dial-peer authenticaton in ios 12.3?
Hello everybody, Is there a good person who could try to remember how to configure authentication in dial-peer on IOS (tm) MC3810 Software (MC3810-A2ISV5-M), Version 12.3(13), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)? dial-peer voice 1 pots authentication username someuser password somepassword does not seem to be any help as it points an error on authentication keyword. Is there anything I could try to do about this before I through it out from my balcony? Thank you. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
software wanted
Hi everybody, can anybody recomend a piece of software, that could graph a live network scanning it via snmp. requirements are: 1. must produce a text output suitable for postproduction. graphviz is an ideal, xml - acceptable. 2. must use no external database i.e. have text config file. clean text console, suitable to run as a cronjob. 3. must be able to work in heterogenous environment. thanks a lot in advance -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: software wanted
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:21:50 +0200 Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote: Hi everybody, can anybody recomend a piece of software, that could graph a live network scanning it via snmp. requirements are: 1. must produce a text output suitable for postproduction. graphviz is an ideal, xml - acceptable. 2. must use no external database i.e. have text config file. clean text console, suitable to run as a cronjob. 3. must be able to work in heterogenous environment. thanks a lot in advance and, the question is about producing network schematic, not about graphs like mrtg, cacti etc, etc -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: internap fcp competitors?
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:35:05 -0400 MageMojo na...@magemojo.com wrote: Does anyone know of competitors to internap's fcp product? Also, I would greatly appreciate if anybody could explain what technically is internap fcp. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov _ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:58:05 -0500 Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Brandon Butterworth bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk wrote: [snip] This W6D is about turning v6 on. At some point, many years from now, when everyone has got bored of supporting legacy v4 for a hand full of legacy users there might be a v6 only day where we turn v4 off to test if it can be generally ceased. Or maybe at some point a year or so from now... display a warning to all users accessing the site over IPv4; reminding them of the need to upgrade their internet connection to IPv6 in order to be able to access new 'premium' content :-) Hope it will NEVER happen
Re: Had an idea - looking for a math buff to tell me if it's possible with today's technology.
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:32 -0700 Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net wrote: Lets say you had a file that was 1,000,000,000 characters consisting of 8,000,000,000bits. What if instead of transferring that file through the interwebs you transmitted a mathematical equation to tell a computer on the other end how to *construct* that file. First you'd feed the file into a cruncher of some type to reduce the pattern of 8,000,000,000 bits into an equation somehow. Sure this would take time, I realize that. The equation would then be transmitted to the other computer where it would use its mad-math-skillz to *figure out the answer* which would theoretically be the same pattern of bits. Thus the same file would emerge on the other end. The real question here is how long would it take for a regular computer to do this kind of math? Just a weird idea I had. If it's a good idea then please consider this intellectual property. LOL 42 :-)
Re: BGP multihoming question.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 13:32:26 +0200 b2 b...@playtime.bg wrote: Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP. In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers (X and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no filters on other side) to advertise X networks to Y and Y to accept them ? My confusion comes from the PA status , i know if it is PI there are no problem to route it to any AS. Basically I think you need to check with your providers whether they will accept each other PA's -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:27:08 -0500 (CDT) Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote: I'm all for that, but, point is that people who fail to meet that standard are currently getting a free ride. IMHO, they should pay and they should have the recourse of being (at least partially) reimbursed by their at-fault software vendors for contributory negligence. Yeah, of course, let's go back into 1990's, and pay for every byte sent. This surely will keep users accountable for their all faulty software. Great idea. You know, I've got a great solution for global warming. Let's hold all the car owners accountable for all the greenhouse gases their cars belch out, and let them have the recourse of being (at least partially) reimbursed by their at-fault car manufacturers and gasoline distributors for contributory negligence. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: looking glass
On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:28:39 +0200 Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: so i went to get a looking glass going, and went to install lg (http://freshmeat.net/projects/lg/) on freebsd 8. it is perl insanity. among other cpan sikness, it wants to build an entire perl implementation of ssh, with 666 other library modules included when there is a perfectly fine ssh client on the machine. is there a decent looking glass package that does not fill my machine with trash? it is called OpenBSD. it will fill your machine with OpenBSD though, don't know if you can afford it. :-) -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: any bring your own bandwidth IPv4 over IPv4 tunnel merchants?
On Mon, 3 May 2010 14:12:45 -0400 Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote: Like many people, I can't justify the expense of commercial IP connectivity for my residence. As a result, I deal with dynamic IP addresses; dns issues; and limitations on the services that I can host at my residence. It just struck me that in the same way that IPv6 connectivity can be done via tunneling over IPv4 (Hurricane Electric, etc.), that static IPv4 addressability could be offered in a similar fashion. Some my question is: Does anyone offer (probably bandwidth restricted) IPv4 over IPv4 tunneling (with static IPs) commercially? I realize that making use of such a service MIGHT violate Terms of Service agreements, but that is going to vary from provider to provider and doesn't make offering such a service inherently wrong. Other possible reasons such services might be desired include wanting access to Internet services which are regionally restricted. (Again TOS violation possibilities MAY or MAY NOT apply.) In the (very?) long term, IPv4 over IPv6 tunneling could end up being one way that organizations can get IPv4 connectivity when the default changes from only-IPv4 to only-IPv6. (Yeah, I know that day may never come...) Holly shit... Where do you live? In Ukraine we have almost no difference (well it is different from one company to another) between commercial and residental setups. At least it is so with smaller providers like one I have at home and one I work for (they are two different companies). So it seems very very strange to me you need to justify anything with your network operator. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: port scanning from spoofed addresses
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:03:20 -0500 Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote: I'm not at all concerned about door-knob twisting or network scanning. What concerns me is that the source addresses are spoofed from our address range and that our upstream providers aren't willing to even look at the problem. But that can be easy addressed by yourself. just do not allow traffic originating from your range on your external interfaces. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
APEWS.ORG
Hello Everybody, Somebody from apews, could you please contact me off list? Thank you. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: APEWS.ORG
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:40:19 -0500 Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:03:22AM +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote: Somebody from apews, could you please contact me off list? (a) unlikely to happen (b) probably doesn't matter anyway, apews isn't widely used (c) better directed to the spam-l mailing list the matter was about two bugs i have found while trying to apply their list for my needs. but since you're saying unlikely to happen - let bugs sit there for long long time. I wash my hands :-) -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
Re: flattengraph.pl
Tim, Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but AFAIR killspike works with rrdtool, while i need to do magic on an old mrtg log format. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov Tim Eberhard wrote: I would suggest looking at Killspike. Works wonders in Cacti (A mtrg based app) Good luck, -Tim Eberhard On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Gregory Edigarov g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua mailto:g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua wrote: Hello, I have some problems with peaks on my mrtg, therefore I went to list archives on mrtg,org, and saw what's available. Then I found out that there is some script called flattengraph.pl, which I believe could help me with the situation. However this program is not available anymore and I cannot find and download it anywhere. So if some good soul will give me a link, or send me the file, I will be really grateful. Thanks a lot in advance. -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
