Distribution (p2p, IPTV), content
>payment models, content distribution technologies and networks, and
>storage/archiving.
>- Disaster recovery - Topics may include risk analysis, training,
>agencies, planning methods, hardware portability, key tools, transport
>audits, and other lessons learned.
>
> In general, presentations are being sought by and for network operators of
> all sizes. Presentations about difficult problems (and interesting
> solutions) that you encounter in the course of your job are encouraged.
>
> In addition, the Program Committee, through participation with other
> organizations and vendor’s, will be programming a NOGLab experience.  The
> topic of the NOGLab will be timely and feature real-world experiences faced
> by operators of today’s Internet.
>
> If you think you have an intere

Re: NANOG 58 - New Orleans - Call For Presentations is open!

2013-04-09 Thread David Temkin
Reminder-  the RFP closed yesterday but we will continue to accept
submissions through the end of the week.

Regards,
-Dave

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Temkin  wrote:

> Just a reminder that the RFP is still open for NANOG 58!
>
> Regards,
> -Dave
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, David Temkin  wrote:
>
>> *Fresh off of a great NANOG 57 in Orlando, your program committee is
>> already working hard to provide a world-class program for NANOG 58 in NOLA
>> - New Orleans, Louisiana - one of my favorite destinations in the world.*
>> *
>> *
>> *As a reminder, we will be following the same Monday-Wednesday program
>> that we started at NANOG 57, with Tutorials beginning Monday morning and
>> closing with the Peering Track (and potentially a social) on Wednesday
>> evening. *
>> *
>> *
>> *We look forward to seeing everyone in The Big Easy!*
>> *
>>
>> 
>>
>> The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 58th
>> meeting in New Orleans on June 3rd - 5th, 2013  Verizon Terremark will
>> host NANOG 58. The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for
>> presentations, panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, keynote materials, and
>> the NOGLab experience for the NANOG 58 program. We invite presentations
>> highlighting issues relating to technology already deployed or soon-to-be
>> deployed in the Internet. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to
>> present real-world deployment experiences with the vendor's products and
>> interoperability via the program and as part of the NOGLab.   NANOG 58
>> submissions are welcome at http://pc.nanog.org.
>>
>> About NANOG
>> NANOG is the premier meeting for network operators in North America.
>> Meetings provide a forum for information exchange among network operators,
>> engineers, and researchers. NANOG meets three times each year, and includes
>> panels, presentations, tutorial sessions, tracks, informal BOFs, and a
>> NOGLab which features interoperability demonstrations. NANOG attendees
>> include operators from networks of all sizes, enterprise operators, peering
>> coordinators, transport and switching equipment vendors, and network
>> researchers. NANOG attendees will share ideas and interact with leaders in
>> the field of network operations, discuss current operational events and
>> issues, and learn about state-of-the-art operational techniques.
>>
>> Materials from NANOG 58 will be archived at:
>> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog58/<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/>
>>  <http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/>
>> Key Dates for NANOG 58
>>
>> • CFP Opens for NANOG 58: 25-February-2013
>> • CFP Deadline #1: Presentation Abstracts Due: 8-April-2013
>> • CFP Deadline #2: Presentation Slides Due: 29-April-2013
>> • NANOG Highlights Page Posted: 22-April-2013
>> • Preliminary Topic List Posted: 26-April-2013
>> • Meeting Agenda Published: 13-May-2013
>> • Meeting Agenda Final sent to printer: 20-May-2013
>> • Lightning Talk Submissions Open (Abstracts Only): 2-June-2013
>> • Speaker FINAL presentations to PCTool or speaker-support: 31-May-2013
>> • On-Site Registration: 31-May-2013
>>
>> The NANOG Program Committee seeks proposals for presentations, panels,
>> tutorial sessions, tracks, and BOFs in all areas of network operations,
>> including (but not limited to):
>>
>>- Power and facilities - Topics may include power reliability and
>>engineering, green power, power efficiency, cooling, and facilities
>>management.
>>- Interconnections - Topics may include IXes, intra-building, MMR,
>>metro-wide connections, peering, and transit purchasing tactics and
>>strategies.
>>- Security - Topics may include routing security, route filtering of
>>large peers/customers, and inter-AS security and cooperation.
>>- DNS - Topics may include using DNS data for network metrics, botnet
>>discovery, and geolocation.
>>- IPv6 - Topics may include real-world deployment challenges, Carrier
>>Grade NAT, NAT-PT implementations that work and scale, and allocation
>>strategies.
>>- Content - Topics may include Distribution (p2p, IPTV), content
>>payment models, content distribution technologies and networks, and
>>storage/archiving.
>>- Disaster recovery - Topics may include risk analysis, training,
>>agencies, planning methods, hardware portability, key tools, transport
>>audits, and other lessons learned.
>>
>> In general, prese

"Open IX" - Seeking to improve IX usefulness in the US

2013-04-26 Thread David Temkin
All,

A cross-functional group representing content providers, data center
providers, and NSPs are working together to provide alternative
interconnection options in various markets in the US by working to foster a
more neutral environment for interconnectivity.

We are seeking input as to what markets are the most challenging for
networks and what kind of services people would desire in those markets.

If you represent a network in the US and could fill out this survey:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GD92PM8 , it would be appreciated.

Regards,
-Dave Temkin


Re: Variety, On The Media, don't understand the Internet

2013-05-16 Thread David Temkin
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:

>
>
> Netflix's policy does require a minimum amount of traffic before an ISP
> can deploy an Open Connect appliance. So smaller ISPs are at a
> disadvantage if they are located in a city without CDN presence.
>
>
To be clear - the purpose of this policy is to ensure that people who
deploy appliances use them in the best way possible for their network.
 Anything less than the minimum amount of traffic and the appliance uses
more bandwidth to fill than serve and you end up in a race of diminishing
returns.  We're always happy to try to find the best solution for any
network, even those too small for an OCA.

For more info see http://openconnect.netflix.com

Regards,
-Dave


[NANOG 58] Final agenda posted and late registration - See you in New Orleans!

2013-05-21 Thread David Temkin
All-

The final agenda for NANOG 58 has been posted at:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog58/agenda

Also of note, Standard Registration ends on May 30 - the price will then go
up $75.  We encourage you to register now and lock in the few remaining
hotel rooms at

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog58/registration

This meeting will follow the new Monday-Wednesday format of tutorials
beginning Monday morning, a Newcomers Lunch, and then General Sessions
beginning in the early afternoon.  The program will conclude with the
Peering Track and then a social on Wednesday night.

Looking forward to seeing everyone in The Big Easy!

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


Re: NANOG 59 - Important Schedule Notice & Call For Presentations. Please read!

2013-07-16 Thread David Temkin
Reminder - submissions are due 30 days from today.  The sooner the better,
as it gives the Program Committee more time to help submitters refine their
presentations for the NANOG audience.

Regards,
-Dave


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Temkin  wrote:

> NANOG Community,
>
> I hope everyone enjoyed New Orleans as much as I did!  It's truly one of
> my favorite cities in the world.  Fresh off a great meeting, we're already
> starting to get ready for NANOG 59 in Phoenix.  If you have a topic you'd
> like to speak about, the program committee would love to consider it.
>  Please watch http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/callforpresentations for
> more information.
>
> After considering feedback from members, speakers, ARIN, and sponsors we
> have decided to make a small tweak to the program timing at NANOG 59.  We
> will continue with the Monday-Wednesday format, however we will move the
> ARIN Track and Tutorials to Tuesday morning, highlighting their importance
> to the program.  The program will begin on Monday morning at 10:00AM
> followed by our popular Newcomers Lunch.  The exact schedule layout can be
> found at http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/preagenda and is also
> attached in JPG format to this email.
>
>
>If you wish to submit a presentation, please keep these important dates
> in mind:
>
>
>Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:16-Aug-2013
>Slides Due:
> 30-Aug-2013
>Topic List Posted:
> 06-Sep-2013
>Final Agenda Published:
> 27-Sep-2013
>
>Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org
>
>Looking forward to seeing everyone in Phoenix!
>
>-Dave Temkin
>
>(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)
>
>


Re: NANOG 59 - Important Schedule Notice & Call For Presentations. Please read!

2013-08-15 Thread David Temkin
All-

One final reminder - abstracts are due by the end of this week.

Also, the track coordinators for the Data Center track (Dan Golding -
dgold...@gmail.com) and the Peering Track  (Nina Bargisen - n...@netflix.com)
would like me to remind you to submit your relevant content for these
tracks early so that your track-specific content may be properly considered.

Regards,
-Dave


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:33 PM, David Temkin  wrote:

> NANOG Community,
>
> I hope everyone enjoyed New Orleans as much as I did!  It's truly one of
> my favorite cities in the world.  Fresh off a great meeting, we're already
> starting to get ready for NANOG 59 in Phoenix.  If you have a topic you'd
> like to speak about, the program committee would love to consider it.
>  Please watch http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/callforpresentations for
> more information.
>
> After considering feedback from members, speakers, ARIN, and sponsors we
> have decided to make a small tweak to the program timing at NANOG 59.  We
> will continue with the Monday-Wednesday format, however we will move the
> ARIN Track and Tutorials to Tuesday morning, highlighting their importance
> to the program.  The program will begin on Monday morning at 10:00AM
> followed by our popular Newcomers Lunch.  The exact schedule layout can be
> found at http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/preagenda and is also
> attached in JPG format to this email.
>
>
>If you wish to submit a presentation, please keep these important dates
> in mind:
>
>
>Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:16-Aug-2013
>Slides Due:
> 30-Aug-2013
>Topic List Posted:
> 06-Sep-2013
>Final Agenda Published:
> 27-Sep-2013
>
>Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org
>
>Looking forward to seeing everyone in Phoenix!
>
>-Dave Temkin
>
>(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)
>
>


Re: NANOG 59 - Important Schedule Notice & Call For Presentations. Please read!

2013-08-24 Thread David Temkin
Reminder to all:  Presentation slides are due on Friday, August 30th.
 Talks without slides may be declined at that point.

Regards,
-Dave
For the NANOG Program Committee


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:33 PM, David Temkin  wrote:

> NANOG Community,
>
> I hope everyone enjoyed New Orleans as much as I did!  It's truly one of
> my favorite cities in the world.  Fresh off a great meeting, we're already
> starting to get ready for NANOG 59 in Phoenix.  If you have a topic you'd
> like to speak about, the program committee would love to consider it.
>  Please watch http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/callforpresentations for
> more information.
>
> After considering feedback from members, speakers, ARIN, and sponsors we
> have decided to make a small tweak to the program timing at NANOG 59.  We
> will continue with the Monday-Wednesday format, however we will move the
> ARIN Track and Tutorials to Tuesday morning, highlighting their importance
> to the program.  The program will begin on Monday morning at 10:00AM
> followed by our popular Newcomers Lunch.  The exact schedule layout can be
> found at http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/preagenda and is also
> attached in JPG format to this email.
>
>
>If you wish to submit a presentation, please keep these important dates
> in mind:
>
>
>Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:16-Aug-2013
>Slides Due:
> 30-Aug-2013
>Topic List Posted:
> 06-Sep-2013
>Final Agenda Published:
> 27-Sep-2013
>
>Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org
>
>Looking forward to seeing everyone in Phoenix!
>
>-Dave Temkin
>
>(Chair, NANOG Program Committee)
>
>


Seeking members for Open IX standards committees

2013-08-26 Thread David Temkin
The Open IX Board is seeking members for the standards committees that will
draft the Data Center/MMR and IXP standards.

Each group will have a chair that will be responsible for their committees
output.  For the initial bodies, the board will pick the chairs - but it is
hoped that the committees can be self organizing in the future and would
meet on an infrequent basis once the initial standards are complete.

If you are interested in working in either of these groups, please send a
few lines to bo...@open-ix.org stating which committee you'd like to work
on, what your qualifications are, and whether or not you'd like to be
considered for chairmanship.  Membership is non-discriminatory and all are
welcome to volunteer regardless of your industry or employer.

For more information on Open-IX, see
http://open-ix.org/OIX-Framework-Latest.pdf

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
 for the Open-IX Board


Final Agenda Published - NANOG 59

2013-10-02 Thread David Temkin
All,

The final agenda for our meeting next week has been published at
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/agenda

Please note that the program begins at 10AM on Monday and the tutorials can
now be found on Tuesday morning.  I hope you all share the excitement that
I do for this great program.

For newcomers, we'll host a welcome lunch on Monday at noon.  Even if
you're an old timer, we'd love to have you at this lunch to help introduce
this potentially record-breaking crowd (we sit at 594 registered attendees
at this moment) to NANOG and help them get the most of their time at the
meeting.

We'll provide you with more information on-site, and as always, feel free
to seek out a member of any of the committees - Program, Development,
Communications, and of course, the Board of Directors, if you have any
questions.  I promise we're a friendly bunch!

Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


NANOG 59 - Monday presentations on YouTube

2013-10-08 Thread David Temkin
All,

We're proud to announce that all of the recorded presentations from Monday
at NANOG 59 in Phoenix have now been posted to Youtube.  You may visit the
NANOG 59 page at
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO8DR5ZGla8j7_jnNYY3d8JB0HfdXe85X

We will also embed links to the individual talks into the agenda at
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/agenda within the next day

This is part of our continuous commitment to improving the NANOG program
for our members.

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


NANOG 59 Tuesday talks now on YouTube

2013-10-09 Thread David Temkin
Please see
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO8DR5ZGla8j7_jnNYY3d8JB0HfdXe85X for
the video list and http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/agenda for a link
to the slides for each talk.


Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


NANOG 59 - Wednesday presentations on YouTube

2013-10-10 Thread David Temkin
NANOG,

All of the recorded presentations from Wednesday at NANOG 59 in Phoenix
including the Q&A with Ladar Levison of Lavabit have now been posted to
YouTube.  You may visit the NANOG 59 YouTube page at http://goo.gl/c4k5zG


Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, NANOG Program Committee


Data Center and IX Standards Published by Open-IX - Certification begins soon!

2013-11-15 Thread David Temkin
I am proud to announce that the final versions of the Data Center and IXP
standards have been completed by their respective working groups and have
been published.

Data Center: http://goo.gl/s4cGBp

IXP: http://goo.gl/O5I1my

Martin Hannigan will follow up shortly with scheduled dates for accepting
applications to become Open-IX Certified.  We intend on accepting
applications for Northern Virginia first, immediately followed by NYC and
other markets.

Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Chair, Open-IX Association