Re: anyone running GPS clocks in Southeastern Georgia?
Sex On Jan 21, 2011 12:32 PM, "Robert E. Seastrom" wrote: > > It is unclear from this NOTAM whether this is an intentional > perturbation of the satellite signals vs. a terrestrial transmitter > (my money is on the latter), but it illustrates why one might want > geographically dispersed time sources on one's network, as well as why > the current trend towards decommissioning LORAN (and in the future, > other navaids) in favor of reliance on a single source is a Bad Plan. > > I'd be curious to see what effects (if any) those who use > GPS-disciplined NTP references in Southeastern Georgia see from this > experiment. > > https://www.faasafety.gov/files/notices/2011/Jan/GPS_Flight_Advisory_CSFTL11-01_Rel.pdf > > -r > >
Network Operators Europe?
What is the name of the mailing list for Network Operators Europe?
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Joe Hamelin wrote: > 16 bit integers. Ok, a lame joke. > > 22694.NET and 58A6.NET are available. What are you trying to name? > > > -- > Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Day Domes wrote: >> unsigned? >> >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin wrote: >>> On Saturday night, Day Domes postulated: >>>> I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see >>>> any issues with this? >>> >>> >>> It's truly unsigned? >>> (15 bit) >>> >>> -- >>> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 >>> >> > A new network that we are going to use to connect all are global data centers and also use to peer with other networks to push data to the Internet
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin wrote: > On Saturday night, Day Domes postulated: >> I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see >> any issues with this? > > > It's truly unsigned? > (15 bit) > > -- > Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 > unsigned?
network name 101100010100110.net
I have been tasked with coming up with a new name for are transit data network. I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see any issues with this?
