Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?

2020-08-04 Thread Djamel Sadok
I mean virtualization of the hardware in terms of running different
router/switch/server instances/VMs/ on the same platform. Is this
desirable?

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:53 AM Mark Tinka  wrote:

>
>
> On 4/Aug/20 16:46, Djamel Sadok wrote:
> >
> >
> > How about hardware slicing support? such as switch, server and router
> > slicing? is this supported/desirable?
>
> So you mean dump the VLAN model and give each service its own switch?
>
> Or do you mean use one server but give each service its own VM? Or
> worse, give each service its own metal server?
>
> Wouldn't that take us back into the digital stone age :-)?
>
> Mark.
>


Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?

2020-08-04 Thread Djamel Sadok
How about hardware slicing support? such as switch, server and router
slicing? is this supported/desirable?

Djamel


On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM Etienne-Victor Depasquale 
wrote:

> I think that it's validation of QoS that really matters now.
>
> If I were to base on this recent video from Keysight
> 
>  (warning:
> requires registration),
> then it seems that there's a lot of emphasis on making grounded claims
> about the QoS that the operator sells.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Etienne
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:52 PM Mark Tinka  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/Aug/20 08:40, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
>>
>> Is the following extract from this Heavy Reading white paper
>> ,
>> useful?
>>
>> " For transport network slicing,
>> operators strongly prefer soft slicing with virtual private networks
>> (VPNs),
>> regardless of the VPN flavor.
>> Ranking at the top of the list was Layer 3 VPNs (selected by 66% of
>> respondents),
>> but Layer 2 VPNs, Ethernet VPNs (EVPNs), and segment routing
>> also ranked highly at 47%, 46%, and 46%, respectively.
>> The point is underscored by the low preferences among all of the hard
>> slicing technologies—
>> those that physically partition resources among slices.
>> Hard slicing options formed the bottom tier among preferences."
>>
>>
>> Well, it's what I've been saying - we have tried & tested systems and
>> solutions that are already native to IP/MPLS networks. Why try to reinvent
>> network virtualization when there are plenty of existing solutions in the
>> wild for next to cheap? VLAN's. l2vpn's. l3vpn's. EVPN. DWDM. And all the
>> rest?
>>
>> The whole fuss, for example, about the GRX vs. IPX all came down to 2Mbps
>> private or public IP-based GTP tunnels vs. 100Mbps l3vpn's.
>>
>> Mobile operators know how to make everyday protocols seem overly
>> complicated.
>>
>> If we go by their nomenclature, the simple operators on this list have
>> been slicing infrastructure for yonks :-).
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>
>
> --
> Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
> Assistant Lecturer
> Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
> Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
> University of Malta
> Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
>


Re: CDN server log

2013-05-16 Thread Djamel Sadok
Hi Pete,

I do not use a CDN I am only interested in analyzing content popularity in
logs. These could be anonymized.

Djamel



On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Pete Mastin pmas...@internap.com wrote:

 Hi djamel.  If I understand your question - you should take a look at what
 sawmill offers. Many of our clients use this product to analyze our cdn
 produced logs.

 http://www.sawmill.net/



 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 15, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Djamel Sadok ja...@cin.ufpe.br wrote:

  Hi,
 
  Anyone knows of any public CDN server log trace. I am looking for object
  popularity, hit rate information, ...
 
  Thanks, Djamel
 




CDN server log

2013-05-15 Thread Djamel Sadok
Hi,

Anyone knows of any public CDN server log trace. I am looking for object
popularity, hit rate information, ...

Thanks, Djamel


TEDB

2011-10-05 Thread Djamel Sadok
Hi,

Does anyone know of any Traffic Engineering database or trace available
somewhere?

Thanks, Djamel


Re: Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch

2010-10-18 Thread Djamel Sadok
How does it compare to the OpenFlow design ideas?

Djamel


On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matlock, Kenneth L
matlo...@exempla.orgwrote:

 Because 'cloud computing' is the latest buzzword, and their marketing
 department thought that by attaching that buzzword to it, that would
 increase sales? :)

 Nevermind that clouds contain nothing but vapor.

 Ken Matlock
 Network Analyst
 Exempla Healthcare
 (303) 467-4671
 matlo...@exempla.org


 -Original Message-
 From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
 Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:14 AM
 To: Brandon Kim
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: Pica8 - Open Source Cloud Switch

 On 18/10/2010 14:27, Brandon Kim wrote:
  Good question Nick, what is a cloud switch? Is this like VSS in cisco
  where you have  a virtual chassis?

 The vss is virtual management software for a virtual switch.  This box
 looks like a piece of hardware that you can plug things into, so I'm
 just
 wondering what makes this a cloud switch and some other piece of kit not
 a
 cloud switch.

 Nick